arbazkhan971/godmode/skills/feature/SKILL.md
feature
Feature flag design, gradual rollouts, A/B testing, kill switches. LaunchDarkly, Unleash, Flagsmith. Triggers on: /godmode:feature, "feature flag", "gradual rollout", "kill switch", "A/B test".
- Source repository stars
- 26
- Declared platforms
- 0
- Static risk flags
- 0
- Last source update
- 2026-08-28
- Source checked
- 2026-08-28
Decision brief
What it does: where it fits
Feature flag design, gradual rollouts, A/B testing, kill switches. LaunchDarkly, Unleash, Flagsmith.
Not for
- Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
- Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.
Compatibility matrix
Platform support, with evidence labels
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
Inspect first. Install second.
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/arbazkhan971/godmode --skill "skills/feature"Inspect the Agent Skill "feature" from https://github.com/arbazkhan971/godmode/blob/18bfc31d669804856ba232f04cdbd172afbdc379/skills/feature/SKILL.md at commit 18bfc31d669804856ba232f04cdbd172afbdc379. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
What the source asks the agent to do
- 01
Workflow
Review the “Workflow” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Review and apply the “Workflow” source section. - 02
Step 1: Flag Strategy Assessment
Review the “Step 1: Flag Strategy Assessment” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Review and apply the “Step 1: Flag Strategy Assessment” source section. - 03
Find existing flag usage
grep -rn "featureFlag\|isEnabled\|isFeatureEnabled" \ src/ --include=".ts" --include=".py" 2/dev/null | wc -l
grep -rn "featureFlag\|isEnabled\|isFeatureEnabled" \ src/ --include=".ts" --include=".py" 2/dev/null | wc -l - 04
Step 2: Flag Types
Review the “Step 2: Flag Types” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Review and apply the “Step 2: Flag Types” source section. - 05
Step 3: Targeting & Gradual Rollout
Review the “Step 3: Targeting & Gradual Rollout” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Review and apply the “Step 3: Targeting & Gradual Rollout” source section.
Permission review
Static risk signals and limitations
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
Why each signal appears
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 93/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 26 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Provenance and original SKILL.md
- Repository
- arbazkhan971/godmode
- Skill path
- skills/feature/SKILL.md
- Commit
- 18bfc31d669804856ba232f04cdbd172afbdc379
- License
- MIT
- Collected
- 2026-08-28
- Default branch
- master
View the original SKILL.md
Feature — Feature Flags & Progressive Delivery
Activate When
- User invokes
/godmode:feature - User says "feature flag", "gradual rollout"
- User says "kill switch", "A/B test"
- Deploying needs safer rollout or deploy/release decoupling
Workflow
Step 1: Flag Strategy Assessment
# Detect existing flag infrastructure
grep -r "launchdarkly\|unleash\|flagsmith\|split\|statsig" \
package.json pyproject.toml 2>/dev/null
# Find existing flag usage
grep -rn "featureFlag\|isEnabled\|isFeatureEnabled" \
src/ --include="*.ts" --include="*.py" 2>/dev/null | wc -l
# Check for stale flags (not evaluated in 30+ days)
grep -rn "featureFlag\|isEnabled" src/ \
--include="*.ts" 2>/dev/null | head -20
FLAG STRATEGY:
Current: None | Homegrown | LaunchDarkly | Unleash
Flag needs: Release | Experiment | Ops | Permission
Environments: Dev | Staging | Prod | Mobile
IF < 5 flags: Homegrown or Flagsmith OSS
IF 5-50 flags: Unleash or Flagsmith
IF 50+ flags with experiments: LaunchDarkly
IF strict data residency: self-hosted
Step 2: Flag Types
| Type | Lifecycle | Default | Duration |
|------------|-------------|---------|-----------|
| Release | Short-lived | OFF | < 2 weeks |
| Experiment | Short-lived | CONTROL | < 4 weeks |
| Ops/Kill | Permanent | ON | Forever |
| Permission | Permanent | OFF | Forever |
RELEASE RAMP:
CREATE → INTERNAL → CANARY 1% → 5% → 25%
→ 50% → 100% → CLEANUP (within 2 weeks)
EXPERIMENT RAMP:
CREATE → CONFIGURE → RUN → SIGNIFICANCE
→ PICK WINNER → CLEANUP (within 1 week)
Step 3: Targeting & Gradual Rollout
RULE PRIORITY (top to bottom):
1. Individual overrides
2. Employee targeting
3. Beta segment
4. Percentage rollout
5. Default OFF
ROLLOUT STAGES:
Internal (0.1%) 1d → Canary (1%) 1-2d
→ Early (5%) 2-3d → Expanding (25%) 3-5d
→ Majority (50%) 3-5d → Full (100%)
GATE CRITERIA (advance only if all pass):
Error rate < baseline + 0.1%
P95 latency < baseline + 10%
Conversion > baseline - 2%
Support tickets < baseline + 5%
STICKY BUCKETING:
hash(flagKey:userId) % 10000 / 100
Same user always sees same variant
Increasing % adds users, never flips existing
Step 4: Kill Switches
REQUIREMENTS:
Effect in < 30 seconds, no deploy needed
Dashboard/CLI accessible, audit trail
Hierarchy: Global → Service → Feature → Region
AUTO-TRIGGERS:
IF error rate > 5% for 2min: disable flag
IF P99 > 3x baseline for 5min: disable flag
FALLBACK:
Locally cached values (5min TTL)
Then hardcoded defaults
Never crash because flag service is down
Step 5: Lifecycle Management
NAMING CONVENTION:
enable_<feature> (release)
exp_<name> (experiment)
disable_<feature> (ops kill switch)
STALE FLAG DETECTION:
Release at 100% for > 2 weeks: STALE
Experiment concluded > 1 week: STALE
Not evaluated in > 30 days: STALE
> 90 days without cleanup date: STALE
THRESHOLDS:
Max flags per service: 50 (audit if more)
Evaluation latency: < 5ms (in-memory cache)
Cache refresh interval: 30 seconds
Cleanup deadline: 2 weeks after 100%
Step 6: A/B Testing Integration
PROCESS:
1. Define hypothesis + primary metric
2. Set guardrail metrics (must not regress)
3. Calculate sample size for power 0.80
4. Configure sticky bucketing variants
5. Wait for significance (p < 0.05)
THRESHOLDS:
Minimum duration: 7 days (full business cycle)
Alpha: 0.05, Power: 0.80
Never peek before minimum sample reached
Correct for multiple testing if > 2 variants
Step 7: Validation
Check: types categorized, naming enforced, owner assigned, cleanup dates set, kill switches defined, sticky bucketing, fallback behavior, audit trail, evaluation < 5ms.
Commit: "feature: <flag_name> — <type> at <pct>%"
Key Behaviors
Never ask to continue. Loop autonomously until done.
- Flags are temporary by default. Cleanup required.
- Decouple deploy from release. Ship dark.
- Kill switches are not optional.
- Clean up flags. Max 2 weeks at 100%.
- Sticky bucketing is mandatory.
- Test both paths. On, off, and transition.
- Default to off, fail to off.
HARD RULES
- Never leave release flags at 100% for > 2 weeks.
- Never nest flag checks. Keep flags independent.
- Never use flags as permanent config.
- Always test both flag-on AND flag-off paths.
- Never evaluate flags in hot loops. Once per request.
- Never expose server-side targeting rules to clients.
- Never call experiment winner without sample size.
- Always maintain an audit trail for flag changes.
Auto-Detection
grep -r "launchdarkly\|unleash\|flagsmith" package.json
grep -rl "featureFlag\|isEnabled" src/ --include="*.ts"
Output Format
Print: Feature: {flag} at {pct}% rollout. Error={err}%, latency_p99={lat}ms. Kill switch: {tested|untested}. Status: {status}.
TSV Logging
step flag_name flag_type platform status details
Keep/Discard Discipline
KEEP if: metrics within guardrails AND no error spike
AND kill switch tested
DISCARD if: error > baseline+0.1% OR latency > +10%
OR conversion drops > 2%
On discard: roll back to previous percentage.
Stop Conditions
STOP when ALL of:
- Flag at 100% with stable metrics for 7 days
- Kill switch tested and verified
- Cleanup scheduled (within 2 weeks)
Error Recovery
- SDK init fails: check API key, implement fallbacks.
- Flag not evaluating: check context (user.id passed?).
- Rollout errors: set to 0%, check logs, resume at 1%.
- Stale flags: run audit, remove code, delete branches.
- Conflicting flags: map deps, encode as prerequisites.
Frequently asked questions
What to verify before installation and use
What does the feature source document cover?
Feature flag design, gradual rollouts, A/B testing, kill switches. LaunchDarkly, Unleash, Flagsmith.
How do I install feature?
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/arbazkhan971/godmode --skill "skills/feature". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Alternatives
Compare before choosing
Borda/AI-Rig
feature
TDD-first feature development — crystallise API as a demo test, drive implementation to pass it, run quality stack and progressive review loop. TRIGGER when: user asks to build new functionality, add a capability, or implement a feature in a Python project; phrases: "add X", "implement Y", "build Z feature", "create a new module for". SKIP when: bug fixes (use `/develop:fix`); refactoring without new behaviour (use `/develop:refactor`); non-Python projects; `.claude/` config changes (use `/found
vasilyu1983/AI-Agents-public
qa-testing-ios
Guides iOS testing with XCTest, XCUITest, Swift Testing, simctl, and xcresult. Use when choosing destinations, controlling flakes, or parsing test artifacts for native apps.
dotnet/skills
writing-mstest-tests
Fix, modernize, review, or explain supplied MSTest code and MSTest-specific configuration while honoring installed versions and project style. ALWAYS USE for direct corrections: expected/actual order; generic/manual assertions; exception, hard-cast, or object[] patterns; TestContext/lifecycle; timeout/cancellation; condition/retry/cleanup; parallelization; MSTest.Sdk setup; or MSTESTxxxx. Use for "review" only when corrected code or edits are wanted. DO NOT USE for new test-case design (code-tes
yonatangross/orchestkit
verify
Grade work that already exists and decide whether it can merge. Runs the project's current unit, integration, and E2E suites plus security scanning and type checking, scores every dimension 0-10, and returns a merge verdict with a VERIFIED-vs-CLAIMED evidence manifest. Writes no test files and edits no source. Use when verifying changes are ready to merge. Use /ork:cover instead when the tests still have to be written.