Best for
- Establishing or maturing an incident response program from scratch
- Documenting procedures for a new incident type after a novel attack
- Automating response workflows in a SOAR platform (Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR)
adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/cursor-claude-codex/skills/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/building-incident-response-playbook/SKILL.md
Designs and documents structured incident response playbooks that define step-by-step procedures for specific incident types aligned with NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks. Covers playbook structure, decision trees, escalation criteria, RACI matrices, and integration with SOAR platforms. Activates for requests involving IR playbook creation, incident response procedure documentation, response runbook development, or SOAR playbook design.
Decision brief
Designs and documents structured incident response playbooks that define step-by-step procedures for specific incident types aligned with NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks. Covers playbook structure, decision trees, escalation criteria, RACI matrices, and integration with SOAR platforms.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai --skill "cursor-claude-codex/skills/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/building-incident-response-playbook"Inspect the Agent Skill "building-incident-response-playbook" from https://github.com/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai/blob/7f71af8164e8f5a775253417aa405b5d9d063faf/cursor-claude-codex/skills/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/building-incident-response-playbook/SKILL.md at commit 7f71af8164e8f5a775253417aa405b5d9d063faf. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
Define the specific scenario the playbook will address:
Define the specific scenario the playbook will address:
Every playbook should follow a consistent structure:
Define clear decision points with binary outcomes:
Write tool-specific instructions for each step (not generic guidance):
Permission review
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 92/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 51 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Do not use for one-time ad hoc investigations; playbooks are reusable procedure documents, not case-specific reports.
Define the specific scenario the playbook will address:
Common playbook types:
Priority Playbooks (build first):
1. Ransomware incident response
2. Phishing/credential compromise
3. Business email compromise
4. Malware infection
5. Data breach/exfiltration
6. DDoS attack
7. Insider threat
8. Account takeover
9. Web application compromise
10. Cloud infrastructure compromise
Every playbook should follow a consistent structure:
PLAYBOOK TEMPLATE
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
1. Playbook Metadata
- Name, version, owner, last review date
- Trigger conditions
- Severity criteria
2. RACI Matrix
- Who is Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, Informed for each step
3. Detection & Triage
- How the incident is detected
- Initial triage checklist
- Severity classification criteria
4. Containment
- Short-term containment actions
- Long-term containment actions
- Evidence preservation requirements
5. Eradication
- Root cause identification
- Malware/threat removal steps
- Verification procedures
6. Recovery
- System restoration steps
- Validation criteria
- Monitoring requirements post-recovery
7. Post-Incident
- Lessons learned meeting trigger
- Report template
- Detection improvement actions
8. Communication
- Internal notification matrix
- External notification requirements (regulators, customers, law enforcement)
- Status update cadence
9. Appendices
- Tool-specific procedures
- Contact lists
- Evidence collection checklists
Define clear decision points with binary outcomes:
Detection Alert Received
├── Is the alert a true positive?
│ ├── YES → Classify severity
│ │ ├── P1 (Critical) → Page incident commander, begin containment immediately
│ │ ├── P2 (High) → Notify IR lead, begin investigation within 30 min
│ │ ├── P3 (Medium) → Queue for investigation within 4 hours
│ │ └── P4 (Low) → Document and investigate within 24 hours
│ └── NO → Document as false positive, tune detection rule
└── Cannot determine → Escalate to Tier 2 for deeper analysis
Escalation triggers:
Write tool-specific instructions for each step (not generic guidance):
CONTAINMENT - Endpoint Isolation via CrowdStrike:
1. Open Falcon Console > Hosts > Search for affected hostname
2. Click on the host > Host Details
3. Click "Contain Host" button in upper right
4. Confirm isolation (host will only communicate with CrowdStrike cloud)
5. Document containment action in incident ticket with timestamp
6. Verify containment: Host should show "Contained" status badge
CONTAINMENT - Block C2 Domain at DNS:
1. SSH to DNS server: ssh [email protected]
2. Add to block zone: echo "zone evil.com { type master; file /etc/bind/db.sinkhole; };" >> /etc/bind/named.conf.local
3. Reload DNS: rndc reload
4. Verify: dig @dns-primary evil.com (should resolve to sinkhole IP 10.0.0.99)
5. Document blocked domain in incident ticket
Convert manual playbook steps into automated workflows:
Validate the playbook through exercises and maintain currency:
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Playbook | Documented, repeatable set of procedures for responding to a specific incident type |
| Runbook | More granular than a playbook; step-by-step technical instructions for a specific task within a playbook |
| RACI Matrix | Responsibility assignment chart defining who is Responsible, Accountable, Consulted, and Informed for each activity |
| Decision Tree | Flowchart-based logic defining the response path based on binary conditions at each decision point |
| Escalation Criteria | Predefined conditions that trigger notification of higher-level personnel or external parties |
| SOAR Playbook | Automated workflow in a Security Orchestration, Automation, and Response platform executing playbook steps |
Context: An organization with a 5-person SOC has no documented phishing response procedure. Analysts handle phishing reports inconsistently.
Approach:
Pitfalls:
INCIDENT RESPONSE PLAYBOOK
============================
Playbook Name: Phishing Incident Response
Version: 2.1
Owner: SOC Manager
Last Reviewed: 2025-11-01
Next Review: 2026-02-01
Trigger: Phishing email reported via [email protected] or phish button
RACI MATRIX
Activity | SOC L1 | SOC L2 | IR Lead | Legal | Comms
Initial Triage | R | C | I | |
Email Analysis | R | A | I | |
Containment | | R | A | I |
Credential Reset | | R | A | |
User Notification | | C | A | | R
Regulatory Notification | | | C | R | A
Lessons Learned | C | C | R | I | I
PROCEDURE STEPS
[Detailed steps with tool-specific instructions]
DECISION TREE
[Flowchart logic]
ESCALATION MATRIX
[Conditions and contacts]
METRICS
Target MTTA: 15 minutes
Target MTTC: 1 hour
Target MTTR: 4 hours
Frequently asked questions
Designs and documents structured incident response playbooks that define step-by-step procedures for specific incident types aligned with NIST SP 800-61r3 and SANS PICERL frameworks. Covers playbook structure, decision trees, escalation criteria, RACI matrices, and integration with SOAR platforms.
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/adriannoes/awesome-agentic-ai --skill "cursor-claude-codex/skills/anthropic-cybersecurity-skills/skills/building-incident-response-playbook". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Alternatives
mgiovani/cc-arsenal
Multi-agent review team: architecture, security, performance, testing, style, docs/UX, plus an adversary that cross-examines the other 6, for security-sensitive, architectural, or large PRs (15+ files) where a single-agent pass risks missing cross-cutting issues. Use for auth/payments/PII changes, schema/pattern changes, compliance sign-off, or when asked to 'get the review team on this' / 'multi-agent review' / 'thorough review before merge'. For a standard PR or a quick pre-merge check, use /r
Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills
Build, review, or migrate .NET MAUI applications across Android, iOS, macOS, and Windows with correct cross-platform UI, platform integration, and native packaging assumptions.
upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplate
Plan, write, and review automated tests following KATA (Komponent Action Test Architecture) on Playwright + TypeScript, or explain existing automated tests in a sealed read-only mode. Use when writing E2E or API/integration tests, creating Page or Api components, designing ATCs, parameterizing test data, registering fixtures, reviewing test code for KATA compliance, or requesting break-down-tests / a plain-English test breakdown. The explain mode reads source and reports assertions without enter
upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplate
Analyze, prioritize, and document test cases in TMS (Jira/Xray), or repair an existing Story-ATS-ATP-ATR-TC cascade through a sealed explicit mode. Use for Test/ATP/ATR artifacts, ROI and automation verdicts, maintaining traceability, fix-traceability, or broken TMS links. The repair-traceability mode audits, plans, waits for explicit approval, applies, and verifies without launching the general documentation workflow. Do NOT use for writing test code (test-automation) or running suites (regress