affaan-m/ECC

code-tour

Create CodeTour `.tour` files — persona-targeted, step-by-step walkthroughs with real file and line anchors. Use for onboarding tours, architecture walkthroughs, PR tours, RCA tours, and structured "explain how this works" requests.

83CollectingWrites filesNetwork access
See how to use itView GitHub source
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "skills/code-tour"
Automated source guide

Source checked Jul 28, 2026·Refresh due Oct 26, 2026

Reorganized from the pinned upstream SKILL.md

Turn code-tour's source instructions into a guide you can follow

According to the pinned SKILL.md from affaan-m/ECC: Create CodeTour .tour files for codebase walkthroughs that open directly to real files and line ranges. Tours live in .tours/ and are meant for the CodeTour format, not ad hoc Markdown notes.

npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "skills/code-tour"
Check the pinned source

Best fit

  • the user asks for a code tour, onboarding tour, architecture walkthrough, or PR tour
  • the user says "explain how X works" and wants a reusable guided artifact
  • the user wants a ramp-up path for a new engineer or reviewer

Bring this context

  • A concrete task that matches the documented purpose of code-tour.
  • The files, examples, or context the task depends on.
  • Your constraints, target environment, and definition of done.

Expected outputs

  • A result that follows the pinned code-tour instructions.
  • A concise record of assumptions, inputs used, and unresolved questions.
  • A final check against the source workflow and relevant permission signals.

Key source sections

Read code-tour through these 5 source sections

Sections are extracted automatically from the pinned SKILL.md and link back to the source.

01

Workflow

Explore the repo before writing anything: - README and package/app entry points - folder structure - relevant config files - the changed files if the tour is PR-focused

SKILL.md · Workflow
README and package/app entry pointsfolder structurerelevant config files
02

Step Types

Use sparingly, usually only for a closing step:

SKILL.md · Step Types
Use sparingly, usually only for a closing step:Do not make the first step content-only.Use to orient the reader to a module:
03

When to Use

Use this skill when: - the user asks for a code tour, onboarding tour, architecture walkthrough, or PR tour - the user says "explain how X works" and wants a reusable guided artifact - the user wants a ramp-up path for a new engineer or reviewer - the task is better served by a…

SKILL.md · When to Use
the user asks for a code tour, onboarding tour, architecture walkthrough, or PR tourthe user says "explain how X works" and wants a reusable guided artifactthe user wants a ramp-up path for a new engineer or reviewer
04

When NOT to Use

Review the “When NOT to Use” section in the pinned source before continuing.

SKILL.md · When NOT to Use
Review and apply the “When NOT to Use” source section.
05

1. Discover

Explore the repo before writing anything: - README and package/app entry points - folder structure - relevant config files - the changed files if the tour is PR-focused

SKILL.md · 1. Discover
README and package/app entry pointsfolder structurerelevant config files

SkillSignal prompt templates

Provide the task, context, and acceptance criteria

These prompts were written by SkillSignal from the source structure; they are not upstream text.

Task-start prompt

Confirm source fit, inputs, and outputs before acting.

Use code-tour to help me with: [specific task]. Context: [files, data, or background]. Constraints: [environment, scope, and prohibited actions]. Before acting, check the pinned SKILL.md and explain which sections apply, what inputs are still missing, and what you will deliver.

Source-guided execution

Make the Agent explicitly follow the key extracted sections.

Apply the pinned code-tour source to [task]. Pay particular attention to these source sections: “Workflow”, “Step Types”, “When to Use”, “When NOT to Use”, “1. Discover”. Preserve the important decision at each step. Mark facts not covered by the source as “needs confirmation” instead of inventing them. Then verify the result against my acceptance criteria: [criteria].

Result-review prompt

Check omissions, permissions, and source drift before delivery.

Review the current code-tour result: (1) does it satisfy the original task; (2) were any applicable steps or limits in the pinned SKILL.md missed; (3) did it perform any unauthorized file, command, network, or data action; and (4) which conclusions remain unverified? List issues first, then fix only what the source or user authorization supports.

Output checklist

Verify each item before delivery

The task matches the purpose documented in the SKILL.md.

The source section “Workflow” has been checked.

The source section “Step Types” has been checked.

The source section “When to Use” has been checked.

The source section “When NOT to Use” has been checked.

Inputs, constraints, and acceptance criteria are explicit.

Unverified facts, compatibility, and outcome claims are clearly marked.

Any file, command, network, or data action has been reviewed.

Choose a different workflow

When another Skill is the better fit

code-tour

Use this skill to create CodeTour .tour files — persona-targeted, step-by-step walkthroughs that link to real files and line numbers. Trigger for: "create a tour", "make a code tour", "generate a tour", "onboarding tour", "tour for this PR", "tour for this bug", "RCA tour", "architecture tour", "explain how X works", "vibe check", "PR review tour", "contributor guide", "help someone ramp up", or any request for a structured walkthrough through code. Supports 20 developer personas (new joiner, bu

A separate implementation from github/awesome-copilot; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.

Open source detail

code-tour

创建 CodeTour `.tour` 文件——针对特定角色的、带有真实文件和行锚点的逐步演练。用于入职引导、架构演练、PR 演练、RCA 演练以及结构化的“解释其工作原理”请求。

A separate implementation from affaan-m/ECC; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.

Open source detail

code-tour

CodeTour `.tour`ファイルを作成 — ペルソナターゲット、ステップバイステップウォークスルー(実際のファイルとラインアンカー付き)。オンボーディングツアー、アーキテクチャウォークスルー、PRツアー、RCAツアー、構造化「これがどのように機能するかを説明」リクエストに使用。

A separate implementation from affaan-m/ECC; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.

Open source detail

FAQ

What does code-tour do?

Create CodeTour .tour files for codebase walkthroughs that open directly to real files and line ranges. Tours live in .tours/ and are meant for the CodeTour format, not ad hoc Markdown notes.

How do I start using code-tour?

The catalog detected this source-specific install command: npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "skills/code-tour". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.

Which Agent platforms does it declare?

No dedicated Agent platform is declared in the pinned source record.

Repository stars
234,327
Repository forks
35,711
Quality
83/100
Source repository last pushed

Quality breakdown

Based on traceable docs and repository signals; stars are not treated as quality.

83/100
Documentation28/30
Specificity21/25
Maintenance20/20
Trust signals14/25

Compare before choosing

Related Agent Skills and source variants

These links are selected from shared tasks, functions, stacks, platforms, and same-name variants. Compare the source owner, documentation, permissions, and maintenance signals.

code-tour by github

Use this skill to create CodeTour .tour files — persona-targeted, step-by-step walkthroughs that link to real files and line numbers. Trigger for: "create a tour", "make a code tour", "generate a tour", "onboarding tour", "tour for this PR", "tour for this bug", "RCA tour", "architecture tour", "explain how X works", "vibe check", "PR review tour", "contributor guide", "help someone ramp up", or any request for a structured walkthrough through code. Supports 20 developer personas (new joiner, bu

code-tour by affaan-m

创建 CodeTour `.tour` 文件——针对特定角色的、带有真实文件和行锚点的逐步演练。用于入职引导、架构演练、PR 演练、RCA 演练以及结构化的“解释其工作原理”请求。

code-tour by affaan-m

CodeTour `.tour`ファイルを作成 — ペルソナターゲット、ステップバイステップウォークスルー(実際のファイルとラインアンカー付き)。オンボーディングツアー、アーキテクチャウォークスルー、PRツアー、RCAツアー、構造化「これがどのように機能するかを説明」リクエストに使用。

design-review by event4u-app

Use when the user says "review the design", "check the UI", or wants a comprehensive UI/UX review. Uses a 7-phase methodology covering interaction, responsiveness, accessibility, and more.

dask by k-dense-ai

Distributed computing for larger-than-RAM pandas/NumPy workflows. Use when you need to scale existing pandas/NumPy code beyond memory or across clusters. Best for parallel file processing, distributed ML, integration with existing pandas code. For out-of-core analytics on single machine use vaex; for in-memory speed use polars.

View original Skill.mdThis page is parsed directly from the repository SKILL.md without editorial rewriting. Collected: Jul 28, 2026 · about 5 min

Code Tour

Create CodeTour .tour files for codebase walkthroughs that open directly to real files and line ranges. Tours live in .tours/ and are meant for the CodeTour format, not ad hoc Markdown notes.

A good tour is a narrative for a specific reader:

  • what they are looking at
  • why it matters
  • what path they should follow next

Only create .tour JSON files. Do not modify source code as part of this skill.

When to Use

Use this skill when:

  • the user asks for a code tour, onboarding tour, architecture walkthrough, or PR tour
  • the user says "explain how X works" and wants a reusable guided artifact
  • the user wants a ramp-up path for a new engineer or reviewer
  • the task is better served by a guided sequence than a flat summary

Examples:

  • onboarding a new maintainer
  • architecture tour for one service or package
  • PR-review walk-through anchored to changed files
  • RCA tour showing the failure path
  • security review tour of trust boundaries and key checks

When NOT to Use

Instead of code-tourUse
A one-off explanation in chat is enoughanswer directly
The user wants prose docs, not a .tour artifactdocumentation-lookup or repo docs editing
The task is implementation or refactoringdo the implementation work
The task is broad codebase onboarding without a tour artifactcodebase-onboarding

Workflow

1. Discover

Explore the repo before writing anything:

  • README and package/app entry points
  • folder structure
  • relevant config files
  • the changed files if the tour is PR-focused

Do not start writing steps before you understand the shape of the code.

2. Infer the reader

Decide the persona and depth from the request.

Request shapePersonaSuggested depth
"onboarding", "new joiner"new-joiner9-13 steps
"quick tour", "vibe check"vibecoder5-8 steps
"architecture"architect14-18 steps
"tour this PR"pr-reviewer7-11 steps
"why did this break"rca-investigator7-11 steps
"security review"security-reviewer7-11 steps
"explain how this feature works"feature-explainer7-11 steps
"debug this path"bug-fixer7-11 steps

3. Read and verify anchors

Every file path and line anchor must be real:

  • confirm the file exists
  • confirm the line numbers are in range
  • if using a selection, verify the exact block
  • if the file is volatile, prefer a pattern-based anchor

Never guess line numbers.

4. Write the .tour

Write to:

.tours/<persona>-<focus>.tour

Keep the path deterministic and readable.

5. Validate

Before finishing:

  • every referenced path exists
  • every line or selection is valid
  • the first step is anchored to a real file or directory
  • the ref points at a branch or commit that actually has every file the tour references (see below)
  • the tour tells a coherent story rather than listing files

The ref Field

ref ties the tour to a git branch or commit. It matters more than it looks: when ref is not the branch the reader has checked out, CodeTour opens each step's file from that revision in git, not from the files on disk. If a file is not in that revision, the step will not open — the reader sees "The editor could not be opened because the file was not found" even though the file is sitting right there. The tour and its comments still show, so the real cause is easy to miss.

Pick ref by tour type:

Tour typeSet ref to
PR tourthe PR branch — never the base branch
Onboarding / architecturethe branch the reader will be on (often main), or leave it out
Not sureleave ref out, so CodeTour reads files straight from disk

The PR case is the common trap: a PR usually adds new files, and new files do not exist on the base branch yet. Point ref at the base (e.g. develop) and every step on a new file fails to open.

Before finishing, confirm each step's file actually exists at the ref you chose.

Step Types

Content

Use sparingly, usually only for a closing step:

{ "title": "Next Steps", "description": "You can now trace the request path end to end." }

Do not make the first step content-only.

Directory

Use to orient the reader to a module:

{ "directory": "src/services", "title": "Service Layer", "description": "The core orchestration logic lives here." }

File + line

This is the default step type:

{ "file": "src/auth/middleware.ts", "line": 42, "title": "Auth Gate", "description": "Every protected request passes here first." }

Selection

Use when one code block matters more than the whole file:

{
  "file": "src/core/pipeline.ts",
  "selection": {
    "start": { "line": 15, "character": 0 },
    "end": { "line": 34, "character": 0 }
  },
  "title": "Request Pipeline",
  "description": "This block wires validation, auth, and downstream execution."
}

Pattern

Use when exact lines may drift:

{ "file": "src/app.ts", "pattern": "export default class App", "title": "Application Entry" }

URI

Use for PRs, issues, or docs when helpful:

{ "uri": "https://github.com/org/repo/pull/456", "title": "The PR" }

Writing Rule: SMIG

Each description should answer:

  • Situation: what the reader is looking at
  • Mechanism: how it works
  • Implication: why it matters for this persona
  • Gotcha: what a smart reader might miss

Keep descriptions compact, specific, and grounded in the actual code.

Narrative Shape

Use this arc unless the task clearly needs something different:

  1. orientation
  2. module map
  3. core execution path
  4. edge case or gotcha
  5. closing / next move

The tour should feel like a path, not an inventory.

Example

{
  "$schema": "https://aka.ms/codetour-schema",
  "title": "API Service Tour",
  "description": "Walkthrough of the request path for the payments service.",
  "ref": "main",
  "steps": [
    {
      "directory": "src",
      "title": "Source Root",
      "description": "All runtime code for the service starts here."
    },
    {
      "file": "src/server.ts",
      "line": 12,
      "title": "Entry Point",
      "description": "The server boots here and wires middleware before any route is reached."
    },
    {
      "file": "src/routes/payments.ts",
      "line": 8,
      "title": "Payment Routes",
      "description": "Every payments request enters through this router before hitting service logic."
    },
    {
      "title": "Next Steps",
      "description": "You can now follow any payment request end to end with the main anchors in place."
    }
  ]
}

Anti-Patterns

Anti-patternFix
Flat file listingTell a story with dependency between steps
Generic descriptionsName the concrete code path or pattern
Guessed anchorsVerify every file and line first
Too many steps for a quick tourCut aggressively
First step is content-onlyAnchor the first step to a real file or directory
Persona mismatchWrite for the actual reader, not a generic engineer

Best Practices

  • keep step count proportional to repo size and persona depth
  • use directory steps for orientation, file steps for substance
  • for PR tours, cover changed files first
  • for monorepos, scope to the relevant packages instead of touring everything
  • close with what the reader can now do, not a recap

Related Skills

  • codebase-onboarding
  • coding-standards
  • council
  • official upstream format: microsoft/codetour
Source repo
affaan-m/ECC
Skill path
skills/code-tour/SKILL.md
Commit SHA
4e973d3eaf92
Repository license
MIT
Data collected