Best for
- Improving code readability and maintainability
- Applying SOLID, KISS, YAGNI principles during refactoring
athola/claude-night-market/plugins/conserve/skills/code-quality-principles/SKILL.md
Applies KISS, YAGNI, and SOLID principles for clean code with reduced complexity. Use when refactoring or reviewing code for over-engineering.
Decision brief
Guidance on KISS, YAGNI, and SOLID principles with language-specific examples.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/athola/claude-night-market --skill "plugins/conserve/skills/code-quality-principles"Inspect the Agent Skill "code-quality-principles" from https://github.com/athola/claude-night-market/blob/90037391d2db6536f67a7ccc8dee7c6819f170b7/plugins/conserve/skills/code-quality-principles/SKILL.md at commit 90037391d2db6536f67a7ccc8dee7c6819f170b7. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
When reviewing code, check: - [ ] No unnecessary complexity (KISS) - [ ] No speculative features (YAGNI) - [ ] Each class has single responsibility (SRP) - [ ] No god classes ( 500 lines) - [ ] Dependencies are injected, not created (DIP)
Improving code readability and maintainability
Throwaway scripts or one-time data migrations
Principle: Avoid unnecessary complexity. Prefer obvious solutions over clever ones.
Review the “Guidelines” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Permission review
The documentation includes network, browsing, or remote request actions.
apiUrl: process.env.API_URL || 'http://localhost:3000',Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 91/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 330 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Guidance on KISS, YAGNI, and SOLID principles with language-specific examples.
Principle: Avoid unnecessary complexity. Prefer obvious solutions over clever ones.
| Prefer | Avoid |
|---|---|
| Simple conditionals | Complex regex for simple checks |
| Explicit code | Magic numbers/strings |
| Standard patterns | Clever shortcuts |
| Direct solutions | Over-abstracted layers |
# Bad: Overly clever one-liner
users = [u for u in (db.get(id) for id in ids) if u and u.active and not u.banned]
# Good: Clear and readable
users = []
for user_id in ids:
user = db.get(user_id)
if user and user.active and not user.banned:
users.append(user)
// Bad: Unnecessary complexity
fn process(data: &[u8]) -> Result<Vec<u8>, Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
data.iter()
.map(|&b| b.checked_add(1).ok_or("overflow"))
.collect::<Result<Vec<_>, _>>()
.map_err(|e| e.into())
}
// Good: Simple and clear
fn process(data: &[u8]) -> Result<Vec<u8>, &'static str> {
let mut result = Vec::with_capacity(data.len());
for &byte in data {
result.push(byte.checked_add(1).ok_or("overflow")?);
}
Ok(result)
}
Principle: Don't implement features until they are actually needed.
| Do | Don't |
|---|---|
| Solve current problem | Build for hypothetical futures |
| Add when 3rd use case appears | Create abstractions for 1 use case |
| Delete dead code | Keep "just in case" code |
| Minimal viable solution | Premature optimization |
# Bad: Premature abstraction for one use case
class AbstractDataProcessor:
def process(self, data): ...
def validate(self, data): ...
def transform(self, data): ...
class CSVProcessor(AbstractDataProcessor):
def process(self, data):
return self.transform(self.validate(data))
# Good: Simple function until more cases appear
def process_csv(data: list[str]) -> list[dict]:
return [parse_row(row) for row in data if row.strip()]
// Bad: Over-engineered config system
interface ConfigProvider<T> {
get<K extends keyof T>(key: K): T[K];
set<K extends keyof T>(key: K, value: T[K]): void;
watch<K extends keyof T>(key: K, callback: (v: T[K]) => void): void;
}
// Good: Simple config for current needs
const config = {
apiUrl: process.env.API_URL || 'http://localhost:3000',
timeout: 5000,
};
Each module/class should have one reason to change.
# Bad: Multiple responsibilities
class UserManager:
def create_user(self, data): ...
def send_welcome_email(self, user): ... # Email responsibility
def generate_report(self, users): ... # Reporting responsibility
# Good: Separated responsibilities
class UserRepository:
def create(self, data): ...
class EmailService:
def send_welcome(self, user): ...
class UserReportGenerator:
def generate(self, users): ...
Open for extension, closed for modification.
# Bad: Requires modification for new types
def calculate_area(shape):
if shape.type == "circle":
return 3.14 * shape.radius**2
elif shape.type == "rectangle":
return shape.width * shape.height
# Must modify to add new shapes
# Good: Extensible without modification
from abc import ABC, abstractmethod
class Shape(ABC):
@abstractmethod
def area(self) -> float: ...
class Circle(Shape):
def __init__(self, radius: float):
self.radius = radius
def area(self) -> float:
return 3.14 * self.radius**2
Subtypes must be substitutable for their base types.
# Bad: Violates LSP - Square changes Rectangle behavior
class Rectangle:
def set_width(self, w):
self.width = w
def set_height(self, h):
self.height = h
class Square(Rectangle): # Breaks when used as Rectangle
def set_width(self, w):
self.width = self.height = w # Unexpected side effect
# Good: Separate types with common interface
class Shape(ABC):
@abstractmethod
def area(self) -> float: ...
class Rectangle(Shape):
def __init__(self, width: float, height: float): ...
class Square(Shape):
def __init__(self, side: float): ...
Clients shouldn't depend on interfaces they don't use.
// Bad: Fat interface
interface Worker {
work(): void;
eat(): void;
sleep(): void;
}
// Good: Segregated interfaces
interface Workable {
work(): void;
}
interface Feedable {
eat(): void;
}
// Clients only implement what they need
class Robot implements Workable {
work(): void { /* ... */ }
}
Depend on abstractions, not concretions.
# Bad: Direct dependency on concrete class
class OrderService:
def __init__(self):
self.db = PostgresDatabase() # Tight coupling
# Good: Depend on abstraction
from abc import ABC, abstractmethod
class Database(ABC):
@abstractmethod
def save(self, data): ...
class OrderService:
def __init__(self, db: Database):
self.db = db # Injected abstraction
| Principle | Question to Ask | Red Flag |
|---|---|---|
| KISS | "Is there a simpler way?" | Complex solution for simple problem |
| YAGNI | "Do I need this right now?" | Building for hypothetical use cases |
| SRP | "What's the one reason to change?" | Class doing multiple jobs |
| OCP | "Can I extend without modifying?" | Switch statements for types |
| LSP | "Can subtypes replace base types?" | Overridden methods with side effects |
| ISP | "Does client need all methods?" | Empty method implementations |
| DIP | "Am I depending on abstractions?" | new keyword in business logic |
When reviewing code, check:
Verification: Run wc -l <file> to check line counts and rg -c "class " <file> (or grep -c "class " <file>) to count classes per file.
imbue:karpathy-principles - The "Simplicity First" principle wraps KISS, YAGNI, and SOLID into a four-principle synthesis derived from Karpathy's observations on LLM coding pitfallsdocs/quality-gates.md#skill-level-quality-gate-composition for the full gate-skill federation graphwc -l <file> run on any modified file and result noted if
the file exceeds 500 lines (god-class threshold)Frequently asked questions
Guidance on KISS, YAGNI, and SOLID principles with language-specific examples.
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/athola/claude-night-market --skill "plugins/conserve/skills/code-quality-principles". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Static rules flagged network in the source; the page lists the matching lines and excerpts.
Alternatives
Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills
Use when building Python 3.11+ CLI apps (Typer/Rich), writing pytest test suites, fixing ruff linting or ty/mypy type errors, configuring pyproject.toml, creating portable scripts, or reviewing Python code. Activates on all Python implementation tasks — routes to specialist agents for CLI architecture, test design, packaging, and code review. Authoritative reference for modern Python 3.11-3.14 patterns and TDD workflows.
Jamie-BitFlight/claude_skills
Shared Python 3.11+ development standards covering type safety (ty, native generics, Protocol, TypeIs), layered architecture, error handling, performance, identifier naming, UI/CLI patterns (Rich/Typer), testing requirements (pytest, 80% coverage, TDD), and quality gates. Activates when any Python skill or agent needs to apply shared standards for implementation, code review, refactoring, or test authoring.
dotnet/skills
Grades a specified set of test methods individually and produces a concise table mapping each test (fully-qualified name) to a letter grade (A–F), a score band, and a one-line note — designed to be posted as a PR comment. Use when the caller wants per-test feedback on a curated list of methods (for example, the new or modified tests in a pull request), not a suite-wide audit. Polyglot: .NET, Python, TS/JS, Java, Go, Ruby, Rust, Swift, Kotlin, PowerShell, C++. Input is a list of test methods (or
Borda/AI-Rig
Multi-agent code review of local Python files, directories, or the current git diff covering architecture, tests, performance, docs, lint, security, and API design. Scope: Python source files in local working tree. Python-file-free targets (pure JS/TS/Go/Rust projects) are out of scope. TRIGGER when: user asks to review local Python files, a directory, or the current git diff/working-tree changes, with no GitHub PR number involved; phrases: "review this", "review my changes", "code review this d