Source profileQuality 87/100Review permissions

Shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps/agent_skills/dependency-doctor/SKILL.md

dependency-doctor

Checks requirements.txt, pyproject.toml, and package.json dependency manifests for surface-level direct-dependency footguns: standard-library shadowing pins, abandoned backports, unpinned dependencies, and obvious intra-manifest conflicts, plus opt-in PyPI yanked releases. Use when the user asks to check a manifest for dependency problems, asks why dependencies won't install or whether anything is wrong with their dependencies, wants a dependency autopsy, or suspects dependency manifest rot. Run

Source repository stars
130,408
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
2
Last source update
2026-08-03
Source checked
2026-08-04

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

Inspect one dependency manifest on the user's machine for direct, surface-level footguns. Explain each finding in plain language, then offer a small, reviewable fix. This does not diagnose a failed pip or uv resolution.

Best for

  • The user asks to check, audit, diagnose, or autopsy a dependency manifest
  • The user wants to rule out direct-manifest issues before deeper install debugging
  • The user suspects stale pins, backports, duplicate entries, or dependency rot

Not for

  • Installing the current dependencies without diagnosing them
  • Upgrading every package or adding a new package

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/Shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps --skill "agent_skills/dependency-doctor"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "dependency-doctor" from https://github.com/Shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps/blob/779e9f9bcf87fa8cd95870a438b70b84e47d3173/agent_skills/dependency-doctor/SKILL.md at commit 779e9f9bcf87fa8cd95870a438b70b84e47d3173. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    When to use

    The user asks to check, audit, diagnose, or autopsy a dependency manifest

    The user asks to check, audit, diagnose, or autopsy a dependency manifestThe user wants to rule out direct-manifest issues before deeper install debuggingThe user suspects stale pins, backports, duplicate entries, or dependency rot
  2. 02

    When not to use

    Installing the current dependencies without diagnosing them

    Installing the current dependencies without diagnosing themUpgrading every package or adding a new packageA full vulnerability audit. Use pip-audit, npm audit, or the project's
  3. 03

    Choose the manifest

    Use the path the user names. If no path is given and several manifests exist, ask which one to inspect. Do not sweep the repository or edit anything merely because the skill was triggered.

    requirements.txtpyproject.toml using PEP 621 or common Poetry dependency tablespackage.json dependency sections
  4. 04

    Run the offline diagnosis

    From this skill directory:

    Python standard-library names published as packagesKnown backports that should not be installed on supported Python versionsDependencies without a usable version constraint
  5. 05

    Explain the diagnosis

    Read references/dependency-pitfalls.md before presenting findings. Lead with high severity items, then medium and low. For each finding, include:

    Package and source lineWhat can breakThe suggested fix

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

Reads files

low · line 30

The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.

ask which one to inspect. Do not sweep the repository or edit anything merely

Runs scripts

medium · line 44

The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.

python3 scripts/dep_doctor.py /path/to/requirements.txt --json

Runs scripts

medium · line 106

The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.

python3 scripts/dep_doctor.py /path/to/requirements.txt --json --online

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score87/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars130,408SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
Shubhamsaboo/awesome-llm-apps
Skill path
agent_skills/dependency-doctor/SKILL.md
Commit
779e9f9bcf87fa8cd95870a438b70b84e47d3173
License
Apache-2.0
Collected
2026-08-04
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

Dependency Doctor

Inspect one dependency manifest on the user's machine for direct, surface-level footguns. Explain each finding in plain language, then offer a small, reviewable fix. This does not diagnose a failed pip or uv resolution.

This is a local developer tool for a project the user chooses. It is not a repository-wide lint rule, a CI gate, or a proposal to enforce dependency policy across unrelated apps.

When to use

  • The user asks to check, audit, diagnose, or autopsy a dependency manifest
  • The user wants to rule out direct-manifest issues before deeper install debugging
  • The user suspects stale pins, backports, duplicate entries, or dependency rot
  • The user asks whether anything looks wrong with their dependencies

When not to use

  • Installing the current dependencies without diagnosing them
  • Upgrading every package or adding a new package
  • A full vulnerability audit. Use pip-audit, npm audit, or the project's approved security scanner for CVE coverage
  • Creating a repo-wide CI check. This skill is user-invoked and local

Choose the manifest

Use the path the user names. If no path is given and several manifests exist, ask which one to inspect. Do not sweep the repository or edit anything merely because the skill was triggered.

Supported inputs:

  • requirements.txt
  • pyproject.toml using PEP 621 or common Poetry dependency tables
  • package.json dependency sections

Run the offline diagnosis

From this skill directory:

python3 scripts/dep_doctor.py /path/to/requirements.txt --json

The default path is fully offline. It reads only the selected manifest. The report shape is:

{
  "file": "/path/to/requirements.txt",
  "findings": [
    {
      "severity": "high",
      "kind": "stdlib-shadowing",
      "package": "pathlib",
      "line": 4,
      "why": "...",
      "fix": "..."
    }
  ],
  "summary": {
    "total": 1,
    "by_severity": {"high": 1},
    "by_kind": {"stdlib-shadowing": 1},
    "online": false
  }
}

The offline checks cover:

  • Python standard-library names published as packages
  • Known backports that should not be installed on supported Python versions
  • Dependencies without a usable version constraint
  • Repeated package entries
  • Conflicting exact pins for the same package

For package.json, Python-specific standard-library and backport checks do not apply. The doctor still checks unpinned values and repeated dependency entries.

Explain the diagnosis

Read references/dependency-pitfalls.md before presenting findings. Lead with high severity items, then medium and low. For each finding, include:

  1. Package and source line
  2. What can break
  3. The suggested fix

Do not call every range a conflict. The deterministic core reports conflicting constraints only when exact pins disagree. Compatible constraints split across multiple lines are duplicate entries that should be combined.

If there are no findings, say what was checked and note the limits. A clean report is not a CVE audit or a full dependency resolver.

Optional PyPI yank check

The online check sends package names and exact pinned versions to pypi.org. Ask for permission before enabling it, even if the user previously requested an offline diagnosis.

python3 scripts/dep_doctor.py /path/to/requirements.txt --json --online

It reports an exact Python release only when every file for that release is marked yanked. Network failures become low-severity findings instead of hiding the offline diagnosis.

Offer fixes, do not apply them silently

After explaining the report, offer a focused edit. Wait for approval before changing the manifest.

  • Remove standard-library packages from supported Python projects
  • Remove obsolete backports, or add a Python-version marker when an old runtime genuinely needs one
  • For an unpinned dependency, inspect the working environment's installed version, confirm it is intended, and propose an exact reviewed pin
  • Keep one entry for duplicates and combine compatible constraints
  • For conflicting exact pins, inspect dependents before choosing a version
  • Replace a yanked pin with a tested, non-yanked release

After any approved edit, rerun the offline diagnosis and the project's existing install or test command. Do not introduce a new CI gate.

Files

  • scripts/dep_doctor.py: stdlib-only manifest parser and diagnosis engine
  • references/dependency-pitfalls.md: reasoning guide for the reported risks

Alternatives

Compare before choosing