Best fit
- Managing AI-driven development workflows
- Planning agent task decomposition
- Optimizing model tier selection
affaan-m/ECC
Operate as an agentic engineer using eval-first execution, decomposition, and cost-aware model routing. Use when AI agents perform most implementation work and humans enforce quality and risk controls.
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill ".kiro/skills/agentic-engineering"Source checked Jul 28, 2026·Refresh due Oct 26, 2026
Reorganized from the pinned upstream SKILL.md
According to the pinned SKILL.md from affaan-m/ECC: Use this skill for engineering workflows where AI agents perform most implementation work and humans enforce quality and risk controls.
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill ".kiro/skills/agentic-engineering"Best fit
Bring this context
Expected outputs
Key source sections
Sections are extracted automatically from the pinned SKILL.md and link back to the source.
Prioritize: - Invariants and edge cases - Error boundaries - Security and auth assumptions - Hidden coupling and rollout risk
1. Define completion criteria before execution. 2. Decompose work into agent-sized units. 3. Route model tiers by task complexity. 4. Measure with evals and regression checks.
1. Define capability eval and regression eval. 2. Run baseline and capture failure signatures. 3. Execute implementation. 4. Re-run evals and compare deltas.
Apply the 15-minute unit rule: - Each unit should be independently verifiable - Each unit should have a single dominant risk - Each unit should expose a clear done condition
Choose model tier based on task complexity:
SkillSignal prompt templates
These prompts were written by SkillSignal from the source structure; they are not upstream text.
Task-start prompt
Confirm source fit, inputs, and outputs before acting.
Use agentic-engineering to help me with: [specific task]. Context: [files, data, or background]. Constraints: [environment, scope, and prohibited actions]. Before acting, check the pinned SKILL.md and explain which sections apply, what inputs are still missing, and what you will deliver.
Source-guided execution
Make the Agent explicitly follow the key extracted sections.
Apply the pinned agentic-engineering source to [task]. Pay particular attention to these source sections: “Review Focus for AI-Generated Code”, “Operating Principles”, “Eval-First Loop”, “Task Decomposition”, “Model Routing”. Preserve the important decision at each step. Mark facts not covered by the source as “needs confirmation” instead of inventing them. Then verify the result against my acceptance criteria: [criteria].
Result-review prompt
Check omissions, permissions, and source drift before delivery.
Review the current agentic-engineering result: (1) does it satisfy the original task; (2) were any applicable steps or limits in the pinned SKILL.md missed; (3) did it perform any unauthorized file, command, network, or data action; and (4) which conclusions remain unverified? List issues first, then fix only what the source or user authorization supports.
Output checklist
The task matches the purpose documented in the SKILL.md.
The source section “Review Focus for AI-Generated Code” has been checked.
The source section “Operating Principles” has been checked.
The source section “Eval-First Loop” has been checked.
The source section “Task Decomposition” has been checked.
Inputs, constraints, and acceptance criteria are explicit.
Unverified facts, compatibility, and outcome claims are clearly marked.
Any file, command, network, or data action has been reviewed.
Choose a different workflow
Operate as an agentic engineer using eval-first execution, decomposition, and cost-aware model routing.
A separate implementation from affaan-m/ECC; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detail評価ファースト実行、分解、コスト対応モデルルーティングを使用してエージェニックエンジニアとして動作します。
A separate implementation from affaan-m/ECC; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detail作为代理工程师,采用评估优先执行、分解和成本感知模型路由进行操作。
A separate implementation from affaan-m/ECC; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detailFAQ
Use this skill for engineering workflows where AI agents perform most implementation work and humans enforce quality and risk controls.
The catalog detected this source-specific install command: npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill ".kiro/skills/agentic-engineering". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
No dedicated Agent platform is declared in the pinned source record.
Quality breakdown
Based on traceable docs and repository signals; stars are not treated as quality.
Compare before choosing
These links are selected from shared tasks, functions, stacks, platforms, and same-name variants. Compare the source owner, documentation, permissions, and maintenance signals.
Operate as an agentic engineer using eval-first execution, decomposition, and cost-aware model routing.
評価ファースト実行、分解、コスト対応モデルルーティングを使用してエージェニックエンジニアとして動作します。
作为代理工程师,采用评估优先执行、分解和成本感知模型路由进行操作。
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program
Grounded design brief from the adopted corpus — style, WCAG-checked color tokens, typography, layout pattern, anti-patterns. Use on ui-design-brief or any which-style/palette/font/chart decision.
Use this skill for engineering workflows where AI agents perform most implementation work and humans enforce quality and risk controls.
Example workflow:
1. Write test that captures desired behavior (eval)
2. Run test → capture baseline failures
3. Implement feature
4. Re-run test → verify improvements
5. Check for regressions in other tests
Apply the 15-minute unit rule:
Good decomposition:
Task: Add user authentication
├─ Unit 1: Add password hashing (15 min, security risk)
├─ Unit 2: Create login endpoint (15 min, API contract risk)
├─ Unit 3: Add session management (15 min, state risk)
└─ Unit 4: Protect routes with middleware (15 min, auth logic risk)
Bad decomposition:
Task: Add user authentication (2 hours, multiple risks)
Choose model tier based on task complexity:
Haiku: Classification, boilerplate transforms, narrow edits
Sonnet: Implementation and refactors
Opus: Architecture, root-cause analysis, multi-file invariants
Cost discipline: Escalate model tier only when lower tier fails with a clear reasoning gap.
Continue session for closely-coupled units
Start fresh session after major phase transitions
Compact after milestone completion, not during active debugging
Prioritize:
Do not waste review cycles on style-only disagreements when automated format/lint already enforce style.
Review checklist:
Track per task:
Example tracking:
Task: Implement user login
Model: Sonnet
Tokens: ~5k input, ~2k output
Retries: 1 (initial implementation had auth bug)
Time: 8 minutes
Outcome: Success