Source profileQuality 92/100

wondelai/skills/crossing-the-chasm/SKILL.md

crossing-the-chasm

Navigate the technology adoption lifecycle from early adopters to mainstream market. Use when the user mentions "crossing the chasm", "beachhead segment", "whole product", "early adopters vs mainstream", "tech go-to-market", "bowling pin strategy", "technology adoption lifecycle", "pragmatist buyers", "growth stalled after early adopters", or "our go-to-market plan". Also trigger when planning go-to-market for a technical product. Covers the D-Day analogy, bowling-pin strategy, the tornado, and

Source repository stars
1,835
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
0
Last source update
2026-07-22
Source checked
2026-08-04

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

Strategic framework for marketing and selling disruptive technology products, particularly the transition from early adopters to mainstream customers.

Best for

  • Use when the user mentions "crossing the chasm", "beachhead segment", "whole product", "early adopters vs mainstream", "tech go-to-market", "bowling pin strategy", "technology adoption lifecycle", "pragmatist buyers", "…

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/wondelai/skills --skill "crossing-the-chasm"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "crossing-the-chasm" from https://github.com/wondelai/skills/blob/dd37ee506ff558e939b3d421557987cced49b866/crossing-the-chasm/SKILL.md at commit dd37ee506ff558e939b3d421557987cced49b866. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Step 1: Target the Point of Attack

    Choose a single, narrowly defined market segment.

    Choose a single, narrowly defined market segment.Beachhead characteristics: specific ("orthopedic surgical centers with 5-10 surgeons", not "healthcare"); urgent, expensive pain; accessible via known channels; a compelling reason to buy (you're 10x better for their pr…Example (Salesforce): not "CRM for all businesses" but "sales force automation for inside sales teams at B2B SaaS startups."
  2. 02

    Step 2: Assemble the Invasion Force

    Create the "whole product" for your beachhead segment.

    [ ] Core technology (your product)[ ] Complementary products/services (integrations, partner solutions)[ ] Installation and setup (onboarding, migration)
  3. 03

    Step 3: Define the Battle

    Position against the competition.

    For [target customer]Who [statement of need/opportunity]Our product is a [product category]
  4. 04

    Step 4: Launch the Invasion

    Execute the go-to-market strategy.

    Execute the go-to-market strategy.For crossing (early majority): lead with references and case studies; message whole-product completeness, ease, and low risk; position as evolution ("Better X", not "new category"); prove with ROI calculators, free tria…See: references/go-to-market.md when building the launch plan -- it details channel selection by buyer type, the reference-and-case-study engine, and pricing/pilot tactics for pragmatists.
  5. 05

    Core Principle

    There is a chasm between early adopters and the mainstream market. Most tech companies fail not because they can't build great products, but because they can't cross from visionaries who love new technology to pragmatists who just want solutions that work. The two groups want fu…

    There is a chasm between early adopters and the mainstream market. Most tech companies fail not because they can't build great products, but because they can't cross from visionaries who love new technology to pragmatis…If the product is modern PLG/freemium B2B SaaS, read references/b2b-saas.md first -- it remaps every step below (the chasm, beachhead, whole product, metrics) for self-serve trials, free tiers, and the false-signal trap…

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

No configured static risk pattern was detected

This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score92/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars1,835SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
wondelai/skills
Skill path
crossing-the-chasm/SKILL.md
Commit
dd37ee506ff558e939b3d421557987cced49b866
License
MIT
Collected
2026-08-04
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

Crossing the Chasm Framework

Strategic framework for marketing and selling disruptive technology products, particularly the transition from early adopters to mainstream customers.

Core Principle

There is a chasm between early adopters and the mainstream market. Most tech companies fail not because they can't build great products, but because they can't cross from visionaries who love new technology to pragmatists who just want solutions that work. The two groups want fundamentally different things -- what wins over innovators actively repels the early majority -- so you must change your strategy, and your whole product, to cross.

If the product is modern PLG/freemium B2B SaaS, read references/b2b-saas.md first -- it remaps every step below (the chasm, beachhead, whole product, metrics) for self-serve trials, free tiers, and the false-signal trap where 1,000 free users looks like a crossing but isn't.

Scoring

Goal: 10/10. Score any tech go-to-market by the Quick Diagnostic at the end: count the rows answered "yes" and map the 7 rows onto a 0-10 scale (roughly 1.4 points per satisfied row).

  • 9-10: single dominable beachhead chosen, 10+ in-segment references, whole product complete via partners, evolution-not-revolution positioning, pragmatist-aligned channel -- adoption is accelerating. You've crossed.
  • 5-6: beachhead picked but whole product or references still thin, or positioning still reads "revolutionary." You're mid-chasm; ship the missing whole-product layers and case studies.
  • <=3: multiple beachheads (or none), visionary messaging, MVP-grade product. Classic early-market tactics aimed at the mainstream -- the most common reason to stall.

Report the score, name the failing diagnostic rows, and give the fix for each.

The Technology Adoption Life Cycle

Innovators → Early Adopters → [CHASM] → Early Majority → Late Majority → Laggards
   2.5%         13.5%                      34%             34%            16%

The Chasm: The gap between early adopters (13.5%) and early majority (34%) -- where most tech products die.

The Five Buyer Groups

Segment% MarketPsychologyWhat They BuyWhat They Need
Innovators2.5%Technology enthusiastsThe newest, coolest techProduct exists, technical specs
Early Adopters13.5%Visionaries seeking advantageChange, revolution, competitive edgeVision, big potential, strategic value
[THE CHASM]
Early Majority34%PragmatistsProductivity improvementsWhole product, references, de-risked
Late Majority34%ConservativesAvoid being left behindCommodity, support, low risk
Laggards16%SkepticsOnly when forcedCheap, simple, necessary

Critical insight: Early adopters and early majority look similar but want opposite things:

Early Adopters (Visionaries)Early Majority (Pragmatists)
Want to be firstWant proven solutions
Tolerate bugs and workaroundsNeed it to "just work"
Buy the future visionBuy present value
Need no referencesNeed references from peers
Want custom solutions, high risk toleranceWant standards, low risk tolerance

Why this matters: You can't market to both simultaneously -- visionary testimonials scare off pragmatists.

See: references/buyer-segments.md when you need to identify which group a specific prospect belongs to, or to write segment-specific messaging -- it has full psychographics and buying triggers per group.

The reference catch-22: Pragmatists won't buy without references from other pragmatists -- but none exist until someone crosses first. This is why the chasm is a chasm and not a slope: the social proof the early majority requires cannot accumulate gradually. Breaking it is the whole game (Steps 1-2 below).

The D-Day Strategy: Crossing the Chasm

Bad approach: Try to be everything to everyone (stall in the chasm). Good approach: Target a single beachhead, dominate it, expand from a position of strength.

Step 1: Target the Point of Attack

Choose a single, narrowly defined market segment.

Beachhead characteristics: specific ("orthopedic surgical centers with 5-10 surgeons", not "healthcare"); urgent, expensive pain; accessible via known channels; a compelling reason to buy (you're 10x better for their problem); whole-product potential via partners; vocal reference potential.

CriteriaGood BeachheadBad Beachhead
SizeBig enough to matter, small enough to dominateToo small to build on, or too big to own
PainUrgent, expensive problemNice-to-have
AccessClear channels to reachScattered, hard to reach
CompetitionWeak or non-existentEntrenched incumbents
Word-of-mouthThey talk to each otherSiloed, isolated

Example (Salesforce): not "CRM for all businesses" but "sales force automation for inside sales teams at B2B SaaS startups."

Process: Brainstorm 20+ segments, score each against the criteria, choose ONE (resist keeping options open), commit to dominating it.

See: references/beachhead-selection.md when running the brainstorm-and-score step above -- it has the scoring matrix, weighting, and the target-customer characterization worksheet to pick the one segment.

Step 2: Assemble the Invasion Force

Create the "whole product" for your beachhead segment.

Whole product layers: Generic (what you ship) → Expected (minimum viable) → Augmented (what pragmatists actually need) → Potential (what it could become).

Example: marketing automation software

LayerWhat It Includes
GenericEmail sending, list management
ExpectedTemplates, analytics, API
AugmentedCRM integration, training, support, services, best-practice playbooks
PotentialAI optimization, personalization, account-based marketing

Critical: The early majority buys the augmented product; ship only the generic and they won't buy.

Whole product checklist:

  • Core technology (your product)
  • Complementary products/services (integrations, partner solutions)
  • Installation and setup (onboarding, migration)
  • Training, support, documentation, best practices
  • Industry-specific adaptations
  • Risk mitigation (security, compliance, SLAs)

Partnerships: Identify gaps between generic and augmented, partner with companies that fill them, go to market jointly for the beachhead.

See: references/whole-product.md when mapping your gaps -- it extends the layers above with a 12-row gap-analysis matrix, the 80% rule, support-tier SLAs, and a planning canvas.

Step 3: Define the Battle

Position against the competition.

Positioning formula:

  • For [target customer]
  • Who [statement of need/opportunity]
  • Our product is a [product category]
  • That [statement of key benefit]
  • Unlike [primary competitive alternative]
  • Our product [statement of primary differentiation]

Example (early Workday): For mid-market companies who need modern HR and finance systems, Workday is a cloud-based ERP that delivers consumer-grade UX and fast implementation. Unlike Oracle and SAP, it requires no IT infrastructure and deploys in months, not years.

Competitive positioning: The market alternative is often NOT a direct competitor -- it's manual processes, spreadsheets, or legacy systems. Differentiate on a dimension you dominate and make the incumbent's strength irrelevant: Salesforce's "No software" positioning turned feature-rich Siebel's complexity into a weakness.

See: references/positioning.md when filling in the formula above or choosing the competitive alternative to displace -- it has the claim-and-evidence structure and the "make the incumbent's strength irrelevant" patterns.

Step 4: Launch the Invasion

Execute the go-to-market strategy.

Customer TypeHow They BuySales Strategy
Early adoptersDirect, evangelical CEODirect sales, founder-led
Early majorityRisk-averse, need proofChannel partners, references, content marketing
Late majorityCommodity, low-touchSelf-service, inside sales

For crossing (early majority): lead with references and case studies; message whole-product completeness, ease, and low risk; position as evolution ("Better X", not "new category"); prove with ROI calculators, free trials, pilots; sell through channels pragmatists trust (analysts, integrators, consultants).

Messaging shift:

Early Adopter MessagingEarly Majority Messaging
"Revolutionary new approach""Proven solution for [problem]"
"Be the first""Join 500 companies like yours"
"Change everything""Improve [specific metric] by X%"
"Visionary""Pragmatic"

See: references/go-to-market.md when building the launch plan -- it details channel selection by buyer type, the reference-and-case-study engine, and pricing/pilot tactics for pragmatists.

Bowling Pin Strategy

After dominating the beachhead, expand to adjacent segments -- each pin knocks down the next: Beachhead → Adjacent #1 → Adjacent #2 → Adjacent #3.

Adjacency criteria: similar needs (whole product transfers), reference credibility (beachhead customers influence the adjacent segment), incremental effort (don't start from scratch).

Example (Salesforce): inside sales at tech startups → inside sales at all B2B companies → all sales teams → customer service → marketing → full CRM platform.

Anti-pattern: Jumping to distant segments before dominating the beachhead.

See: references/expansion.md when sequencing your next 2-3 segments -- adjacency scoring and the bowling-pin ordering rules. For full worked arcs (Salesforce, VMware, Zoom, Atlassian) and stuck-in-the-chasm failures (Palm, Segway), see references/case-studies.md when you need a pattern-match for your own situation.

The Tornado: After the Chasm

Once you cross, demand accelerates (the "tornado"): rapid mainstream adoption, a shift from solution selling to product selling, commodity dynamics, and market-leader consolidation.

Strategic shift: before the chasm -- whole product, customization, high touch; during the tornado -- standardization, scalability, distribution.

Gorilla/chimp/monkey dynamics: the gorilla (market leader, 80%+ share) takes most of the profit; chimps (strong #2-#3) survive in niches; monkeys struggle. Become the gorilla in your beachhead, then expand.

Common Mistakes

MistakeWhy It FailsFix
Selling to early majority like early adoptersWrong messaging, wrong productBuild whole product, emphasize proof
Multiple beachheadsSpread too thin, own nothingChoose ONE segment, dominate it
Incomplete whole productPragmatists won't buyPartner to fill gaps
"Revolutionary" positioningScares off early majorityFrame as evolution, proven solution
Skipping referencesNo social proof for pragmatistsInvest in case studies, testimonials

Quick Diagnostic

Audit any tech go-to-market, and re-run it as the completion gate before declaring the chasm crossed. Each "If No" is a chasm symptom; act on the failing rows first.

QuestionIf NoAction
Have we chosen a single, narrowly defined beachhead with an urgent, expensive problem?You're in the chasmDefine one narrow target market; resist multiple beachheads
Can we plausibly dominate this segment?Wrong beachheadChoose a narrower or different segment
Do we have 10+ reference customers from that exact segment?Pragmatists won't buyBuild lighthouse customers and case studies
Is the whole product complete -- partnerships in place to fill the gaps?Product won't meet pragmatist needsIdentify generic-to-augmented gaps, partner to fill them
Does positioning emphasize proven value over revolution?Wrong message for the early majorityReframe: evolution, not revolution
Is the distribution channel aligned with pragmatist buying behavior?You reach visionaries, not pragmatistsSell through analysts, integrators, references, channel
Are adoption metrics accelerating (entering the tornado)?Still stuck before the chasmRe-check the rows above -- something is still early-market

Further Reading

For the complete methodology:

About the Author

Geoffrey A. Moore is a consultant, venture partner, and author whose work at The Chasm Group and Chasm Institute has shaped go-to-market strategy for enterprise technology companies for over 30 years. Crossing the Chasm has sold over a million copies and is required reading at business schools and tech companies worldwide.