Source profileQuality 95/100Review permissions

Bang-isme/CodexAI---Skills/skills/codex-workflow-autopilot/SKILL.md

codex-workflow-autopilot

Use after intent is known to route build, fix, review, debug, docs, or Scrum requests into ordered workflow steps with exit criteria.

Source repository stars
7
Declared platforms
1
Static risk flags
1
Last source update
2026-08-18
Source checked
2026-08-25

Decision brief

What it does: where it fits

Route tasks by complexity: complex - Thinking Partner + Devil's Advocate, teaching - Teaching Mode + explaincode.py, simple - direct execution. Map intent to workflow (build/fix/review/debug/docs). Use BMAD 4-phase for complex. Always end with Phase X quality gate.

Best for

    Not for

    • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
    • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

    Compatibility matrix

    Platform support, with evidence labels

    PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
    CodexDeclaredSource recordInstall path and trigger
    Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Open the compatibility checker

    Installation

    Inspect first. Install second.

    The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

    Source-detected install commandSource
    npx skills add https://github.com/Bang-isme/CodexAI---Skills --skill "skills/codex-workflow-autopilot"
    Safe inspection promptEditorial

    Inspect the Agent Skill "codex-workflow-autopilot" from https://github.com/Bang-isme/CodexAI---Skills/blob/7bba6b1e98b2d56be7c8b9291bf7f379208f3b88/skills/codex-workflow-autopilot/SKILL.md at commit 7bba6b1e98b2d56be7c8b9291bf7f379208f3b88. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

    Workflow

    What the source asks the agent to do

    1. 01

      Workflow Autopilot

      1. Activate after intent analysis is confirmed. 2. Activate on explicit $codex-workflow-autopilot or $route. 3. Activate teaching mode on $teach, "explain", or "walk me through". 4. Activate Scrum overlay on backlog, story, sprint, review, retrospective, release-readiness, or sh…

      Activate after intent analysis is confirmed.Activate on explicit $codex-workflow-autopilot or $route.Activate teaching mode on $teach, "explain", or "walk me through".
    2. 02

      Intent to Workflow

      Review the “Intent to Workflow” section in the pinned source before continuing.

      Review and apply the “Intent to Workflow” source section.
    3. 03

      Phase 1: Analysis (no code)

      confirm requirements and constraints

      confirm requirements and constraintsinspect existing patternscapture key decisions
    4. 04

      Phase 2: Planning (no code)

      Checkpoint: wait for explicit user approval before Phase 3.

      create plan via $codex-plan-writer or $plandefine task-level input/output/verify- create plan via $codex-plan-writer or $plan - define task-level input/output/verify
    5. 05

      Phase 3: Solutioning (no code)

      finalize architecture and data flow decisions

      finalize architecture and data flow decisionsidentify cross-file impacts- finalize architecture and data flow decisions - identify cross-file impacts

    Permission review

    Static risk signals and limitations

    Runs scripts

    medium · line 212

    The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.

    Always run `--help` before invoking a script.

    Evidence record

    Why each signal appears

    EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
    SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
    Quality score95/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
    Repository stars7SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
    Compatibility1 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
    Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

    Pinned source

    Provenance and original SKILL.md

    Repository
    Bang-isme/CodexAI---Skills
    Skill path
    skills/codex-workflow-autopilot/SKILL.md
    Commit
    7bba6b1e98b2d56be7c8b9291bf7f379208f3b88
    License
    MIT
    Collected
    2026-08-25
    Default branch
    main
    View the original SKILL.md

    TL;DR

    Route tasks by complexity: complex -> Thinking Partner + Devil's Advocate, teaching -> Teaching Mode + explain_code.py, simple -> direct execution. Map intent to workflow (build/fix/review/debug/docs). Use BMAD 4-phase for complex. Always end with Phase X quality gate.

    Workflow Autopilot

    Activation

    1. Activate after intent analysis is confirmed.
    2. Activate on explicit $codex-workflow-autopilot or $route.
    3. Activate teaching mode on $teach, "explain", or "walk me through".
    4. Activate Scrum overlay on backlog, story, sprint, review, retrospective, release-readiness, or shorthand commands such as $sprint-plan, $story-ready-check, $retro, and $release-readiness.
    5. Activate reasoning rigor on $codex-reasoning-rigor, $rigor, "don't be generic", "go deeper", "make it specific", or "use the repo, not generic advice".
    6. Activate on alias triggers: $plan, $debug, $create, $prototype, $review, $deploy, $handoff, $refactor.
    7. When activated via alias, load the corresponding .workflows/<name>.md file before executing the flow.
    8. Activate brainstorm mode on $brainstorm, "brainstorm", "think through options", or "explore approaches".
    9. Activate review-feedback routing on $review-feedback, "address review feedback", or "respond to code review".
    10. Route "prototype", "MVP", "fullstack", "from scratch", or "build whole app" to $prototype and require codex-spec-driven-development before implementation.
    11. Activate project pulse on $today, $pulse, $daily, $status, $brief, "hôm nay thế nào?", "what's next?", "what should I work on?", or "project status". Route to codex-project-pulse.

    Behavioral Protocol Decision Tree

    Agent context loaded?
        |- Yes -> apply agent behavioral rules + file_ownership boundaries
        |   `- Then route to the matching workflow mode or alias file
        |
        `- No -> fallback to existing keyword-based mode detection
            |
            `- Task complexity?
                |- Complex (architecture/design/multi-file) -> activate Thinking Partner mode
                |   `- Before presenting solution -> activate Devil's Advocate mode
                |
                |- Teaching request -> activate Teaching Mode + explain_code.py
                |
                `- Simple (single file fix) -> direct execution
    

    Behavioral Modes

    SignalsModeBehavior
    what if, ideas, optionsbrainstormask clarifying questions and present alternatives, no code
    think with me, compare options, help me decidethinking-partnerco-think with tradeoff-first framing and explicit decision criteria
    build, create, implementimplementexecute quickly with production-focused output, enforce TDD
    prototype, MVP, fullstack, from scratchprototyperun $hook -> $init-profile if needed -> $genome/$init-docs -> $spec -> $plan -> implementation -> $check-full
    test first, TDD, red-green, failing testtddenforce RED-GREEN-REFACTOR cycle via $tdd, no production code without failing test
    error, bug, brokendebug4-phase systematic debugging via $root-cause: root cause → pattern → hypothesis → fix
    review, audit, checkreviewinspect and report findings by severity
    challenge this, poke holes, red team, counterargumentdevils-advocatestress-test assumptions, expose risks, and propose mitigations
    explain, teach, learnteachexplain progressively with examples
    deploy, release, shipshipprioritize stability and complete checks

    Scrum Overlay Trigger

    Trigger Scrum overlay when the request mentions:

    • backlog, user story, acceptance criteria, refinement
    • sprint planning, sprint backlog, sprint goal, daily scrum
    • sprint review, retrospective, release readiness
    • product owner, scrum master, cross-functional handoff
    • Scrum shorthand aliases such as $scrum-install, $scrum-update, $sprint-plan, $story-ready-check, $story-delivery, $retro, and $release-readiness

    Load and apply: references/workflow-scrum.md. Keep the routing contract in sync with references/workflow-routing-contract.json.

    Rules:

    • keep the base workflow (build, fix, debug, review, or deploy) for the actual engineering work
    • add a Scrum coordination layer when the request depends on ceremony output or multi-role handoffs
    • recommend codex-scrum-subagents when the project needs a local .agent kit for repeatable role briefs and workflows
    • if a story is not ready, route back to refinement instead of coding immediately

    Reasoning Rigor Trigger

    Trigger this overlay when the user asks for:

    • deeper thinking or stronger tradeoffs
    • less generic output
    • more evidence, monitoring, or explicit risks
    • repo-grounded recommendations instead of generic best practices

    Load and apply: codex-reasoning-rigor.

    Rules:

    • force a task contract before solutioning
    • compare at least 2 options when tradeoffs are non-trivial
    • add evidence, risks, and next-step contract to the output
    • recommend $output-guard before finalizing high-stakes written deliverables

    Thinking-Partner Trigger

    Trigger this mode when user asks for collaborative reasoning rather than immediate implementation.

    • Signal examples: "think with me", "compare options", "which approach is better", "help me decide".
    • Load and apply: references/thinking-partner-mode.md.
    • Ask focused clarifying questions before proposing workflow.
    • Present option matrix with tradeoffs, risks, and recommended path.
    • Convert selected path back to workflow steps and exit criteria.

    Devil's Advocate Trigger

    Trigger this mode when user asks for challenge, risk probing, or plan hardening.

    • Signal examples: "be critical", "find blind spots", "red team this plan", "play devil's advocate".
    • Load and apply: references/devils-advocate-mode.md.
    • Attack assumptions explicitly and rank findings by impact/likelihood.
    • Provide mitigation actions and clear stop/ship criteria.
    • Return to normal workflow mode only after key risks are addressed or explicitly accepted.

    Teaching Mode Trigger

    Trigger this mode when user asks to understand project code, not to modify it.

    • Signal examples: $teach, "explain this", "teach me", "how does this work", "walk me through".
    • Load and apply: references/teaching-mode-spec.md.
    • Prefer project-specific explanation over generic language/framework theory.
    • Use scripts/explain_code.py as optional context helper for functions/imports/imported-by mapping.
    • Output in four layers: what, how, why, connections, then gotchas.
    • Keep scope tight to user request (function/file/module) and avoid unnecessary full-file dumps.

    Intent to Workflow

    IntentStepsExit Criteria
    buildanalyze → plan ($plan) → isolate ($worktree) → TDD implement ($tdd) → test → gatetests pass, TDD verified, gate pass
    prototypepreflight ($hook) -> profile/context/docs -> spec ($spec) -> plan ($plan) -> TDD implementation -> role-doc/knowledge update -> full gatespec exists, acceptance criteria pass, full gate pass or advisory warnings listed
    fixsystematic debug ($root-cause) → root-cause → regression test ($tdd) → fix → gateroot cause found, regression test pass, gate pass
    reviewinspect → categorize findings → recommend actionsfindings documented with severity
    debugsystematic debug ($root-cause) → Phase 1-4 → test → gateverified fix with evidence, gate pass
    docsscope change → update docs → verify links/accuracy → gatedocs updated and verified

    Scrum Ceremony Routing

    Scrum SignalSuggested CeremonyBase WorkflowRecommended Roles
    vague backlog item, user story, acceptance criteriabacklog refinementbuildproduct-owner -> scrum-master
    sprint planning, sprint goal, forecastsprint planningbuildscrum-master -> product-owner -> delivery leads
    blocker, dependency, daily syncdaily scrumdebugscrum-master
    ready story in sprintstory deliverybuild or fixscrum-orchestrator + delivery roles + qa-engineer
    sprint demo, stakeholder feedbacksprint reviewreviewproduct-owner + scrum-master + qa-engineer
    process issue, improvement experimentretrospectivereviewscrum-master + squad
    ship decision, rollback, release gaterelease readinessdeployscrum-master + qa-engineer + security-engineer + devops-engineer

    BMAD for Complex Requests

    Use BMAD when intent analysis marks complexity: complex.

    Phase 1: Analysis (no code)

    • confirm requirements and constraints
    • inspect existing patterns
    • capture key decisions

    Phase 2: Planning (no code)

    • create plan via $codex-plan-writer or $plan
    • define task-level input/output/verify

    Checkpoint: wait for explicit user approval before Phase 3.

    Phase 3: Solutioning (no code)

    • finalize architecture and data flow decisions
    • identify cross-file impacts

    Phase 4: Implementation (code)

    • For complex tasks: Set up isolated workspace via $worktree
    • For plan with independent tasks: Use subagent execution via $sdd
    • For all code changes: Follow TDD cycle via $tdd
    • implement task by task
    • run tests/docs as workflow requires

    Phase X: Verification (always last)

    1. Run $codex-execution-quality-gate or $gate.
    2. If gate fails, fix blockers and rerun.
    3. Do not declare completion before gate decision.
    4. Use $finish to handle branch completion if using worktree.

    Reference Files

    • references/workflow-routing-contract.json: machine-checkable routing contract for modes, overlays, and output fields.
    • references/thinking-partner-mode.md: use only when collaborative option analysis is requested.
    • references/devils-advocate-mode.md: use only when explicit challenge/risk probing is requested.
    • references/teaching-mode-spec.md: use when user asks for code walkthrough, explanation, or teaching.
    • references/workflow-scrum.md: use when the request maps to Scrum ceremonies, story readiness, or release readiness.
    • references/workflow-create.md: execution template for new feature workflows.
    • ../.workflows/prototype.md: alias workflow for MVP/fullstack prototype execution.
    • references/workflow-debug.md: execution template for debugging workflows.
    • references/workflow-review.md: execution template for review workflows.
    • references/workflow-refactor.md: execution template for refactoring workflows.
    • references/workflow-deploy.md: execution template for deployment workflows.
    • references/workflow-handoff.md: execution template for session handoff workflows.
    • references/workflow-plan.md: execution template for planning and BMAD Phase 1-2 workflows.
    • ../.workflows/plan.md: alias workflow for planning and BMAD Phase 1-2.
    • ../.workflows/debug.md: alias workflow for 4-phase debugging.
    • ../.workflows/create.md: alias workflow for build-mode execution.
    • ../.workflows/review.md: alias workflow for review plus written-output quality checks.
    • ../.workflows/deploy.md: alias workflow for ship preparation and full gate.
    • ../.workflows/handoff.md: alias workflow for session transfer and summary generation.
    • ../.workflows/refactor.md: alias workflow for restructuring and simplifying code.

    Helper Script

    • scripts/explain_code.py: optional context helper for functions, imports, and imported-by mapping.
    • See skills/.system/REGISTRY.md for full script paths.

    Script Invocation Discipline

    1. Always run --help before invoking a script.
    2. Treat scripts as black-box helpers and prefer direct execution over source inspection.
    3. Read script source only when customization or bug fixing is required.

    Overrides

    • "skip test": remove test step and warn quality confidence is reduced.
    • "no docs": remove docs step and warn maintainability confidence is reduced.
    • "just do it": default to build workflow and still show brief step plan.
    • "skip plan": allow for simple scope; for complex scope warn and reconfirm.

    Scope Heuristic

    • small: 1-3 files, single concern
    • medium: 4-10 files, multiple concerns
    • large: 10+ files or architectural impact

    Output Contract

    Return fenced JSON in conversation:

    {
      "mode": "brainstorm | thinking-partner | implement | tdd | debug | review | devils-advocate | teach | ship",
      "workflow_type": "build | fix | review | debug | docs | refactor | deploy | handoff",
      "steps": ["step1", "step2"],
      "exit_criteria": ["criterion1"],
      "estimated_scope": "small | medium | large",
      "phase": "analysis | planning | solutioning | implementation | verification",
      "coordination_overlay": "none | scrum",
      "ceremony": "none | backlog-refinement | sprint-planning | daily-scrum | story-delivery | sprint-review | retrospective | release-readiness"
    }
    

    Primary execution remains sequential by default. Native Codex custom agents can participate when they are installed and explicitly selected.

    Frequently asked questions

    What to verify before installation and use

    What does the codex-workflow-autopilot source document cover?

    Route tasks by complexity: complex - Thinking Partner + Devil's Advocate, teaching - Teaching Mode + explaincode.py, simple - direct execution. Map intent to workflow (build/fix/review/debug/docs). Use BMAD 4-phase for complex. Always end with Phase X quality gate.

    How do I install codex-workflow-autopilot?

    The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/Bang-isme/CodexAI---Skills --skill "skills/codex-workflow-autopilot". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.

    Which Agent platforms does the source record declare?

    The pinned source record declares support for: codex.

    Which permission-related actions were detected?

    Static rules flagged exec-script in the source; the page lists the matching lines and excerpts.

    Alternatives

    Compare before choosing

    Computed 9880

    vasilyu1983/AI-Agents-public

    research-git

    Scans public GitHub repos for agent skills, dev practices, and code patterns. Use when enriching skills, setting team policy, or researching a build domain.

    Computed 9420

    upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplate

    test-documentation

    Analyze, prioritize, and document test cases in TMS (Jira/Xray), or repair an existing Story-ATS-ATP-ATR-TC cascade through a sealed explicit mode. Use for Test/ATP/ATR artifacts, ROI and automation verdicts, maintaining traceability, fix-traceability, or broken TMS links. The repair-traceability mode audits, plans, waits for explicit approval, applies, and verifies without launching the general documentation workflow. Do NOT use for writing test code (test-automation) or running suites (regress

    Computed 9024,921

    alirezarezvani/claude-skills

    research-summarizer

    Structured research summarization agent skill for non-dev users. Handles academic papers, web articles, reports, and documentation. Extracts key findings, generates comparative analyses, and produces properly formatted citations. Use when: user wants to summarize a research paper, compare multiple sources, extract citations from documents, or create structured research briefs. Plugin for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, and OpenClaw.

    Computed 9916

    NintendaDev/unikit-ai

    unikit-docs

    Generate and maintain the project's TECHNICAL documentation from its codebase — scans the project structure, tech stack, and module boundaries, then writes a lean README landing page plus detailed topic pages (architecture, modules, setup, build, APIs), only the docs that are relevant. Use whenever the user wants to create, update, or validate documentation of the CODE or the project itself, e.g. "generate documentation", "create docs", "write the README", "update the project docs", "document th