Best fit
- Any application calling Claude, OpenAI, or similar LLM APIs
- Batch processing pipelines where cost adds up quickly
- Multi-model architectures that need intelligent routing
affaan-m/ECC
Cost optimization patterns for LLM API usage — model routing by task complexity, budget tracking, retry logic, and prompt caching.
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "skills/cost-aware-llm-pipeline"Source checked Jul 28, 2026·Refresh due Oct 26, 2026
Reorganized from the pinned upstream SKILL.md
According to the pinned SKILL.md from affaan-m/ECC: Patterns for controlling LLM API costs while maintaining quality. Combines model routing, budget tracking, retry logic, and prompt caching into a composable pipeline.
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "skills/cost-aware-llm-pipeline"Best fit
Bring this context
Expected outputs
Key source sections
Sections are extracted automatically from the pinned SKILL.md and link back to the source.
Building applications that call LLM APIs (Claude, GPT, etc.)
Automatically select cheaper models for simple tasks, reserving expensive models for complex ones.
Automatically select cheaper models for simple tasks, reserving expensive models for complex ones.
Track cumulative spend with frozen dataclasses. Each API call returns a new tracker — never mutates state.
Retry only on transient errors. Fail fast on authentication or bad request errors.
SkillSignal prompt templates
These prompts were written by SkillSignal from the source structure; they are not upstream text.
Task-start prompt
Confirm source fit, inputs, and outputs before acting.
Use cost-aware-llm-pipeline to help me with: [specific task]. Context: [files, data, or background]. Constraints: [environment, scope, and prohibited actions]. Before acting, check the pinned SKILL.md and explain which sections apply, what inputs are still missing, and what you will deliver.
Source-guided execution
Make the Agent explicitly follow the key extracted sections.
Apply the pinned cost-aware-llm-pipeline source to [task]. Pay particular attention to these source sections: “When to Activate”, “Core Concepts”, “1. Model Routing by Task Complexity”, “2. Immutable Cost Tracking”, “3. Narrow Retry Logic”. Preserve the important decision at each step. Mark facts not covered by the source as “needs confirmation” instead of inventing them. Then verify the result against my acceptance criteria: [criteria].
Result-review prompt
Check omissions, permissions, and source drift before delivery.
Review the current cost-aware-llm-pipeline result: (1) does it satisfy the original task; (2) were any applicable steps or limits in the pinned SKILL.md missed; (3) did it perform any unauthorized file, command, network, or data action; and (4) which conclusions remain unverified? List issues first, then fix only what the source or user authorization supports.
Output checklist
The task matches the purpose documented in the SKILL.md.
The source section “When to Activate” has been checked.
The source section “Core Concepts” has been checked.
The source section “1. Model Routing by Task Complexity” has been checked.
The source section “2. Immutable Cost Tracking” has been checked.
Inputs, constraints, and acceptance criteria are explicit.
Unverified facts, compatibility, and outcome claims are clearly marked.
Any file, command, network, or data action has been reviewed.
Choose a different workflow
LLM APIの使用量のコスト最適化パターン — タスクの複雑さによるモデルルーティング、予算追跡、リトライロジック、プロンプトキャッシング。
A separate implementation from affaan-m/ECC; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detailLLM API 使用成本优化模式 —— 基于任务复杂度的模型路由、预算跟踪、重试逻辑和提示缓存。
A separate implementation from affaan-m/ECC; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detailWhen the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program
A separate implementation from coreyhaines31/marketingskills; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detailFAQ
Patterns for controlling LLM API costs while maintaining quality. Combines model routing, budget tracking, retry logic, and prompt caching into a composable pipeline.
The catalog detected this source-specific install command: npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "skills/cost-aware-llm-pipeline". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
No dedicated Agent platform is declared in the pinned source record.
Quality breakdown
Based on traceable docs and repository signals; stars are not treated as quality.
Compare before choosing
These links are selected from shared tasks, functions, stacks, platforms, and same-name variants. Compare the source owner, documentation, permissions, and maintenance signals.
LLM APIの使用量のコスト最適化パターン — タスクの複雑さによるモデルルーティング、予算追跡、リトライロジック、プロンプトキャッシング。
LLM API 使用成本优化模式 —— 基于任务复杂度的模型路由、预算跟踪、重试逻辑和提示缓存。
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program
Grounded design brief from the adopted corpus — style, WCAG-checked color tokens, typography, layout pattern, anti-patterns. Use on ui-design-brief or any which-style/palette/font/chart decision.
Use BEFORE writing or editing any non-trivial UI — inventories components, design tokens, shadcn primitives, and reusable patterns into state.ui_audit. Hard gate for the ui directive set.
Patterns for controlling LLM API costs while maintaining quality. Combines model routing, budget tracking, retry logic, and prompt caching into a composable pipeline.
Automatically select cheaper models for simple tasks, reserving expensive models for complex ones.
MODEL_SONNET = "claude-sonnet-4-6"
MODEL_HAIKU = "claude-haiku-4-5-20251001"
_SONNET_TEXT_THRESHOLD = 10_000 # chars
_SONNET_ITEM_THRESHOLD = 30 # items
def select_model(
text_length: int,
item_count: int,
force_model: str | None = None,
) -> str:
"""Select model based on task complexity."""
if force_model is not None:
return force_model
if text_length >= _SONNET_TEXT_THRESHOLD or item_count >= _SONNET_ITEM_THRESHOLD:
return MODEL_SONNET # Complex task
return MODEL_HAIKU # Simple task (3-4x cheaper)
Track cumulative spend with frozen dataclasses. Each API call returns a new tracker — never mutates state.
from dataclasses import dataclass
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
class CostRecord:
model: str
input_tokens: int
output_tokens: int
cost_usd: float
@dataclass(frozen=True, slots=True)
class CostTracker:
budget_limit: float = 1.00
records: tuple[CostRecord, ...] = ()
def add(self, record: CostRecord) -> "CostTracker":
"""Return new tracker with added record (never mutates self)."""
return CostTracker(
budget_limit=self.budget_limit,
records=(*self.records, record),
)
@property
def total_cost(self) -> float:
return sum(r.cost_usd for r in self.records)
@property
def over_budget(self) -> bool:
return self.total_cost > self.budget_limit
Retry only on transient errors. Fail fast on authentication or bad request errors.
from anthropic import (
APIConnectionError,
InternalServerError,
RateLimitError,
)
_RETRYABLE_ERRORS = (APIConnectionError, RateLimitError, InternalServerError)
_MAX_RETRIES = 3
def call_with_retry(func, *, max_retries: int = _MAX_RETRIES):
"""Retry only on transient errors, fail fast on others."""
for attempt in range(max_retries):
try:
return func()
except _RETRYABLE_ERRORS:
if attempt == max_retries - 1:
raise
time.sleep(2 ** attempt) # Exponential backoff
# AuthenticationError, BadRequestError etc. → raise immediately
Cache long system prompts to avoid resending them on every request.
messages = [
{
"role": "user",
"content": [
{
"type": "text",
"text": system_prompt,
"cache_control": {"type": "ephemeral"}, # Cache this
},
{
"type": "text",
"text": user_input, # Variable part
},
],
}
]
Combine all four techniques in a single pipeline function:
def process(text: str, config: Config, tracker: CostTracker) -> tuple[Result, CostTracker]:
# 1. Route model
model = select_model(len(text), estimated_items, config.force_model)
# 2. Check budget
if tracker.over_budget:
raise BudgetExceededError(tracker.total_cost, tracker.budget_limit)
# 3. Call with retry + caching
response = call_with_retry(lambda: client.messages.create(
model=model,
messages=build_cached_messages(system_prompt, text),
))
# 4. Track cost (immutable)
record = CostRecord(model=model, input_tokens=..., output_tokens=..., cost_usd=...)
tracker = tracker.add(record)
return parse_result(response), tracker
| Model | Input ($/1M tokens) | Output ($/1M tokens) | Relative Cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.80 | $4.00 | 1x |
| Sonnet 4.6 | $3.00 | $15.00 | ~4x |
| Opus 4.5 | $15.00 | $75.00 | ~19x |