github/awesome-copilot/skills/csharp-tunit/SKILL.md
csharp-tunit
Get best practices for TUnit unit testing, including data-driven tests
- Source repository stars
- 37,126
- Declared platforms
- 0
- Static risk flags
- 0
- Last source update
- 2026-07-28
- Source checked
- 2026-07-28
Decision brief
What it does—and where it fits
Your goal is to help me write effective unit tests with TUnit, covering both standard and data-driven testing approaches.
Not for
- Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
- Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.
Compatibility matrix
Platform support, with evidence labels
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
Inspect first. Install second.
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill "skills/csharp-tunit"Inspect the Agent Skill "csharp-tunit" from https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685/skills/csharp-tunit/SKILL.md at commit 9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
What the source asks the agent to do
- 01
Project Setup
Use a separate test project with naming convention [ProjectName].Tests
Use a separate test project with naming convention [ProjectName].TestsReference TUnit package and TUnit.Assertions for fluent assertionsCreate test classes that match the classes being tested (e.g., CalculatorTests for Calculator) - 02
Test Structure
No test class attributes required (like xUnit/NUnit)
No test class attributes required (like xUnit/NUnit)Use [Test] attribute for test methods (not [Fact] like xUnit)Follow the Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA) pattern - 03
Standard Tests
Keep tests focused on a single behavior
Keep tests focused on a single behaviorAvoid testing multiple behaviors in one test methodUse TUnit's fluent assertion syntax with await Assert.That() - 04
Data-Driven Tests
Use [Arguments] attribute for inline test data (equivalent to xUnit's [InlineData])
Use [Arguments] attribute for inline test data (equivalent to xUnit's [InlineData])Use [MethodData] for method-based test data (equivalent to xUnit's [MemberData])Use [ClassData] for class-based test data - 05
Assertions
Use await Assert.That(value).IsEqualTo(expected) for value equality
Use await Assert.That(value).IsEqualTo(expected) for value equalityUse await Assert.That(value).IsSameReferenceAs(expected) for reference equalityUse await Assert.That(value).IsTrue() or await Assert.That(value).IsFalse() for boolean conditions
Permission review
Static risk signals and limitations
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
Why each signal appears
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 68/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 37,126 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Provenance and original SKILL.md
- Repository
- github/awesome-copilot
- Skill path
- skills/csharp-tunit/SKILL.md
- Commit
- 9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685
- License
- MIT
- Collected
- 2026-07-28
- Default branch
- main
View the original SKILL.md
TUnit Best Practices
Your goal is to help me write effective unit tests with TUnit, covering both standard and data-driven testing approaches.
Project Setup
- Use a separate test project with naming convention
[ProjectName].Tests - Reference TUnit package and TUnit.Assertions for fluent assertions
- Create test classes that match the classes being tested (e.g.,
CalculatorTestsforCalculator) - Use .NET SDK test commands:
dotnet testfor running tests - TUnit requires .NET 8.0 or higher
Test Structure
- No test class attributes required (like xUnit/NUnit)
- Use
[Test]attribute for test methods (not[Fact]like xUnit) - Follow the Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA) pattern
- Name tests using the pattern
MethodName_Scenario_ExpectedBehavior - Use lifecycle hooks:
[Before(Test)]for setup and[After(Test)]for teardown - Use
[Before(Class)]and[After(Class)]for shared context between tests in a class - Use
[Before(Assembly)]and[After(Assembly)]for shared context across test classes - TUnit supports advanced lifecycle hooks like
[Before(TestSession)]and[After(TestSession)]
Standard Tests
- Keep tests focused on a single behavior
- Avoid testing multiple behaviors in one test method
- Use TUnit's fluent assertion syntax with
await Assert.That() - Include only the assertions needed to verify the test case
- Make tests independent and idempotent (can run in any order)
- Avoid test interdependencies (use
[DependsOn]attribute if needed)
Data-Driven Tests
- Use
[Arguments]attribute for inline test data (equivalent to xUnit's[InlineData]) - Use
[MethodData]for method-based test data (equivalent to xUnit's[MemberData]) - Use
[ClassData]for class-based test data - Create custom data sources by implementing
ITestDataSource - Use meaningful parameter names in data-driven tests
- Multiple
[Arguments]attributes can be applied to the same test method
Assertions
- Use
await Assert.That(value).IsEqualTo(expected)for value equality - Use
await Assert.That(value).IsSameReferenceAs(expected)for reference equality - Use
await Assert.That(value).IsTrue()orawait Assert.That(value).IsFalse()for boolean conditions - Use
await Assert.That(collection).Contains(item)orawait Assert.That(collection).DoesNotContain(item)for collections - Use
await Assert.That(value).Matches(pattern)for regex pattern matching - Use
await Assert.That(action).Throws<TException>()orawait Assert.That(asyncAction).ThrowsAsync<TException>()to test exceptions - Chain assertions with
.Andoperator:await Assert.That(value).IsNotNull().And.IsEqualTo(expected) - Use
.Oroperator for alternative conditions:await Assert.That(value).IsEqualTo(1).Or.IsEqualTo(2) - Use
.Within(tolerance)for DateTime and numeric comparisons with tolerance - All assertions are asynchronous and must be awaited
Advanced Features
- Use
[Repeat(n)]to repeat tests multiple times - Use
[Retry(n)]for automatic retry on failure - Use
[ParallelLimit<T>]to control parallel execution limits - Use
[Skip("reason")]to skip tests conditionally - Use
[DependsOn(nameof(OtherTest))]to create test dependencies - Use
[Timeout(milliseconds)]to set test timeouts - Create custom attributes by extending TUnit's base attributes
Test Organization
- Group tests by feature or component
- Use
[Category("CategoryName")]for test categorization - Use
[DisplayName("Custom Test Name")]for custom test names - Consider using
TestContextfor test diagnostics and information - Use conditional attributes like custom
[WindowsOnly]for platform-specific tests
Performance and Parallel Execution
- TUnit runs tests in parallel by default (unlike xUnit which requires explicit configuration)
- Use
[NotInParallel]to disable parallel execution for specific tests - Use
[ParallelLimit<T>]with custom limit classes to control concurrency - Tests within the same class run sequentially by default
- Use
[Repeat(n)]with[ParallelLimit<T>]for load testing scenarios
Migration from xUnit
- Replace
[Fact]with[Test] - Replace
[Theory]with[Test]and use[Arguments]for data - Replace
[InlineData]with[Arguments] - Replace
[MemberData]with[MethodData] - Replace
Assert.Equalwithawait Assert.That(actual).IsEqualTo(expected) - Replace
Assert.Truewithawait Assert.That(condition).IsTrue() - Replace
Assert.Throws<T>withawait Assert.That(action).Throws<T>() - Replace constructor/IDisposable with
[Before(Test)]/[After(Test)] - Replace
IClassFixture<T>with[Before(Class)]/[After(Class)]
Why TUnit over xUnit?
TUnit offers a modern, fast, and flexible testing experience with advanced features not present in xUnit, such as asynchronous assertions, more refined lifecycle hooks, and improved data-driven testing capabilities. TUnit's fluent assertions provide clearer and more expressive test validation, making it especially suitable for complex .NET projects.
Alternatives
Compare before choosing
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
ab-testing
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program
event4u-app/agent-config
testing-anti-patterns
Use BEFORE writing/changing tests, adding mocks, or test-only methods on production classes — vs mocking-the-mock, production pollution, partial mocks, and overfit/tautological assertions
event4u-app/agent-config
design-review
Use when the user says "review the design", "check the UI", or wants a comprehensive UI/UX review. Uses a 7-phase methodology covering interaction, responsiveness, accessibility, and more.
event4u-app/agent-config
pest-testing
Use when writing, generating, or improving Pest tests for Laravel — clear intent, good coverage, maintainable structure, and alignment with project testing conventions.