jongwony
Review Skills published by jongwony, their source repositories, maintenance signals, and identity status.
- Skills
- 22
- Repository stars
- 160
- Identity status
- Source-linked
Provenance
Source and identity
- Profile type
- Creator
- Canonical name
- jongwony
- Public sources
- 1
- License context
- MIT
Source entries
Agent Skills from jongwony
Repository stars and maintenance signals provide context, but do not automatically become an individual Skill's quality score.
jongwony/epistemic-protocols
apportion
Apportion an autonomous goal into coarse execution units and derive each unit's completion conditions before the run begins. Cuts the goal at its evidenced seams so each unit fits one execution horizon and every goal obligation lands in some unit, derives per-unit completion and invariant predicates plus the cross-unit plan conditions, and emits one resolution certificate per unit: a conjoined predicate when completion compiles, otherwise an accepted-uncovered or reserved-judgment witness that r
jongwony/epistemic-protocols
bound
Define epistemic boundaries per decision. Dispatches the boundary kind up-front (direction/priority, scope, type/concept, ownership, or emergent) through a fail-closed deficit-fit certificate, then classifies each boundary by a uniform settlement disposition — user-supplies, AI-proposes, AI-autonomous, or dismiss — into a BoundaryMap. The captured kind sets WHAT is bounded; the disposition sets HOW it is settled downstream (ownership is the degenerate kind where the two coincide). Type: (Boundar
jongwony/epistemic-protocols
contextualize
Detect application-context mismatch after execution. Verifies applicability when correct output may not fit the actual context, registering each mismatch through a fail-closed deficit-fit certificate before disposition, producing contextualized execution. Judgment (does the aspect stand?) and disposition (adapt, keep, or withdraw the result) are separate axes: the judgment is relay-eligible on cited evidence, the disposition is the user's answer about the target in front of them, and a relay may
jongwony/epistemic-protocols
elicit
Resolve via Extended-Mind reverse induction. Reverse-traces decision coordinates from externalized substrate (codebase, rules, past sessions, user environment) and surfaces them as cycle-emergent dimension projections; user answers explicate the coordinates until intent crystallizes. The read-only re-projection loop is monotone — accepted coordinates are immutable. Type: (AbstractAporia, Hybrid, REVERSE-INDUCE-CYCLE, IntentSeed × ExternalizedSubstrate) → ResolvedEndpoint. Alias: Euporia(εὐπορία)
jongwony/epistemic-protocols
formal-review
This skill should be used when the user asks to "formal review", "formal lens review", or invokes /formal-review. A fixed-lens PR review for this repository's formally-structured protocol changes: it pins a Category Theory / Type Theory / Operational Semantics lens panel plus a gap scan over only the files changed in a PR, analyzes each lens in isolation, adversarially cross-verifies the findings, and posts the survivors as a single consolidated PR comment. Project-local contributor tooling.
jongwony/epistemic-protocols
frame
Multi-perspective framing — a pure lens-formation tool. When the right framework is absent, places analytical lenses before the user, then for each selected lens declares the substrate it needs (an abstract persona/capability) with advisory binding hints and a channel need, and hands lens↔substrate pairs off — without executing, isolating, arranging, or synthesizing. A single lens returns directly; multiple lenses where at least one needs a specialized substrate become a substrate-correspondence
jongwony/epistemic-protocols
gap
Gap surfacing before decisions. Raises procedural, consideration, assumption, and alternative gaps as questions when gaps go unnoticed, producing an audited decision. Type: (GapUnnoticed, AI, SURFACE, Decision) → AuditedDecision. Alias: Syneidesis(συνείδησις).
jongwony/epistemic-protocols
grasp
Verify understanding after AI work through intent-scented entry points. Type: (ResultUngrasped, User, VERIFY, Result) → VerifiedUnderstanding. Alias: Katalepsis(κατάληψις).
jongwony/epistemic-protocols
ground
Validate structural mapping between abstract and concrete domains. Constructs domain correspondences and presents concrete instantiations when mapping uncertainty is detected, producing validated mapping. Also recognizes self-grounding (an abstraction validated against its own instances) and derives a split-vs-trim partition reading that routes wrong-fusion recovery. Type: (MappingUncertain, AI, GROUND, R) → ValidatedMapping. Alias: Analogia(ἀναλογία).
jongwony/epistemic-protocols
ideate
Divergent candidate-field generation before any selection is made. When the object-level candidate field is empty or has prematurely converged, infers seed vs. blank entry from the invocation utterance alone — zero entry questions. A blank entry opens an abstract frame map for user selection before any concrete idea is shown, mitigating early-example fixation and preserving ownership; a seeded entry expands directly from the user's own fragments. Generates candidates in parallel across open fram
jongwony/epistemic-protocols
induce
Calibrate and crystallize in-process abstraction through dialectical triangulation. Proposes calibrated candidate abstractions with personalized grounding examples and shapes them via user widen/narrow/fuse/reorient moves when an instance set has converged toward an unnamed essence, producing crystallized abstraction. Type: (AbstractionInProcess, AI, INDUCE, A) → CrystallizedAbstraction. Alias: Periagoge(περιαγωγή).
jongwony/epistemic-protocols
inquire
Infer context insufficiency before execution. Surfaces uncertainties through information-gain prioritized inquiry when AI infers areas of context insufficiency, producing informed execution. Type: (ContextInsufficient, AI, INQUIRE, Prospect) → InformedExecution. Alias: Aitesis(αἴτησις).
Pinned paths
Every entry links to a specific source path and commit when available.
Repository context
Activity, license, and repository-level popularity are shown as context.
Open the source
Inspect the public repository