notque/vexjoy-agent/skills/meta/agent-creator/SKILL.md
agent-creator
Scaffold vexjoy-agent operator .md files: frontmatter, routing block, operator context, reference loading table, phase/gate workflow.
- Source repository stars
- 413
- Declared platforms
- 0
- Static risk flags
- 3
- Last source update
- 2026-07-25
- Source checked
- 2026-08-04
Decision brief
What it does—and where it fits
Scaffold correctly-formed vexjoy-agent operator .md files. An agent file is a system-prompt contract: it sets identity, constraints, expertise, and routing — not application code.
Not for
- Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
- Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.
Compatibility matrix
Platform support, with evidence labels
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
Inspect first. Install second.
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/notque/vexjoy-agent --skill "skills/meta/agent-creator"Inspect the Agent Skill "agent-creator" from https://github.com/notque/vexjoy-agent/blob/b19dacd072f5befd29b525b25dbecc7a1cd86d92/skills/meta/agent-creator/SKILL.md at commit b19dacd072f5befd29b525b25dbecc7a1cd86d92. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
What the source asks the agent to do
- 01
Phase 1 — DISCOVER
Check for domain overlap before creating anything.
Check for domain overlap before creating anything.Gate 1: If an existing agent covers the domain, add a references/ file to that agent instead of creating a new one. Proceed only when no existing agent covers the domain, or the user confirms after seeing the overlap.Read docs/PHILOSOPHY.md before proceeding — the philosophy governs operator context structure, progressive disclosure, positive framing, and tool restrictions. Components that violate it will fail CI. - 02
Phase 2 — DESIGN
Decide the agent's identity and routing contract before writing a single line.
Decide the agent's identity and routing contract before writing a single line.Load references/agent-design-patterns.md for operator context structure, hook design, routing design, authority/trust framing, and smells-to-rewrite guidance.Load references/agent-eval-design.md when drafting the description and activation cases — the case classes and worked example live there. - 03
Phase 3 — SCAFFOLD
Write the agent file using the annotated template.
Role statement: what the agent does, what domain it ownsExpertise list: concrete capabilities with specific sub-skillsMandatory pre-action protocol: what to read before acting and why - 04
Phase 4 — REGISTER
Add the agent to the routing index.
Add the agent to the routing index.Verify the count increased by exactly one:Gate 4: agents/INDEX.json contains the new agent entry. The router cannot discover unregistered agents. - 05
Phase 5 — VALIDATE
Run all validation checks before declaring the agent shippable.
Run all validation checks before declaring the agent shippable.
Permission review
Static risk signals and limitations
Reads files
The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.
| Complexity | Low (single-file, read-only), Medium (multi-file, routing), High (full sweeps, orchestration) |Writes files
The documentation asks the agent to create, modify, or delete local files.
Write the agent file using the annotated template.Runs scripts
The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.
python3 scripts/validate_positive_instruction_docs.pyRuns scripts
The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.
python3 -c "import yaml; yaml.safe_load(open('agents/{agent-name}.md').read().split('---')[1]); print('OK')"Evidence record
Why each signal appears
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 85/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 413 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Provenance and original SKILL.md
- Repository
- notque/vexjoy-agent
- Skill path
- skills/meta/agent-creator/SKILL.md
- Commit
- b19dacd072f5befd29b525b25dbecc7a1cd86d92
- License
- MIT
- Collected
- 2026-08-04
- Default branch
- main
View the original SKILL.md
Agent Creator
Scaffold correctly-formed vexjoy-agent operator .md files. An agent file is a system-prompt contract: it sets identity, constraints, expertise, and routing — not application code.
Phases: DISCOVER → DESIGN → SCAFFOLD → REGISTER → VALIDATE
Phase 1 — DISCOVER
Check for domain overlap before creating anything.
grep -i "<domain-keyword>" agents/*.md | grep "^agents/" | cut -d: -f1 | sort -u
ls agents/ | grep "<domain-prefix>"
Gate 1: If an existing agent covers the domain, add a references/ file to that agent instead of creating a new one. Proceed only when no existing agent covers the domain, or the user confirms after seeing the overlap.
Read docs/PHILOSOPHY.md before proceeding — the philosophy governs operator context structure, progressive disclosure, positive framing, and tool restrictions. Components that violate it will fail CI.
Phase 2 — DESIGN
Decide the agent's identity and routing contract before writing a single line.
| Decision | Question to answer |
|---|---|
| Role type | Reviewer/auditor, code modifier/engineer, or orchestrator? |
| Allowed tools | Matches role: reviewers→Read/Glob/Grep; engineers→+Edit/Write/Bash; orchestrators→Read/Agent/Bash |
| Complexity | Low (single-file, read-only), Medium (multi-file, routing), High (full sweeps, orchestration) |
| Triggers | 3–6 specific phrases a user would naturally say — not generic verbs |
| pairs_with | 2–3 agents commonly co-dispatched; verify each exists on disk before listing |
| Reference files | Domains needing depth — each goes in agents/{name}/references/ loaded on demand |
| Description craft | Intent verb + domain object, 2–3 adjacent terms, one false-positive boundary clause with redirect |
| Activation cases | 3 should-trigger / 2 should-not-trigger / 2 near-miss phrases drafted now, saved at scaffold time |
Load references/agent-design-patterns.md for operator context structure, hook design, routing design, authority/trust framing, and smells-to-rewrite guidance.
Load references/agent-eval-design.md when drafting the description and activation cases — the case classes and worked example live there.
Gate 2: All eight decisions answered before writing agent file content.
Phase 3 — SCAFFOLD
Write the agent file using the annotated template.
Load references/agent-frontmatter-template.md for the complete template with all required fields and valid values.
File layout:
agents/
├── {agent-name}.md # operator file — the system prompt contract
└── {agent-name}/
├── references/
│ └── *.md # deep context, loaded on demand
├── SPEC.md # optional: contract for complex/high-impact agents
└── EVAL.md # optional: repeatable eval cases
Writing the operator context (body after frontmatter):
- Role statement: what the agent does, what domain it owns
- Expertise list: concrete capabilities with specific sub-skills
- Mandatory pre-action protocol: what to read before acting and why
- Operator context block: hardcoded behaviors, default behaviors (ON), optional behaviors (OFF)
- Capabilities and limitations table: CAN / CANNOT with agent suggestions for out-of-scope requests
- Reference loading table:
| Signal | Load These Files | Why |— required when areferences/directory exists - Workflow section: phase-by-phase with gates
- Error handling: cause/solution pairs for common failures
- Preferred patterns: what good looks like (positive framing)
- Anti-rationalization table: common rationalizations with required action
Positive framing (CI gate): Every instruction tells the reader what to do. Run the check after writing:
python3 scripts/validate_positive_instruction_docs.py
Exit code 1 means violations. Rewrite flagged instructions in action form before proceeding.
Progressive disclosure: Main agent file stays navigable. Deep reference material goes in {agent-name}/references/ loaded on demand. If the file exceeds 600 lines, extract content to references/ first.
Gate 3: Agent file written, YAML frontmatter parses cleanly:
python3 -c "import yaml; yaml.safe_load(open('agents/{agent-name}.md').read().split('---')[1]); print('OK')"
Phase 4 — REGISTER
Add the agent to the routing index.
python3 scripts/generate-agent-index.py
Verify the count increased by exactly one:
python3 -c "
import json
d = json.load(open('agents/INDEX.json'))
agents = d.get('agents', [])
print(f'Registered agents: {len(agents)}')"
Gate 4: agents/INDEX.json contains the new agent entry. The router cannot discover unregistered agents.
Phase 5 — VALIDATE
Run all validation checks before declaring the agent shippable.
# Structural checks: filenames, frontmatter, line counts, loading tables
python3 scripts/validate-references.py --agent {agent-name}
# Positive framing gate (scans all tracked .md files)
python3 scripts/validate_positive_instruction_docs.py
# YAML parse
python3 -c "import yaml; yaml.safe_load(open('agents/{agent-name}.md').read().split('---')[1]); print('YAML OK')"
# Verify pairs_with entries exist on disk
python3 -c "
import yaml, os
txt = open('agents/{agent-name}.md').read()
fm = yaml.safe_load(txt.split('---')[1])
for p in fm.get('routing', {}).get('pairs_with', []):
exists = os.path.exists(f'agents/{p}.md') or os.path.exists(f'skills/{p}/SKILL.md')
print(f' {p}: {\"OK\" if exists else \"MISSING\"}')"
Gate 5: All scripts exit 0. No phantom pairs_with entries. No positive-framing violations.
Manual review (the scripts cannot check these):
- Description craft: read the description aloud. Does it state intent, name 2–3 adjacent terms, mark one false-positive boundary? See
references/agent-frontmatter-template.mdDescription Craft. - Activation cases recorded: confirm
agents/{name}/references/activation-cases.md(or equivalent notes section) lists 3 should-trigger / 2 should-not-trigger / 2 near-miss phrases. Mental-pass each phrase against the description. Seereferences/agent-eval-design.md.
Error Handling
YAML parse error on frontmatter
Cause: Unquoted colon in description, or bad indentation in routing block. Solution: Wrap description in double quotes. Run the YAML parse command above — the traceback pinpoints the line.
Trigger conflict with existing agent
Cause: Two agents claim the same trigger phrase.
Solution: Run the duplicate detection script in agents/toolkit-governance-engineer/references/routing-table-patterns.md. Make this agent's trigger more specific.
Agent not appearing in routing after INDEX regeneration
Cause: Agent file path not matching the expected pattern, or frontmatter missing routing.triggers.
Solution: Confirm file is at agents/{name}.md. Confirm routing.triggers is a non-empty list.
Reference loading table missing from validation
Cause: Agent body has no | Signal | Load These Files | Why | table.
Solution: Add a reference loading table with at least one row. See references/agent-design-patterns.md for the required format.
Preferred Patterns
Role-matched allowed-tools
Set allowed-tools to match what the agent actually does — reviewers read only, engineers write, orchestrators dispatch. This ensures agents stay within their domain and cannot make out-of-scope changes.
Triggers that match natural speech
Write triggers as phrases a first-time user would naturally say, not internal system identifiers. "fix a bug in Go" routes better than "golang-debugging-invocation".
Reference loading table as required section
Every agent that has a references/ directory includes a loading table mapping signals to files. Agents without this table load references eagerly, violating the progressive disclosure principle from docs/PHILOSOPHY.md.
Expertise list over motivational framing
List concrete capabilities the agent has: version-specific idiom tables, failure mode catalogs, concrete commands. Skip "you are an expert in X" — it adds no information the model will act on.
Reference Loading Table
| Signal | Load These Files | Why |
|---|---|---|
| operator context structure, reference loading table format, phase/gate pattern, hook design, routing design, authority/trust framing, smells to rewrite | references/agent-design-patterns.md | Vexjoy-specific architecture patterns, instruction hierarchy, and rewrite catalog for vague framing |
| frontmatter fields, YAML template, complexity tiers, INDEX.json registration, description craft | references/agent-frontmatter-template.md | Complete annotated template with all required fields, valid values, and description-writing guide |
| activation eval, output eval, should-trigger / should-not-trigger / near-miss, routing failure, description tuning | references/agent-eval-design.md | How to design activation and output evals at scaffold time so the right agent gets picked and produces correct work |
Alternatives
Compare before choosing
HKUDS/Vibe-Trading
strategy-generate
Create, modify, and optimize quantitative trading strategies, then backtest and evaluate them.
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
quality-manager-qms-iso13485
ISO 13485 Quality Management System implementation and maintenance for medical device organizations. Provides QMS design, documentation control, internal auditing, CAPA management, and certification support. Use when working with medical device quality systems, preparing for ISO 13485 audits, managing regulatory compliance documentation, setting up corrective actions, or building audit preparation programs. Useful for quality management, audit preparation, regulatory compliance, medical device d
MoizIbnYousaf/marketing-cli
higgsfield-generate
Use when the user wants to generate an image or video via Higgsfield AI. Covers 30+ models: Soul V2, Seedance 2.0, Kling 3.0, Veo 3.1, GPT Image 2, Nano Banana 2. Also covers Marketing Studio — branded ad video/image with avatars and products. Use whenever: "generate an image", "make a video", "animate this photo", "image-to-video", "img2vid", "edit this image with AI", "produce a clip", "create an ad", "make a UGC video", "marketing video", "brand video", "TV spot", "import product from URL", "
davepoon/buildwithclaude
figma-automation
Automate Figma tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): files, components, design tokens, comments, exports. Always search tools first for current schemas.