wyre-technology/msp-claude-plugins/msp-claude-plugins/kaseya/autotask/skills/tickets/SKILL.md
Autotask Tickets
Autotask ticket lifecycle: status/priority codes and transition rules, the ticket field schema, SLA calculation and clock behavior, escalation rules, ticket metrics, and the MCP tool surface (create, update, search, history, notes) for MSP service desk operations.
- Source repository stars
- 39
- Declared platforms
- 0
- Static risk flags
- 0
- Last source update
- 2026-08-06
- Source checked
- 2026-08-06
Decision brief
What it does—and where it fits
Autotask ticket lifecycle: status/priority codes and transition rules, the ticket field schema, SLA calculation and clock behavior, escalation rules, ticket metrics, and the MCP tool surface (create, update, search, history, notes) for MSP service desk operations.
Not for
- Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
- Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.
Compatibility matrix
Platform support, with evidence labels
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
Inspect first. Install second.
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/wyre-technology/msp-claude-plugins --skill "msp-claude-plugins/kaseya/autotask/skills/tickets"Inspect the Agent Skill "Autotask Tickets" from https://github.com/wyre-technology/msp-claude-plugins/blob/c1011303bfd2a65abc9b260884d9858d1a482a6f/msp-claude-plugins/kaseya/autotask/skills/tickets/SKILL.md at commit c1011303bfd2a65abc9b260884d9858d1a482a6f. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
What the source asks the agent to do
- 01
Anti-triggers
The status, priority, and queue IDs configured in your tenant —
The status, priority, and queue IDs configured in your tenant —Note bodies, attachments, or charges hanging off a ticket — useStructured multi-phase work — project Tasks are a separate entity - 02
Ticket Status Codes
Based on the Autotask API, these are the standard ticket status values:
Completing directly from NEW generates a warningCOMPLETE requires resolution fieldESCALATED requires escalation reason - 03
Status Transition Rules
Validation Rules: - Completing directly from NEW generates a warning - COMPLETE requires resolution field - ESCALATED requires escalation reason - INPROGRESS should have assigned resource
Completing directly from NEW generates a warningCOMPLETE requires resolution fieldESCALATED requires escalation reason - 04
Ticket Priority Levels
Note: In Autotask, lower numbers = lower priority. Priority 4 is most urgent.
Note: In Autotask, lower numbers = lower priority. Priority 4 is most urgent. - 05
Ticket Field Reference
Core fields to know: title, companyID, status, priority, queueID (all required on create); contactID, issueType/subIssueType, assignedResourceID + assignedResourceRoleID (must be set together), dueDateTime, and resolution (required when completing).
Core fields to know: title, companyID, status, priority, queueID (all required on create); contactID, issueType/subIssueType, assignedResourceID + assignedResourceRoleID (must be set together), dueDateTime, and resoluti…See references/fields.md for the complete field reference (core, classification, assignment, SLA/timeline, contract/billing, and resolution fields).
Permission review
Static risk signals and limitations
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
Why each signal appears
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 100/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 39 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Provenance and original SKILL.md
- Repository
- wyre-technology/msp-claude-plugins
- Skill path
- msp-claude-plugins/kaseya/autotask/skills/tickets/SKILL.md
- Commit
- c1011303bfd2a65abc9b260884d9858d1a482a6f
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Collected
- 2026-08-06
- Default branch
- main
View the original SKILL.md
Autotask Ticket Management
Overview
Autotask tickets are the core unit of service delivery in the PSA. Every client request, incident, problem, and change flows through the ticketing system. This skill covers comprehensive ticket management including business logic, SLA calculations, escalation rules, and performance metrics.
Anti-triggers
- The status, priority, and queue IDs configured in your tenant —
the tables below are Autotask defaults and are routinely customised;
fetch the real values with
autotask-picklists. - Note bodies, attachments, or charges hanging off a ticket — use
autotask-ticket-notes-attachments. - Structured multi-phase work — project Tasks are a separate entity
from Tickets; use
autotask-projects. - Tickets in Kaseya's other PSAs — BMS
(
kaseya-bms-api-patterns) and VSA (kaseya-vsa-api-patterns) each have their own ticket objects that do not sync with Autotask. - A ticket in a non-Kaseya PSA, or in an RMM's own helpdesk —
"ticket", "status", "queue", and "SLA" mean the same thing in all of
them and none of them read Autotask. Confirm the system of record
first, then use
connectwise-psa-tickets,halopsa-tickets,atera-tickets,syncro-tickets,superops-tickets, orninjaone-rmm-tickets.
Ticket Status Codes
Based on the Autotask API, these are the standard ticket status values:
| Status ID | Name | Description | Business Logic |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | NEW | Newly created ticket | Default for new tickets, SLA clock starts |
| 2 | IN_PROGRESS | Actively being worked | Resource should be assigned |
| 5 | COMPLETE | Issue resolved | Requires resolution field, stops SLA |
| 6 | WAITING_CUSTOMER | Awaiting customer response | SLA clock may pause |
| 13 | WAITING_MATERIALS | Waiting for parts/equipment | SLA clock may pause |
| 14 | ESCALATED | Escalated to higher tier | Requires escalation reason |
Status Transition Rules
NEW (1) ──────────────────────────────> COMPLETE (5)
│ ↑
↓ │
IN_PROGRESS (2) ──────────────────────────>─┤
│ │ │
│ ↓ │
│ WAITING_CUSTOMER (6) ──────────────>─┤
│ │ │
│ ↓ │
│ WAITING_MATERIALS (13) ────────────>─┘
│
↓
ESCALATED (14) ─────> IN_PROGRESS (2) ────> COMPLETE (5)
Validation Rules:
- Completing directly from NEW generates a warning
- COMPLETE requires resolution field
- ESCALATED requires escalation reason
- IN_PROGRESS should have assigned resource
Ticket Priority Levels
| Priority ID | Name | Response SLA | Resolution SLA | Business Context |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | CRITICAL | 1 hour | 4 hours | Complete business outage |
| 3 | HIGH | 2 hours | 8 hours | Major productivity impact |
| 2 | MEDIUM | 4 hours | 24 hours | Single user/workaround exists |
| 1 | LOW | 8 hours | 72 hours | Minor issue/enhancement |
Note: In Autotask, lower numbers = lower priority. Priority 4 is most urgent.
Ticket Field Reference
Core fields to know: title, companyID, status, priority, queueID (all required on create); contactID, issueType/subIssueType, assignedResourceID + assignedResourceRoleID (must be set together), dueDateTime, and resolution (required when completing).
See references/fields.md for the complete field reference (core, classification, assignment, SLA/timeline, contract/billing, and resolution fields).
SLA Calculation Logic
Default SLA Times by Priority
const SLA_DEFAULTS = {
CRITICAL: { response: 1, resolution: 4 }, // hours
HIGH: { response: 2, resolution: 8 },
MEDIUM: { response: 4, resolution: 24 },
LOW: { response: 8, resolution: 72 }
};
Contract SLA terms override these defaults when present. See references/examples.md for the due-date calculation function.
SLA Clock Behavior
| Status | SLA Clock |
|---|---|
| NEW | Running |
| IN_PROGRESS | Running |
| WAITING_CUSTOMER | Paused (configurable) |
| WAITING_MATERIALS | Paused (configurable) |
| ESCALATED | Running |
| COMPLETE | Stopped |
Escalation Rules
Escalation Levels
| Level | Trigger | Action |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | SLA 0-4 hours overdue | Notify assigned resource |
| 2 | SLA 4-8 hours overdue | Notify team lead |
| 3 | SLA 8+ hours overdue | Notify management |
Automatic escalation triggers: an SLA violation (overdue dueDateTime), a stale WAITING_CUSTOMER status (no activity for 7+ days), and CRITICAL-priority tickets with no assignedResourceID. See references/examples.md for the rule-check implementation.
Ticket Metrics & KPIs
Key metrics: average resolution time (completedDate − createDate for COMPLETE tickets), SLA compliance rate (completed-on-time or still-within-SLA, divided by tickets with a due date), and escalation count. See references/examples.md for the calculation function and a sample status/priority distribution report.
MCP Tool Reference
Create a Ticket
Tool: autotask_create_ticket
Args: {
"companyID": 12345,
"title": "Unable to access email - multiple users affected",
"description": "Sales team (5 users) reporting Outlook showing disconnected since 9am.",
"queueID": 8,
"priority": 3,
"status": 1,
"contactID": 67890
}
Required: companyID, title, status, priority, queueID
Update a Ticket
Tool: autotask_update_ticket
Args: {
"ticketId": 54321,
"status": 2,
"assignedResourceID": 29744150,
"assignedResourceRoleID": 29683459
}
Only fields provided will be changed. Common update scenarios:
| Scenario | Fields to Set |
|---|---|
| Assign technician | assignedResourceID + assignedResourceRoleID (both required together) |
| Change status | status (see status codes above) |
| Complete ticket | status: 5 (resolution via ticket note) |
| Escalate | status: 14 |
| Update priority | priority |
| Change due date | dueDateTime (ISO 8601 format) |
| Reassign contact | contactID |
Search Tickets
Tool: autotask_search_tickets
Args: {
"companyId": 12345,
"status": 1,
"assignedResourceId": 29744150,
"searchTerm": "email",
"pageSize": 25
}
Filters: companyId, status, priority, queueId, assignedResourceId, searchTerm, pageSize
Get Ticket Details
Tool: autotask_get_ticket_details
Args: { "ticketId": 54321 }
Get Ticket History (Audit Trail)
Use this to answer status transition and change attribution questions — e.g. "when did this ticket move from In Progress to Waiting Customer?", "who changed the priority?", "how long did it sit in NEW before someone picked it up?". Each row is one audited field change on the ticket.
Tool: autotask_search_ticket_history
Args: { "ticketId": 54321, "pageSize": 100 }
Required: ticketId (Autotask does not support unscoped history queries — there is no way to ask "show me every status transition across all tickets" without enumerating ticket IDs and looping). pageSize defaults to 50, max 500.
Returns an array of history entries. Field set is picklist-dependent; common fields include id, ticketID, resourceID (who made the change), dateChanged, and field-specific before/after columns. For status transitions, look for changes where the audited field is status and compare the before/after picklist IDs against the status codes table above.
Workflow for "find tickets that went from status X to status Y":
autotask_search_ticketswith the relevant filters (company, date range, current status) to get candidate ticket IDs.- For each candidate, call
autotask_search_ticket_historyand look for a status-field change where old=X and new=Y. - This is a fan-out pattern. On large tenants, scope the initial search tightly (by company, date, or assigned resource) before looping.
To fetch a single history entry by its ID:
Tool: autotask_get_ticket_history
Args: { "historyId": 987654 }
Add a Ticket Note
Tool: autotask_create_ticket_note
Args: {
"ticketId": 54321,
"title": "Status Update",
"description": "Identified root cause as KB5034441 update. Applying fix.",
"noteType": 1,
"publish": 0
}
noteType: 1=Internal, 2=External. publish: 0=No, 1=Yes (visible to client portal).
API Patterns
Creating a Ticket with Business Validation
POST /v1.0/Tickets
Content-Type: application/json
{
"companyID": 12345,
"title": "Unable to access email - multiple users affected",
"description": "Sales team (5 users) reporting Outlook showing disconnected since 9am. Webmail working.",
"queueID": 8,
"priority": 3,
"status": 1,
"issueType": 5,
"subIssueType": 12,
"contactID": 67890,
"dueDateTime": "2024-02-15T17:00:00Z"
}
Query Builder Patterns
Open tickets for company with includes:
{
"filter": [
{"field": "companyID", "op": "eq", "value": 12345},
{"field": "status", "op": "noteq", "value": 5}
],
"includeFields": ["Company.companyName", "AssignedResource.firstName", "AssignedResource.lastName"]
}
Tickets created today (CORRECT — must use gte + lt range):
{
"filter": [
{"field": "createDate", "op": "gte", "value": "2026-04-13T00:00:00Z"},
{"field": "createDate", "op": "lt", "value": "2026-04-14T00:00:00Z"}
]
}
Warning: Using only today's date returns zero results. You MUST use a range:
gtetoday ANDlttomorrow. See the api-patterns skill for the full explanation and dynamic date computation.
See references/api.md for additional query patterns (SLA-breached tickets, date-range queries) and the full status-update / note-creation request bodies (complete-with-resolution, escalate-with-reason, internal vs external notes).
Common Workflows
Ticket Creation Flow
- Validate company exists and has active contract
- Check for duplicates - search open tickets with similar title
- Auto-set defaults:
- Status → NEW (1)
- Priority → MEDIUM (2) if not specified
- Calculate SLA based on priority and contract
- Route to queue based on issue type
- Send acknowledgment to contact
Status Transition Validation
Before transitioning a ticket, validate required fields per target status: COMPLETE requires resolution (and warns if skipping the IN_PROGRESS step), ESCALATED requires escalationReason, and IN_PROGRESS warns if no assignedResourceID is set. See references/examples.md for the validation function.
Error Handling
Common API Errors
| Code | Message | Resolution |
|---|---|---|
| 400 | Invalid field value | Verify picklist IDs for your instance |
| 400 | Status transition not allowed | Check workflow rules |
| 401 | Unauthorized | Verify API credentials |
| 403 | Insufficient permissions | Check resource security level |
| 404 | Entity not found | Confirm ticket/company exists |
| 409 | Conflict/Locked | Ticket being edited by another user |
| 429 | Rate limited | Implement exponential backoff |
Validation Errors
| Error | Cause | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| CompanyID required | Missing company | All tickets need a company |
| QueueID invalid | Queue not found | Query /v1.0/Queues for valid IDs |
| Resolution required | Completing without resolution | Add resolution text |
| Status transition invalid | Invalid workflow | Check allowed transitions |
Best Practices
- Validate before creating - Search for duplicates, verify company/contract
- Use descriptive titles - Include who's affected and symptoms
- Set accurate priority - Use impact/urgency matrix, not everything is Critical
- Log time immediately - Don't batch at end of day
- Update status promptly - Keeps queues accurate for reporting
- Use internal notes for technical details - Keep external notes professional
- Monitor SLA metrics - Address breaches before they escalate
Related Skills
- Autotask CRM - Company and contact management
- Autotask Contracts - Service agreements and billing
- Autotask Time Entries - Time tracking and billing
- Autotask API Patterns - Query builder and authentication
Alternatives
Compare before choosing
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
app-store-optimization
App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching keywords, analyzing competitor rankings, generating metadata suggestions, and improving app visibility on Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Use when the user asks about ASO, app store rankings, app metadata, app titles and descriptions, app store listings, app visibility, or mobile app marketing on iOS or Android. Supports keyword research and scoring, competitor keyword analysis, metadata optimization, A/B test planning, launch checklist
dotnet/skills
migrate-vstest-to-mtp
Migrates .NET test projects from VSTest to Microsoft.Testing.Platform (MTP). Use when user asks to "migrate to MTP", "switch from VSTest", "enable Microsoft.Testing.Platform", "use MTP runner", set OutputType=Exe only for test projects in Directory.Build.props, or mentions EnableMSTestRunner, EnableNUnitRunner, or UseMicrosoftTestingPlatformRunner. USE FOR: MTP behavioral differences vs VSTest (exit code 8, zero tests discovered, --ignore-exit-code, TESTINGPLATFORM_EXITCODE_IGNORE); centralizing
HKUDS/Vibe-Trading
strategy-generate
Create, modify, and optimize quantitative trading strategies, then backtest and evaluate them.
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills
dask
Distributed computing for larger-than-RAM pandas/NumPy workflows. Use when you need to scale existing pandas/NumPy code beyond memory or across clusters. Best for parallel file processing, distributed ML, integration with existing pandas code. For out-of-core analytics on single machine use vaex; for in-memory speed use polars.