Source profileQuality 84/100Review permissions

XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-Code/packages/opencode/src/skill/builtin/.bundle/product-design/workflows/audit/SKILL.md

audit

Audit or critique a product flow, journey, workflow, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or multi-step product experience by capturing screenshots first, then reporting UX, design, and accessibility findings inline from that evidence. Use Figma only when the user explicitly asks for a board. Use when the user asks to audit, review, critique, inspect, assess, analyze, evaluate, or give feedback on a product experience.

Source repository stars
12,632
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
2
Last source update
2026-08-04
Source checked
2026-08-04

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

Use this skill when the user wants to audit, review, critique, inspect, assess, analyze, evaluate, or give feedback on a product flow, journey, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or other product experience.

Best for

  • Use when the user asks to audit, review, critique, inspect, assess, analyze, evaluate, or give feedback on a product experience.

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-Code --skill "packages/opencode/src/skill/builtin/.bundle/product-design/workflows/audit"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "audit" from https://github.com/XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-Code/blob/f1e99640da903b22c1147b9fee15d5fdf5691c21/packages/opencode/src/skill/builtin/.bundle/product-design/workflows/audit/SKILL.md at commit f1e99640da903b22c1147b9fee15d5fdf5691c21. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Critical Overrides

    Refer to the Plugin router $index before proceeding.

    Refer to the Plugin router $index before proceeding.Follow $critical-overrides.- Refer to the Plugin router $index before proceeding. - Follow $critical-overrides.
  2. 02

    User Context

    Before starting, load $user-context and run its preflight script when local shell access is available.

    Before starting, load $user-context and run its preflight script when local shell access is available.Use saved product URLs, Figma files, screenshots, reference images, codebase paths, Storybook, tokens, design systems, brand assets, component refs, browser preferences, and share targets as grounding material when rele…Do not inspect every saved reference. Inspect only what the current task needs.
  3. 03

    Route

    1. Identify the product or surface. 2. Identify the flow or task. 3. Choose the capture tool. 4. Capture the flow. 5. Save and inspect each screenshot. 6. Return the audit inline with the accepted screenshots.

    Identify the product or surface.Identify the flow or task.Choose the capture tool.
  4. 04

    Capture And Audit The Flow

    You are an expert design, UX, and accessibility auditor. For each step in the flow, capture what the user sees, observe how the screen behaves, inspect the screenshot, and write audit notes before moving on.

    Use the screenshot you actually saw.Save that exact screenshot to the local audit folder.Open or inspect the saved file before accepting it.
  5. 05

    Final Response

    After the flow is captured and notes are written, list every step in the final response.

    step numbershort description of the stepgeneral health of that step

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

Runs scripts

medium · line 22

The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.

Before starting, load [$user-context](../user-context/SKILL.md) and run its preflight script when local shell access is available.

Reads files

low · line 88

The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.

Open or inspect the saved file before accepting it.

Reads files

low · line 106

The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.

Inspect the saved screenshot file before upload or handoff.

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score84/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars12,632SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
XiaomiMiMo/MiMo-Code
Skill path
packages/opencode/src/skill/builtin/.bundle/product-design/workflows/audit/SKILL.md
Commit
f1e99640da903b22c1147b9fee15d5fdf5691c21
License
MIT
Collected
2026-08-04
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

Audit

Use this skill when the user wants to audit, review, critique, inspect, assess, analyze, evaluate, or give feedback on a product flow, journey, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or other product experience.

The output is not a loose opinion. The output is:

  • Screenshots of the flow
  • Those screenshots rendered inline in the report
  • A numbered step list
  • UX and design findings tied to steps or screenshots
  • Accessibility risks tied to steps or screenshots
  • Clear limits on what could not be checked from screenshots alone

Critical Overrides

User Context

Before starting, load $user-context and run its preflight script when local shell access is available.

Use saved product URLs, Figma files, screenshots, reference images, codebase paths, Storybook, tokens, design systems, brand assets, component refs, browser preferences, and share targets as grounding material when relevant.

Do not inspect every saved reference. Inspect only what the current task needs.

Route

Before auditing:

  1. Identify the product or surface.
  2. Identify the flow or task.
  3. Choose the capture tool.
  4. Capture the flow.
  5. Save and inspect each screenshot.
  6. Return the audit inline with the accepted screenshots.

Output rules:

  • Default to a concise inline report with screenshots rendered in the chat.
  • Saving screenshots and notes in the workspace is an internal implementation detail. Do not ask the user to choose a local folder.
  • If the user explicitly asks for Figma, create the Figma audit board in addition to the inline report.
  • After the inline report, ask once: Want me to plot this out in Figma with the screenshots and notes?

Capture rules:

  • Follow the Browser Choice rule in $index.
  • If none of those can capture valid screenshots or control the flow, stop and report the blocker.

Browser capture order:

  1. Load the Browser skill before browser work.
  2. Connect to the browser and use the current tab when it already shows the target.
  3. Do not reload or navigate away unless the audit needs a fresh start.
  4. Observe the visible state before acting.
  5. Before each click, type, or key press, use the latest DOM snapshot to target one clear control.
  6. After each action, take the cheapest fresh check that proves what changed: DOM for structure, screenshot for visual state.
  7. Save and inspect the accepted screenshot before using it as audit evidence.

Figma rules:

  • If Figma is the destination, load the required Figma skills before creating or editing the file.
  • Keep a local copy of every screenshot even when Figma succeeds.
  • Do not upload a screenshot to Figma until the saved local file has been inspected and accepted.
  • Figma is not done until the screenshots are visibly placed in the Figma output.
  • After placing screenshots in Figma, render or inspect the board and confirm every flow step has the correct screenshot visible in the correct card.
  • If an image is missing, misplaced, blank, or only uploaded as an unused asset, fix it before handoff.
  • If Figma tools cannot create files or place images, return the inline audit and explain the missing Figma capability.

Evidence rules:

  • Use only evidence captured in the current audit run.
  • Do not use memory, prior chats, old traces, cached screenshots, or prior generated artifacts as audit evidence unless the user explicitly provides them.
  • Do not audit until the product, flow, and capture tool are known.
  • Do not claim full accessibility compliance from screenshots alone.

Capture And Audit The Flow

You are an expert design, UX, and accessibility auditor. For each step in the flow, capture what the user sees, observe how the screen behaves, inspect the screenshot, and write audit notes before moving on.

Follow references/design-audit-framework.md when deciding what to inspect and how to describe strengths, UX issues, accessibility risks, limits, and recommendations.

Screenshot source rule:

  • Use the screenshot you actually saw.
  • Save that exact screenshot to the local audit folder.
  • Open or inspect the saved file before accepting it.
  • If the saved file shows the wrong window, wrong state, blank page, crop, or loading screen, reject it and capture again.
  • When Figma is the destination, upload that accepted local file.
  • After upload, verify the Figma board shows the same step.
  • Do not replace a Browser, Chrome, or Computer Use screenshot with an OS screenshot unless you first prove the saved file shows the same window and state.

For every step:

  1. Move to the next step in the requested flow.
  2. Wait until the screen is loaded and visually stable.
  3. Check for loading spinners, blank areas, login walls, error pages, blocked states, cookie dialogs, and half-rendered content.
  4. Capture the screenshot.
  5. Inspect the screenshot before accepting it.
  6. Reject the screenshot if it is blank, loading, cropped, blocked, or showing the wrong state.
  7. Observe behavior that matters for the audit, such as navigation, focus, loading, validation, error handling, empty states, motion, and whether the next action is clear.
  8. Write notes for that step.
  9. In the notes, report strengths, UX issues, accessibility risks, and any limits that made the step difficult to audit.
  10. Save accepted screenshots with numbered names, such as 01-start.png, 02-form-filled.png, and 03-confirmation.png.
  11. Inspect the saved screenshot file before upload or handoff.
  12. Keep each accepted screenshot and its notes together for the final inline report.
  13. If the user explicitly requested Figma, add each accepted screenshot and its notes to the board immediately.

Default inline report:

  • Render accepted screenshots in flow order.
  • Keep the report pithy: overall verdict, numbered steps, highest-impact changes, and evidence limits.
  • Tie every finding to the screenshot or step that supports it.

If the user explicitly requested Figma:

  • Place screenshots in order, left to right on the same row, with 200px between each one. Go to a new row every 15 screenshots, and separate those rows by 600px.
  • Underneath the screenshot, add text with the Step number and its name, and notes.
  • Keep a local folder copy even when Figma succeeds.
  • When you are done, wrap all of the assets you added in a Section and title the section.

Acceptance checks:

  • Every important step in the requested flow has a valid screenshot or a named blocker.
  • Screenshots are saved in order.
  • Screenshots are rendered inline in the final report.
  • When Figma was explicitly requested, screenshots and notes are placed in the board as they are captured.
  • Every note points to the screenshot or step it describes.
  • Notes explain strengths, UX issues, accessibility risks, and evidence limits when those apply.
  • Accessibility risks say what can be seen from screenshots and what still needs testing.
  • The final screenshot set and notes are enough to support the requested audit.

Blockers:

  • The flow cannot be completed.
  • A required step cannot be screenshotted.
  • The source changes in a way that makes the flow unclear.
  • Screenshots cannot be saved or rendered inline.
  • Notes cannot be written.
  • The requested claim would require evidence that screenshots cannot provide.
  • Do not claim an audit if the actual flow could not be accessed and captured. Help Center pages, web searches, and other indirect evidence are research, not an audit.

Final Response

After the flow is captured and notes are written, list every step in the final response.

The final step list MUST include:

  • step number
  • short description of the step
  • general health of that step

Also include where the full output was saved or placed.

Keep the language direct. Do not use broad design jargon when a plain phrase works.

Alternatives

Compare before choosing

Computed 86398

tobihagemann/turbo

audit

Project-wide health audit pipeline that fans out to all analysis skills in parallel, evaluates findings, and produces a unified report at .turbo/audit.md. Use when the user asks to "audit the project", "run a full audit", "project health check", "audit my code", "codebase audit", or "comprehensive review".

Computed 86398

tobihagemann/turbo

audit

Project-wide health audit pipeline that fans out to all analysis skills in parallel, evaluates findings, and produces a unified report at .turbo/audit.md. Use when the user asks to "audit the project", "run a full audit", "project health check", "audit my code", "codebase audit", or "comprehensive review".

Computed 976

mgiovani/cc-arsenal

team-review

Multi-agent review team: architecture, security, performance, testing, style, docs/UX, plus an adversary that cross-examines the other 6, for security-sensitive, architectural, or large PRs (15+ files) where a single-agent pass risks missing cross-cutting issues. Use for auth/payments/PII changes, schema/pattern changes, compliance sign-off, or when asked to 'get the review team on this' / 'multi-agent review' / 'thorough review before merge'. For a standard PR or a quick pre-merge check, use /r

Computed 9632,606

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

neuropixels-analysis

Analyze Neuropixels extracellular recordings end-to-end with SpikeInterface. Covers loading SpikeGLX/Open Ephys/NWB data, preprocessing, drift/motion correction, Kilosort4 (and CPU) spike sorting, quality metrics, and unit curation (threshold-based, model-based UnitRefine, and AI-assisted visual review). Use when working with Neuropixels 1.0/2.0 recordings, spike sorting, or extracellular electrophysiology analysis.