arbiterForge/codeArbiter/plugins/ca-pi/routines/context-creation/SKILL.md
context-creation
The brownfield back-fill. Routed to by /create-context, and by startup when .codearbiter/CONTEXT.md lacks the <!--INITIALIZED--> body marker but source code exists. Six gated phases — pre-flight, scout dispatch, synthesis, gap interview, write, lock. Reads the existing codebase through parallel scouts, drafts every surviving project-state doc, resolves gaps with the user, and locks the project as initialized.
- Source repository stars
- 138
- Declared platforms
- 0
- Static risk flags
- 2
- Last source update
- 2026-08-04
- Source checked
- 2026-08-04
Decision brief
What it does—and where it fits
Wrap an existing codebase in project state, without guessing. Routed to by /create-context, and by startup when .codearbiter/CONTEXT.md exists but carries no body marker and meaningful source code is present. When no meaningful source exists, this is the wrong skill — route to d…
Not for
- Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
- Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.
Compatibility matrix
Platform support, with evidence labels
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
Inspect first. Install second.
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/arbiterForge/codeArbiter --skill "plugins/ca-pi/routines/context-creation"Inspect the Agent Skill "context-creation" from https://github.com/arbiterForge/codeArbiter/blob/53c788cd82ddbb50c50d657775edf5a01f10dc9e/plugins/ca-pi/routines/context-creation/SKILL.md at commit 53c788cd82ddbb50c50d657775edf5a01f10dc9e. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
What the source asks the agent to do
- 01
Phase 1 — Pre-flight confirmation · gate: BLOCK
Confirm the repository is a brownfield codebase safe for scout-based extraction:
Confirm is absent from CONTEXT.md.Confirm meaningful source code is present beyond the excluded set.Identify the primary source directories (src/, backend/, frontend/, lib/, app/, or equivalent). - 02
Phase 2 — Scout dispatch · gate: BLOCK
A scout is a restricted, read-only role, not an unconstrained general-purpose agent. A scout reads one targeted slice of the codebase and returns a structured findings report — file paths, line numbers, and named values only, never raw code excerpts. Scouts are internal to this…
Scout A — Tech stack. Read package.json, lockfiles, pyproject.toml, requirements.txt, go.mod, Cargo.toml, .gemspec, Gemfile. Report languages, runtime versions, frameworks, key dependencies, the dependency manager, lice…Scout B — Infrastructure. Read CI/CD config (.github/workflows/, .gitlab-ci.yml, Jenkinsfile, .circleci/config.yml), Dockerfile, docker-compose.yml, Makefile, .tf, IaC. Report CI/CD platform, build/test/lint commands, d…Scout C — Architecture. Read the source tree (names and structure only), entry points (main.ts, index.ts, app.py, server.go), and imports in entry points only. Report component list, entry points, module boundaries, arc… - 03
Phase 3 — Synthesis · gate: BLOCK
Draft every surviving project-state doc from the six reports, working only from the reports. Map source to destination:
HIGH — directly and unambiguously in a report (e.g., "jest" in package.json). Write it as fact.MEDIUM — inferred from an indirect signal (directory layout implies layered architecture, no explicit config). Write it with a note: inferred from [signal], verify before relying on it.LOW — no signal, or conflicting signals. Write a [CONFIRM-NN] placeholder. - 04
Phase 4 — Gap interview · gate: BLOCK
Resolve [CONFIRM-NN] items with the user. Ask only what the scouts could not answer with HIGH confidence.
Present the [CONFIRM-NN] list grouped by category — gaps the scan could not resolve.Ask ONE targeted question per item. No compound questions. Do not re-ask anything scouts answered with HIGH confidence.Per answer: if it resolves the gap, replace the placeholder with content; if the user explicitly defers, keep the placeholder, mark it deferred with the date, and record it in open-questions.md; if the answer is vague,… - 05
Phase 5 — Project-state write · gate: BLOCK
Write the surviving docs to /.codearbiter/. Every doc carries actual content — no unresolved placeholder may remain where a value was determined:
Write ONE provenance file per derived doc to .codearbiter/.provenance/.json via provenancelib.writeprovenance and newrecord. Each entry carries: path (repo-relative), hash (the scout's git hash-object oid), drifttrigger…Synthesize .codearbiter/code-map.md (concern → path → ≤1-line role) from Scout C (architecture) evidence. Use concern headings ( ) and column-0 bullets (- \path\ — role). Keep it coarse — module/concern granularity only…Write the surviving docs to /.codearbiter/. Every doc carries actual content — no unresolved placeholder may remain where a value was determined:
Permission review
Static risk signals and limitations
Reads files
The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.
(`prefix` defaults to `v` unless Scout A found a different existing tag convention; `payload` is `.` for a single-package repository.) Zero, or more than one, candidate manifest or changelog is LOW confidence — the same "no signal, or conflReads files
The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.
| `open-tasks.md` | Create the file with its heading only. **Every task goes in through the board helper, one call per item — `python3 "<plugin-root>/hooks/taskwrite.py" add "<task>"` — never by writing entries into the file directly** (B-1Writes files
The documentation asks the agent to create, modify, or delete local files.
| `open-tasks.md` | Create the file with its heading only. **Every task goes in through the board helper, one call per item — `python3 "<plugin-root>/hooks/taskwrite.py" add "<task>"` — never by writing entries into the file directly** (B-1Writes files
The documentation asks the agent to create, modify, or delete local files.
Write the file, then:Evidence record
Why each signal appears
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 88/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 138 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Provenance and original SKILL.md
- Repository
- arbiterForge/codeArbiter
- Skill path
- plugins/ca-pi/routines/context-creation/SKILL.md
- Commit
- 53c788cd82ddbb50c50d657775edf5a01f10dc9e
- License
- AGPL-3.0
- Collected
- 2026-08-04
- Default branch
- main
View the original SKILL.md
context-creation
Wrap an existing codebase in project state, without guessing. Routed to by /create-context, and by startup when .codearbiter/CONTEXT.md exists but carries no <!--INITIALIZED--> body marker and meaningful source code is present. When no meaningful source exists, this is the wrong skill — route to decompose instead.
This back-fills from existing source. It complements /ca-init, which scaffolds an empty .codearbiter/ for a fresh project; here the docs are derived from what is already on disk.
Pre-flight
Read these, or STOP and surface the gap — never guess project identity or a command:
<project-root>/.codearbiter/CONTEXT.md— if it already carries<!--INITIALIZED-->, context exists. Stop and route to normal operation.- The repository root listing (one level deep) — the source surface this skill extracts from.
The excluded set (not "meaningful source"): .git/, .codearbiter/, .claude/, AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, README.md, LICENSE, .gitignore, .gitmodules, and standard tooling dotfiles (.editorconfig, .prettierrc, etc.). Meaningful source MUST exist beyond it.
Phase 1 — Pre-flight confirmation · gate: BLOCK
Confirm the repository is a brownfield codebase safe for scout-based extraction:
- Confirm
<!--INITIALIZED-->is absent fromCONTEXT.md. - Confirm meaningful source code is present beyond the excluded set.
- Identify the primary source directories (
src/,backend/,frontend/,lib/,app/, or equivalent).
State the finding to the user: existing source detected, beginning scout-based extraction.
Gate: <!--INITIALIZED--> absent AND meaningful source present. If the marker is present, stop and route to normal operation. If no meaningful source exists, stop and route to decompose. Neither condition met → do not proceed.
Phase 2 — Scout dispatch · gate: BLOCK
A scout is a restricted, read-only role, not an unconstrained
general-purpose agent. A scout reads one targeted slice of the codebase and
returns a structured findings report — file paths, line numbers, and named
values only, never raw code excerpts. Scouts are internal to this skill; they
are never invoked from a command.
Dispatch six isolated scout subagents simultaneously. If the active host
cannot provide isolated subagents, BLOCK context creation and report the host
capability gap. The general inline-role fallback does not apply here: this
skill's report-only synthesis contract depends on the orchestrator never
loading the scouts' raw source into its own context.
Each reads only its assigned slice:
- Scout A — Tech stack. Read
package.json, lockfiles,pyproject.toml,requirements.txt,go.mod,Cargo.toml,*.gemspec,Gemfile. Report languages, runtime versions, frameworks, key dependencies, the dependency manager, license fields. Additionally report, at the repository root only: which ofpackage.json/pyproject.toml/Cargo.toml/composer.jsoncarry a version field (candidate release manifests), which ofCHANGELOG.md/CHANGES.md/HISTORY.mdare present (candidate changelogs), and any existing tag naming convention visible in the repo (e.g. av*tag) — the inputs Phase 3/5 use to draft.codearbiter/release-targets.md. - Scout B — Infrastructure. Read CI/CD config (
.github/workflows/,.gitlab-ci.yml,Jenkinsfile,.circleci/config.yml),Dockerfile*,docker-compose*.yml,Makefile,*.tf, IaC. Report CI/CD platform, build/test/lint commands, deployment targets, environment names, containerization, IaC tool. - Scout C — Architecture. Read the source tree (names and structure only), entry points (
main.ts,index.ts,app.py,server.go), and imports in entry points only. Report component list, entry points, module boundaries, architectural pattern, public interfaces. - Scout D — Security posture. Read auth files (
auth*,middleware*,guard*,jwt*,session*,oauth*), crypto import lines, secret-loading sites (process.env,os.environ, vault/KMS call sites — paths and line numbers only, never values),.env.example(never.env). Report auth mechanism, crypto libraries, secret-loading patterns (paths + lines, no values), vault/KMS integration, hardcoded-secret risk files (paths only). - Scout E — Testing. Read test files and test config (
vitest.config.*,jest.config.*,pytest.ini, Makefile test flags), coverage config. Report test framework, runner command, coverage tool, coverage thresholds in config, naming convention, approximate test count by type, fixtures. - Scout F — Data model. Read migration files (
migrations/,drizzle/,alembic/,db/migrate/), schema definitions (schema.ts,*.prisma,*.sql,models/), ORM config, DB connection config (keys only, never credentials). Report database type, ORM/query builder, entity names, migration tool, approximate entity count, multi-tenancy patterns.
The orchestrator reads only the scout reports in later phases — never the raw source — to preserve working context. A scout that finds nothing returns an explicit "not found" report, never silence.
Content hashes: Scouts additionally emit a git hash-object <path> content oid per cited file in the hash field of their evidence entry. The scout already Read those files — no additional pass is needed, and no raw content is forwarded to the orchestrator.
Gate: all six scout reports returned. A missing report is a blocking gap — do not proceed with an incomplete picture. Re-dispatch a failing scout before Phase 3.
Phase 3 — Synthesis · gate: BLOCK
Draft every surviving project-state doc from the six reports, working only from the reports. Map source to destination:
| Scout source | Destination |
|---|---|
| A (tech stack), B (build/test/lint commands), E (test runner) | tech-stack.md |
| C (architecture), E (structure) | coding-standards.md |
| D (security) | security-controls.md (thin) |
| A (candidate manifest, candidate changelog, tag convention) | .codearbiter/release-targets.md |
| All scouts | CONTEXT.md (project identity, purpose, scope, NOT-building) |
Classify every finding by confidence:
- HIGH — directly and unambiguously in a report (e.g.,
"jest"inpackage.json). Write it as fact. - MEDIUM — inferred from an indirect signal (directory layout implies layered architecture, no explicit config). Write it with a note: inferred from [signal], verify before relying on it.
- LOW — no signal, or conflicting signals. Write a
[CONFIRM-NN]placeholder.
Every [CONFIRM-NN] carries: a sequential ID, one sentence on what is unknown, why it matters, and what would resolve it. IDs are sequential with open-questions.md.
.codearbiter/release-targets.md is HIGH-confidence only when Scout A found exactly one candidate manifest and exactly one candidate changelog at the repository root. Draft the row then, in the grammar <plugin-root>/hooks/_releaselib.py's module docstring declares — a single-target project needs only prefix, manifest, changelog, payload:
<!-- release-targets -->
[app]
prefix: v
manifest: package.json
changelog: CHANGELOG.md
payload: .
<!-- /release-targets -->
(prefix defaults to v unless Scout A found a different existing tag convention; payload is . for a single-package repository.) Zero, or more than one, candidate manifest or changelog is LOW confidence — the same "no signal, or conflicting signals" rule above — and gets a [CONFIRM-NN] instead of a guessed row; this doc is never scaffolded from an ambiguous scan, and the file is simply not written until the gap is resolved in Phase 4.
Gate: every surviving doc drafted; every low-confidence inference carries a [CONFIRM-NN]. No silent omission. A domain with no scout signal gets a doc with a [CONFIRM-NN] for the whole section — never an empty file.
Phase 4 — Gap interview · gate: BLOCK
Resolve [CONFIRM-NN] items with the user. Ask only what the scouts could not answer with HIGH confidence.
- Present the
[CONFIRM-NN]list grouped by category — gaps the scan could not resolve. - Ask ONE targeted question per item. No compound questions. Do not re-ask anything scouts answered with HIGH confidence.
- Per answer: if it resolves the gap, replace the placeholder with content; if the user explicitly defers, keep the placeholder, mark it deferred with the date, and record it in
open-questions.md; if the answer is vague, challenge it and demand a concrete answer before recording anything.
Gate: every [CONFIRM-NN] has exactly one outcome — resolved (replaced with content) or explicitly deferred (marked and recorded in open-questions.md). No item is silently dropped. Do not proceed with unacknowledged gaps.
Phase 5 — Project-state write · gate: BLOCK
Write the surviving docs to <project-root>/.codearbiter/. Every doc carries actual content — no unresolved placeholder may remain where a value was determined:
| File | Content |
|---|---|
CONTEXT.md | Project identity, purpose, scope, primary users, NOT-building. Frontmatter MUST include arbiter: enabled (the activation flag the SessionStart hook keys on) and stage: set to a single maturity number (default 1; the user may raise it if the project is further along). |
tech-stack.md | Languages, frameworks, test runner, lint command, build command, coverage command, issue-tracker command (e.g. gh issue create). |
coding-standards.md | Structural patterns, naming conventions, style rules. |
security-controls.md | Thin: auth mechanism, banned crypto primitives, secret-loading stance. Only what a security boundary actually requires. |
open-questions.md | Every deferred [CONFIRM-NN] in CONFIRM-NN: <description> form. |
open-tasks.md | Create the file with its heading only. Every task goes in through the board helper, one call per item — python3 "<plugin-root>/hooks/taskwrite.py" add "<task>" — never by writing entries into the file directly (B-18). The helper owns the board schema the SessionStart hook and the statusline parse, so a backlog seeded this way cannot drift from it; and once open-tasks.md is enrolled in the protected-state registry, a direct write is refused outright, which would leave a Write-tool instruction here unfollowable. If scouts found no backlog, the heading-only file stands as the stub. |
overrides.log | Empty append-only audit log, created so /override has a sink. |
release-targets.md | Conditional, unlike every other row above: written ONLY when Phase 3 drafted it at HIGH confidence (exactly one candidate manifest, exactly one candidate changelog) or Phase 4 resolved its [CONFIRM-NN] to a concrete row. Left unwritten otherwise — /release's own back-fill lane (or a later context-creation run, once the ambiguity resolves) is the sanctioned way to create it, never a guess made here. This file is marker-gated protected state; it needs the authoring marker below, unlike every other row in this table. |
Authoring marker — required for release-targets.md only. That path is enrolled in the protected-state registry as marker-gated (hook H-22), so a Write against it is refused unless a fresh authoring marker exists. This lane is a sanctioned author of it, so it mints one immediately before the write and removes it immediately after — the same one-pass shape /release's back-fill lane uses:
mkdir -p "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.codearbiter/.markers"
touch "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.codearbiter/.markers/release-targets-authoring"
Write the file, then:
rm -f "$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)/.codearbiter/.markers/release-targets-authoring"
Skip both commands entirely when this run is not writing release-targets.md — a marker minted for a write that never happens is a 30-minute window nothing needed. No other file in the table above is enrolled, so none of them take a marker.
If scouts found existing decision records (docs/decisions/, adr/), summarize them as entries under .codearbiter/decisions/ in the standard ADR format. If a record cannot be fully parsed, summarize what is known, flag the uncertainty, and note the source path for review.
Provenance and code-map (small addition, not a Phase 5 rebuild):
- Write ONE provenance file per derived doc to
.codearbiter/.provenance/<doc>.jsonvia_provenancelib.write_provenanceandnew_record. Each entry carries:path(repo-relative),hash(the scout'sgit hash-objectoid),drift_trigger(from_provenancelib.classify_source(path)), and theclaimsarray withlines,claim, andconfidencedrawn from the scout evidence. - Synthesize
.codearbiter/code-map.md(concern → path → ≤1-line role) from Scout C (architecture) evidence. Use concern headings (## <concern>) and column-0 bullets (- \path` — role`). Keep it coarse — module/concern granularity only, no full file listing.
Do NOT scaffold any cut doc — see <plugin-root>/includes/cut-docs.md for the canonical never-scaffold list. Maturity lives in the stage: frontmatter of CONTEXT.md, not a separate file.
Gate: every surviving doc written; CONTEXT.md frontmatter carries arbiter: enabled and stage:; no resolved value left as a placeholder. Deferred [CONFIRM-NN] items are acceptable only in open-questions.md.
Phase 6 — Initialization lock · gate: BLOCK
Lock the project state as initialized and return to normal orchestration:
- Write the
<!--INITIALIZED-->marker into the body ofCONTEXT.md. - List
.codearbiter/and display the populated tree. - Confirm each required file is present and non-empty:
CONTEXT.md(witharbiter: enabledfrontmatter and the<!--INITIALIZED-->body marker),tech-stack.md,coding-standards.md,security-controls.md,open-questions.md,open-tasks.md,overrides.log. - State the return to normal operation: extraction complete, project state initialized and locked,
/ca-featureavailable to begin work. Deferred questions live inopen-questions.md.
Gate: arbiter: enabled set and <!--INITIALIZED--> present in CONTEXT.md; every required file present and non-empty. Do not close this skill without confirming both markers are written.
Hard rules
- MUST NOT write
<!--INITIALIZED-->while any[CONFIRM-NN]is unaddressed — every gap must be resolved or explicitly deferred toopen-questions.mdfirst. - MUST NOT resolve a
[CONFIRM-NN]by guessing — surface the question to the user or defer it. - MUST NOT proceed past Phase 2 with fewer than six scout reports.
- MUST NOT run Phase 2 inline — isolated scout subagents are required for the report-only synthesis boundary.
- MUST NOT load raw source into the orchestrator context after Phase 1 — synthesize from scout reports only.
- MUST NOT record a scout finding that exposes a secret value — paths and line numbers only.
- MUST NOT scaffold a cut doc — see
<plugin-root>/includes/cut-docs.mdfor the canonical never-scaffold list. Maturity is thestage:frontmatter number inCONTEXT.md. - MUST NOT run when
CONTEXT.mdalready carries<!--INITIALIZED-->— stop and route to normal operation.
Alternatives
Compare before choosing
arbiterForge/codeArbiter
context-creation
The brownfield back-fill. Routed to by /create-context, and by startup when .codearbiter/CONTEXT.md lacks the <!--INITIALIZED--> body marker but source code exists. Six gated phases — pre-flight, scout dispatch, synthesis, gap interview, write, lock. Reads the existing codebase through parallel scouts, drafts every surviving project-state doc, resolves gaps with the user, and locks the project as initialized.
arbiterForge/codeArbiter
context-creation
The brownfield back-fill. Routed to by /create-context, and by startup when .codearbiter/CONTEXT.md lacks the <!--INITIALIZED--> body marker but source code exists. Six gated phases — pre-flight, scout dispatch, synthesis, gap interview, write, lock. Reads the existing codebase through parallel scouts, drafts every surviving project-state doc, resolves gaps with the user, and locks the project as initialized.
arbiterForge/codeArbiter
context-creation
The brownfield back-fill. Routed to by /create-context, and by startup when .codearbiter/CONTEXT.md lacks the <!--INITIALIZED--> body marker but source code exists. Six gated phases — pre-flight, scout dispatch, synthesis, gap interview, write, lock. Reads the existing codebase through parallel scouts, drafts every surviving project-state doc, resolves gaps with the user, and locks the project as initialized.
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
ab-testing
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program