Source profileQuality 85/100Review permissions

notque/vexjoy-agent/skills/meta/agent-creator/SKILL.md

agent-creator

Scaffold vexjoy-agent operator .md files: frontmatter, routing block, operator context, reference loading table, phase/gate workflow.

Source repository stars
413
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
3
Last source update
2026-07-25
Source checked
2026-08-04

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

Scaffold correctly-formed vexjoy-agent operator .md files. An agent file is a system-prompt contract: it sets identity, constraints, expertise, and routing — not application code.

Best for

    Not for

    • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
    • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

    Compatibility matrix

    Platform support, with evidence labels

    PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
    CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Open the compatibility checker

    Installation

    Inspect first. Install second.

    The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

    Source-detected install commandSource
    npx skills add https://github.com/notque/vexjoy-agent --skill "skills/meta/agent-creator"
    Safe inspection promptEditorial

    Inspect the Agent Skill "agent-creator" from https://github.com/notque/vexjoy-agent/blob/b19dacd072f5befd29b525b25dbecc7a1cd86d92/skills/meta/agent-creator/SKILL.md at commit b19dacd072f5befd29b525b25dbecc7a1cd86d92. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

    Workflow

    What the source asks the agent to do

    1. 01

      Phase 1 — DISCOVER

      Check for domain overlap before creating anything.

      Check for domain overlap before creating anything.Gate 1: If an existing agent covers the domain, add a references/ file to that agent instead of creating a new one. Proceed only when no existing agent covers the domain, or the user confirms after seeing the overlap.Read docs/PHILOSOPHY.md before proceeding — the philosophy governs operator context structure, progressive disclosure, positive framing, and tool restrictions. Components that violate it will fail CI.
    2. 02

      Phase 2 — DESIGN

      Decide the agent's identity and routing contract before writing a single line.

      Decide the agent's identity and routing contract before writing a single line.Load references/agent-design-patterns.md for operator context structure, hook design, routing design, authority/trust framing, and smells-to-rewrite guidance.Load references/agent-eval-design.md when drafting the description and activation cases — the case classes and worked example live there.
    3. 03

      Phase 3 — SCAFFOLD

      Write the agent file using the annotated template.

      Role statement: what the agent does, what domain it ownsExpertise list: concrete capabilities with specific sub-skillsMandatory pre-action protocol: what to read before acting and why
    4. 04

      Phase 4 — REGISTER

      Add the agent to the routing index.

      Add the agent to the routing index.Verify the count increased by exactly one:Gate 4: agents/INDEX.json contains the new agent entry. The router cannot discover unregistered agents.
    5. 05

      Phase 5 — VALIDATE

      Run all validation checks before declaring the agent shippable.

      Run all validation checks before declaring the agent shippable.

    Permission review

    Static risk signals and limitations

    Reads files

    low · line 33

    The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.

    | Complexity | Low (single-file, read-only), Medium (multi-file, routing), High (full sweeps, orchestration) |

    Writes files

    medium · line 50

    The documentation asks the agent to create, modify, or delete local files.

    Write the agent file using the annotated template.

    Runs scripts

    medium · line 82

    The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.

    python3 scripts/validate_positive_instruction_docs.py

    Runs scripts

    medium · line 92

    The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.

    python3 -c "import yaml; yaml.safe_load(open('agents/{agent-name}.md').read().split('---')[1]); print('OK')"

    Evidence record

    Why each signal appears

    EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
    SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
    Quality score85/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
    Repository stars413SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
    Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
    Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

    Pinned source

    Provenance and original SKILL.md

    Repository
    notque/vexjoy-agent
    Skill path
    skills/meta/agent-creator/SKILL.md
    Commit
    b19dacd072f5befd29b525b25dbecc7a1cd86d92
    License
    MIT
    Collected
    2026-08-04
    Default branch
    main
    View the original SKILL.md

    Agent Creator

    Scaffold correctly-formed vexjoy-agent operator .md files. An agent file is a system-prompt contract: it sets identity, constraints, expertise, and routing — not application code.

    Phases: DISCOVER → DESIGN → SCAFFOLD → REGISTER → VALIDATE


    Phase 1 — DISCOVER

    Check for domain overlap before creating anything.

    grep -i "<domain-keyword>" agents/*.md | grep "^agents/" | cut -d: -f1 | sort -u
    ls agents/ | grep "<domain-prefix>"
    

    Gate 1: If an existing agent covers the domain, add a references/ file to that agent instead of creating a new one. Proceed only when no existing agent covers the domain, or the user confirms after seeing the overlap.

    Read docs/PHILOSOPHY.md before proceeding — the philosophy governs operator context structure, progressive disclosure, positive framing, and tool restrictions. Components that violate it will fail CI.


    Phase 2 — DESIGN

    Decide the agent's identity and routing contract before writing a single line.

    DecisionQuestion to answer
    Role typeReviewer/auditor, code modifier/engineer, or orchestrator?
    Allowed toolsMatches role: reviewers→Read/Glob/Grep; engineers→+Edit/Write/Bash; orchestrators→Read/Agent/Bash
    ComplexityLow (single-file, read-only), Medium (multi-file, routing), High (full sweeps, orchestration)
    Triggers3–6 specific phrases a user would naturally say — not generic verbs
    pairs_with2–3 agents commonly co-dispatched; verify each exists on disk before listing
    Reference filesDomains needing depth — each goes in agents/{name}/references/ loaded on demand
    Description craftIntent verb + domain object, 2–3 adjacent terms, one false-positive boundary clause with redirect
    Activation cases3 should-trigger / 2 should-not-trigger / 2 near-miss phrases drafted now, saved at scaffold time

    Load references/agent-design-patterns.md for operator context structure, hook design, routing design, authority/trust framing, and smells-to-rewrite guidance.

    Load references/agent-eval-design.md when drafting the description and activation cases — the case classes and worked example live there.

    Gate 2: All eight decisions answered before writing agent file content.


    Phase 3 — SCAFFOLD

    Write the agent file using the annotated template.

    Load references/agent-frontmatter-template.md for the complete template with all required fields and valid values.

    File layout:

    agents/
    ├── {agent-name}.md          # operator file — the system prompt contract
    └── {agent-name}/
        ├── references/
        │   └── *.md             # deep context, loaded on demand
        ├── SPEC.md              # optional: contract for complex/high-impact agents
        └── EVAL.md              # optional: repeatable eval cases
    

    Writing the operator context (body after frontmatter):

    1. Role statement: what the agent does, what domain it owns
    2. Expertise list: concrete capabilities with specific sub-skills
    3. Mandatory pre-action protocol: what to read before acting and why
    4. Operator context block: hardcoded behaviors, default behaviors (ON), optional behaviors (OFF)
    5. Capabilities and limitations table: CAN / CANNOT with agent suggestions for out-of-scope requests
    6. Reference loading table: | Signal | Load These Files | Why | — required when a references/ directory exists
    7. Workflow section: phase-by-phase with gates
    8. Error handling: cause/solution pairs for common failures
    9. Preferred patterns: what good looks like (positive framing)
    10. Anti-rationalization table: common rationalizations with required action

    Positive framing (CI gate): Every instruction tells the reader what to do. Run the check after writing:

    python3 scripts/validate_positive_instruction_docs.py
    

    Exit code 1 means violations. Rewrite flagged instructions in action form before proceeding.

    Progressive disclosure: Main agent file stays navigable. Deep reference material goes in {agent-name}/references/ loaded on demand. If the file exceeds 600 lines, extract content to references/ first.

    Gate 3: Agent file written, YAML frontmatter parses cleanly:

    python3 -c "import yaml; yaml.safe_load(open('agents/{agent-name}.md').read().split('---')[1]); print('OK')"
    

    Phase 4 — REGISTER

    Add the agent to the routing index.

    python3 scripts/generate-agent-index.py
    

    Verify the count increased by exactly one:

    python3 -c "
    import json
    d = json.load(open('agents/INDEX.json'))
    agents = d.get('agents', [])
    print(f'Registered agents: {len(agents)}')"
    

    Gate 4: agents/INDEX.json contains the new agent entry. The router cannot discover unregistered agents.


    Phase 5 — VALIDATE

    Run all validation checks before declaring the agent shippable.

    # Structural checks: filenames, frontmatter, line counts, loading tables
    python3 scripts/validate-references.py --agent {agent-name}
    
    # Positive framing gate (scans all tracked .md files)
    python3 scripts/validate_positive_instruction_docs.py
    
    # YAML parse
    python3 -c "import yaml; yaml.safe_load(open('agents/{agent-name}.md').read().split('---')[1]); print('YAML OK')"
    
    # Verify pairs_with entries exist on disk
    python3 -c "
    import yaml, os
    txt = open('agents/{agent-name}.md').read()
    fm = yaml.safe_load(txt.split('---')[1])
    for p in fm.get('routing', {}).get('pairs_with', []):
        exists = os.path.exists(f'agents/{p}.md') or os.path.exists(f'skills/{p}/SKILL.md')
        print(f'  {p}: {\"OK\" if exists else \"MISSING\"}')"
    

    Gate 5: All scripts exit 0. No phantom pairs_with entries. No positive-framing violations.

    Manual review (the scripts cannot check these):

    • Description craft: read the description aloud. Does it state intent, name 2–3 adjacent terms, mark one false-positive boundary? See references/agent-frontmatter-template.md Description Craft.
    • Activation cases recorded: confirm agents/{name}/references/activation-cases.md (or equivalent notes section) lists 3 should-trigger / 2 should-not-trigger / 2 near-miss phrases. Mental-pass each phrase against the description. See references/agent-eval-design.md.

    Error Handling

    YAML parse error on frontmatter

    Cause: Unquoted colon in description, or bad indentation in routing block. Solution: Wrap description in double quotes. Run the YAML parse command above — the traceback pinpoints the line.

    Trigger conflict with existing agent

    Cause: Two agents claim the same trigger phrase. Solution: Run the duplicate detection script in agents/toolkit-governance-engineer/references/routing-table-patterns.md. Make this agent's trigger more specific.

    Agent not appearing in routing after INDEX regeneration

    Cause: Agent file path not matching the expected pattern, or frontmatter missing routing.triggers. Solution: Confirm file is at agents/{name}.md. Confirm routing.triggers is a non-empty list.

    Reference loading table missing from validation

    Cause: Agent body has no | Signal | Load These Files | Why | table. Solution: Add a reference loading table with at least one row. See references/agent-design-patterns.md for the required format.


    Preferred Patterns

    Role-matched allowed-tools

    Set allowed-tools to match what the agent actually does — reviewers read only, engineers write, orchestrators dispatch. This ensures agents stay within their domain and cannot make out-of-scope changes.

    Triggers that match natural speech

    Write triggers as phrases a first-time user would naturally say, not internal system identifiers. "fix a bug in Go" routes better than "golang-debugging-invocation".

    Reference loading table as required section

    Every agent that has a references/ directory includes a loading table mapping signals to files. Agents without this table load references eagerly, violating the progressive disclosure principle from docs/PHILOSOPHY.md.

    Expertise list over motivational framing

    List concrete capabilities the agent has: version-specific idiom tables, failure mode catalogs, concrete commands. Skip "you are an expert in X" — it adds no information the model will act on.


    Reference Loading Table

    SignalLoad These FilesWhy
    operator context structure, reference loading table format, phase/gate pattern, hook design, routing design, authority/trust framing, smells to rewritereferences/agent-design-patterns.mdVexjoy-specific architecture patterns, instruction hierarchy, and rewrite catalog for vague framing
    frontmatter fields, YAML template, complexity tiers, INDEX.json registration, description craftreferences/agent-frontmatter-template.mdComplete annotated template with all required fields, valid values, and description-writing guide
    activation eval, output eval, should-trigger / should-not-trigger / near-miss, routing failure, description tuningreferences/agent-eval-design.mdHow to design activation and output evals at scaffold time so the right agent gets picked and produces correct work

    Alternatives

    Compare before choosing

    Computed 9929,558

    HKUDS/Vibe-Trading

    strategy-generate

    Create, modify, and optimize quantitative trading strategies, then backtest and evaluate them.

    Computed 9823,781

    alirezarezvani/claude-skills

    quality-manager-qms-iso13485

    ISO 13485 Quality Management System implementation and maintenance for medical device organizations. Provides QMS design, documentation control, internal auditing, CAPA management, and certification support. Use when working with medical device quality systems, preparing for ISO 13485 audits, managing regulatory compliance documentation, setting up corrective actions, or building audit preparation programs. Useful for quality management, audit preparation, regulatory compliance, medical device d

    Computed 9828

    MoizIbnYousaf/marketing-cli

    higgsfield-generate

    Use when the user wants to generate an image or video via Higgsfield AI. Covers 30+ models: Soul V2, Seedance 2.0, Kling 3.0, Veo 3.1, GPT Image 2, Nano Banana 2. Also covers Marketing Studio — branded ad video/image with avatars and products. Use whenever: "generate an image", "make a video", "animate this photo", "image-to-video", "img2vid", "edit this image with AI", "produce a clip", "create an ad", "make a UGC video", "marketing video", "brand video", "TV spot", "import product from URL", "

    Computed 973,251

    davepoon/buildwithclaude

    figma-automation

    Automate Figma tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): files, components, design tokens, comments, exports. Always search tools first for current schemas.