johnqtcg/awesome-skills/skills/e2e-test/SKILL.md
e2e-test
Design, maintain, and execute reliable end-to-end tests for critical user journeys with Agent Browser as first choice for exploration and Playwright as the preferred code path for suites and CI. Use for E2E strategy, journey coverage, flaky test triage, artifact collection, CI gating, regression prevention, and browser automation tasks.
- Source repository stars
- 30
- Declared platforms
- 0
- Static risk flags
- 2
- Last source update
- 2026-08-22
- Source checked
- 2026-08-25
Decision brief
What it does: where it fits
Use this skill to create E2E coverage that is deterministic, evidence-backed, and maintainable in real repositories.
Not for
- Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
- Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.
Compatibility matrix
Platform support, with evidence labels
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
Inspect first. Install second.
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/johnqtcg/awesome-skills --skill "skills/e2e-test"Inspect the Agent Skill "e2e-test" from https://github.com/johnqtcg/awesome-skills/blob/d63cf368c1b106871b56454bd73c293701bef500/skills/e2e-test/SKILL.md at commit d63cf368c1b106871b56454bd73c293701bef500. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
What the source asks the agent to do
- 01
Quick Reference
Do not use this skill for visual design review with no automated journey value, performance/load testing, or tests that would require guessed secrets, endpoints, or private accounts.
Do not use this skill for visual design review with no automated journey value, performance/load testing, or tests that would require guessed secrets, endpoints, or private accounts. - 02
Load References Selectively
Load on demand, not up front. A typical Playwright coding task needs the two every-task rows plus playwright-patterns.md — three files. Everything below that is conditional; open it when the trigger in the first column actually applies.
Load on demand, not up front. A typical Playwright coding task needs the two every-task rows plus playwright-patterns.md — three files. Everything below that is conditional; open it when the trigger in the first column… - 03
Runner Strategy
Use both tools intentionally, not interchangeably.
Agent Browser first:journey discoveryrepro of flaky or environment-specific UI behavior - 04
Operating Model
1. Classify the task: - new journey coverage - flaky triage - failed CI investigation - exploratory browser reproduction - test architecture or CI gate design
Classify the task:new journey coverageflaky triage - 05
Runner Selection Guidance
If the project has no Node.js / Playwright (e.g., Go, Python, Rust web apps):
Use the project's native test framework (Go net/http, Python requests/httpx, etc.)Do NOT install Playwright into a project that has no JavaScript toolchainFollow the project's existing E2E test conventions if they exist
Permission review
Static risk signals and limitations
Reads files
The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.
scan repository config, scripts, env files, docs, and existing testsReads files
The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.
Place the guard where it can still prevent the read: file scope, inside the test,Network access
The documentation includes network, browsing, or remote request actions.
await page.goto("http://staging");Evidence record
Why each signal appears
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 96/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 30 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Provenance and original SKILL.md
- Repository
- johnqtcg/awesome-skills
- Skill path
- skills/e2e-test/SKILL.md
- Commit
- d63cf368c1b106871b56454bd73c293701bef500
- License
- MIT
- Collected
- 2026-08-25
- Default branch
- main
View the original SKILL.md
E2E test
Use this skill to create E2E coverage that is deterministic, evidence-backed, and maintainable in real repositories.
Quick Reference
| If you need to… | Go to |
|---|---|
| Design new E2E test coverage for a user journey | §Operating Model → new journey coverage + Load references/checklists.md |
| Write or update Playwright tests | §Runner Strategy + Load references/playwright-patterns.md |
| Use advanced Playwright (auth, fixtures, mocking, CI sharding) | Load references/playwright-deep-patterns.md |
| Triage a flaky or failing E2E test | §Operating Model → flaky triage + Load references/checklists.md |
| Use Agent Browser for exploration or repro | §Runner Strategy + Load references/agent-browser-workflows.md |
| Design CI gates for E2E suites | §Operating Model → CI gate design + Load references/environment-and-dependency-gates.md |
| Avoid common Playwright mistakes | Load references/anti-examples.md |
| Test content inside an iframe (payment, editor, OAuth) | Load references/playwright-deep-patterns.md §Iframes |
| Handle a Tauri or native-mobile app | §Version and Platform Gate → Platform Scope Boundary |
| Check generated spec code before reporting | Run python3 scripts/lint_e2e_spec.py <file.spec.ts> |
| See a fully worked E2E output example | Load references/golden-examples.md |
Do not use this skill for visual design review with no automated journey value, performance/load testing, or tests that would require guessed secrets, endpoints, or private accounts.
Load References Selectively
Load on demand, not up front. A typical Playwright coding task needs the two
every-task rows plus playwright-patterns.md — three files. Everything below that
is conditional; open it when the trigger in the first column actually applies.
| When | Load / run | Contents |
|---|---|---|
| Every task, before coverage or gate decisions | references/checklists.md | 5 checklists: pre-run readiness, journey coverage, flaky triage, quarantine, result reporting |
| Every task, before claiming runnable | references/environment-and-dependency-gates.md | Readiness gates per context (local / preview / staging / CI), available vs declared vs missing, dependency matrix |
| Before gate decisions | bash scripts/discover_e2e_needs.sh | Detects runner, Node, framework, existing tests, env-var states, CI platform. Report facts, not guesses |
| Writing Playwright code (JS only) | references/playwright-patterns.md | Selector order (getByRole first), wait patterns, assertion contracts, config baseline, API-introduction + Node tables |
| Auth, fixtures, data isolation, mocking, iframes, sharding | references/playwright-deep-patterns.md | The advanced layer — large; open the section you need |
| A mistake not among the seven below | references/anti-examples.md | Extended catalog only, no overlap with §Anti-Examples here |
| Using Agent Browser | references/agent-browser-workflows.md | Commands, exploration→code conversion, repro steps, handoff format |
| Shaping the final report | references/golden-examples.md | Full output-contract examples (Playwright + Go). All figures in it are synthetic |
| Grading generated spec code | python3 scripts/lint_e2e_spec.py <file> | Deterministic check of C1–C4 / S1 / S3 / S5 / H2 + W1. Evidence, not a verdict |
Runner Strategy
Use both tools intentionally, not interchangeably.
- Agent Browser first:
- journey discovery
- repro of flaky or environment-specific UI behavior
- fast semantic interaction and screenshot capture
- Playwright preferred for code:
- committed E2E tests
- CI suites
- repeated local validation
- multi-browser or matrix execution
If a task starts in Agent Browser and the flow is valuable long-term, convert the learned steps into Playwright coverage.
Operating Model
-
Classify the task:
- new journey coverage
- flaky triage
- failed CI investigation
- exploratory browser reproduction
- test architecture or CI gate design
-
Run
scripts/discover_e2e_needs.shto collect repository facts (Playwright version, framework, existing tests, env vars, CI platform). Use its structured output for gate decisions instead of guessing. -
Run the environment and configuration gate.
-
Choose the runner path:
- Agent Browser for exploration or reproduction
- Playwright for maintainable automated coverage
- both when discovery should become code
- non-JS projects: use the project's native test framework (see Runner Selection below)
-
Produce only the strongest deliverable the environment can actually support:
- runnable test
- guarded scaffold with explicit skips
- triage report with repro commands
Runner Selection Guidance
If the project has no Node.js / Playwright (e.g., Go, Python, Rust web apps):
- Use the project's native test framework (Go
net/http, Pythonrequests/httpx, etc.) - Do NOT install Playwright into a project that has no JavaScript toolchain
- Follow the project's existing E2E test conventions if they exist
- Document the runner selection rationale in the Output Contract
- All 5 mandatory gates still apply regardless of runner choice
Mandatory Gates
1) Configuration Gate
Before generating or updating runnable tests:
- scan repository config, scripts, env files, docs, and existing tests
- list required variables, accounts, feature flags, and service dependencies
- mark each with one of these four states — the same vocabulary
scripts/discover_e2e_needs.shemits:
| State | Means | Consequence |
|---|---|---|
available | a non-empty value exists now (process env or a real .env) | usable |
declared | the name is known but no value is supplied here — a .env.example entry, or E2E_PASS= with nothing after it | not usable; confirm the runtime source before claiming runnable |
missing | no evidence the project uses this variable at all | scaffold or stop |
unknown | not yet inspected | inspect before deciding |
declared is the state most easily mistaken for available. A template file
proves a variable is expected, never that a value exists. Treating the two as
the same is what turns "cannot run" into a false "ready".
Never print a variable's value to check whether it is set — report the state. CI logs, screen recordings, and agent transcripts all capture stdout.
If required values are missing:
- do not invent them
- generate placeholder-only scaffolding with explicit TODOs and skip guards when code output is still useful
- otherwise stop and report the exact blockers
Guard every variable the suite needs, not just the first one. A
test.skip(!USER) leaves an unset PASS to reach the page as undefined, which
surfaces as a login failure rather than "you forgot to set PASS".
Place the guard where it can still prevent the read: file scope, inside the test,
or in a beforeEach / beforeAll hook. A guard in one test says nothing about
another test.
A test.skip in afterEach / afterAll is worse than useless. Measured on
Playwright 1.62.0 (scripts/verify_hook_semantics.sh): the test body runs,
reads the unset value, and the run is then reported as skipped — so a suite
that should have failed loudly reports as skipped instead. Never put a guard in an
after hook.
In every result include:
- required variable list with each variable's state
- example export block or config shape
- missing variables
2) Environment Gate
Before claiming a test is runnable, determine:
- target environment: local, preview, staging, CI
- base URL and auth flow
- whether seed/reset is deterministic
- whether third-party dependencies can be stubbed or must be live
- whether test accounts and permissions are available
Read references/environment-and-dependency-gates.md whenever environment readiness is uncertain.
3) Execution Integrity Gate
Never claim a suite or repro was executed unless it actually ran.
If commands were not run, output:
Not run in this environment- reason
- exact commands to run next
If commands were run, report:
- command(s)
- target environment
- pass/fail status
- artifact locations
4) Stability Gate
Do not treat a single pass as proof of reliability for critical paths or flaky failures.
Use repeat runs, traces, screenshots, and environment evidence before concluding:
- the bug is fixed
- the test is stable
- the failure is infra-only
5) Side-Effect Gate
Default to safe behavior for real-world side effects:
- avoid production data mutation
- avoid real-money or irreversible flows unless explicitly configured for safe test execution
- require explicit approval or isolation for destructive actions
Version and Platform Gate
Before recommending Playwright code or config, adapt to the repository's actual platform:
| Signal | Adaptation |
|---|---|
Playwright < 1.27 | Prefer locator and stable attribute selectors. getByRole, getByLabel, getByTestId, and getByPlaceholder do not exist yet. |
Playwright < 1.29 | No expect(...).toPass(). Use expect.poll() (1.21+) instead. |
Playwright < 1.33 | No filter({ hasNot }) and no expect(locator).toBeAttached(). |
Node below the pinned Playwright's engines.node floor | npm install fails. Not runnable — do not claim "ready to run". |
Node meets engines but is outside Playwright's supported list (latest 22.x / 24.x / 26.x) | Runnable but unsupported. Say so; do not report it as supported. |
Two different Node constraints exist — the engines.node install floor and the
documented supported-runtime list — and they do not agree. Both tables are in
references/playwright-patterns.md §Node.js Compatibility.
Never wait on waitForLoadState('networkidle') at any version — Playwright marks
it DISCOURAGED. Assert the user-visible state instead.
The full API-introduction and Node-compatibility tables live in
references/playwright-patterns.md §Version and Platform Gate. Read the
project's pinned version before generating code; when it cannot be determined,
target the oldest plausible version and say so in the Output Contract.
Framework adaptation checklist:
- Next.js: verify
baseURL, server startup, and auth/session bootstrapping strategy. - SPA: prefer explicit waits on route or API completion, not arbitrary sleeps.
- SSR: assert server-rendered and hydrated states separately when needed.
- Monorepo: locate the owning package, config file, and CI entrypoint before generating commands.
Platform Scope Boundary
Playwright is not the answer everywhere. Route away from it rather than generating code that cannot run:
| Platform | Route to | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Native iOS / Android | Detox, Maestro, or Appium | No browser to drive |
| Tauri | WebdriverIO + @wdio/tauri-service | Renders in the OS webview (WKWebView / WebView2 / WebKitGTK); Playwright cannot attach. See references/playwright-deep-patterns.md §Tauri |
| Electron | Playwright _electron | Supported natively |
| React Native Web | Playwright | Standard DOM; testID → data-testid |
Say plainly that the tool does not fit, name the right one, and stop. A plausible-looking Playwright suite for a Tauri app is worse than no answer.
Content Inside Iframes
Page-level locators do not cross a frame boundary. Embedded payment fields,
editors, and OAuth screens need frameLocator. When an element is visibly on
screen but "not found", check for an iframe before changing the selector — see
references/playwright-deep-patterns.md §Iframes and Embedded Third-Party
Content. Payment iframes additionally require the Side-Effect Gate: confirm
sandbox mode before running anything.
Playwright-First Engineering Rules
Use references/playwright-deep-patterns.md whenever generating or refactoring Playwright code.
At minimum:
- prefer reusable fixtures and domain helpers over copy-pasted flows
- use stable auth setup such as
storageStatewhen appropriate - isolate data per test or per worker
- define what can be mocked and what must stay real
- choose serial vs parallel execution intentionally
- keep retries, trace, screenshot, and video policies aligned with CI needs
If the repository lacks the needed config or fixtures, generate the smallest honest scaffold rather than pseudo-runnable code.
Anti-Examples
1) Unconditional waitForTimeout in assertions
BAD:
await page.waitForTimeout(3000);
await expect(page.getByText("Order confirmed")).toBeVisible();
GOOD:
await expect(page.getByText("Order confirmed")).toBeVisible();
2) Fragile CSS selector chains
BAD:
await page.locator(".app > div:nth-child(2) .cta.primary").click();
GOOD:
await page.getByRole("button", { name: "Continue" }).click();
3) Shared mutable data across tests
BAD:
const sharedEmail = "[email protected]";
test("profile update", async ({ page }) => { /* mutates same account */ });
GOOD:
const email = `e2e-${test.info().parallelIndex}-${Date.now()}@example.com`;
test("profile update", async ({ page }) => { /* isolated data per test */ });
4) Guessing env values or credentials
BAD:
await page.goto("http://staging");
await page.fill("#email", "[email protected]");
await page.fill("#password", "password123");
GOOD:
test.skip(!process.env.E2E_BASE_URL || !process.env.E2E_USER, "explicit TODOs until config exists");
await page.goto(process.env.E2E_BASE_URL!);
5) Silently serializing entire suite
BAD:
test.describe.configure({ mode: "serial" });
GOOD:
test.describe("checkout funnel", () => {
test.describe.configure({ mode: "serial" }); // justified by irreversible payment sandbox state
});
6) Repeating login instead of storageState
BAD:
test.beforeEach(async ({ page }) => {
await page.goto("/login");
await page.fill("#email", process.env.E2E_USER!);
});
GOOD:
test.use({ storageState: "playwright/.auth/user.json" });
7) Pseudo-runnable scaffold without test.skip
BAD:
test("checkout", async ({ page }) => {
await page.goto(process.env.E2E_BASE_URL!);
});
GOOD:
test.skip(!process.env.E2E_BASE_URL, "missing base URL");
// TODO: wire payment sandbox account before enabling this journey
Agent Browser Bridge
Use Agent Browser to discover or reproduce, then convert findings into durable code.
Required bridge steps:
- capture the environment and entry URL
- record the exact command sequence
- save milestone screenshots
- note the selectors or semantic targets that proved stable
- translate the validated flow into Playwright assertions and helpers
Read references/agent-browser-workflows.md when using Agent Browser.
Flaky Test Policy
See references/checklists.md §Flaky Triage Template for the complete template.
Key rules:
- A test is flaky only with non-deterministic behavior under unchanged code and environment
- Required sequence: reproduce (
--repeat-each=Nor-count=N) → classify root cause → fix → quarantine with deadline - Root cause categories: selector instability, async race, test-data coupling, network instability, environment drift, application defect
- quarantine only with owner, tracking issue, and removal deadline
CI Strategy
For PR automation, separate Blocking critical journeys from broader nightly coverage:
- Blocking PR gate:
- run
playwright install --with-deps chromiumduring setup when browsers are not pre-baked - use Secret injection for base URL, auth state bootstrap, and sandbox-only credentials
- upload-artifact for trace, screenshot, video, and HTML report on failure
- keep retries and timeout values explicit in config and CI job output
- run
- Nightly / extended lane:
- run broader browser matrix, accessibility sweeps, and visual regression
- increase retries only for known infra volatility, not to hide product bugs
Output Contract
For any E2E task, return:
Task typeRunner choiceEnvironment gateConfig/dependency statusCovered journeyorFailure under triageExecuted commandsExecution statusArtifactsNext actions
If code was generated, also include:
- files created or updated
- skip conditions or TODO markers if scaffolding only
Machine-Readable Summary (JSON)
When the output will be consumed by CI or downstream tooling, append:
{
"task_type": "new_journey_coverage",
"runner": "playwright",
"environment": "local",
"execution_status": "pass",
"tests_passed": 3,
"tests_failed": 0,
"tests_skipped": 0,
"artifacts": ["playwright-report/index.html", "test-results/"],
"scorecard": { "critical": "PASS", "standard": "5/6", "hygiene": "4/4" },
"blockers": [],
"next_actions": ["add password-reset edge case"]
}
Quality Scorecard
For non-Playwright runners (Go HTTP, Python requests, etc.), mark Playwright-specific items as N/A. Count only applicable items when computing pass rates.
List every item including the N/A ones. Dropping a row and dividing by a smaller denominator inflates the score.
For Playwright output, run python3 scripts/lint_e2e_spec.py <file> before
reporting. It mechanically checks C1, C2, C3, C4, S1, S3, S5, and H2, plus W1
(network wait armed after its trigger — an extra check, not a scorecard item).
It does not check S2, S4, S6, H1, H3, H4 — those need repository and CI
context it cannot see, so assess them yourself. A clean report is weaker
evidence than a dirty one: it is a heuristic pass, not a parser, and cannot see
through helpers or page objects.
Critical (any FAIL → overall FAIL)
| # | Item | PASS rule |
|---|---|---|
| C1 | No unconditional waitForTimeout in assertions | Zero instances outside diagnostic comments |
| C2 | Data isolation explicit | Each test owns its data or has deterministic cleanup |
| C3 | No guessed secrets or URLs | All external values from env/config with skip guard |
| C4 | All 5 mandatory gates addressed | Configuration, Environment, Execution Integrity, Stability, Side-Effect |
Standard (≥ 4/6 PASS)
| # | Item | PASS rule |
|---|---|---|
| S1 | Selectors use getByRole/getByLabel/getByTestId | ≥ 90% of interactions use accessible selectors |
| S2 | Auth strategy explicit | storageState reuse or justified in-test login |
| S3 | Assertions after major interactions | Every user-visible state change has an expect |
| S4 | Artifact policy configured | trace, screenshot, video settings present |
| S5 | Serial vs parallel justified | Serial only with documented reason |
| S6 | Mock boundaries documented | Each mocked dependency has rationale |
Hygiene (≥ 3/4 PASS)
| # | Item | PASS rule |
|---|---|---|
| H1 | Reusable fixtures/helpers | Shared flows extracted, not copy-pasted |
| H2 | Descriptive test names | Name describes user journey, not implementation |
| H3 | CI strategy present | Blocking gate vs nightly split documented |
| H4 | Repeat-run validation | Critical paths validated with --repeat-each |
Frequently asked questions
What to verify before installation and use
What does the e2e-test source document cover?
Use this skill to create E2E coverage that is deterministic, evidence-backed, and maintainable in real repositories.
How do I install e2e-test?
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/johnqtcg/awesome-skills --skill "skills/e2e-test". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Which permission-related actions were detected?
Static rules flagged read-files, network in the source; the page lists the matching lines and excerpts.
Alternatives
Compare before choosing
vasilyu1983/AI-Agents-public
qa-testing-ios
Guides iOS testing with XCTest, XCUITest, Swift Testing, simctl, and xcresult. Use when choosing destinations, controlling flakes, or parsing test artifacts for native apps.
yonatangross/orchestkit
verify
Grade work that already exists and decide whether it can merge. Runs the project's current unit, integration, and E2E suites plus security scanning and type checking, scores every dimension 0-10, and returns a merge verdict with a VERIFIED-vs-CLAIMED evidence manifest. Writes no test files and edits no source. Use when verifying changes are ready to merge. Use /ork:cover instead when the tests still have to be written.
microsoft/Sico
android-tester
Execute Android UI workflows on a sandbox device, review results, and produce a structured execution report.
AI-Unified-Process/marketplace
browserless-test
Creates Vaadin Browserless server-side unit tests for Vaadin views covering navigation, component interactions, form validation, grid operations, and notifications. Use when the user asks to "write Browserless tests", "write Vaadin UI unit tests", "unit test a Vaadin view without a browser", "create view tests with the official Vaadin testing framework", or mentions Browserless testing, SpringBrowserlessTest, browserless-test-junit6, UI Unit Testing, or server-side Vaadin testing.