Best fit
- "What ads are my competitors running?"
- "Tear down [competitor]'s ad strategy"
- "Find new creative angles for our paid campaigns"
github/awesome-copilot
Use this skill when the user asks to analyze, tear down, or reverse-engineer a competitor's paid ads. Trigger for prompts like "what ads is [competitor] running", "tear down their ad strategy", "competitor ad analysis", "find ad angles we haven't tried", or "reverse-engineer their paid funnel". Do not trigger for organic/SEO competitor research or website positioning analysis.
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill "skills/competitor-ad-intelligence"Source checked Jul 28, 2026·Refresh due Oct 26, 2026
Reorganized from the pinned upstream SKILL.md
According to the pinned SKILL.md from github/awesome-copilot: Scrape competitor ads from Meta and Google, analyze creative patterns, reverse-engineer landing page funnels, and produce a full strategic teardown — hooks, formats, positioning bets, vulnerabilities, and counter-plays.
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill "skills/competitor-ad-intelligence"Best fit
Bring this context
Expected outputs
Key source sections
Sections are extracted automatically from the pinned SKILL.md and link back to the source.
1. Competitor names + domains (e.g., apollo.io, clay.run) 2. Your product/domain — for comparison framing 3. Channels: Meta only, Google only, or both? (default: both) 4. Depth level: - Standard: Ad scrape + creative analysis + landing page analysis - Deep: Standard + historical…
For each competitor domain, scrape ads from Meta Ad Library.
For each competitor domain, scrape ads from Google Ads Transparency Center.
After collecting all ads, perform structured analysis.
For each unique landing page URL found in ads, fetch and analyze:
SkillSignal prompt templates
These prompts were written by SkillSignal from the source structure; they are not upstream text.
Task-start prompt
Confirm source fit, inputs, and outputs before acting.
Use competitor-ad-intelligence to help me with: [specific task]. Context: [files, data, or background]. Constraints: [environment, scope, and prohibited actions]. Before acting, check the pinned SKILL.md and explain which sections apply, what inputs are still missing, and what you will deliver.
Source-guided execution
Make the Agent explicitly follow the key extracted sections.
Apply the pinned competitor-ad-intelligence source to [task]. Pay particular attention to these source sections: “Phase 0: Intake”, “Phase 1: Scrape Meta Ads”, “Phase 2: Scrape Google Ads”, “Phase 3: Analyze Creative Patterns”, “Phase 4: Landing Page & Funnel Analysis”. Preserve the important decision at each step. Mark facts not covered by the source as “needs confirmation” instead of inventing them. Then verify the result against my acceptance criteria: [criteria].
Result-review prompt
Check omissions, permissions, and source drift before delivery.
Review the current competitor-ad-intelligence result: (1) does it satisfy the original task; (2) were any applicable steps or limits in the pinned SKILL.md missed; (3) did it perform any unauthorized file, command, network, or data action; and (4) which conclusions remain unverified? List issues first, then fix only what the source or user authorization supports.
Output checklist
The task matches the purpose documented in the SKILL.md.
The source section “Phase 0: Intake” has been checked.
The source section “Phase 1: Scrape Meta Ads” has been checked.
The source section “Phase 2: Scrape Google Ads” has been checked.
The source section “Phase 3: Analyze Creative Patterns” has been checked.
Inputs, constraints, and acceptance criteria are explicit.
Unverified facts, compatibility, and outcome claims are clearly marked.
Any file, command, network, or data action has been reviewed.
Choose a different workflow
Backlink + distribution checklist that expands a site's KD ceiling beyond what on-page work alone can earn. Use when the user mentions 'backlinks', 'off-page SEO', 'directory submissions', 'guest posts', 'outreach targets', 'link building', 'submit to directories', 'get listed in listicles', 'Product Hunt launch backlinks', or asks 'how do I get more domain authority'. Generates a prioritized, researched target list across directories, listicles, and guest-post candidates — does NOT submit anyth
A separate implementation from MoizIbnYousaf/marketing-cli; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detailBuild an organic-traffic operating system for any site or app: a multi-phase, resumable engine that ships programmatic landing pages (alternatives, comparisons, use-cases, playbooks) on top of real keyword research. Use when the user says 'SEO machine', 'build organic traffic', 'rank on Google', 'we need traffic', 'alternatives pages', 'comparison pages', '/for/ pages', 'programmatic SEO', or 'build an SEO engine'. Distinct from `seo-audit` (one-off diagnostic) and `seo-content` (single-article
A separate implementation from MoizIbnYousaf/marketing-cli; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detailCreates high-converting 'X vs Y' and 'X alternatives' SEO pages that capture comparison search traffic. Researches competitors, writes honest comparison content, and adds schema markup (FAQPage, ItemList). Use when someone needs alternatives pages, comparison content, or says 'alternatives page', 'vs page', 'comparison', 'competitor alternatives', 'X vs Y page', or wants to capture competitor brand search traffic with SEO content. Also trigger when someone wants to rank for competitor brand name
A separate implementation from MoizIbnYousaf/marketing-cli; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detailFAQ
Scrape competitor ads from Meta and Google, analyze creative patterns, reverse-engineer landing page funnels, and produce a full strategic teardown — hooks, formats, positioning bets, vulnerabilities, and counter-plays.
The catalog detected this source-specific install command: npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill "skills/competitor-ad-intelligence". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
No dedicated Agent platform is declared in the pinned source record.
Quality breakdown
Based on traceable docs and repository signals; stars are not treated as quality.
Compare before choosing
These links are selected from shared tasks, functions, stacks, platforms, and same-name variants. Compare the source owner, documentation, permissions, and maintenance signals.
Backlink + distribution checklist that expands a site's KD ceiling beyond what on-page work alone can earn. Use when the user mentions 'backlinks', 'off-page SEO', 'directory submissions', 'guest posts', 'outreach targets', 'link building', 'submit to directories', 'get listed in listicles', 'Product Hunt launch backlinks', or asks 'how do I get more domain authority'. Generates a prioritized, researched target list across directories, listicles, and guest-post candidates — does NOT submit anyth
Build an organic-traffic operating system for any site or app: a multi-phase, resumable engine that ships programmatic landing pages (alternatives, comparisons, use-cases, playbooks) on top of real keyword research. Use when the user says 'SEO machine', 'build organic traffic', 'rank on Google', 'we need traffic', 'alternatives pages', 'comparison pages', '/for/ pages', 'programmatic SEO', or 'build an SEO engine'. Distinct from `seo-audit` (one-off diagnostic) and `seo-content` (single-article
Creates high-converting 'X vs Y' and 'X alternatives' SEO pages that capture comparison search traffic. Researches competitors, writes honest comparison content, and adds schema markup (FAQPage, ItemList). Use when someone needs alternatives pages, comparison content, or says 'alternatives page', 'vs page', 'comparison', 'competitor alternatives', 'X vs Y page', or wants to capture competitor brand search traffic with SEO content. Also trigger when someone wants to rank for competitor brand name
Strategic keyword research powered by web search and brand context. Use this skill whenever the user mentions keywords, keyword research, SEO topics, content topics, 'what should I write about', content strategy, blog ideas, search traffic, or content planning. Also trigger when the user wants to plan what content to create, when existing content isn't attracting search traffic, when any skill needs keyword-plan.md but it doesn't exist, or when the user asks about SEO in the context of content c
When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues, plan site architecture, or implement schema markup. Use when someone says 'SEO audit', 'technical SEO', 'site architecture', 'schema markup', 'internal linking', 'why isn't my site ranking', 'site health check', 'crawl issues', 'fix my SEO', 'my traffic dropped', 'rankings fell', or 'site not ranking'. Also trigger when someone wants to plan URL structure, design navigation, add structured data, or review any website for search perfor
Scrape competitor ads from Meta and Google, analyze creative patterns, reverse-engineer landing page funnels, and produce a full strategic teardown — hooks, formats, positioning bets, vulnerabilities, and counter-plays.
Core principle: A competitor's ad portfolio is a window into their growth strategy. Long-running ads reveal what converts. New ads reveal what they're testing. Landing pages reveal their positioning bets. The best ad creative teams start with evidence from what's already working, then differentiate.
Gather from the user:
apollo.io, clay.run)For each competitor domain, scrape ads from Meta Ad Library.
Use web_search to find competitor ads in the Meta Ad Library (publicly accessible, no API key needed):
web_search: site:facebook.com/ads/library "[competitor_name]"
web_search: "[competitor_name]" Meta Ad Library active ads
web_search: "[competitor_name]" facebook ads examples
You can also visit the Meta Ad Library directly: https://www.facebook.com/ads/library/?active_status=active&ad_type=all&country=US&q=<competitor_name>
Use fetch_webpage on the Ad Library URL to extract ad details if your agent supports it.
Note: Apify actors for Meta Ad Library scraping exist but are unreliable as of April 2026 due to Meta's anti-scraping measures. Use
web_searchas the primary method.
Collect per ad:
For each competitor domain, scrape ads from Google Ads Transparency Center.
Use web_search to find competitor ads in Google Ads Transparency Center (publicly accessible):
web_search: site:adstransparency.google.com "[competitor_name]"
web_search: "[competitor_name]" Google Ads transparency
web_search: "[competitor_name]" google search ads examples
You can also visit directly: https://adstransparency.google.com/?search_text=<competitor_name>
Use fetch_webpage on the Transparency Center URL to extract ad details if your agent supports it.
Collect per ad:
After collecting all ads, perform structured analysis.
Group all ad headlines/openers by hook type:
| Hook Type | Pattern | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Fear/Loss | Risk of missing out or falling behind | "Your competitors are already using AI SDRs" |
| Outcome | Direct result promise | "10x your pipeline in 30 days" |
| Question | Challenges current assumption | "Still doing outbound manually?" |
| Social proof | Names customers or numbers | "Join 500+ B2B teams using [product]" |
| Contrarian | Challenges conventional wisdom | "Cold email isn't dead. Your copy is." |
| Empathy | Validates their pain | "We know SDR ramp time is brutal" |
| Product-led | Feature as hook | "[Feature] is live — see what's new" |
Count how many ads per competitor use each hook type. This reveals their primary messaging strategy.
| Format | Meta | |
|---|---|---|
| Static image | [N] | N/A |
| Video | [N] | [N] |
| Carousel | [N] | N/A |
| Search text | N/A | [N] |
| Display banner | N/A | [N] |
List all unique CTAs found. Common patterns:
For each unique landing page URL found in ads, fetch and analyze:
fetch_webpage: [landing_page_url]
Or use curl if fetch_webpage is unavailable.
Extract per landing page:
Group all ads into logical campaigns by:
For each campaign cluster:
| Dimension | Analysis |
|---|---|
| Strategic intent | What is this campaign trying to achieve? (Awareness / Lead gen / Free trial / Competitive displacement) |
| Target persona | Who is this ad speaking to? (Role, pain, stage) |
| Positioning bet | What market position are they claiming? |
| Hook strategy | Fear / Outcome / Social proof / Contrarian / Product-led |
| Conversion path | Ad → LP → CTA → [Demo call / Free trial / Content download] |
| Longevity signal | How long has this been running? (Longer = likely working) |
| A/B tests detected | Multiple creatives to same LP = active testing |
Based on ad volume and platform distribution, estimate where they're concentrating spend:
| Platform | Ad Count | % of Total | Estimated Focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Meta (Facebook) | [N] | [X%] | [Awareness / Retargeting] |
| Meta (Instagram) | [N] | [X%] | [Visual / younger audience] |
| Google Search | [N] | [X%] | [Bottom-funnel capture] |
| Google Display | [N] | [X%] | [Awareness / retargeting] |
| YouTube | [N] | [X%] | [Education / awareness] |
Identify across all competitors:
Identify weaknesses in each competitor's ad strategy:
| Vulnerability Type | Description |
|---|---|
| Message-LP mismatch | Ad promises one thing, LP delivers another |
| Single-persona dependency | All ads target the same persona — missing segments |
| Platform concentration | Heavy on one platform, absent from others |
| No social proof | Ads or LPs lack credibility markers |
| Weak CTA | Asking for too much too soon (demo before value) |
| Generic positioning | Claims anyone could make — not differentiated |
| Stale creative | Same ads running unchanged for months — fatigue risk |
If Web Archive data exists for their landing pages:
# Competitor Ad Intelligence Report — [DATE]
## Coverage
- Competitors analyzed: [list]
- Meta ads collected: [N]
- Google ads collected: [N]
- Unique landing pages analyzed: [N]
- Estimated active campaigns: [N]
---
## Executive Summary
[3-5 sentence summary: What is the competitive ad landscape? What's working? Where are the gaps and vulnerabilities?]
---
## Meta Ad Analysis
### Hook Distribution
| Hook Type | [Comp1] | [Comp2] | [Comp3] |
|-----------|---------|---------|---------|
| Fear/Loss | 40% | 10% | 0% |
| Outcome | 30% | 50% | 60% |
...
### Top Performing Ads (Longest Running)
**[Competitor] — [Ad Title/Hook]**
> [Ad copy excerpt]
- Format: [type]
- CTA: [text]
- Running since: [date]
- Why it likely works: [analysis]
---
## Google Ad Analysis
### Headline Patterns
[Top headline structures with examples]
### Most Common CTAs
[ranked list]
---
## Campaign Breakdown
### Campaign 1: [Inferred Campaign Name]
- **Competitor:** [name]
- **Ads in cluster:** [N]
- **Platform(s):** [Meta / Google / Both]
- **Strategic intent:** [Awareness / Lead gen / Competitive displacement / etc.]
- **Target persona:** [Description]
- **Hook strategy:** [Type]
- **Landing page:** [URL]
- Hero: "[Headline text]"
- CTA: "[Button text]"
- Message match: [Score/10]
- **Longevity:** [First seen date → status]
- **A/B tests detected:** [Yes/No — what they're testing]
**Sample ad:**
> **Headline:** [text]
> **Body:** [text]
> **CTA:** [button]
> **Format:** [Image/Video/Carousel]
**Assessment:** [1-2 sentences — is this working? Why/why not?]
### Campaign 2: ...
---
## Funnel Map
[Ad: Hook/Angle] → [LP: /landing-page-url] → [CTA: Book Demo] ↓ [Ad: Different angle] → [LP: /same-or-different] → [CTA: Free Trial]
---
## Budget Allocation Estimate
| Platform | Share | Focus Area |
|----------|-------|-----------|
| [Platform] | [X%] | [Intent] |
---
## Creative Gap Analysis
### Angles Nobody Is Running
1. [Angle] — Why it could work for you: [reasoning]
2. [Angle] — ...
### Overcrowded Angles (Avoid or Differentiate)
- [Angle] — [N] of [N] competitors use this
### Format White Space
- [Format] is not being used by competitors on [platform]
---
## Vulnerability Report
### 1. [Vulnerability]
**Competitor:** [name]
**Evidence:** [What we observed]
**Your opportunity:** [How to exploit this gap]
### 2. ...
---
## Recommended Counter-Plays
### Counter-Play 1: [Name]
- **Target their weakness:** [Which vulnerability]
- **Your ad angle:** [Hook]
- **Platform:** [Where to run]
- **Proposed headline:** "[headline]"
- **Proposed body:** "[copy]"
- **LP strategy:** [What your landing page should emphasize]
- **Why test this:** [rationale]
### Counter-Play 2: ...
| Component | Cost |
|---|---|
| Ad library research (web_search) | Free |
| Landing page fetching | Free |
| Web Archive lookup (deep mode) | Free |
| Analysis | Free (LLM reasoning) |
| Total | Free |
web_search — query Meta Ad Library and Google Ads Transparency Centerfetch_webpage or curl — fetch and analyze landing pages