Best for
- Use when writing tests, reviewing test quality, or establishing testing standards.
majiayu000/spellbook/skills/comprehensive-testing/SKILL.md
Complete testing strategy covering TDD workflow, test pyramid, unit/integration/E2E/property testing, framework best practices (Jest, Vitest, pytest), mock strategies, and CI integration. Use when writing tests, reviewing test quality, or establishing testing standards.
Decision brief
Based on Anthropic's Claude Code Best Practices and community patterns
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/majiayu000/spellbook --skill "skills/comprehensive-testing"Inspect the Agent Skill "comprehensive-testing" from https://github.com/majiayu000/spellbook/blob/01c5d88b0139a80ac38bfe7206ea99f28b0fc999/skills/comprehensive-testing/SKILL.md at commit 01c5d88b0139a80ac38bfe7206ea99f28b0fc999. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
Review the “TDD Workflow (Anthropic Recommended)” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Review the “The 6-Step Process” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Review the “Step 1: Write Tests First” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Review the “Step 2: Verify Tests Fail” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Review the “Step 3: Commit Test Suite” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Permission review
The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.
npm test # or pytest, go test, etc.The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.
git add tests/Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 98/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 249 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Based on Anthropic's Claude Code Best Practices and community patterns
"Claude performs best when it has a clear target to iterate against—a test case provides concrete success criteria."
Testing is not about proving code works; it's about designing code that is testable and documenting expected behavior.
/\
/ \ E2E Tests (10%)
/----\ - Full user flows
/ \ - Slowest, most brittle
/--------\
/ \ Integration Tests (20%)
/------------\ - Component interaction
/ \ - Real dependencies
/----------------\
Unit Tests (70%)
- Single function/method
- Fast, isolated, many
| Level | Speed | Scope | When to Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unit | <10ms | Single function | All logic |
| Integration | <1s | Multiple components | APIs, DB |
| E2E | <30s | Full flow | Critical paths |
1. WRITE TESTS FIRST
↓
2. VERIFY TESTS FAIL
↓
3. COMMIT TEST SUITE
↓
4. IMPLEMENT CODE
↓
5. VERIFY WITH SUBAGENT
↓
6. COMMIT IMPLEMENTATION
Be EXPLICIT about TDD to avoid mock implementations:
"I want to implement [feature] using TDD.
First, write tests for [expected behavior] with these input/output pairs:
- Input: X → Expected: Y
- Input: A → Expected: B
Do NOT create any implementation yet."
# Run tests and confirm they fail for the RIGHT reason
npm test # or pytest, go test, etc.
# Expected: "function not found" or "undefined"
# NOT: syntax error, wrong import
git add tests/
git commit -m "test: Add tests for [feature] (RED phase)"
"Now implement the code to make these tests pass.
Do NOT modify the tests.
Run tests after each change until all pass."
Claude will enter an autonomous loop:
Write code → Run tests → Analyze failures → Adjust → Repeat
"Use a subagent to independently verify the implementation:
- Is it overfitting to tests?
- Are edge cases handled?
- Is the code maintainable?"
git add src/
git commit -m "feat: Implement [feature] (GREEN phase)"
describe('UserService', () => {
it('should create user with valid email', async () => {
// Arrange - Setup test data and dependencies
const userRepo = new InMemoryUserRepository();
const service = new UserService(userRepo);
const input = { email: '[email protected]', name: 'Test' };
// Act - Execute the code under test
const user = await service.create(input);
// Assert - Verify the results
expect(user.email).toBe('[email protected]');
expect(user.id).toBeDefined();
expect(await userRepo.findById(user.id)).toEqual(user);
});
});
def test_order_total_with_discount():
"""
Given an order with items totaling $100
When a 20% discount is applied
Then the total should be $80
"""
# Given
order = Order()
order.add_item(Item(price=50))
order.add_item(Item(price=50))
# When
order.apply_discount(Percentage(20))
# Then
assert order.total == Money(80)
// Structure
describe('ModuleName', () => {
describe('methodName', () => {
it('should [expected behavior] when [condition]', () => {});
});
});
// Setup/Teardown
beforeAll(async () => { /* one-time setup */ });
beforeEach(() => { /* per-test setup */ });
afterEach(() => { /* per-test cleanup */ });
afterAll(async () => { /* one-time cleanup */ });
// Async testing
it('handles async operations', async () => {
const result = await asyncFunction();
expect(result).toBe(expected);
});
// Error testing
it('throws on invalid input', () => {
expect(() => validate(null)).toThrow('Input required');
});
// Snapshot testing (use sparingly)
it('renders correctly', () => {
const tree = renderer.create(<Component />).toJSON();
expect(tree).toMatchSnapshot();
});
// Table-driven tests
it.each([
[1, 1, 2],
[2, 2, 4],
[0, 0, 0],
])('add(%i, %i) = %i', (a, b, expected) => {
expect(add(a, b)).toBe(expected);
});
vitest.config.ts:
export default defineConfig({
test: {
globals: true,
environment: 'node',
coverage: {
provider: 'v8',
reporter: ['text', 'json', 'html'],
thresholds: {
lines: 80,
branches: 70,
functions: 80,
},
},
},
});
import pytest
from mymodule import Calculator
# Fixtures for dependency injection
@pytest.fixture
def calculator():
return Calculator()
@pytest.fixture
def database():
db = TestDatabase()
yield db
db.cleanup()
# Parametrized tests
@pytest.mark.parametrize("a,b,expected", [
(1, 1, 2),
(2, 2, 4),
(0, 0, 0),
(-1, 1, 0),
])
def test_add(calculator, a, b, expected):
assert calculator.add(a, b) == expected
# Exception testing
def test_divide_by_zero(calculator):
with pytest.raises(ZeroDivisionError):
calculator.divide(1, 0)
# Async testing
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_async_operation():
result = await async_function()
assert result == expected
# Markers for categorization
@pytest.mark.slow
@pytest.mark.integration
def test_database_connection(database):
assert database.is_connected()
conftest.py:
import pytest
@pytest.fixture(scope="session")
def database_url():
return "postgresql://test:test@localhost/test"
@pytest.fixture(autouse=True)
def reset_database(database):
yield
database.rollback()
pytest.ini:
[pytest]
testpaths = tests
python_files = test_*.py
python_functions = test_*
addopts = -v --cov=src --cov-report=term-missing
markers =
slow: marks tests as slow
integration: marks tests as integration tests
package mypackage
import (
"testing"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert"
"github.com/stretchr/testify/require"
)
func TestAdd(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
name string
a, b int
expected int
}{
{"positive numbers", 1, 2, 3},
{"zero values", 0, 0, 0},
{"negative numbers", -1, -2, -3},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
result := Add(tt.a, tt.b)
assert.Equal(t, tt.expected, result)
})
}
}
// Table-driven with subtests
func TestUserService_Create(t *testing.T) {
t.Run("creates user with valid input", func(t *testing.T) {
repo := NewInMemoryRepo()
svc := NewUserService(repo)
user, err := svc.Create(CreateUserInput{Email: "[email protected]"})
require.NoError(t, err)
assert.NotEmpty(t, user.ID)
assert.Equal(t, "[email protected]", user.Email)
})
t.Run("returns error for invalid email", func(t *testing.T) {
repo := NewInMemoryRepo()
svc := NewUserService(repo)
_, err := svc.Create(CreateUserInput{Email: "invalid"})
require.Error(t, err)
assert.Contains(t, err.Error(), "invalid email")
})
}
| Scenario | Mock? | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| External APIs | ✅ Yes | Slow, unreliable, costs money |
| Time/Date | ✅ Yes | Non-deterministic |
| Random | ✅ Yes | Non-deterministic |
| Database (unit) | ✅ Yes | Slow, complex setup |
| Database (integration) | ❌ No | Test real behavior |
| Your own code | ⚠️ Rarely | Prefer real implementations |
| File system | ⚠️ Depends | Use temp dirs when possible |
// Jest - Mock module
jest.mock('./emailService', () => ({
sendEmail: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({ success: true }),
}));
// Jest - Mock function
const mockCallback = jest.fn();
mockCallback.mockReturnValue(42);
// Vitest - Spy
import { vi } from 'vitest';
const spy = vi.spyOn(console, 'log');
// Time mocking
beforeEach(() => {
vi.useFakeTimers();
vi.setSystemTime(new Date('2024-01-01'));
});
afterEach(() => {
vi.useRealTimers();
});
# pytest - Mock with unittest.mock
from unittest.mock import Mock, patch, MagicMock
@patch('mymodule.external_api.fetch')
def test_with_mocked_api(mock_fetch):
mock_fetch.return_value = {'data': 'mocked'}
result = my_function()
assert result == expected
mock_fetch.assert_called_once_with('expected_arg')
# Fixture-based mock
@pytest.fixture
def mock_email_service():
service = Mock()
service.send.return_value = True
return service
// ❌ Heavy mocking
const mockRepo = {
findById: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue({ id: '1', name: 'Test' }),
save: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
delete: jest.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
};
// ✅ In-memory implementation (test double)
class InMemoryUserRepository implements UserRepository {
private users: Map<string, User> = new Map();
async findById(id: string): Promise<User | null> {
return this.users.get(id) || null;
}
async save(user: User): Promise<User> {
this.users.set(user.id, user);
return user;
}
async delete(id: string): Promise<void> {
this.users.delete(id);
}
}
Detailed material starting at ## Boundary Testing has been moved to reference/extended.md to keep this skill concise. Load that reference when the task requires the moved examples, command catalogs, checklists, platform details, or implementation templates.
Alternatives
dotnet/skills
Analyzes test suites in any language and tags each test with standardized traits (positive, negative, critical-path, boundary, smoke, regression, integration, performance, security). Use when the user wants to categorize, audit, or label tests with traits. Works across .NET (MSTest/xUnit/NUnit/TUnit), Python (pytest), TS/JS (Jest/Vitest), Java, Go, Ruby, Rust, Swift, Kotlin, PowerShell, and C++ — auto-editing when the framework has canonical tag syntax, otherwise report-only. Do not use for writ
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills
Build, inspect, test, and analyze bounded process-based discrete-event simulations with SimPy, including events, resources, interrupts, monitoring, replications, warm-up, and reproducible output analysis.
dotnet/skills
MANDATORY for static requests to find, identify, or list untested source files or modules, sources without tests, source-to-test pairing, test-gap worklists, or suggested test locations. Invoke even for a tiny package; do not substitute manual globbing. Uses Roslyn for C#/.NET and tree-sitter for Python, TS/JS, Go, Java, Rust, and Ruby. DO NOT USE FOR: line/branch coverage, CRAP risk, or grading existing tests.
dotnet/skills
Grades a specified set of test methods individually and produces a concise table mapping each test (fully-qualified name) to a letter grade (A–F), a score band, and a one-line note — designed to be posted as a PR comment. Use when the caller wants per-test feedback on a curated list of methods (for example, the new or modified tests in a pull request), not a suite-wide audit. Polyglot: .NET, Python, TS/JS, Java, Go, Ruby, Rust, Swift, Kotlin, PowerShell, C++. Input is a list of test methods (or