Best for
- Collaboration/partnership decisions
- Career or job changes
- Investment of significant time/money
naveedharri/benai-skills/shared-skills/decision-toolkit/SKILL.md
Generate structured decision-making tools — step-by-step guides, bias checkers, scenario explorers, and interactive dashboards. Use when facing significant choices requiring systematic analysis. Supports multiple cognitive styles and output formats.
Decision brief
Generate structured decision-making tools — step-by-step guides, bias checkers, scenario explorers, and interactive dashboards. Supports multiple cognitive styles and output formats.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/naveedharri/benai-skills --skill "shared-skills/decision-toolkit"Inspect the Agent Skill "decision-toolkit" from https://github.com/naveedharri/benai-skills/blob/81c92a39f3c7be5754b9bc7efee6aaa5627d535c/shared-skills/decision-toolkit/SKILL.md at commit 81c92a39f3c7be5754b9bc7efee6aaa5627d535c. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
What could go wrong and is it worth it? - New ventures, changes, experiments
Ask user for: - What is the decision? - What are the options? - What's the timeline? - What's at stake? - Any relevant background?
Ask user for: - What is the decision? - What are the options? - What's the timeline? - What's at stake? - Any relevant background?
Based on user preference and context: - Complex decision + time available → Interactive HTML - Quick analysis → Markdown framework - On-the-go consumption → Voice summary - Need to share with others → PDF report
Use templates in templates/ directory: - decision-guide-template.html — Full interactive wizard - decision-framework.md — Text-based analysis - decision-voice-summary.md — Audio script template
Permission review
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 85/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 48 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Create structured decision support materials that help humans think through significant choices systematically. This skill produces interactive tools, not just analysis — empowering the decision-maker rather than deciding for them.
Different people process decisions differently:
| Style | Accommodation |
|---|---|
| Analytical | Numbers, matrices, weighted scores |
| Intuitive | Gut-check prompts, "how does this feel?" |
| Visual | Diagrams, progress bars, color coding |
| Verbal | Written summaries, question prompts |
| Sequential | Step-by-step wizard flow |
| Global | Dashboard overview option |
Invoke this skill when user faces:
Not for: Trivial decisions, emergency responses, or when user just needs information.
Should I pursue this opportunity?
Where should I invest my time/money/attention?
What could go wrong and is it worth it?
Which option among alternatives?
Nine steps, each focused on one dimension:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ 1. CONTEXT What is the decision? │
│ 2. FIRST PRINCIPLES Does this solve a real problem? │
│ 3. TIMING Is now the right moment? │
│ 4. STAKEHOLDERS Who else is involved? Are they stable? │
│ 5. BIASES What might cloud my judgment? │
│ 6. OPPORTUNITY COST What am I giving up? │
│ 7. SCENARIOS What could happen? │
│ 8. QUESTIONS What do I still need to learn? │
│ 9. SYNTHESIS Summary + decision │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Step-by-step wizard with:
For offline/text-based use:
For audio consumption:
For documentation/sharing:
1. What problem does this solve?
2. Can I solve it myself?
3. Is this the best solution?
4. What assumptions am I making?
5. If starting fresh today, would I choose this?
□ FOMO — Am I afraid of missing out?
□ Sunk Cost — Am I factoring past investment?
□ Authority — Am I deferring to credentials?
□ Social Proof — Am I following the crowd?
□ Commitment — Do I feel locked in by past statements?
□ Optimism — Am I assuming problems will resolve?
□ Recency — Am I overweighting recent events?
□ Confirmation — Am I seeking validating info only?
□ Shiny Object — Is novelty distracting me?
□ Loss Aversion — Am I overweighting potential losses?
Hours/week × Weeks × Hourly rate = Direct cost
+ What else could those hours produce?
+ What relationships/opportunities might suffer?
= True opportunity cost
| Scenario | Probability | Outcome | Expected Value |
|----------|-------------|---------|----------------|
| Worst | X% | ... | ... |
| Bad | X% | ... | ... |
| Neutral | X% | ... | ... |
| Good | X% | ... | ... |
| Best | X% | ... | ... |
Imagine it's [future date]. This decision failed. Why?
Possible causes:
1. ...
2. ...
3. ...
Which causes are within my control?
Which warning signs should I watch for?
How will I feel about this decision in:
- 10 minutes?
- 10 months?
- 10 years?
Imagine you're 80 looking back.
Would you regret doing this?
Would you regret NOT doing this?
Ask user for:
Or extract from existing documents (meeting transcripts, notes).
Based on user preference and context:
Use templates in templates/ directory:
decision-guide-template.html — Full interactive wizarddecision-framework.md — Text-based analysisdecision-voice-summary.md — Audio script templateReplace placeholders:
{{DECISION_TITLE}} — What's being decided{{CONTEXT}} — Background information{{OPTIONS}} — Available choices{{STAKEHOLDERS}} — People/teams involved{{TIMELINE}} — Relevant dates{{FACTORS}} — Key evaluation criteriaIf using Agency brand:
<main role="main" aria-label="Decision Guide">
<nav aria-label="Progress">
<ol role="list">...</ol>
</nav>
<section aria-labelledby="step-title">
<h1 id="step-title">...</h1>
</section>
</main>
// Ensure all interactive elements are focusable
// Tab order follows visual order
// Enter/Space activate buttons
// Arrow keys navigate options
<div role="status" aria-live="polite" id="announcer">
<!-- Announce step changes, selections, results -->
</div>
/* Minimum 4.5:1 for normal text, 3:1 for large text */
--text-on-light: #000000; /* 21:1 on white */
--text-on-dark: #ffffff; /* 21:1 on black */
--text-on-primary: #ffffff; /* Check each color */
@media (prefers-reduced-motion: reduce) {
* {
animation: none !important;
transition: none !important;
}
}
User: Analyze this meeting transcript and create a decision toolkit
Claude: [Extracts decision, stakeholders, options from transcript]
[Generates interactive HTML guide]
[Creates voice summary]
User: I need to decide whether to take a new job offer
Claude: [Asks clarifying questions]
[Generates decision framework]
[Customizes for career decision type]
User: Help me think through this partnership decision, just give me the frameworks
Claude: [Provides markdown framework]
[Skips interactive tool]
[Focuses on key questions]
SKILL.md — This filetemplates/decision-guide-template.html — Interactive wizard templatetemplates/decision-framework.md — Text-based analysis templatetemplates/decision-voice-summary.md — Audio script templatereferences/bias-encyclopedia.md — Detailed bias descriptionsreferences/framework-deep-dives.md — Extended framework explanationsWorks well with:
Context: Initial skill creation from Synthius decision session
Key Insight: Dashboard-everything-at-once overwhelms. Step-by-step wizard with one concept per screen dramatically improves usability.
Architecture: 9-step journey covering all major decision dimensions. State object persists selections across steps. Summary aggregates everything.
Accessibility Note: High contrast neobrutalism actually helps accessibility — clear borders, distinct states, no subtle gradients.
Alternatives
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program
JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills
Suede-owned experimentation discipline for hypotheses, sample sizing, test duration, significance, and repeatable experiment programs. Use when comparing variants, deciding whether a result is reliable, or building an experiment backlog and cadence. NOT FOR: analytics instrumentation (use suede-analytics), post-click conversion diagnosis (use suede-site-alchemy), or writing the variant copy itself (use suede-copy).
narrative-io/narrative-skills-marketplace
Translate a fuzzy analytical question into a rigorous investigation plan. Interrogates the ask, grounds the plan in the available data dictionary, applies analytical best practices, and produces a structured brief of query specifications for a downstream query-writing skill. Plans, does not write SQL. Use when: "why did X drop", "is there a relationship between A and B", "who are our highest-value customers", "what's driving the change in Y", "investigate this trend", "design an analysis for", "
PramodDutta/qaskills
Generate optimized test combinations using pairwise (all-pairs) testing algorithms to achieve maximum coverage with minimum test cases across multiple input parameters