HKUDS/Vibe-Trading/agent/src/skills/defi-yield/SKILL.md
defi-yield
DeFi yield analysis and optimization — lending rates, LP yields, staking returns, yield farming strategies, risk-adjusted yield comparison, and protocol-level sustainability assessment.
- Source repository stars
- 29,558
- Declared platforms
- 0
- Static risk flags
- 0
- Last source update
- 2026-08-04
- Source checked
- 2026-08-04
Decision brief
What it does—and where it fits
DeFi yield analysis and optimization — lending rates, LP yields, staking returns, yield farming strategies, risk-adjusted yield comparison, and protocol-level sustainability assessment.
Not for
- Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
- Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.
Compatibility matrix
Platform support, with evidence labels
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
Inspect first. Install second.
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/HKUDS/Vibe-Trading --skill "agent/src/skills/defi-yield"Inspect the Agent Skill "defi-yield" from https://github.com/HKUDS/Vibe-Trading/blob/3a752d5a8ed088633040893de1cc9e6dc712596f/agent/src/skills/defi-yield/SKILL.md at commit 3a752d5a8ed088633040893de1cc9e6dc712596f. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
What the source asks the agent to do
- 01
5. Yield Sustainability Assessment
Warning signs of unsustainable yield: 1. APY 100% with no clear revenue source → token emissions will dilute to zero 2. Protocol TVL growing but token price declining → mercenary capital chasing yield 3. Yield declining month-over-month while TVL is stable → emissions being cut…
APY 100% with no clear revenue source → token emissions will dilute to zeroProtocol TVL growing but token price declining → mercenary capital chasing yieldYield declining month-over-month while TVL is stable → emissions being cut - 02
Sustainability Assessment
Review the “Sustainability Assessment” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Review and apply the “Sustainability Assessment” source section. - 03
Core Concepts
Lending rates as market signal:
Lending rates as market signal: - 04
1. DeFi Yield Sources
Review the “1. DeFi Yield Sources” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Review and apply the “1. DeFi Yield Sources” source section. - 05
2. Lending Rate Analysis
Lending rates as market signal:
Lending rates as market signal:
Permission review
Static risk signals and limitations
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
Why each signal appears
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 85/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 29,558 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Provenance and original SKILL.md
- Repository
- HKUDS/Vibe-Trading
- Skill path
- agent/src/skills/defi-yield/SKILL.md
- Commit
- 3a752d5a8ed088633040893de1cc9e6dc712596f
- License
- MIT
- Collected
- 2026-08-04
- Default branch
- main
View the original SKILL.md
DeFi Yield Analysis & Optimization
Overview
Analyze and compare yields across DeFi protocols — lending, liquidity provision, staking, and yield farming — to identify the best risk-adjusted opportunities and assess sustainability. DeFi yields are a real-time proxy for crypto market leverage demand, capital allocation, and protocol health.
Core Concepts
1. DeFi Yield Sources
| Yield Source | Mechanism | Typical APY Range | Risk Level |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lending (supply) | Earn interest from borrowers | 1-15% (stablecoins 3-8%) | Low-medium |
| Borrowing cost | Interest paid by borrowers | 3-20% | N/A (cost side) |
| LP fees (AMM) | Trading fee share from DEX | 5-50% (varies by pair) | Medium-high |
| Staking | Validator/delegation rewards | 3-15% | Low-medium |
| Liquidity mining | Protocol token incentives | 10-500% (unsustainable) | High |
| Restaking | Re-hypothecated staking yield | 5-20% (ETH + AVS rewards) | Medium-high |
| Points farming | Off-chain points → future airdrop | Unknown (speculative) | Very high |
2. Lending Rate Analysis
Lending rates as market signal:
# High borrow rates = high leverage demand = bullish sentiment
# Low borrow rates = low leverage demand = bearish / waiting
def lending_rate_signal(borrow_rate_stable, borrow_rate_eth):
"""Analyze DeFi lending rates for market sentiment."""
if borrow_rate_stable > 15:
stable_signal = "extreme_demand" # Leveraged long via stablecoin borrowing
elif borrow_rate_stable > 8:
stable_signal = "elevated_demand"
elif borrow_rate_stable > 3:
stable_signal = "normal"
else:
stable_signal = "low_demand" # Bear market, no one borrowing
if borrow_rate_eth > 10:
eth_signal = "extreme_demand" # Shorting or leveraged strategies
elif borrow_rate_eth > 5:
eth_signal = "elevated"
else:
eth_signal = "low_demand"
return stable_signal, eth_signal
Key lending protocols:
| Protocol | Chain | Specialization | TVL Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aave V3 | Multi-chain | Blue-chip lending, institutional grade | $10-20B |
| Compound V3 | Ethereum, Base | Conservative, USDC-focused | $3-5B |
| MakerDAO/Sky | Ethereum | CDP-based DAI/USDS minting | $8-15B |
| Morpho | Ethereum | Rate optimization, P2P matching | $3-8B |
| Spark | Ethereum | MakerDAO lending arm | $2-5B |
| Kamino | Solana | Concentrated LP + lending | $1-3B |
3. LP Yield Analysis
Impermanent Loss (IL) — the core risk of LP positions:
def impermanent_loss(price_ratio_change):
"""
Calculate impermanent loss for a 50/50 AMM pool.
price_ratio_change: new_price / old_price of the volatile asset.
"""
r = price_ratio_change
il = 2 * (r ** 0.5) / (1 + r) - 1
return il * 100 # Return as percentage
# Examples:
# Price +25% → IL = -0.6%
# Price +50% → IL = -2.0%
# Price +100% (2x) → IL = -5.7%
# Price +200% (3x) → IL = -13.4%
# Price -50% → IL = -5.7%
# Price -75% → IL = -20.0%
LP yield = fee income + token incentives - impermanent loss
def net_lp_yield(fee_apy, incentive_apy, estimated_il_annualized):
"""Calculate risk-adjusted LP yield."""
gross_yield = fee_apy + incentive_apy
net_yield = gross_yield - abs(estimated_il_annualized)
return net_yield
# Example: ETH/USDC pool
# Fee APY: 15%, Incentive APY: 20%, Estimated IL: 8%
# Net yield: 15% + 20% - 8% = 27%
LP pool evaluation criteria:
| Metric | Good | Mediocre | Avoid |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fee APY / TVL | > 10% | 5-10% | < 5% |
| IL risk (based on pair volatility) | < 5% annualized | 5-15% | > 15% |
| TVL stability (30d change) | Growing or stable | Declining < 10% | Declining > 30% |
| Volume/TVL ratio | > 0.5x daily | 0.1-0.5x | < 0.1x |
| Incentive dependency | < 30% of yield | 30-70% | > 70% (unsustainable) |
4. Staking Yield Analysis
ETH staking ecosystem:
| Method | APY | Risk | Liquidity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Solo validator | ~3.5% | Slashing, downtime | Locked (exit queue) |
| Lido (stETH) | ~3.3% | Smart contract, governance | Liquid (stETH tradeable) |
| Rocket Pool (rETH) | ~3.2% | Smart contract, more decentralized | Liquid |
| Coinbase (cbETH) | ~3.0% | Custodial, regulatory | Liquid |
| EigenLayer restaking | ~3.5% + AVS rewards | Smart contract, slashing risk | Semi-liquid |
Staking yield signal:
# ETH staking yield trends
# Rising yield = more transactions / MEV = network activity increasing (bullish)
# Falling yield = less activity = network cooling down
# Restaking yield premium
restaking_premium = eigenlayer_yield - native_staking_yield
if restaking_premium > 3:
signal = "high_restaking_demand" # AVS demand strong
elif restaking_premium > 1:
signal = "moderate_premium"
else:
signal = "low_premium" # Restaking risk not compensated
5. Yield Sustainability Assessment
The "real yield" test:
def yield_sustainability(protocol):
"""
Real yield = yield funded by actual economic activity (fees, revenue)
Token yield = yield funded by token emissions (inflationary, unsustainable)
"""
total_yield_usd = protocol.total_yield_distributed_per_year
fee_revenue_usd = protocol.annual_fee_revenue
token_emission_usd = protocol.annual_token_emissions_at_market_price
real_yield_pct = fee_revenue_usd / total_yield_usd * 100
token_yield_pct = token_emission_usd / total_yield_usd * 100
if real_yield_pct > 80:
sustainability = "highly_sustainable" # Revenue-funded
elif real_yield_pct > 50:
sustainability = "partially_sustainable"
elif real_yield_pct > 20:
sustainability = "emission_dependent" # Mostly token incentives
else:
sustainability = "ponzi_risk" # Almost entirely token-funded
return sustainability, real_yield_pct
Warning signs of unsustainable yield:
- APY > 100% with no clear revenue source → token emissions will dilute to zero
- Protocol TVL growing but token price declining → mercenary capital chasing yield
- Yield declining month-over-month while TVL is stable → emissions being cut
- Protocol governance voting to increase emissions → short-term pump, long-term dilution
- Multiple yield sources stacking (lending + LP + staking + points) → complexity hides risk
6. Risk-Adjusted Yield Comparison Framework
def risk_adjusted_yield(opportunities):
"""Compare DeFi opportunities on risk-adjusted basis."""
scored = []
for opp in opportunities:
# Base yield
base = opp.apy
# Risk deductions
smart_contract_risk = -2 if opp.audit_status == "unaudited" else -0.5
il_risk = -opp.estimated_il if opp.type == "LP" else 0
protocol_risk = -1 if opp.tvl < 50_000_000 else 0 # Small protocol risk
chain_risk = -0.5 if opp.chain != "ethereum" else 0 # Non-ETH chain risk
sustainability_risk = -(base * 0.3) if opp.real_yield_pct < 30 else 0
# Adjusted yield
adjusted = base + smart_contract_risk + il_risk + protocol_risk + chain_risk + sustainability_risk
scored.append({
"protocol": opp.name,
"base_apy": base,
"adjusted_apy": adjusted,
"risk_level": opp.risk_level,
})
return sorted(scored, key=lambda x: x["adjusted_apy"], reverse=True)
Data Sources
| Source | Access | Data Available |
|---|---|---|
| DeFi Llama Yields | Free | APY across 1000+ pools/protocols |
| Aave/Compound dashboards | Free | Real-time lending rates |
| Dune Analytics | Free | Custom yield queries |
| DeBank | Free | Portfolio yield tracking |
| TokenTerminal | Free/Paid | Protocol revenue and earnings |
| EigenLayer dashboard | Free | Restaking rates and AVS yields |
Output Format
## DeFi Yield Analysis — [Date]
### Market Yield Overview
- **Stablecoin lending (Aave USDC)**: X.X% supply APY
- **ETH staking**: X.X% base + X.X% restaking premium
- **Top LP yields**: [pool1 X%, pool2 X%]
- **Yield trend**: [rising / stable / compressing]
### Top Opportunities (Risk-Adjusted)
| Rank | Protocol | Pool/Strategy | Base APY | Adjusted APY | Risk |
|------|----------|--------------|----------|-------------|------|
| 1 | [protocol] | [pool] | X.X% | X.X% | Low |
| 2 | [protocol] | [pool] | X.X% | X.X% | Medium |
| 3 | [protocol] | [pool] | X.X% | X.X% | Medium |
### Lending Market Signal
- **Stablecoin borrow rates**: X.X% → [high leverage demand / normal / low]
- **ETH borrow rates**: X.X% → [shorting demand / normal]
- **Utilization rates**: [high / normal / low]
### Sustainability Assessment
| Protocol | Real Yield % | Token Yield % | Verdict |
|----------|-------------|---------------|---------|
| [protocol] | XX% | XX% | Sustainable |
| [protocol] | XX% | XX% | Emission-dependent |
### Yield Strategy Recommendation
- **Conservative**: [stablecoin lending on Aave/Compound, X-X% APY]
- **Balanced**: [ETH staking + restaking, X-X% APY]
- **Aggressive**: [LP on DEX with hedged IL, X-X% net APY]
### Risk Warnings
1. [Smart contract risk: protocol X is unaudited]
2. [IL risk: volatile pair X/Y estimated IL X%]
3. [Sustainability risk: protocol Y >80% token-funded]
Notes
- DeFi yields are highly variable and can change within hours; quoted APYs are point-in-time snapshots
- "APY" in DeFi often assumes compounding that requires manual action (claiming + restaking); true returns may be lower
- Smart contract risk is the dominant risk in DeFi; even audited protocols have been exploited (multi-sig, oracle manipulation)
- Tax implications of DeFi yield vary by jurisdiction; yield farming income is taxable in most countries
- This framework is for research purposes only and does not constitute investment advice
Alternatives
Compare before choosing
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
ab-testing
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
churn-prevention
When the user wants to reduce churn, build cancellation flows, set up save offers, recover failed payments, or implement retention strategies. Also use when the user mentions 'churn,' 'cancel flow,' 'offboarding,' 'save offer,' 'dunning,' 'failed payment recovery,' 'win-back,' 'retention,' 'exit survey,' 'pause subscription,' 'involuntary churn,' 'people keep canceling,' 'churn rate is too high,' 'how do I keep users,' or 'customers are leaving.' Use this whenever someone is losing subscribers o
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
app-store-optimization
App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching keywords, analyzing competitor rankings, generating metadata suggestions, and improving app visibility on Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Use when the user asks about ASO, app store rankings, app metadata, app titles and descriptions, app store listings, app visibility, or mobile app marketing on iOS or Android. Supports keyword research and scoring, competitor keyword analysis, metadata optimization, A/B test planning, launch checklist
wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep
citation-audit
Use it for operations and research tasks; the detail page covers purpose, installation, and practical steps.