github/awesome-copilot/skills/csharp-xunit/SKILL.md
csharp-xunit
Get best practices for XUnit unit testing, including data-driven tests
- Source repository stars
- 37,126
- Declared platforms
- 0
- Static risk flags
- 0
- Last source update
- 2026-07-28
- Source checked
- 2026-07-28
Decision brief
What it does—and where it fits
Your goal is to help me write effective unit tests with XUnit, covering both standard and data-driven testing approaches.
Not for
- Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
- Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.
Compatibility matrix
Platform support, with evidence labels
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
Inspect first. Install second.
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill "skills/csharp-xunit"Inspect the Agent Skill "csharp-xunit" from https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685/skills/csharp-xunit/SKILL.md at commit 9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
What the source asks the agent to do
- 01
Project Setup
Use a separate test project with naming convention [ProjectName].Tests
Use a separate test project with naming convention [ProjectName].TestsReference Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk, xunit, and xunit.runner.visualstudio packagesCreate test classes that match the classes being tested (e.g., CalculatorTests for Calculator) - 02
Test Structure
No test class attributes required (unlike MSTest/NUnit)
No test class attributes required (unlike MSTest/NUnit)Use fact-based tests with [Fact] attribute for simple testsFollow the Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA) pattern - 03
Standard Tests
Keep tests focused on a single behavior
Keep tests focused on a single behaviorAvoid testing multiple behaviors in one test methodUse clear assertions that express intent - 04
Data-Driven Tests
Use [Theory] combined with data source attributes
Use [Theory] combined with data source attributesUse [InlineData] for inline test dataUse [MemberData] for method-based test data
Permission review
Static risk signals and limitations
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
Why each signal appears
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 66/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 37,126 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Provenance and original SKILL.md
- Repository
- github/awesome-copilot
- Skill path
- skills/csharp-xunit/SKILL.md
- Commit
- 9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685
- License
- MIT
- Collected
- 2026-07-28
- Default branch
- main
View the original SKILL.md
XUnit Best Practices
Your goal is to help me write effective unit tests with XUnit, covering both standard and data-driven testing approaches.
Project Setup
- Use a separate test project with naming convention
[ProjectName].Tests - Reference Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk, xunit, and xunit.runner.visualstudio packages
- Create test classes that match the classes being tested (e.g.,
CalculatorTestsforCalculator) - Use .NET SDK test commands:
dotnet testfor running tests
Test Structure
- No test class attributes required (unlike MSTest/NUnit)
- Use fact-based tests with
[Fact]attribute for simple tests - Follow the Arrange-Act-Assert (AAA) pattern
- Name tests using the pattern
MethodName_Scenario_ExpectedBehavior - Use constructor for setup and
IDisposable.Dispose()for teardown - Use
IClassFixture<T>for shared context between tests in a class - Use
ICollectionFixture<T>for shared context between multiple test classes
Standard Tests
- Keep tests focused on a single behavior
- Avoid testing multiple behaviors in one test method
- Use clear assertions that express intent
- Include only the assertions needed to verify the test case
- Make tests independent and idempotent (can run in any order)
- Avoid test interdependencies
Data-Driven Tests
- Use
[Theory]combined with data source attributes - Use
[InlineData]for inline test data - Use
[MemberData]for method-based test data - Use
[ClassData]for class-based test data - Create custom data attributes by implementing
DataAttribute - Use meaningful parameter names in data-driven tests
Assertions
- Use
Assert.Equalfor value equality - Use
Assert.Samefor reference equality - Use
Assert.True/Assert.Falsefor boolean conditions - Use
Assert.Contains/Assert.DoesNotContainfor collections - Use
Assert.Matches/Assert.DoesNotMatchfor regex pattern matching - Use
Assert.Throws<T>orawait Assert.ThrowsAsync<T>to test exceptions - Use fluent assertions library for more readable assertions
Mocking and Isolation
- Consider using Moq or NSubstitute alongside XUnit
- Mock dependencies to isolate units under test
- Use interfaces to facilitate mocking
- Consider using a DI container for complex test setups
Test Organization
- Group tests by feature or component
- Use
[Trait("Category", "CategoryName")]for categorization - Use collection fixtures to group tests with shared dependencies
- Consider output helpers (
ITestOutputHelper) for test diagnostics - Skip tests conditionally with
Skip = "reason"in fact/theory attributes
Alternatives
Compare before choosing
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
ab-testing
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program
event4u-app/agent-config
testing-anti-patterns
Use BEFORE writing/changing tests, adding mocks, or test-only methods on production classes — vs mocking-the-mock, production pollution, partial mocks, and overfit/tautological assertions
event4u-app/agent-config
design-review
Use when the user says "review the design", "check the UI", or wants a comprehensive UI/UX review. Uses a 7-phase methodology covering interaction, responsiveness, accessibility, and more.
event4u-app/agent-config
pest-testing
Use when writing, generating, or improving Pest tests for Laravel — clear intent, good coverage, maintainable structure, and alignment with project testing conventions.