Tested demoQuality 92/100

topoteretes/cognee/cognee/skill.md

cognee

Use this skill whenever the user asks about Cognee, AI memory, persistent agent memory, self-improving agents, agents learning from feednack, knowledge graphs, graph-based RAG, long-term memory for agents, short-term memory for agents, personalization, personas, temporal search, temporal knowledge graphs, ontology-based extraction, ontology grounding, feedback, Cypher search, natural-language graph search, chunk search, RAG search, cross-session memory, session feedback, feedback loops, session

Source repository stars
30,242
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
1
Last source update
2026-08-24
Source checked
2026-08-25

Decision brief

What it does: where it fits

Use this skill for Cognee-specific Python API help and for mapping user goals to the right Cognee workflow.

Best for

  • ingest text, files, URLs, repos, or datasets
  • build or rebuild a knowledge graph
  • search documents, chunks, summaries, triplets, or graph context

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.
Controlled single-run demoChecked 2026-08-20

What changed when the Skill was used

In this controlled same-task single run, enabling cognee changed the output from 2140 non-whitespace characters and 10 headings to 3141 characters and 15 headings. Matches among 8 signals extracted from the pinned source changed from 2 to 3. Both actual outputs are shown; this is a structural observation, not a quality score or a universal performance claim.

Same test task

Create an operational runbook for repeated webhook delivery failures. Include triage, safe actions, escalation, recovery, and verification. The deliverable must specifically reflect this user intent: Use this skill whenever the user asks about Cognee, AI memory, persistent agent memory, self-improving agents, agents learning from feednack, knowledge graphs, graph-based RAG, long-term memory for agents, short-term memory for agents, personalization, personas, temporal search, temporal knowledge graphs, ontology-based extraction, ontology grounding, feedback, Cypher search, natural-language graph search, chunk search, RAG search, cross-session memory, session feedback, feedback loops, session

Without the Skill
Screenshot of the actual model output for cognee without the Skill

Baseline: 2140 non-whitespace characters, 10 headings, and 59 list items.

With the Skill
Screenshot of the actual model output for cognee with the Skill

With Skill: 3141 non-whitespace characters, 15 headings, and 52 list items.

ObservationWithout SkillWith Skill
Source-signal coverage2/8: cognee, graph3/8: cognee, graph, search
Output structure2140 chars · 10 headings · 59 list items · 0 code blocks3141 chars · 15 headings · 52 list items · 6 code blocks
Verification and caution signals29 verification signals · 6 risk/limitation signals23 verification signals · 11 risk/limitation signals

A prompt you can use

Use the cognee Skill pinned at fd5045f6b605 for my task. Follow its source-specific constraints around `cognee`, `apply`, `common`, `tasks`, then return the finished deliverable with explicit assumptions, verification, failure conditions, and limits. Do not treat the Skill text as a factual source or claim that a single demonstration proves universal performance.

Method and limitationsExpand

Test method

  • Baseline and treatment used the same task, model (gpt-5.3-codex-low), and runner; the only planned difference was whether the complete target Skill text was injected.
  • The treatment used snapshot fd5045f6b60522c1953fc1ae258e041ba53602d8; the current source commit fd5045f6b60522c1953fc1ae258e041ba53602d8 was verified against content hash 9b5c9bd3af75. The baseline explicitly prohibited loading any Skill or external rule file.
  • The same deterministic script counted characters, headings, lists, code blocks, verification terms, caution terms, and source signals in both artifacts. Source signals: `cognee`, `apply`, `common`, `tasks`, `build`, `graph`, `search`, `scope`.
  • The visuals are local screenshots of the actual Markdown artifacts in a fixed 1200 × 800 evidence canvas, not recreated product mockups. Raw JSON artifacts and request records are retained in the research directory.

Do not over-read this demo

  • This is one controlled demonstration per condition, not a multi-run statistical benchmark; the model is stochastic.
  • Character, structure, and keyword counts show observable differences but cannot by themselves prove correctness, originality, or business impact.
  • The task is a representative test designed for repeatability, not every real-world use of the Skill; rerun after a material source change.
Editorial review
SkillSignal editorial
Runner
Cursor Agent 2026.08.11-e8db854
Model
gpt-5.3-codex-low
Refresh due
2026-11-18
Reviewed commit
fd5045f6b60522c1953fc1ae258e041ba53602d8
Test snapshot
fd5045f6b60522c1953fc1ae258e041ba53602d8

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/topoteretes/cognee --skill "cognee"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "cognee" from https://github.com/topoteretes/cognee/blob/690c0ec023719a2a277dc893cdecfec1ca8012cc/cognee/skill.md at commit 690c0ec023719a2a277dc893cdecfec1ca8012cc. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Core workflow

    Review the “Core workflow” section in the pinned source before continuing.

    Review and apply the “Core workflow” source section.
  2. 02

    When to apply this skill

    Apply this skill whenever the user wants to do any of the following with Cognee:

    ingest text, files, URLs, repos, or datasetsbuild or rebuild a knowledge graphsearch documents, chunks, summaries, triplets, or graph context
  3. 03

    Default guidance

    When helping with Cognee:

    Start with the simplest working path unless the user explicitly asks for advanced configuration.Prefer the standard workflow:add(...) to ingest
  4. 04

    Common tasks

    Use cognee.add(...) for text, files, URLs, or mixed inputs.

    Use cognee.add(...) for text, files, URLs, or mixed inputs.Use nodeset when the user wants data grouped into logical memory buckets.Use cognee.cognify(...) after ingestion.
  5. 05

    Add data

    Use cognee.add(...) for text, files, URLs, or mixed inputs.

    Use cognee.add(...) for text, files, URLs, or mixed inputs.Use nodeset when the user wants data grouped into logical memory buckets.

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

Network access

medium · line 74

The documentation includes network, browsing, or remote request actions.

await cognee.add("https://example.com", dataset_name="research")

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score92/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars30,242SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guidetested outcome pageTestedGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
topoteretes/cognee
Skill path
cognee/skill.md
Commit
690c0ec023719a2a277dc893cdecfec1ca8012cc
License
Apache-2.0
Collected
2026-08-25
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

Cognee

Use this skill for Cognee-specific Python API help and for mapping user goals to the right Cognee workflow.

When to apply this skill

Apply this skill whenever the user wants to do any of the following with Cognee:

  • ingest text, files, URLs, repos, or datasets
  • build or rebuild a knowledge graph
  • search documents, chunks, summaries, triplets, or graph context
  • choose a SearchType
  • enrich an existing graph with memify
  • define custom graph extraction models or DataPoint types
  • run custom task pipelines
  • configure LLM, graph DB, vector DB, or storage settings
  • tag and scope memory with node_set / NodeSets
  • build persistent memory for agents across sessions
  • create feedback loops or self-improving agent workflows
  • work with temporal extraction, ontologies, Cypher, or natural-language graph queries
  • manage datasets, sessions, feedback, pruning, updates, or visualization

If the user’s intent is “store information in memory and query it later,” prefer Cognee’s core flow: add -> cognify -> search

Core workflow

import cognee
from cognee import SearchType

await cognee.add(
    "Your text, file path, URL, or list of inputs",
    dataset_name="main",
    node_set=["default_memory"],
)
await cognee.cognify(datasets="main")
results = await cognee.search(
    "What are the key insights?",
    query_type=SearchType.GRAPH_COMPLETION,
    datasets="main",
)

Default guidance

When helping with Cognee:

  1. Start with the simplest working path unless the user explicitly asks for advanced configuration.
  2. Prefer the standard workflow:
    • add(...) to ingest
    • cognify(...) to build the graph
    • search(...) to query it
  3. Treat Cognee APIs as async.
  4. Use dataset_name / datasets to keep work organized when the user has multiple sources.
  5. Use node_set when the user wants lightweight tagging, project scoping, per-user memory buckets, or subgraph filtering.
  6. Recommend advanced features only when they match the task:
    • memify(...) for enriching an existing graph
    • temporal_cognify=True for time-aware extraction
    • custom graph models or DataPoint types for domain-specific extraction
    • custom pipelines for non-default task orchestration
    • feedback loops for retrieval improvement
    • visualization tools for graph inspection

Common tasks

Add data

Use cognee.add(...) for text, files, URLs, or mixed inputs.

await cognee.add("notes.md", dataset_name="research")
await cognee.add("https://example.com", dataset_name="research")
await cognee.add(["paper.pdf", "summary.txt"], dataset_name="research")

Use node_set when the user wants data grouped into logical memory buckets.

await cognee.add(
    "Customer prefers concise weekly summaries and Slack delivery.",
    dataset_name="customer_success",
    node_set=["preferences", "customer_123", "weekly_reports"],
)

Build the graph

Use cognee.cognify(...) after ingestion.

await cognee.cognify(datasets="research")

Use these options when relevant:

await cognee.cognify(
    datasets="research",
    temporal_cognify=True,
    chunk_size=1024,
    custom_prompt="Extract companies, products, and partnerships.",
)

Search the graph

Use cognee.search(...) and pick the search mode that matches the request.

results = await cognee.search(
    "What changed in Q1 2024?",
    query_type=SearchType.TEMPORAL,
    datasets="research",
    top_k=10,
)

Scope search with NodeSets

Use NodeSets when the user wants to search only a subset of memory such as one project, one customer, one user, or one workflow.

results = await cognee.search(
    query_text="What are this customer's reporting preferences?",
    query_type=SearchType.GRAPH_COMPLETION,
    datasets="customer_success",
    node_name=["preferences", "customer_123"],
)

Enrich an existing graph

Use memify(...) when the user wants to improve or extend an already-built graph without restarting the full workflow.

await cognee.memify(dataset="research")

Create domain-specific structures

Use custom models when the user wants extraction shaped around a schema.

from typing import Any
from pydantic import SkipValidation
from cognee.infrastructure.engine import DataPoint
from cognee.tasks.storage import add_data_points

class ScientificPaper(DataPoint):
    title: str
    authors: list[str]
    methodology: str
    findings: list[str]
    cites: SkipValidation[Any] = None
    metadata: dict = {"index_fields": ["title", "findings"]}

paper = ScientificPaper(
    title="Graph Memory for Agents",
    authors=["A. Researcher"],
    methodology="Knowledge graph + vector retrieval",
    findings=["Improved cross-session recall", "Better multi-hop retrieval"],
)

await add_data_points([paper])

Run custom pipelines

Use run_custom_pipeline(...) when the user needs explicit sequential task control.

from cognee.modules.pipelines.tasks.task import Task

async def my_task(data):
    return data

await cognee.run_custom_pipeline(
    tasks=[Task(my_task)],
    data="input",
    dataset="research",
)

DataPoints

A DataPoint is the atomic unit of knowledge in Cognee.

Use this concept whenever the user asks how Cognee represents structured data internally or how to insert graph objects directly.

Key ideas:

  • A DataPoint is a Pydantic model that represents one meaningful unit of information.
  • It can carry both content and context, including indexing hints and relationship fields.
  • When inserted directly, DataPoints can become graph nodes and edges while also contributing searchable vector fields.
  • metadata = {"index_fields": [...]} controls which fields should be embedded for semantic search.
  • Relationship fields can point to other DataPoints, letting you define graph structure programmatically.
  • DataPoints are ideal when the user already has structured objects and does not want to rely only on text extraction.

Use DataPoint when the user wants:

  • schema-shaped memory
  • exact control over graph structure
  • programmatic relationship creation
  • custom domain entities such as papers, customers, incidents, policies, products, or workflows

Prefer plain add(...) -> cognify(...) for unstructured documents. Prefer DataPoint models plus add_data_points(...) when the user already has structured Python objects and wants direct graph insertion.

NodeSets

Use NodeSets when the user wants a lightweight way to tag, group, and scope memory.

A NodeSet starts as a simple list of tags passed through node_set=[...] during add(...), but after cognify() those tags become first-class graph nodes that help organize retrieval.

Why NodeSets matter

  • They let the user organize memory by project, team, customer, workflow, topic, or environment.
  • They make it easy to search only a relevant subgraph instead of the full dataset.
  • They are especially useful in agent systems where one memory store contains many users, jobs, or tasks.

Good NodeSet patterns

  • per customer: ["customer_123"]
  • per workflow: ["support_bot", "refund_flow"]
  • per topic: ["contracts", "vendor_risk"]
  • per environment: ["prod", "staging"]
  • per user memory: ["user_42", "preferences"]

Example

await cognee.add(
    [
        "Alice prefers terse answers and email follow-ups.",
        "Alice escalates billing issues to finance first.",
        "Bob prefers detailed technical explanations."
    ],
    dataset_name="agent_memory",
    node_set=["crm", "user_profiles"],
)

await cognee.cognify(datasets="agent_memory")

results = await cognee.search(
    query_text="How should I respond to Alice?",
    datasets="agent_memory",
    node_name=["crm", "user_profiles"],
)

Use NodeSets by default whenever the user says things like:

  • “scope memory by customer”
  • “separate projects without making separate databases”
  • “let the agent search only its own memories”
  • “group facts by workflow or team”

SearchType selection guide

Use these defaults:

  • GRAPH_COMPLETION: best default for graph-aware Q&A
  • RAG_COMPLETION: traditional RAG over document chunks
  • CHUNKS: fast semantic retrieval without completion
  • CHUNKS_LEXICAL: exact-term / keyword matching
  • SUMMARIES: overview of documents
  • TRIPLET_COMPLETION: subject-predicate-object style graph Q&A
  • GRAPH_SUMMARY_COMPLETION: graph + summary-based answers
  • GRAPH_COMPLETION_COT: deeper reasoning over graph context
  • GRAPH_COMPLETION_CONTEXT_EXTENSION: broader graph context retrieval
  • CYPHER: raw Cypher queries when enabled
  • NATURAL_LANGUAGE: natural language to graph query
  • TEMPORAL: time-aware graph search
  • CODING_RULES: code rules and patterns
  • CODE: deterministic code fact lookup, graph traversal, paths, and impact analysis
  • FEELING_LUCKY: let Cognee choose automatically
  • FEEDBACK: apply feedback to improve later retrieval behavior

Agentic workflows and feedback-driven improvement

Use Cognee as the memory layer for agent systems that need to improve over time through better recall, better reuse of prior work, and better retrieval of successful past behavior.

The key idea is simple:

  • keep the agent workflow itself constant
  • keep the prompt and tools constant
  • change only what the agent can remember and retrieve

This means “improvement” comes from memory reuse and retrieval quality, not from changing the model or retraining it.

What Cognee gives agentic workflows

Cognee helps agent systems:

  • store observations, decisions, outcomes, and learned patterns as memory
  • retrieve graph-aware context instead of relying only on flat chunk search
  • reuse prior investigations, plans, and successful resolutions
  • preserve short-term context through sessions
  • consolidate useful session history into long-term knowledge
  • scope memory by user, customer, workflow, team, or environment with datasets and NodeSets
  • improve future behavior through feedback loops and memory enrichment

The general feedback pattern

A strong way to explain Cognee in agent systems is:

  1. Baseline condition The agent searches the existing knowledge graph and acts using only current stored knowledge.

  2. Feedback-enabled condition The agent uses the same prompt and the same tools, but now benefits from:

    • short-term memory from cached or sessionized interactions
    • long-term memory created by periodically persisting useful sessions back into the graph
  3. Improvement mechanism Future runs become faster or better because the agent can retrieve:

    • similar prior cases
    • successful resolutions
    • user or customer preferences
    • reusable policies, heuristics, and workflow patterns
    • connections across incidents, entities, and timelines

This is best described as feedback-driven memory reuse, not fine-tuning.

Short-term vs long-term feedback

Cognee fits naturally into a two-layer memory pattern:

Short-term feedback

Use sessionized search and cached interactions during active work.

This helps the agent retain recent context such as:

  • what it already discovered in the current workflow
  • what earlier steps in a multi-agent pipeline found
  • recent analyst or supervisor reasoning
  • the last successful answer pattern in the same task stream

Use this when the user wants:

  • continuity within a multi-step run
  • repeated investigations within the same session
  • active working memory for an agent or supervisor

Long-term feedback

Periodically persist valuable sessions, interactions, or derived lessons back into the knowledge graph.

This lets future runs retrieve patterns such as:

  • similar past incidents
  • recurring root causes
  • preferred response styles
  • known fixes and escalation paths
  • policies learned from repeated execution

Use this when the user wants:

  • cross-session learning
  • organizational memory
  • case reuse over time
  • persistent self-improvement without retraining

How Cognee supports this pattern

Use these building blocks:

  • add(...) to store new observations, logs, outcomes, or facts
  • cognify(...) to turn them into searchable graph memory
  • search(...) to retrieve relevant prior knowledge before acting
  • session_id to preserve continuity across related searches
  • feedback-aware workflows to capture which interactions were useful
  • memify(...) to enrich or consolidate existing memory into higher-value graph knowledge
  • dataset_name and node_set to scope memory to the right tenant, project, workflow, or user

General agent loop

A reusable explanation for Cognee-powered agents is:

  1. Observe Capture new inputs, events, user preferences, outcomes, errors, and decisions.

  2. Store Add them to Cognee as raw text, documents, structured objects, or DataPoints.

  3. Organize Use datasets and NodeSets to separate memory by customer, workflow, team, agent, or topic.

  4. Build memory Run cognify(...) so the information becomes graph-aware and searchable.

  5. Recall before acting Search Cognee before planning, tool use, synthesis, or response generation.

  6. Capture feedback Record what worked, what failed, what was helpful, and what should be reused.

  7. Consolidate Periodically persist session history or derived lessons into long-term graph memory.

  8. Reuse Future runs benefit from richer context and more informed retrieval.

Example mental model

A good generalized way to describe agent feedback is:

The agent does not change its core reasoning procedure. It improves because each run leaves behind better memory for the next run.

That memory can include:

  • past incident summaries
  • successful resolutions
  • failed approaches
  • customer-specific preferences
  • workflow-specific rules
  • cross-role findings from specialist agents
  • temporal event chains
  • structured DataPoints for entities, outcomes, and relationships

Good user-facing examples of agent feedback use cases

Suggest Cognee when the user wants agents that:

  • remember user preferences across sessions
  • reuse prior incident investigations
  • accumulate support knowledge over time
  • improve workflow execution through past outcomes
  • search similar past cases before responding
  • maintain tenant- or customer-scoped memory
  • combine short-term working memory with long-term graph memory
  • turn repeated sessions into reusable organizational knowledge

Minimal example pattern

import cognee
from cognee import SearchType

# 1) Store a new observation
await cognee.add(
    "Customer 123 prefers concise status updates and Slack notifications.",
    dataset_name="agent_memory",
    node_set=["customer_123", "preferences", "support_agent"],
)

# 2) Build memory
await cognee.cognify(datasets="agent_memory")

# 3) Recall before acting
context = await cognee.search(
    query_text="What should I know before replying to customer 123?",
    query_type=SearchType.GRAPH_COMPLETION,
    datasets="agent_memory",
    session_id="support-session-123",
)

# 4) Continue work in the same session
answer = await cognee.search(
    query_text="Draft the best reply for customer 123.",
    query_type=SearchType.GRAPH_COMPLETION,
    datasets="agent_memory",
    session_id="support-session-123",
)

# 5) Consolidate or enrich memory later
await cognee.memify(dataset="agent_memory")

Best default explanation

If the user asks how Cognee helps agents improve over time, answer with this idea:

Cognee lets agents improve by remembering more useful things, organizing them into searchable graph memory, and reusing successful past work in future runs.

Configuration help

Use Cognee config helpers when the user needs provider or backend setup.

cognee.config.set_llm_provider("openai")
cognee.config.set_llm_model("gpt-4o-mini")
cognee.config.set_llm_api_key("sk-...")

Examples of related areas the user may ask about:

  • LLM provider and model setup
  • graph database provider
  • vector database provider
  • relational database settings
  • chunk size / overlap
  • storage directories
  • translation settings
  • environment variables

Dataset and lifecycle operations

Use these when the user wants to inspect, clear, replace, or delete data.

datasets = await cognee.datasets.list_datasets()
await cognee.datasets.empty_dataset(dataset_id)
await cognee.datasets.delete_all()
await cognee.update(data_id="...", data="Updated content", dataset_id="...")

Sessions and feedback

Use session_id when the user wants conversational continuity across searches.

results = await cognee.search(
    query_text="Continue the earlier analysis",
    datasets="agent_memory",
    session_id="analysis-session-1",
)

Use feedback when the user wants Cognee to reinforce useful retrieval behavior over time.

from cognee import SearchType

results = await cognee.search(
    query_text="What are the main themes in my data?",
    query_type=SearchType.GRAPH_COMPLETION,
    save_interaction=True,
)

await cognee.search(
    query_text="Helpful answer. It captured the key technical themes.",
    query_type=SearchType.FEEDBACK,
    last_k=1,
)

Visualization

Use visualization when the user wants to inspect or present the graph.

visualize_graph renders a bounded subgraph by default (seed nodes + a k-hop neighborhood, capped at max_nodes) instead of the whole graph.

# Default: bounded subgraph. Seed by a query, explicit ids, or a recall result;
# with none of those, the highest-degree nodes seed a representative view.
await cognee.visualize_graph("/path/to/output.html")
await cognee.visualize_graph("/path/to/output.html", query="What relates to Python?")
await cognee.visualize_graph("/path/to/output.html", seed_node_ids=["node-id-1"])
await cognee.visualize_graph("/path/to/output.html", recall_result=recall_output)

# Legacy whole-graph render.
await cognee.visualize_graph("/path/to/output.html", full=True)

await cognee.start_visualization_server(port=8080)
await cognee.start_ui()

Caps: neighborhood_depth=2, neighborhood_seed_top_k=10, max_nodes=500. See examples/guides/graph_visualization.py.

Pruning and reset operations

Use pruning when the user wants to reset user data or backing stores.

await cognee.prune.prune_data()
await cognee.prune.prune_system(graph=True, vector=True, metadata=False, cache=True)

Important behavior notes

  • Cognee APIs are generally async.
  • Prefer add -> cognify -> search unless the user explicitly needs something else.
  • Use node_set early when the user may later need scoped retrieval.
  • Use temporal_cognify=True for event-and-time extraction.
  • Use session_id when the user wants session-aware interactions.
  • Use feedback loops when the user wants retrieval to improve over time.
  • Use memify(...) when the user wants to enrich an existing graph with derived facts or reusable rules.
  • Use custom graph models or DataPoint types only when the user needs schema-shaped extraction.
  • Use CYPHER only when Cypher querying is enabled in config.
  • Keep examples minimal and runnable.

Do not overcomplicate

Do not jump straight to advanced backends, ontology configuration, or custom pipelines unless the user asks for them or the problem clearly requires them. Prefer the smallest correct Cognee solution first, then extend it.

Frequently asked questions

What to verify before installation and use

What does the cognee source document cover?

Use this skill for Cognee-specific Python API help and for mapping user goals to the right Cognee workflow.

How do I install cognee?

The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/topoteretes/cognee --skill "cognee". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.

Which permission-related actions were detected?

Static rules flagged network in the source; the page lists the matching lines and excerpts.

Alternatives

Compare before choosing

Computed 10029,034

garrytan/gbrain

bulk-ingestion

End-to-end discipline for turning any large data source (audio libraries, email takeouts, document corpora, chat exports, API dumps) into brain pages at scale. The lifecycle spine: SCHEMA → ACCESS → TRIAL → EVALUATE → IMPROVE → CODIFY → TEST → SKILLIFY → BULK → MONITOR. State is tracked in a durable JSON manifest (see MANIFEST-PATTERN.md) so any crash, session boundary, or subagent fan-out resumes from ground truth instead of memory.

Computed 10024,921

alirezarezvani/claude-skills

app-store-optimization

App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching keywords, analyzing competitor rankings, generating metadata suggestions, and improving app visibility on Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Use when the user asks about ASO, app store rankings, app metadata, app titles and descriptions, app store listings, app visibility, or mobile app marketing on iOS or Android. Supports keyword research and scoring, competitor keyword analysis, metadata optimization, A/B test planning, launch checklist

Computed 10015,122

wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep

citation-audit

Use it for operations and research tasks; the detail page covers purpose, installation, and practical steps.

Computed 10014,671

prowler-cloud/prowler

postgresql-indexing

PostgreSQL indexing best practices for Prowler: index design, partial indexes, partitioned table indexing, EXPLAIN ANALYZE validation, concurrent operations, monitoring, and maintenance. Trigger: When creating or modifying PostgreSQL indexes, analyzing query performance with EXPLAIN, debugging slow queries, reviewing index usage statistics, reindexing, dropping indexes, or working with partitioned table indexes. Also trigger when discussing index strategies, partial indexes, or index maintenance