Best for
- Use when the user mentions FluencyLoop, "fluency", the .
baokhang83/fluencyloop/plugins/fluencyloop/skills/fluencyloop/SKILL.md
FluencyLoop — stay fluent in code as AI writes it. Router/overview for the per-feature loop (design → build+teach → review), the optional up-front planning stage for large chunks, the woven-in constitution that grows from decisions, plus post-merge backfill. Use when the user mentions FluencyLoop, "fluency", the .fluencyloop/ directory, or wants to set up / understand the workflow but hasn't named a specific stage.
Decision brief
The code and your fluency in it are produced together, or not at all.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Declared | Source record | Install path and trigger |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/baokhang83/fluencyloop --skill "plugins/fluencyloop/skills/fluencyloop"Inspect the Agent Skill "fluencyloop" from https://github.com/baokhang83/fluencyloop/blob/fe3ccf6dada2c36057a3d65b84ca150bd9b9c96e/plugins/fluencyloop/skills/fluencyloop/SKILL.md at commit fe3ccf6dada2c36057a3d65b84ca150bd9b9c96e. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
For a conversational request to "set up FluencyLoop" (not a literal CLI command), initialise an absent .fluencyloop/ scaffold, then continue with $fluencyloop:feature (or $fluencyloop:plan for a big chunk). The constitution fills itself in from there.
This section takes priority over every later workflow instruction. If the developer gives a literal fluencyloop CLI command, such as fluencyloop init, fluencyloop -v, or fluencyloop check, they requested only that command.
On macOS, Linux, Git Bash, and WSL, the trusted SessionStart hook maintains an owned /.local/bin/fluencyloop shim for this installed plugin. Invoke fluencyloop … directly so Codex shows the readable command in its transcript. Do not resolve its path, check PATH, or describe the…
FluencyLoop's stage skills use AskUserQuestion in Claude Code for genuine prompts. Codex has no equivalent question-form tool, so they ask a concise standalone question in chat and pause for the answer before continuing.
This creates .fluencyloop/ (scripts, templates, constitution stub). Agent skills are activated through the agent's installation mechanism and are never copied into the project. A feature is a branch (feature/); sessions are committed journals; the per-developer calibration profi…
Permission review
The documentation includes network, browsing, or remote request actions.
Do not send an interim update, inspect the workspace, read state, search the web, check PATH,The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.
Do not route to a stage or run a follow-up command after it succeeds. In particular,Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 86/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 38 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 1 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
The code and your fluency in it are produced together, or not at all.
This section takes priority over every later workflow instruction. If the developer gives a
literal fluencyloop CLI command, such as fluencyloop init, fluencyloop -v, or
fluencyloop check, they requested only that command.
fluencyloop init, request sandbox elevation for that exact command before its first
execution. It may create Codex-protected .git metadata; do not first attempt it in the
standard sandbox.fluencyloop immediately.fluencyloop init must not automatically start a feature or plan.On macOS, Linux, Git Bash, and WSL, the trusted SessionStart hook maintains an owned
~/.local/bin/fluencyloop shim for this installed plugin. Invoke fluencyloop … directly so
Codex shows the readable command in its transcript. Do not resolve its path, check PATH, or
describe the shim to the developer.
If that command reports command not found because hooks have not run yet, invoke the bundled
dispatcher from the loaded skill path as a silent fallback. On native Windows, invoke the adjacent
fluencyloop.ps1 with pwsh.
FluencyLoop's stage skills use AskUserQuestion in Claude Code for genuine prompts. Codex
has no equivalent question-form tool, so they ask a concise standalone question in chat and pause
for the answer before continuing.
FluencyLoop keeps the people behind a codebase fluent in it as AI writes more of it. At its core is a per-feature loop — design → build (teach) → review — driven by whoever is building. Nothing gates a merge; work that skips the loop is caught after merge by backfill.
PER BIG CHUNK (optional) REPEATS, PER FEATURE (contributor-driven)
( plan ) → design → build (teach) → review
architecture + roadmap diagrams session journal PR view assembles itself
Planning is optional — reach for it only when a chunk of work is too big for one
feature/branch and needs an architecture + roadmap first. Small work goes straight to
$fluencyloop:feature.
The constitution (the project's checkable principles) is load-bearing — plan and feature both check designs against it — but it is not a stage you sit down and author. It's born from your first real intent (a plan, or the first feature as backstop) and grows as features harvest repeatable stances from real decisions. Same law as the journal and the calibration profile: it accretes from building, never authored cold unless you explicitly choose to.
| The user wants to… | Skill |
|---|---|
| Plan a large chunk — architecture, task breakdown, roadmap | $fluencyloop:plan |
| Start building something, stay fluent as they go | $fluencyloop:feature |
| Prepare a PR / summarise a feature for a reviewer | $fluencyloop:review |
| Document work that shipped without the loop | $fluencyloop:backfill |
For a conversational request to "set up FluencyLoop" (not a literal CLI command), initialise an
absent .fluencyloop/ scaffold, then continue with $fluencyloop:feature (or
$fluencyloop:plan for a big chunk). The constitution fills itself in from there.
fluencyloop init # initialises Git if needed, then scaffolds .fluencyloop/
This creates .fluencyloop/ (scripts, templates, constitution stub). Agent skills are activated
through the agent's installation mechanism and are never copied into the project. A feature is a branch (feature/<slug>); sessions are committed journals;
the per-developer calibration profile lives globally in ~/.fluencyloop/ and is never
committed.
FluencyLoop is cheap to run because the deterministic scripts do everything mechanical and the model spends tokens only on the irreducible rationale. The split, per stage:
| Stage | The scripts assemble (deterministic) | The model writes (irreducible) |
|---|---|---|
| Declare / design | feature branch, design.md stub, state.json (slug / branch / stage / base) | the design diagrams (the shapes), the constitution check |
| Build (per slice) | slice-context (diff + metadata + likely_decision), the session skeleton, the decision blocks (fluencyloop decision), calibration signal / compact, state.json updates | the code, the taught why, knowledge-transfer prose, the decision field values |
| Review | assemble-pr-view (sessions inlined, commit range, base), PR creation | the reviewer-facing distillation |
| Backfill | feature + session scaffold, state.json, decision blocks, check drift | the reconstructed rationale (marked unverified) |
The rule: if a stage asks the model to produce something a script could assemble deterministically — a file skeleton, a commit range, a formatted block, a state read — that's a bug; move it to a script. The model's tokens go to the why, never to plumbing.
Alternatives
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Use when planning, running, or learning from chaos engineering experiments. Triggers on "chaos experiment", "fault injection", "gameday", "resilience test", "blast radius", "steady state", "abort criteria", "Chaos Toolkit", "Chaos Mesh", "Litmus", "Gremlin", "AWS FIS", or any deliberate failure-injection question. Ships experiment designer, blast-radius calculator, and postmortem generator (all stdlib Python), 4 references on chaos principles + experiment design + attack taxonomy + tooling lands
wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep
Get a deep critical review of research from an external reviewer backend (Codex or manual). Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.
PramodDutta/qaskills
Simulate aggressive user behavior patterns including rapid clicking, random navigation, form abuse, tab spamming, and unexpected interaction sequences to find UI resilience issues
PramodDutta/qaskills
Comprehensive Puppeteer browser automation and testing skill for headless Chrome scripting, web scraping, PDF generation, network interception, and end-to-end test workflows in JavaScript and TypeScript.