Best for
- Requirements are unclear or ambiguous
- Multiple approaches could solve the problem
- Trade-offs need to be explored with the user
davekilleen/Dex/.claude/plugins/compound-engineering/skills/brainstorming/SKILL.md
This skill should be used before implementing features, building components, or making changes. It guides exploring user intent, approaches, and design decisions before planning. Triggers on "let's brainstorm", "help me think through", "what should we build", "explore approaches", ambiguous feature requests, or when the user's request has multiple valid interpretations that need clarification.
Decision brief
This skill provides detailed process knowledge for effective brainstorming sessions that clarify WHAT to build before diving into HOW to build it.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/davekilleen/Dex --skill ".claude/plugins/compound-engineering/skills/brainstorming"Inspect the Agent Skill "brainstorming" from https://github.com/davekilleen/Dex/blob/2aa1a433a3c8879dfe320902a976197dda3a2484/.claude/plugins/compound-engineering/skills/brainstorming/SKILL.md at commit 2aa1a433a3c8879dfe320902a976197dda3a2484. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
Before diving into questions, assess whether brainstorming is needed.
Before diving into questions, assess whether brainstorming is needed.
Ask questions one at a time to understand the user's intent. Avoid overwhelming with multiple questions.
After understanding the idea, propose 2-3 concrete approaches.
Summarize key decisions in a structured format.
Permission review
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 86/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 456 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
This skill provides detailed process knowledge for effective brainstorming sessions that clarify WHAT to build before diving into HOW to build it.
Brainstorming is valuable when:
Brainstorming can be skipped when:
Before diving into questions, assess whether brainstorming is needed.
Signals that requirements are clear:
Signals that brainstorming is needed:
If requirements are clear, suggest: "Your requirements seem clear. Consider proceeding directly to planning or implementation."
Ask questions one at a time to understand the user's intent. Avoid overwhelming with multiple questions.
Question Techniques:
Prefer multiple choice when natural options exist
Start broad, then narrow
Validate assumptions explicitly
Ask about success criteria early
Key Topics to Explore:
| Topic | Example Questions |
|---|---|
| Purpose | What problem does this solve? What's the motivation? |
| Users | Who uses this? What's their context? |
| Constraints | Any technical limitations? Timeline? Dependencies? |
| Success | How will you measure success? What's the happy path? |
| Edge Cases | What shouldn't happen? Any error states to consider? |
| Existing Patterns | Are there similar features in the codebase to follow? |
Exit Condition: Continue until the idea is clear OR user says "proceed" or "let's move on"
After understanding the idea, propose 2-3 concrete approaches.
Structure for Each Approach:
### Approach A: [Name]
[2-3 sentence description]
**Pros:**
- [Benefit 1]
- [Benefit 2]
**Cons:**
- [Drawback 1]
- [Drawback 2]
**Best when:** [Circumstances where this approach shines]
Guidelines:
Summarize key decisions in a structured format.
Design Doc Structure:
---
date: YYYY-MM-DD
topic: <kebab-case-topic>
---
# <Topic Title>
## What We're Building
[Concise description—1-2 paragraphs max]
## Why This Approach
[Brief explanation of approaches considered and why this one was chosen]
## Key Decisions
- [Decision 1]: [Rationale]
- [Decision 2]: [Rationale]
## Open Questions
- [Any unresolved questions for the planning phase]
## Next Steps
→ `/workflows:plan` for implementation details
Output Location: docs/brainstorms/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-brainstorm.md
Present clear options for what to do next:
/workflows:planDuring brainstorming, actively resist complexity:
Keep sections short—200-300 words maximum. After each section of output, pause to validate understanding:
This prevents wasted effort on misaligned designs.
| Anti-Pattern | Better Approach |
|---|---|
| Asking 5 questions at once | Ask one at a time |
| Jumping to implementation details | Stay focused on WHAT, not HOW |
| Proposing overly complex solutions | Start simple, add complexity only if needed |
| Ignoring existing codebase patterns | Research what exists first |
| Making assumptions without validating | State assumptions explicitly and confirm |
| Creating lengthy design documents | Keep it concise—details go in the plan |
Brainstorming answers WHAT to build:
Planning answers HOW to build it:
When brainstorm output exists, /workflows:plan should detect it and use it as input, skipping its own idea refinement phase.
Alternatives
obra/superpowers
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
When the user wants to reduce churn, build cancellation flows, set up save offers, recover failed payments, or implement retention strategies. Also use when the user mentions 'churn,' 'cancel flow,' 'offboarding,' 'save offer,' 'dunning,' 'failed payment recovery,' 'win-back,' 'retention,' 'exit survey,' 'pause subscription,' 'involuntary churn,' 'people keep canceling,' 'churn rate is too high,' 'how do I keep users,' or 'customers are leaving.' Use this whenever someone is losing subscribers o
JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills
Suede-owned experimentation discipline for hypotheses, sample sizing, test duration, significance, and repeatable experiment programs. Use when comparing variants, deciding whether a result is reliable, or building an experiment backlog and cadence. NOT FOR: analytics instrumentation (use suede-analytics), post-click conversion diagnosis (use suede-site-alchemy), or writing the variant copy itself (use suede-copy).