affaan-m/ECC

cpp-testing

仅用于编写/更新/修复C++测试、配置GoogleTest/CTest、诊断失败或不稳定的测试,或添加覆盖率/消毒器时使用。

74CollectingNetwork accessWrites files
See how to use itView GitHub source
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "docs/zh-CN/skills/cpp-testing"
Automated source guide

Source checked Jul 28, 2026·Refresh due Oct 26, 2026

Reorganized from the pinned upstream SKILL.md

Turn cpp-testing's source instructions into a guide you can follow

According to the pinned SKILL.md from affaan-m/ECC: 针对现代 C++(C++17/20)的代理导向测试工作流,使用 GoogleTest/GoogleMock 和 CMake/CTest。

npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "docs/zh-CN/skills/cpp-testing"
Check the pinned source

Best fit

  • 仅用于编写/更新/修复C++测试、配置GoogleTest/CTest、诊断失败或不稳定的测试,或添加覆盖率/消毒器时使用。

Bring this context

  • A concrete task that matches the documented purpose of cpp-testing.
  • The files, examples, or context the task depends on.
  • Your constraints, target environment, and definition of done.

Expected outputs

  • A result that follows the pinned cpp-testing instructions.
  • A concise record of assumptions, inputs used, and unresolved questions.
  • A final check against the source workflow and relevant permission signals.

Key source sections

Read cpp-testing through these 5 source sections

Sections are extracted automatically from the pinned SKILL.md and link back to the source.

01

使用时机

编写新的 C++ 测试或修复现有测试 为 C++ 组件设计单元/集成测试覆盖 添加测试覆盖、CI 门控或回归保护 配置 CMake/CTest 工作流以实现一致的执行 调查测试失败或偶发性行为 启用用于内存/竞态诊断的消毒剂

SKILL.md · 使用时机
编写新的 C++ 测试或修复现有测试为 C++ 组件设计单元/集成测试覆盖添加测试覆盖、CI 门控或回归保护
02

不适用时机

在不修改测试的情况下实现新的产品功能 与测试覆盖或失败无关的大规模重构 没有测试回归需要验证的性能调优 非 C++ 项目或非测试任务

SKILL.md · 不适用时机
在不修改测试的情况下实现新的产品功能与测试覆盖或失败无关的大规模重构没有测试回归需要验证的性能调优
03

核心概念

TDD 循环:红 → 绿 → 重构(先写测试,最小化修复,然后清理)。 隔离:优先使用依赖注入和仿制品,而非全局状态。 测试布局:tests/unit、tests/integration、tests/testdata。 Mock 与 Fake:Mock 用于交互,Fake 用于有状态行为。 CTest 发现:使用 gtestdiscovertests() 进行稳定的测试发现。 CI 信号:先运行子集,然后使用 --output-on-failure 运行完整套件。

SKILL.md · 核心概念
TDD 循环:红 → 绿 → 重构(先写测试,最小化修复,然后清理)。隔离:优先使用依赖注入和仿制品,而非全局状态。测试布局:tests/unit、tests/integration、tests/testdata。
04

TDD 工作流

遵循 RED → GREEN → REFACTOR 循环:

SKILL.md · TDD 工作流
RED:编写一个捕获新行为的失败测试GREEN:实现最小的更改以使其通过REFACTOR:在测试保持通过的同时进行清理
05

代码示例

Review the “代码示例” section in the pinned source before continuing.

SKILL.md · 代码示例
Review and apply the “代码示例” source section.

SkillSignal prompt templates

Provide the task, context, and acceptance criteria

These prompts were written by SkillSignal from the source structure; they are not upstream text.

Task-start prompt

Confirm source fit, inputs, and outputs before acting.

Use cpp-testing to help me with: [specific task]. Context: [files, data, or background]. Constraints: [environment, scope, and prohibited actions]. Before acting, check the pinned SKILL.md and explain which sections apply, what inputs are still missing, and what you will deliver.

Source-guided execution

Make the Agent explicitly follow the key extracted sections.

Apply the pinned cpp-testing source to [task]. Pay particular attention to these source sections: “使用时机”, “不适用时机”, “核心概念”, “TDD 工作流”, “代码示例”. Preserve the important decision at each step. Mark facts not covered by the source as “needs confirmation” instead of inventing them. Then verify the result against my acceptance criteria: [criteria].

Result-review prompt

Check omissions, permissions, and source drift before delivery.

Review the current cpp-testing result: (1) does it satisfy the original task; (2) were any applicable steps or limits in the pinned SKILL.md missed; (3) did it perform any unauthorized file, command, network, or data action; and (4) which conclusions remain unverified? List issues first, then fix only what the source or user authorization supports.

Output checklist

Verify each item before delivery

The task matches the purpose documented in the SKILL.md.

The source section “使用时机” has been checked.

The source section “不适用时机” has been checked.

The source section “核心概念” has been checked.

The source section “TDD 工作流” has been checked.

Inputs, constraints, and acceptance criteria are explicit.

Unverified facts, compatibility, and outcome claims are clearly marked.

Any file, command, network, or data action has been reviewed.

Choose a different workflow

When another Skill is the better fit

FAQ

What does cpp-testing do?

针对现代 C++(C++17/20)的代理导向测试工作流,使用 GoogleTest/GoogleMock 和 CMake/CTest。

How do I start using cpp-testing?

The catalog detected this source-specific install command: npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "docs/zh-CN/skills/cpp-testing". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.

Which Agent platforms does it declare?

No dedicated Agent platform is declared in the pinned source record.

Repository stars
234,327
Repository forks
35,711
Quality
74/100
Source repository last pushed

Quality breakdown

Based on traceable docs and repository signals; stars are not treated as quality.

74/100
Documentation26/30
Specificity18/25
Maintenance20/20
Trust signals10/25

Compare before choosing

Related Agent Skills and source variants

These links are selected from shared tasks, functions, stacks, platforms, and same-name variants. Compare the source owner, documentation, permissions, and maintenance signals.

View original Skill.mdThis page is parsed directly from the repository SKILL.md without editorial rewriting. Collected: Jul 28, 2026 · about 1 min

C++ 测试(代理技能)

针对现代 C++(C++17/20)的代理导向测试工作流,使用 GoogleTest/GoogleMock 和 CMake/CTest。

使用时机

  • 编写新的 C++ 测试或修复现有测试
  • 为 C++ 组件设计单元/集成测试覆盖
  • 添加测试覆盖、CI 门控或回归保护
  • 配置 CMake/CTest 工作流以实现一致的执行
  • 调查测试失败或偶发性行为
  • 启用用于内存/竞态诊断的消毒剂

不适用时机

  • 在不修改测试的情况下实现新的产品功能
  • 与测试覆盖或失败无关的大规模重构
  • 没有测试回归需要验证的性能调优
  • 非 C++ 项目或非测试任务

核心概念

  • TDD 循环:红 → 绿 → 重构(先写测试,最小化修复,然后清理)。
  • 隔离:优先使用依赖注入和仿制品,而非全局状态。
  • 测试布局tests/unittests/integrationtests/testdata
  • Mock 与 Fake:Mock 用于交互,Fake 用于有状态行为。
  • CTest 发现:使用 gtest_discover_tests() 进行稳定的测试发现。
  • CI 信号:先运行子集,然后使用 --output-on-failure 运行完整套件。

TDD 工作流

遵循 RED → GREEN → REFACTOR 循环:

  1. RED:编写一个捕获新行为的失败测试
  2. GREEN:实现最小的更改以使其通过
  3. REFACTOR:在测试保持通过的同时进行清理
// tests/add_test.cpp
#include <gtest/gtest.h>

int Add(int a, int b); // Provided by production code.

TEST(AddTest, AddsTwoNumbers) { // RED
  EXPECT_EQ(Add(2, 3), 5);
}

// src/add.cpp
int Add(int a, int b) { // GREEN
  return a + b;
}

// REFACTOR: simplify/rename once tests pass

代码示例

基础单元测试 (gtest)

// tests/calculator_test.cpp
#include <gtest/gtest.h>

int Add(int a, int b); // Provided by production code.

TEST(CalculatorTest, AddsTwoNumbers) {
    EXPECT_EQ(Add(2, 3), 5);
}

夹具 (gtest)

// tests/user_store_test.cpp
// Pseudocode stub: replace UserStore/User with project types.
#include <gtest/gtest.h>
#include <memory>
#include <optional>
#include <string>

struct User { std::string name; };
class UserStore {
public:
    explicit UserStore(std::string /*path*/) {}
    void Seed(std::initializer_list<User> /*users*/) {}
    std::optional<User> Find(const std::string &/*name*/) { return User{"alice"}; }
};

class UserStoreTest : public ::testing::Test {
protected:
    void SetUp() override {
        store = std::make_unique<UserStore>(":memory:");
        store->Seed({{"alice"}, {"bob"}});
    }

    std::unique_ptr<UserStore> store;
};

TEST_F(UserStoreTest, FindsExistingUser) {
    auto user = store->Find("alice");
    ASSERT_TRUE(user.has_value());
    EXPECT_EQ(user->name, "alice");
}

Mock (gmock)

// tests/notifier_test.cpp
#include <gmock/gmock.h>
#include <gtest/gtest.h>
#include <string>

class Notifier {
public:
    virtual ~Notifier() = default;
    virtual void Send(const std::string &message) = 0;
};

class MockNotifier : public Notifier {
public:
    MOCK_METHOD(void, Send, (const std::string &message), (override));
};

class Service {
public:
    explicit Service(Notifier &notifier) : notifier_(notifier) {}
    void Publish(const std::string &message) { notifier_.Send(message); }

private:
    Notifier &notifier_;
};

TEST(ServiceTest, SendsNotifications) {
    MockNotifier notifier;
    Service service(notifier);

    EXPECT_CALL(notifier, Send("hello")).Times(1);
    service.Publish("hello");
}

CMake/CTest 快速入门

# CMakeLists.txt (excerpt)
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.20)
project(example LANGUAGES CXX)

set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD 20)
set(CMAKE_CXX_STANDARD_REQUIRED ON)

include(FetchContent)
# Prefer project-locked versions. If using a tag, use a pinned version per project policy.
set(GTEST_VERSION v1.17.0) # Adjust to project policy.
FetchContent_Declare(
  googletest
  # Google Test framework (official repository)
  URL https://github.com/google/googletest/archive/refs/tags/${GTEST_VERSION}.zip
)
FetchContent_MakeAvailable(googletest)

add_executable(example_tests
  tests/calculator_test.cpp
  src/calculator.cpp
)
target_link_libraries(example_tests GTest::gtest GTest::gmock GTest::gtest_main)

enable_testing()
include(GoogleTest)
gtest_discover_tests(example_tests)
cmake -S . -B build -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug
cmake --build build -j
ctest --test-dir build --output-on-failure

运行测试

ctest --test-dir build --output-on-failure
ctest --test-dir build -R ClampTest
ctest --test-dir build -R "UserStoreTest.*" --output-on-failure
./build/example_tests --gtest_filter=ClampTest.*
./build/example_tests --gtest_filter=UserStoreTest.FindsExistingUser

调试失败

  1. 使用 gtest 过滤器重新运行单个失败的测试。
  2. 在失败的断言周围添加作用域日志记录。
  3. 启用消毒剂后重新运行。
  4. 根本原因修复后,扩展到完整套件。

覆盖率

优先使用目标级别的设置,而非全局标志。

option(ENABLE_COVERAGE "Enable coverage flags" OFF)

if(ENABLE_COVERAGE)
  if(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_ID MATCHES "GNU")
    target_compile_options(example_tests PRIVATE --coverage)
    target_link_options(example_tests PRIVATE --coverage)
  elseif(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_ID MATCHES "Clang")
    target_compile_options(example_tests PRIVATE -fprofile-instr-generate -fcoverage-mapping)
    target_link_options(example_tests PRIVATE -fprofile-instr-generate)
  endif()
endif()

GCC + gcov + lcov:

cmake -S . -B build-cov -DENABLE_COVERAGE=ON
cmake --build build-cov -j
ctest --test-dir build-cov
lcov --capture --directory build-cov --output-file coverage.info
lcov --remove coverage.info '/usr/*' --output-file coverage.info
genhtml coverage.info --output-directory coverage

Clang + llvm-cov:

cmake -S . -B build-llvm -DENABLE_COVERAGE=ON -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=clang++
cmake --build build-llvm -j
LLVM_PROFILE_FILE="build-llvm/default.profraw" ctest --test-dir build-llvm
llvm-profdata merge -sparse build-llvm/default.profraw -o build-llvm/default.profdata
llvm-cov report build-llvm/example_tests -instr-profile=build-llvm/default.profdata

消毒剂

option(ENABLE_ASAN "Enable AddressSanitizer" OFF)
option(ENABLE_UBSAN "Enable UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer" OFF)
option(ENABLE_TSAN "Enable ThreadSanitizer" OFF)

if(ENABLE_ASAN)
  add_compile_options(-fsanitize=address -fno-omit-frame-pointer)
  add_link_options(-fsanitize=address)
endif()
if(ENABLE_UBSAN)
  add_compile_options(-fsanitize=undefined -fno-omit-frame-pointer)
  add_link_options(-fsanitize=undefined)
endif()
if(ENABLE_TSAN)
  add_compile_options(-fsanitize=thread)
  add_link_options(-fsanitize=thread)
endif()

偶发性测试防护

  • 切勿使用 sleep 进行同步;使用条件变量或门闩。
  • 为每个测试创建唯一的临时目录并始终清理它们。
  • 避免在单元测试中依赖真实时间、网络或文件系统。
  • 对随机化输入使用确定性种子。

最佳实践

应该做

  • 保持测试的确定性和隔离性
  • 优先使用依赖注入而非全局变量
  • 对前置条件使用 ASSERT_*,对多个检查使用 EXPECT_*
  • 在 CTest 标签或目录中分离单元测试与集成测试
  • 在 CI 中运行消毒剂以进行内存和竞态检测

不应该做

  • 不要在单元测试中依赖真实时间或网络
  • 当可以使用条件变量时,不要使用睡眠作为同步手段
  • 不要过度模拟简单的值对象
  • 不要对非关键日志使用脆弱的字符串匹配

常见陷阱

  • 使用固定的临时路径 → 为每个测试生成唯一的临时目录并清理它们。
  • 依赖挂钟时间 → 注入时钟或使用模拟时间源。
  • 偶发性并发测试 → 使用条件变量/门闩和有界等待。
  • 隐藏的全局状态 → 在夹具中重置全局状态或移除全局变量。
  • 过度模拟 → 对有状态行为优先使用 Fake,仅对交互进行 Mock。
  • 缺少消毒剂运行 → 在 CI 中添加 ASan/UBSan/TSan 构建。
  • 仅在调试版本上计算覆盖率 → 确保覆盖率目标使用一致的标志。

可选附录:模糊测试 / 属性测试

仅在项目已支持 LLVM/libFuzzer 或属性测试库时使用。

  • libFuzzer:最适合 I/O 最少的纯函数。
  • RapidCheck:基于属性的测试,用于验证不变量。

最小的 libFuzzer 测试框架(伪代码:替换 ParseConfig):

#include <cstddef>
#include <cstdint>
#include <string>

extern "C" int LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput(const uint8_t *data, size_t size) {
    std::string input(reinterpret_cast<const char *>(data), size);
    // ParseConfig(input); // project function
    return 0;
}

GoogleTest 的替代方案

  • Catch2:仅头文件,表达性强的匹配器
  • doctest:轻量级,编译开销最小
Source repo
affaan-m/ECC
Skill path
docs/zh-CN/skills/cpp-testing/SKILL.md
Commit SHA
4e973d3eaf92
Repository license
MIT
Data collected