What is finishing-a-development-branch?
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work
obra/superpowers
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work
npx skills add https://github.com/obra/superpowers --skill "skills/finishing-a-development-branch"Quick start
Install it or open the source, trigger it with a clear task, then follow the source workflow.
npx skills add https://github.com/obra/superpowers --skill "skills/finishing-a-development-branch"Use finishing-a-development-branch to help me with: [describe your task]. Before you begin, tell me what input you need, the steps you will follow, and the expected output.
No structured workflow was detected; follow the original SKILL.md below.
Continue to the workflowDirect answers
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work
It is relevant to workflows involving the tasks described in the upstream documentation.
SkillSignal detected this source-specific command: npx skills add https://github.com/obra/superpowers --skill "skills/finishing-a-development-branch". Inspect the repository and command before running it.
The upstream source does not declare a dedicated Agent platform.
Static analysis detected exec-script signals. Review the cited source lines before installing; these signals are not a security audit.
This page combines upstream documentation with deterministic repository, quality, and static-risk signals. It is not described as a manual test or security review.
SkillSignal brief
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work
Useful in these contexts
Core capabilities
Distilled from the source
About 4 min · 10 sections
Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work
Quality breakdown
Based on traceable docs and repository signals; stars are not treated as quality.
Compare before choosing
These links are selected from shared tasks, functions, stacks, platforms, and same-name variants. Compare the source owner, documentation, permissions, and maintenance signals.
Use when the feature is implementation-complete and the next step is 'ship it' — verifies, cleans up, and routes to merge/PR/park/discard — even when the user just says 'I'm done, what now?'.
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program
When the user wants to reduce churn, build cancellation flows, set up save offers, recover failed payments, or implement retention strategies. Also use when the user mentions 'churn,' 'cancel flow,' 'offboarding,' 'save offer,' 'dunning,' 'failed payment recovery,' 'win-back,' 'retention,' 'exit survey,' 'pause subscription,' 'involuntary churn,' 'people keep canceling,' 'churn rate is too high,' 'how do I keep users,' or 'customers are leaving.' Use this whenever someone is losing subscribers o
Grounded design brief from the adopted corpus — style, WCAG-checked color tokens, typography, layout pattern, anti-patterns. Use on ui-design-brief or any which-style/palette/font/chart decision.
Write and maintain DESIGN.md + PRODUCT.md — captures visual decisions and interaction patterns so design tasks stay consistent across sessions without re-scanning past work.
Core principle: Verify tests → Detect environment → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.
Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
Run the project's full test suite (npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...).
If tests fail, report the failures and stop — the menu comes after a green suite:
Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:
[Show failures]
If tests pass: continue to Step 2.
GIT_DIR=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
GIT_COMMON=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
# Capture now, while still inside the workspace — Step 5 changes directory
# before cleanup (Step 6) needs this value
WORKTREE_PATH=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
This determines which menu to show and how cleanup works:
| State | Menu | Cleanup |
|---|---|---|
GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON (normal repo) | Standard 3 options | No worktree to clean up |
GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON, named branch | Standard 3 options | Provenance-based (see Step 6) |
GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON, detached HEAD | Reduced 2 options (no merge) | Externally managed — leave in place |
The base branch is whatever this work forked from — usually named in the plan, the conversation, or the branch's upstream. If it is not already known, ask: "This branch split from - is that correct?" Confirm before merging: merging into the wrong base is expensive to undo.
Normal repo and named-branch worktree — present exactly these 3 options:
Implementation complete. What would you like to do?
1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
Which option?
Detached HEAD — present exactly these 2 options:
Implementation complete. You're on a detached HEAD (externally managed workspace).
1. Push as new branch and create a Pull Request
2. Keep as-is (I'll handle it later)
Which option?
Present the menu exactly as written — concise, with every option coming from the list above. Discarding the work happens only in response to your human partner explicitly asking for it (see "If your human partner asks to discard the work" below). Wait for their answer; the integration decision is theirs.
# Get main repo root for CWD safety
MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$MAIN_ROOT"
# Merge first — verify success before removing anything
git checkout <base-branch>
git pull
git merge <feature-branch>
# Verify tests on merged result
<test command>
If tests fail on the merged result: stop, leave the worktree and branch in place, and investigate — nothing has been pushed, so the merge is local and recoverable.
Once the merged result is green: clean up the worktree (Step 6), then delete the branch:
git branch -d <feature-branch>
git push -u origin <feature-branch>
# From a detached HEAD, name the new branch on the remote:
# git push origin HEAD:refs/heads/<new-branch>
Then create the pull/merge request against with the forge's tooling — its CLI if one is available, or the creation URL most forges print when you push — following the repo's PR template and conventions if present, and report the URL to your human partner.
Keep the worktree — your human partner iterates on PR feedback there.
Report: "Keeping branch . Worktree preserved at ."
This path exists only as a response to an explicit request to throw the work away. Confirm first:
This will permanently delete:
- Branch <name>
- All commits: <commit-list>
- Worktree at <path>
Type 'discard' to confirm.
Wait for that exact confirmation. When it arrives:
MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$MAIN_ROOT"
Then clean up the worktree (Step 6) and force-delete the branch:
git branch -D <feature-branch>
Runs for Option 1 and confirmed discards. Options 2 and 3 always
preserve the worktree. Both callers have already changed directory to the
main repo root — worktree removal must run from outside the worktree —
and use the GIT_DIR/GIT_COMMON/WORKTREE_PATH values captured in
Step 2, from before that directory change.
If GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON: Normal repo, no worktree to clean up. Done.
If WORKTREE_PATH is under .worktrees/ or worktrees/: Superpowers
created this worktree — we own cleanup:
git worktree remove "$WORKTREE_PATH"
git worktree prune # Self-healing: clean up any stale registrations
Otherwise: The host environment owns this workspace — leave it in place. If your platform provides a workspace-exit tool, use it.
| Option | Merge | Push | Keep Worktree | Cleanup Branch |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Merge locally | yes | - | - | yes |
| 2. Create PR | - | yes | yes | - |
| 3. Keep as-is | - | - | yes | - |
| Discard (explicit request only) | - | - | - | yes (force) |
| Excuse | Reality |
|---|---|
| "Tests passed earlier this session" | Run the suite on the tree you are about to integrate. A green run only proves the tree it ran on. |
| "They obviously want it merged" | Integration is your human partner's decision. Present the menu and wait. |
| "They seem done with this feature — I'll offer to discard it" | The menu is complete as written. Discard happens only when your human partner asks for it in so many words. |
| "'Yeah, get rid of it' counts as confirmation" | Only the typed word discard authorizes deletion. |
| "The PR is up, so the worktree is clutter now" | PR feedback gets fixed in that worktree. It stays until the work lands. |
| "This other worktree looks stale — I'll clean it too" | Clean up only worktrees under .worktrees/ or worktrees/. Everything else belongs to the host. |
| "The merged-result failure is probably flaky" | A failing merged result stops everything. Branch and worktree stay put while you investigate. |
| "The base branch is obviously main" | Confirm the fork point or ask. Merging into the wrong base is expensive to undo. |
| "The push was rejected — force-push will fix it" | A rejected push means the remote moved. Investigate; force-push only on your human partner's explicit request. |