Source profileQuality 92/100Review permissions

laurigates/claude-plugins/configure-plugin/skills/configure-all/SKILL.md

configure-all

Run all infrastructure standards checks and fixes. Use when onboarding a new project, doing a full compliance audit, or batch-fixing with --fix.

Source repository stars
54
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
1
Last source update
2026-08-28
Source checked
2026-08-28

Decision brief

What it does: where it fits

Run all infrastructure standards compliance checks.

Best for

  • Use when onboarding a new project, doing a full compliance audit, or batch-fixing with --fix.

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/laurigates/claude-plugins --skill "configure-plugin/skills/configure-all"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "configure-all" from https://github.com/laurigates/claude-plugins/blob/c056e44b978db58648ad20440dc1515cb09af09d/configure-plugin/skills/configure-all/SKILL.md at commit c056e44b978db58648ad20440dc1515cb09af09d. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Step 1: Detect project type

    1. Read .project-standards.yaml if it exists 2. Auto-detect project type from file indicators: - infrastructure: Has terraform/, helm/, argocd/, or .tf files - frontend: Has package.json with vue/react dependencies - python: Has pyproject.toml or requirements.txt 3. Apply --type…

    Read .project-standards.yaml if it existsAuto-detect project type from file indicators:infrastructure: Has terraform/, helm/, argocd/, or .tf files
  2. 02

    Step 2: List components from the manifest

    The component roster lives in components.yaml — the single source of truth. Never hand-maintain a component list here; run the lister:

    The component roster lives in components.yaml — the single source of truth. Never hand-maintain a component list here; run the lister:Each COMPONENT= DOMAIN= HASSCRIPT= TYPES= line is one component skill. If the lister reports STATUS=ERROR, stop and surface the ISSUES: block — the manifest and the skills on disk have drifted.
  3. 03

    Step 3: Run all checks

    For each listed component whose TYPES includes the detected project type (TYPES=all always applies), invoke it in check-only mode using the SlashCommand tool — e.g. COMPONENT=configure-tests runs:

    For each listed component whose TYPES includes the detected project type (TYPES=all always applies), invoke it in check-only mode using the SlashCommand tool — e.g. COMPONENT=configure-tests runs:Skip components whose TYPES excludes the detected project type, and report them as SKIP. For finer applicability judgment (e.g. Skaffold only when a k8s/ dir exists), see REFERENCE.md.Collect results from each check.
  4. 04

    Step 3b: Heavy path — parallel check fan-out (optional)

    Step 3 is a sequential pass and stays the default. When the applicable set is large, the same work can be split across one read-only check agent per roster row using the bundled harness — see Workflow harness (template) below and workflows/configure-all-check.workflow.js.

    Agent in allowed-tools — without it the skill cannot dispatch at all.SlashCommand in each check agent's own toolset — without it the agentStep 3 is a sequential pass and stays the default. When the applicable set is large, the same work can be split across one read-only check agent per roster row using the bundled harness — see Workflow harness (template)…
  5. 05

    Step 4: Generate compliance report

    Print a summary table with each component's status (PASS/WARN/FAIL), overall counts, and a list of issues to fix. For report format template, see REFERENCE.md.

    Print a summary table with each component's status (PASS/WARN/FAIL), overall counts, and a list of issues to fix. For report format template, see REFERENCE.md.

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

Runs scripts

medium · line 51

The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.

bash "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/list-components.sh"

Runs scripts

medium · line 115

The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.

Run each failing configure command with `--fix`

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score92/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars54SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
laurigates/claude-plugins
Skill path
configure-plugin/skills/configure-all/SKILL.md
Commit
c056e44b978db58648ad20440dc1515cb09af09d
License
MIT
Collected
2026-08-28
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

/configure:all

Run all infrastructure standards compliance checks.

When to Use This Skill

Use this skill when...Use another approach when...
Performing comprehensive infrastructure auditChecking single component (use specific /configure:X skill)
Setting up new project with all standardsProject already has all standards configured
CI/CD compliance validationNeed detailed status only (use /configure:status)
Running initial configurationInteractive component selection needed (use /configure:select)
Batch-fixing all compliance issues with --fixManual review of each component preferred

Context

  • Project standards: !find . -maxdepth 1 -name \'.project-standards.yaml\'
  • Project type indicators: !find . -maxdepth 1 \( -name 'package.json' -o -name 'pyproject.toml' -o -name 'Cargo.toml' -o -name '*.tf' \)
  • Infrastructure dirs: !find . -maxdepth 1 -type d \( -name 'terraform' -o -name 'helm' -o -name 'argocd' \)
  • Current standards version: !find . -maxdepth 1 -name '.project-standards.yaml' -exec grep -m1 "^standards_version:" {} +

Parameters

Parse from command arguments:

  • --check-only: Report status without offering fixes (CI/CD mode)
  • --fix: Apply all fixes automatically without prompting
  • --type <type>: Override auto-detected project type (frontend, infrastructure, python)

Execution

Execute this comprehensive infrastructure standards compliance check:

Step 1: Detect project type

  1. Read .project-standards.yaml if it exists
  2. Auto-detect project type from file indicators:
    • infrastructure: Has terraform/, helm/, argocd/, or *.tf files
    • frontend: Has package.json with vue/react dependencies
    • python: Has pyproject.toml or requirements.txt
  3. Apply --type override if provided
  4. Report detected vs tracked type if different

Step 2: List components from the manifest

The component roster lives in components.yaml — the single source of truth. Never hand-maintain a component list here; run the lister:

bash "${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/list-components.sh"

Each COMPONENT=<name> DOMAIN=<domain> HAS_SCRIPT=<bool> TYPES=<types> line is one component skill. If the lister reports STATUS=ERROR, stop and surface the ISSUES: block — the manifest and the skills on disk have drifted.

Step 3: Run all checks

For each listed component whose TYPES includes the detected project type (TYPES=all always applies), invoke it in check-only mode using the SlashCommand tool — e.g. COMPONENT=configure-tests runs:

/configure:tests --check-only

Skip components whose TYPES excludes the detected project type, and report them as SKIP. For finer applicability judgment (e.g. Skaffold only when a k8s/ dir exists), see REFERENCE.md.

Collect results from each check.

Step 3b: Heavy path — parallel check fan-out (optional)

Step 3 is a sequential pass and stays the default. When the applicable set is large, the same work can be split across one read-only check agent per roster row using the bundled harness — see ## Workflow harness (template) below and workflows/configure-all-check.workflow.js.

Take this path only when all of the following hold:

ConditionWhy
15 or more applicable componentsBelow ~15, the sequential path is cheaper than 15 agent preambles. This floor is enforced in the harness, which aborts under it.
The run is a check, not a fix--fix never enters the workflow — see Step 5
The lister returned STATUS=OKAn empty or errored roster aborts the harness; there is no fan-out width to read

Two things the harness needs that this skill's frontmatter now grants:

  1. Agent in allowed-tools — without it the skill cannot dispatch at all.
  2. SlashCommand in each check agent's own toolset — without it the agent re-derives a component check from scratch instead of invoking /configure:<component> --check-only, which is the whole point.

The applicability filter is not delegated. types === 'all' || types.split(',').includes(projectType) is manifest data the lister already emits, so no agent decides it. Finer judgements the manifest cannot express (Skaffold only when a k8s/ dir exists — see REFERENCE.md) are resolved here, before dispatch, and passed in as ambiguous.

The synthesis stage is a barrier: the fix plan must see every component at once, because no single check agent can know that pre-commit and linting both write .pre-commit-config.yaml.

Step 4: Generate compliance report

Print a summary table with each component's status (PASS/WARN/FAIL), overall counts, and a list of issues to fix. For report format template, see REFERENCE.md.

Step 5: Apply fixes (if requested)

If --fix flag is set or user confirms:

  1. Run each failing configure command with --fix
  2. Report what was fixed and what requires manual intervention

--fix never runs inside the workflow. Several components mutate the same files; parallel fixers would race. Apply the fixPlan sequentially.

Step 6: Update standards tracking

Create or update .project-standards.yaml with the current standards version, project type, timestamp, and component versions. For template, see REFERENCE.md.

Agentic Optimizations

ContextCommand
Quick compliance check (all components)/configure:all --check-only
Auto-fix all issues/configure:all --fix
Check standards file validitytest -f .project-standards.yaml && cat .project-standards.yaml | head -10
List project type indicatorsfind . -maxdepth 1 \( -name 'package.json' -o -name 'pyproject.toml' -o -name 'Cargo.toml' \) -exec basename {} \;
Count missing componentsgrep -c "status: missing" compliance-report.txt 2>/dev/null

Flags

FlagDescription
--check-onlyReport status without offering fixes
--fixApply all fixes automatically
--type <type>Override project type (frontend, infrastructure, python)

Exit Codes (for CI)

CodeMeaning
0All checks passed
1Warnings found (non-blocking)
2Failures found (blocking)

A workflow returns a value, not a process status, so exitCode cannot come from the harness. When the Step 3b path is taken, this skill maps the returned report.overall onto the table above: PASS → 0, WARN → 1, FAIL → 2.

Workflow harness (template)

workflows/configure-all-check.workflow.js ships beside this skill. It is a TEMPLATE to adapt, not a script to run verbatim. Read it, then rewrite it for the work in front of you.

Adapt freely: the check and synthesis agent prompts, the wave width, the ambiguous handling, the schema's optional fields, and the shape of the fixPlan entries your project's remediation actually needs.

Preserve across any adaptation: (a) the loop bound comes from scripts/list-components.sh's COMPONENT= rows passed in as args.roster, never from a prose "for each component" — and the applicability filter stays the pure types === 'all' || types.split(',').includes(projectType) expression, so no agent classifies a manifest field; (b) CHECK_SCHEMA's closed PASS|WARN|FAIL|ERROR status enum, plus the files array that makes contention detectable, so a vague verdict is structurally impossible and a null return becomes an explicit ERROR row rather than a silent pass; (c) the Synthesize stage is a barrier — the fix plan must see every component at once, because contention over a shared file (pre-commit and linting both write .pre-commit-config.yaml) is invisible to any single check agent. Two consequences of (c) that are also non-negotiable: the checks are read-only, and --fix is applied outside the workflow, sequentially.

Skip the harness when: fewer than ~15 components are applicable, or the run is a single-component check, or the lister reported STATUS=ERROR — that is a linear pass and the harness is pure overhead. The steps above remain the authoritative description of what each stage must produce; the harness only fixes how the work is split.

This supersedes the former hardcoded four-teammate split (linting / security / testing / CI). That table partitioned a roster it did not read, so it drifted every time components.yaml changed; the harness derives its partition from the lister instead.

See Also

  • /configure:select - Interactively select which components to configure
  • /configure:status - Quick read-only status overview
  • components.yaml - The authoritative component roster (per-component /configure:X skills are listed there, not here)

Frequently asked questions

What to verify before installation and use

What does the configure-all source document cover?

Run all infrastructure standards compliance checks.

How do I install configure-all?

The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/laurigates/claude-plugins --skill "configure-plugin/skills/configure-all". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.

Which permission-related actions were detected?

Static rules flagged exec-script in the source; the page lists the matching lines and excerpts.

Alternatives

Compare before choosing

Computed 9836,049

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

dask

Distributed computing for larger-than-RAM pandas/NumPy workflows. Use when you need to scale existing pandas/NumPy code beyond memory or across clusters. Best for parallel file processing, distributed ML, integration with existing pandas code. For out-of-core analytics on single machine use vaex; for in-memory speed use polars.

Computed 9836,049

K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

neurokit2

Use NeuroKit2 to build or audit reproducible research workflows for physiological time-series preprocessing, event/interval analysis, multimodal alignment, variability, and complexity. Trigger when code imports neurokit2 or needs its current APIs, schemas, and method-aware validation—not for diagnosis or device validation.

Computed 966,897

trailofbits/skills

vector-forge

Mutation-driven test vector generation. Finds implementations of a cryptographic algorithm or protocol, runs mutation testing to identify escaped mutants, then generates new test vectors that deliberately exercise the uncovered code paths. Compares before/after mutation kill rates to prove vector effectiveness. Use when generating cryptographic test vectors, measuring Wycheproof coverage gaps, finding escaped mutants via mutation testing, creating cross-implementation test suites, or improving t

Computed 9695

travisjneuman/.claude

test-specialist

This skill should be used when writing test cases, fixing bugs, analyzing code for potential issues, or improving test coverage for JavaScript/TypeScript applications. Use this for unit tests, integration tests, end-to-end tests, debugging runtime errors, logic bugs, performance issues, security vulnerabilities, and systematic code analysis.