github/awesome-copilot

copilot-pr-autopilot

Copilot left 14 review comments on your PR — half are nits. Hours of fix → reply → resolve → re-request, and each round lands MORE comments. This skill runs loop engineering: auto-triggers Copilot Code Review via GraphQL (no @copilot mention), triages every open thread (Copilot, humans, advanced-security) with a fix / decline / escalate rubric, dispatches parallel fix sub-agents that obey the repo build/test/lint conventions, commits per iteration, replies+resolves citing the pushed SHA, then re

89CollectingRuns scriptsWrites files
See how to use itView GitHub source
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill "skills/copilot-pr-autopilot"

Quick start

Start using it in three steps

Install it or open the source, trigger it with a clear task, then follow the source workflow.

1

Install the Skill

npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill "skills/copilot-pr-autopilot"
2

Describe the task

Use copilot-pr-autopilot to help me with: [describe your task]. Before you begin, tell me what input you need, the steps you will follow, and the expected output.

3

Follow the workflow

No structured workflow was detected; follow the original SKILL.md below.

Continue to the workflow

Direct answers

Answers to review before you install

What is copilot-pr-autopilot?

Copilot left 14 review comments on your PR — half are nits. Hours of fix → reply → resolve → re-request, and each round lands MORE comments.

Who should use copilot-pr-autopilot?

It is relevant to workflows involving Code review, Testing, Engineering, Design.

How do you install copilot-pr-autopilot?

SkillSignal detected this source-specific command: npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill "skills/copilot-pr-autopilot". Inspect the repository and command before running it.

Which Agent platforms does it support?

The upstream source does not declare a dedicated Agent platform.

What permissions or risks should you review?

Static analysis detected exec-script, write-files signals. Review the cited source lines before installing; these signals are not a security audit.

What are the current evidence limits?

This page combines upstream documentation with deterministic repository, quality, and static-risk signals. It is not described as a manual test or security review.

SkillSignal brief

Decide whether it fits your work first

Copilot left 14 review comments on your PR — half are nits. Hours of fix → reply → resolve → re-request, and each round lands MORE comments.

Useful in these contexts

Not yet included in a workflow collection

Core capabilities

Code reviewTestingEngineeringDesignOperations

Distilled from the source

Understand this Skill in one minute

About 9 min · 8 sections

When it is worth using

  1. The user asks to "request Copilot review" or "run a Copilot review loop"

  2. A PR is functionally complete and the user wants a final correctness pass

  3. A previous Copilot review on the PR has left open threads that need

Limits and cautions

  1. The PR is still under active design — wait until the structure is stable;

  2. The user wants human reviewer feedback, not Copilot's.

Repository stars
37,126
Repository forks
4,654
Quality
89/100
Source repository last pushed

Quality breakdown

Based on traceable docs and repository signals; stars are not treated as quality.

89/100
Documentation26/30
Specificity25/25
Maintenance18/20
Trust signals20/25

Compare before choosing

Related Agent Skills and source variants

These links are selected from shared tasks, functions, stacks, platforms, and same-name variants. Compare the source owner, documentation, permissions, and maintenance signals.

python-design-patterns by wshobson

Python design patterns including KISS, Separation of Concerns, Single Responsibility, and composition over inheritance. Use this skill when designing a new service or component from scratch and choosing how to layer responsibilities, when refactoring a God class or monolithic function that has grown too large, when deciding whether to add a new abstraction or live with duplication, when evaluating a pull request for structural issues like tight coupling or leaking internal types, when choosing b

metagraphed by JSONbored

Use when writing, validating, or preparing ANY contribution or pull request to the JSONbored/metagraphed repo — adding/enriching a subnet's public surfaces (the most common contribution), a code/schema change to the Worker API or build scripts, picking an issue, running the local gates, and formatting the commit + PR. metagraphed reviews PRs ONE-SHOT via the Gittensory Gate (the GitHub App that auto-merges/auto-closes) plus a strict CI suite; there is no review back-and-forth, so a PR must be co

git-workflow by affaan-m

Git workflow patterns including branching strategies, commit conventions, merge vs rebase, conflict resolution, and collaborative development best practices for teams of all sizes.

code-reviewer by jeffallan

Analyzes code diffs and files to identify bugs, security vulnerabilities (SQL injection, XSS, insecure deserialization), code smells, N+1 queries, naming issues, and architectural concerns, then produces a structured review report with prioritized, actionable feedback. Use when reviewing pull requests, conducting code quality audits, identifying refactoring opportunities, or checking for security issues. Invoke for PR reviews, code quality checks, refactoring suggestions, review code, code quali

dmux-workflows by affaan-m

Multi-agent orchestration using dmux (tmux pane manager for AI agents). Patterns for parallel agent workflows across Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and other harnesses. Use when running multiple agent sessions in parallel or coordinating multi-agent development workflows.

View original Skill.mdThis page is parsed directly from the repository SKILL.md without editorial rewriting. Collected: Jul 28, 2026 · about 9 min

Copilot PR Autopilot

Drive any GitHub pull request through repeated rounds of Copilot code review until the agent has done its job — every Copilot finding has a reply from the agent (fix-acknowledgement, decline-with-rationale, or explicit escalate-to-user hand-off). Remaining open threads, if any, are deliberate hand-offs to the human merge owner — they're not loop failures. Repository-agnostic — works on any repo that has Copilot Code Review enabled, run from a machine with gh CLI installed and authenticated (see Prerequisites).

When to Use This Skill

  • The user asks to "request Copilot review" or "run a Copilot review loop" on a PR.
  • A PR is functionally complete and the user wants a final correctness pass via repeated automated review rounds.
  • A previous Copilot review on the PR has left open threads that need triage, fixing, replying, and resolving.

When NOT to Use This Skill

  • The PR is still under active design — wait until the structure is stable; otherwise findings churn round-over-round.
  • The user wants human reviewer feedback, not Copilot's.

Prerequisites

  • gh CLI installed and authenticated against the target repository.
  • PowerShell on PATH — Windows PowerShell 5.1+ (powershell.exe) or PowerShell 7+ (pwsh). Both are tested.
  • Copilot Code Review is the primary use case (01-request-review.ps1 uses GraphQL requestReviewsByLogin to trigger Copilot). It is NOT a hard requirement — if 01-request-review.ps1 fails because Copilot isn't enabled on the repo / account, the agent can still drive existing review threads (human, advanced-security, etc.) to completion by running steps 3–8 once as a single iteration; just skip the trigger + wait. There is no auto-detect for "Copilot unavailable" — the agent makes that decision after the trigger fails (the script can't reliably tell "Copilot disabled" from "Copilot enabled but not yet triggered" from API state alone).

Permissions: who can run the full loop

The full multi-round autopilot (steps 1 → 9 → 1) needs Triage or Write permission on the target repo, because GitHub's only public API for adding the Copilot bot as a reviewer (requestReviewsByLogin) is gated on that permission. Verified against the public REST + GraphQL surface in this PR's commit history — there is no public-API path for bot reviewers without write permission.

You are…What works
Repo collaborator with Triage / WriteFull loop: 01 triggers Copilot, 02 waits, 0408 triage / fix / reply, loop back to 01. Hands-off.
External PR author (no write permission)01 will throw a clear actionable error. Use -SingleIteration mode: address all current findings in one pass, then either click the UI 🔄 next to Copilot, or push a substantive commit (the synchronize event auto-triggers Copilot on most repos). Then re-run 02 to verify.

In single-iteration mode the loop's convergence boolean is Converged: true iff OpenThreadsAwaitingReply == 0 (the agent's side is done). The maintainer-side re-trigger then drives any additional rounds.

Every script dot-sources scripts/_lib.ps1 which runs Assert-GhReady on load: if gh is missing OR gh auth status fails, the script halts before any work with a single actionable error message naming the install command and gh auth login. The agent should surface that message to the user verbatim and stop the loop — do not retry or work around it.

Step-by-Step Workflow

The loop: steps 1 → 2 → 3 → 4 → 5 → 6 → 7 → 8 → 9, then back to step 1 if Converged: false. Repeat the 1→9 round until step 9 returns Converged: true; only then run step 10 once and call task_complete. At every 10th round, the parent runs the round-cap recap gate before looping back — recap all prior rounds and stop if the loop has drifted out of the PR's original scope.

Each round runs steps 1–9; step 10 is a one-time cleanup after convergence. The parent agent coordinates; every sub-agent step runs in a fresh context with a bounded budget. Cross-cutting protocol (time-boxing, extension, single-iteration fallback): orchestration.md.

  1. Request review (parent) — see 01-request-review.md
  2. Wait for review (sub-agent, 20-min cap) — see 02-wait.md
  3. List + categorize open threads (sub-agent, 5 min) — see 03-list-threads.md
  4. Triage (sub-agent, 5 min per ≤5 threads) — see 04-triage.md
  5. Fix (sub-agents, parallel max 5, 5 min each) — see 05-fix.md
  6. Build + test per repo conventions (sub-agent, 10 min) — see 06-build-test.md
  7. Commit + push (parent) — see 07-commit-push.md
  8. Reply (always) + resolve (conditional) (sub-agent drafts, parent posts) — see 08-reply-resolve.md
  9. Convergence verify (sub-agent, 3 min) — see 09-convergence.md
    • Converged: false → loop back to step 1 for another round (re-trigger, wait, list, triage, fix, push, reply, re-check). Each round addresses Copilot's findings on the previous round's HEAD; the loop terminates as soon as Copilot has nothing new to say AND every open thread has a reply from the agent.
    • Converged: true → exit the loop, run step 10 once, call task_complete with the proof.
    • Every 10th round (10, 20, 30…) → run the round-cap recap gate before looping back. Recap ALL prior rounds against the PR's original scope and pick a verdict: CONTINUE, REVERT-AND-SHIP (drop drifted commits, ship the in-scope ones), or HAND-OFF (escalate to the user). This is the circuit breaker that stops a runaway bot-review loop.
  10. Cleanup outdated (parent, post-convergence, once) — see 10-cleanup.md

Convergence is computed by scripts/02-check-review-status.ps1 as a single Converged: true boolean. Do not call task_complete until it returns true; print the proof (HeadOid, LatestCopilotReview.commitOid, submittedAt) in the completion message.

Gotchas

The bundled scripts enforce the hard correctness invariants (trigger landing via copilot_work_started event id, Converged requiring HEAD-match + zero-awaiting + at-HEAD review, single-iteration fallback semantics, PR-state guard). Trust them — don't re-derive. The notes below cover decisions the scripts can't make for you:

  • Reply to every open thread; resolve only when the loop owns the disposition. For fix and decline threads, reply + resolve. For escalate-to-user threads, reply with the analysis but leave the thread OPEN (08-reply-and-resolve.ps1 -NoResolve) so the human merge owner can act on it. See 08-reply-resolve.md.
  • Copilot threads are loop-owned; human / advanced-security / other-bot threads default to escalate-to-user. Auto-resolving a human review thread can hide unaddressed concerns. See 04-triage.md for the rubric.
  • One focused commit per round, not one per PR. Bundling rounds destroys the audit trail of which finding drove which change and breaks git bisect. See 07-commit-push.md.
  • Build/test/lint with the repo's own commands (per its CONTRIBUTING / AGENTS / README / package.json / Makefile) before pushing a fix. Discovery procedure: 06-build-test.md.
  • Push back with written rationale when a Copilot finding would over-engineer the design for a hypothetical edge case. Auto-accepting every suggestion erodes the design — see the decline path in 04-triage.md.
  • Scripting traps (gh api graphql -F type-coercion, git stash push -m positional parsing, the three GraphQL traps for the reviewer mutation) are documented in references/api-quirks.md. Read before modifying any script.

Troubleshooting

IssueSolution
Script throws prerequisite missing — gh CLI is not on PATHInstall gh (winget install GitHub.cli on Windows; brew install gh on macOS; package manager on Linux; or download from https://cli.github.com). Then gh auth login. Surface the message to the user and STOP the loop — do not retry.
Script throws prerequisite missing — gh CLI is not authenticatedRun gh auth login. STOP the loop until the user completes auth.
Trigger fails or no copilot_work_started event landsPush a substantive (non-whitespace) commit — auto-assign on synchronize is the most reliable trigger. Persistent failure indicates Copilot Code Review may not be enabled on the repo / account (check repo Settings → Code & automation → Copilot, or account-level Copilot Pro/Pro+).
No new review after waiting ~10 minQuiet-period after recent dismissal or trivial-diff suppression. Push a substantive commit and retry. Do not blindly re-run 01-request-review.ps1 — it reports InFlight while Copilot is still a requested reviewer.
Outdated-but-unresolved threads in the open listExpected: unresolved state is the source of truth. Reply + resolve them like any other open thread. 10-cleanup-outdated.ps1 is only a final safety net.
Unsure whether to fix or decline a findingSee references/04-triage.md.
Need a reply phrasing for "fixed", "declined", or "drift"See the templates under templates/reply-fix.md, reply-decline.md, reply-drift.md, reply-partial.md.

References

Skill path
skills/copilot-pr-autopilot/SKILL.md
Commit SHA
9933dcad5be5
Repository license
MIT
Data collected