Best fit
- ユーザー向けボタン/タッチポイントを完全な状態変更シーケンスを通して追跡し、機能が個別に機能するが互いにキャンセルされたり、間違った最終状態を生成したり、UIを矛盾した状態にしたままにするバグを見つけます。次の場合に使用します:体系的なデバッグがバグを見つけたが、ユーザーは壊れたボタンを報告する場合、または共有状態ストアに触れる主要なリファクター後。
affaan-m/ECC
ユーザー向けボタン/タッチポイントを完全な状態変更シーケンスを通して追跡し、機能が個別に機能するが互いにキャンセルされたり、間違った最終状態を生成したり、UIを矛盾した状態にしたままにするバグを見つけます。次の場合に使用します:体系的なデバッグがバグを見つけたが、ユーザーは壊れたボタンを報告する場合、または共有状態ストアに触れる主要なリファクター後。
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "docs/ja-JP/skills/click-path-audit"Source checked Jul 28, 2026·Refresh due Oct 26, 2026
Reorganized from the pinned upstream SKILL.md
According to the pinned SKILL.md from affaan-m/ECC: 静的コード読み取りが見落とすバグを見つけ:状態相互作用の副作用、順序を付けられた呼び出し間の競合状態、および互いに静かに取り消すハンドラー。
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "docs/ja-JP/skills/click-path-audit"Best fit
Bring this context
Expected outputs
Key source sections
Sections are extracted automatically from the pinned SKILL.md and link back to the source.
従来のデバッグチェック: - 関数が存在しますか?(不足している配線) - クラッシュしますか?(ランタイムエラー) - 正しいタイプを返しますか?(データフロー)
対象領域のすべてのインタラクティブなタッチポイントについて:
任意のタッチポイントを監査する前に、すべての状態ストアアクションの副作用マップを構築:
任意のタッチポイントを監査する前に、すべての状態ストアアクションの副作用マップを構築:
対象領域の各ボタン/トグル/フォーム送信について:
SkillSignal prompt templates
These prompts were written by SkillSignal from the source structure; they are not upstream text.
Task-start prompt
Confirm source fit, inputs, and outputs before acting.
Use click-path-audit to help me with: [specific task]. Context: [files, data, or background]. Constraints: [environment, scope, and prohibited actions]. Before acting, check the pinned SKILL.md and explain which sections apply, what inputs are still missing, and what you will deliver.
Source-guided execution
Make the Agent explicitly follow the key extracted sections.
Apply the pinned click-path-audit source to [task]. Pay particular attention to these source sections: “この解決する問題”, “動作方法”, “実行ステップ”, “ステップ1:マップ状態ストア”, “ステップ2:各タッチポイントを監査”. Preserve the important decision at each step. Mark facts not covered by the source as “needs confirmation” instead of inventing them. Then verify the result against my acceptance criteria: [criteria].
Result-review prompt
Check omissions, permissions, and source drift before delivery.
Review the current click-path-audit result: (1) does it satisfy the original task; (2) were any applicable steps or limits in the pinned SKILL.md missed; (3) did it perform any unauthorized file, command, network, or data action; and (4) which conclusions remain unverified? List issues first, then fix only what the source or user authorization supports.
Output checklist
The task matches the purpose documented in the SKILL.md.
The source section “この解決する問題” has been checked.
The source section “動作方法” has been checked.
The source section “実行ステップ” has been checked.
The source section “ステップ1:マップ状態ストア” has been checked.
Inputs, constraints, and acceptance criteria are explicit.
Unverified facts, compatibility, and outcome claims are clearly marked.
Any file, command, network, or data action has been reviewed.
Choose a different workflow
Trace every user-facing button/touchpoint through its full state change sequence to find bugs where functions individually work but cancel each other out, produce wrong final state, or leave the UI in an inconsistent state. Use when: systematic debugging found no bugs but users report broken buttons, or after any major refactor touching shared state stores.
A separate implementation from affaan-m/ECC; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detail追踪每个面向用户的按钮/触点的完整状态变化序列,以发现功能单独工作但相互抵消、产生错误最终状态或使UI处于不一致状态的错误。适用于:系统调试未发现错误但用户报告按钮失效,或在任何涉及共享状态存储的重大重构之后。
A separate implementation from affaan-m/ECC; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detailWhen the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program
A separate implementation from coreyhaines31/marketingskills; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detailFAQ
静的コード読み取りが見落とすバグを見つけ:状態相互作用の副作用、順序を付けられた呼び出し間の競合状態、および互いに静かに取り消すハンドラー。
The catalog detected this source-specific install command: npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "docs/ja-JP/skills/click-path-audit". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
No dedicated Agent platform is declared in the pinned source record.
Quality breakdown
Based on traceable docs and repository signals; stars are not treated as quality.
Compare before choosing
These links are selected from shared tasks, functions, stacks, platforms, and same-name variants. Compare the source owner, documentation, permissions, and maintenance signals.
Trace every user-facing button/touchpoint through its full state change sequence to find bugs where functions individually work but cancel each other out, produce wrong final state, or leave the UI in an inconsistent state. Use when: systematic debugging found no bugs but users report broken buttons, or after any major refactor touching shared state stores.
追踪每个面向用户的按钮/触点的完整状态变化序列,以发现功能单独工作但相互抵消、产生错误最终状态或使UI处于不一致状态的错误。适用于:系统调试未发现错误但用户报告按钮失效,或在任何涉及共享状态存储的重大重构之后。
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program
When the user wants to reduce churn, build cancellation flows, set up save offers, recover failed payments, or implement retention strategies. Also use when the user mentions 'churn,' 'cancel flow,' 'offboarding,' 'save offer,' 'dunning,' 'failed payment recovery,' 'win-back,' 'retention,' 'exit survey,' 'pause subscription,' 'involuntary churn,' 'people keep canceling,' 'churn rate is too high,' 'how do I keep users,' or 'customers are leaving.' Use this whenever someone is losing subscribers o
Grounded design brief from the adopted corpus — style, WCAG-checked color tokens, typography, layout pattern, anti-patterns. Use on ui-design-brief or any which-style/palette/font/chart decision.
静的コード読み取りが見落とすバグを見つけ:状態相互作用の副作用、順序を付けられた呼び出し間の競合状態、および互いに静かに取り消すハンドラー。
従来のデバッグチェック:
しかし、それはチェックしません:
実例:「新しいメール」ボタンがsetComposeMode(true)を呼び出してからselectThread(null)。両方は個別に機能しました。しかし、selectThreadにはcomposeMode: falseをリセットする副作用がありました。ボタンは何もしなかった。54のバグは体系的なデバッグによって見つかりました — これは見落とされました。
対象領域のすべてのインタラクティブなタッチポイントについて:
1. ハンドラーを特定(onClick、onSubmit、onChangeなど)
2. ハンドラーのすべての関数呼び出しを**順序で**追跡
3. 各関数呼び出し**について**:
a. どの状態を読んでいますか?
b. どの状態を書き込んでいますか?
c. 共有状態に副作用がありますか?
d. 副作用として状態をリセット/クリアしますか?
4. チェック:後の呼び出しが以前の呼び出しからの状態変更を取り消しますか?
5. チェック:最終状態はユーザーがボタンラベルから期待するもの?
6. チェック:競合状態がありますか(非同期呼び出しが間違った順序で解決される)?
任意のタッチポイントを監査する前に、すべての状態ストアアクションの副作用マップを構築:
範囲内の各Zustand ストア / React コンテキストについて:
各アクション/セッター:
- どのフィールドをセットしますか?
- 副作用として他のフィールドをリセットしますか?
- ドキュメント:actionName → {sets: [...], resets: [...]}
これは重要な参照です。「新しいメール」バグはselectThreadがcomposeModeをリセットしていることを知らないと見えなくなりました。
出力形式:
STORE: emailStore
setComposeMode(bool) → sets: {composeMode}
selectThread(thread|null) → sets: {selectedThread, selectedThreadId, messages, drafts, selectedDraft, summary} RESETS: {composeMode: false, composeData: null, redraftOpen: false}
setDraftGenerating(bool) → sets: {draftGenerating}
...
DANGEROUS RESETS(所有していない状態をクリアするアクション):
selectThread → composeMode をリセット(setComposeModeで所有)
reset → すべてをリセット
対象領域の各ボタン/トグル/フォーム送信について:
TOUCHPOINT: [ボタンラベル] in [Component:line]
ハンドラー:[関数呼び出しの完全なシーケンス]
最終状態:[これが達成されるべきもの]
詳細については、ドキュメントを参照してください。