Source profileQuality 88/100

muend/geoai-skills/skills/geoai-orchestrator/SKILL.md

geoai-orchestrator

Route genuinely ambiguous or multi-stage geospatial work across specialist skills while enforcing shared CRS, validity, leakage, units, verification, and reproducibility rules. Use for requests spanning multiple stages such as acquisition, imagery, modeling, analysis, and map delivery, or for an explicit end-to-end pipeline. Never invoke for one domain merely because a parameter is unclear. Code implementation/review, backend or platform choice, and production-readiness review are direct special

Source repository stars
6
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
0
Last source update
2026-08-04
Source checked
2026-08-04

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

The hub of an 18-skill geospatial module. Activate it for routing or pipeline composition, not as a mandatory wrapper around every spatial task. Its job: (1) diagnose what kind of spatial problem the user actually has, (2) design the pipeline across stages, (3) route each stage…

Best for

    Not for

    • Buffering in degrees ("0.01 degree buffer") — reproject first.
    • EPSG:4326 → Web Mercator area statistics — Mercator distorts area

    Compatibility matrix

    Platform support, with evidence labels

    PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
    CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Open the compatibility checker

    Installation

    Inspect first. Install second.

    The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

    Source-detected install commandSource
    npx skills add https://github.com/muend/geoai-skills --skill "skills/geoai-orchestrator"
    Safe inspection promptEditorial

    Inspect the Agent Skill "geoai-orchestrator" from https://github.com/muend/geoai-skills/blob/4ac195e3f372cc4ffe97c53db7a9dae7317bc7ed/skills/geoai-orchestrator/SKILL.md at commit 4ac195e3f372cc4ffe97c53db7a9dae7317bc7ed. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

    Workflow

    What the source asks the agent to do

    1. 01

      Module-wide invariants (enforced in every stage)

      1. CRS is explicit, always. Report the CRS of every input on first contact. Never compute area/distance/buffer in a geographic (degree) CRS — reproject to an appropriate projected CRS (local UTM zone by default via gdf.estimateutmcrs(); equal-area such as EPSG:6933 for global ar…

      CRS is explicit, always. Report the CRS of every input on firstAxis order discipline. GeoJSON is lon/lat; many APIs and humans sayGeometry validity before analysis. Check isvalid; repair with
    2. 02

      Routing gate — read before producing any output

      This orchestrator routes by invoking, never by naming. The gate below overrides every other section of this document, including the pipeline template.

      Invoke, do not list. Every specialist you select must be invoked withRoute every correction, not the first one. When a request containsNever make routing conditional on permission. Do not write "say the
    3. 03

      Module map — route by problem type

      This table selects specialists; it does not hand off to them. Every row you select must be invoked under the routing gate. For cross-cutting method standards (leakage, metrics, reproducibility), invoke ml-experiment-standards and swe-devops-standards when their rules apply.

      This table selects specialists; it does not hand off to them. Every row you select must be invoked under the routing gate. For cross-cutting method standards (leakage, metrics, reproducibility), invoke ml-experiment-sta…
    4. 04

      Pipeline design protocol

      For any multi-stage request, produce a short pipeline plan BEFORE writing code, then invoke the specialists that plan names in the same response:

      For any multi-stage request, produce a short pipeline plan BEFORE writing code, then invoke the specialists that plan names in the same response:
    5. 05

      Pipeline:

      1. → → output: → check: 2. ... Success criterion:

      → → output: → check:...1. → → output: → check: 2. ... Success criterion:

    Permission review

    Static risk signals and limitations

    No configured static risk pattern was detected

    This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.

    Evidence record

    Why each signal appears

    EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
    SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
    Quality score88/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
    Repository stars6SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
    Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
    Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

    Pinned source

    Provenance and original SKILL.md

    Repository
    muend/geoai-skills
    Skill path
    skills/geoai-orchestrator/SKILL.md
    Commit
    4ac195e3f372cc4ffe97c53db7a9dae7317bc7ed
    License
    MIT
    Collected
    2026-08-04
    Default branch
    main
    View the original SKILL.md

    GeoAI Orchestrator

    The hub of an 18-skill geospatial module. Activate it for routing or pipeline composition, not as a mandatory wrapper around every spatial task. Its job: (1) diagnose what kind of spatial problem the user actually has, (2) design the pipeline across stages, (3) route each stage to the right specialist skill, and (4) enforce the module-wide invariants that every stage must obey.

    Routing gate — read before producing any output

    This orchestrator routes by invoking, never by naming. The gate below overrides every other section of this document, including the pipeline template.

    1. Invoke, do not list. Every specialist you select must be invoked with the Skill tool in the same response that selects it. Naming a skill in a table, plan, or prose sentence is not a handoff. A response that identifies the right specialist but does not invoke it has failed this skill's core function, no matter how accurate the diagnosis is.
    2. Route every correction, not the first one. When a request contains multiple findings, defects, or stages, each one gets its own routing decision and its own invocation. Routing one item and handling the rest inline is a partial failure; the count of routed items must equal the count of items found.
    3. Never make routing conditional on permission. Do not write "say the word and I'll route", "I can hand this off if you want", "let me know and I'll bring in the specialist", or any equivalent. Offering to route later is the single most common failure of this skill. If you have identified the specialist, invoke it now.
    4. Clarification is not a substitute for routing. Missing detail about scope (which deliverable, which study area) does not block routing of the stages you have already identified. Ask the scope question and route in the same response. Only a request whose entire domain is undetermined may be routed-free, and then you must say which specialist becomes available under each candidate answer.
    5. Audit requests are deliver requests. "Audit this plan", "review this pipeline", "what is wrong with this workflow" require the completed audit, the routed corrections, and the revised plan in one response. Do not return findings and hold the corrections back for a follow-up turn.

    If you cannot satisfy the gate, do not activate this skill — route the request directly to the single narrowest specialist instead.

    Module map — route by problem type

    Stage / problemSpecialist skill
    Data acquisition, formats, CRS, tiling, pipelinesgeo-data-engineering
    Satellite/aerial imagery, spectral indices, classificationremote-sensing-analysis
    Planetary-scale archives, GEE Python API, cloud compositinggoogle-earth-engine
    CNN/U-Net/ViT on EO data, segmentation, detectiongeo-deep-learning
    Autocorrelation, hotspots, clusters, spatial regressionspatial-statistics
    Site selection, suitability, AHP/weighted overlaymcda-suitability-analysis
    Interpolation from point samples, kriging, variogramsgeostatistics-interpolation
    DEM, slope, watersheds, flow, viewshedterrain-hydrology
    LiDAR / point clouds, DTM/DSM/CHM, PDALpoint-cloud-lidar
    Routing, service areas, accessibility, OD matricesnetwork-accessibility-analysis
    GPS tracks, trajectories, stops/trips, map matchingmovement-trajectory
    Multi-temporal comparison, land cover change, trendschange-detection
    Map design, choropleths, web maps, publication figurescartography-geoviz
    Spatial SQL, PostGIS, large-scale spatial joinspostgis-spatial-sql
    Local ArcGIS Pro, ArcPy, .aprx, or .gdb executionarcgis-pro-automation

    This table selects specialists; it does not hand off to them. Every row you select must be invoked under the routing gate. For cross-cutting method standards (leakage, metrics, reproducibility), invoke ml-experiment-standards and swe-devops-standards when their rules apply.

    Pipeline design protocol

    For any multi-stage request, produce a short pipeline plan BEFORE writing code, then invoke the specialists that plan names in the same response:

    ## Pipeline: <goal>
    1. <stage> → <skill> → output: <artifact> → check: <verification criterion>
    2. ...
    Success criterion: <what the user can inspect to accept the result>
    

    The plan is a routing manifest, not a proposal awaiting approval. Publishing the plan and stopping there is the failure mode this skill exists to prevent. Do not wait for confirmation before routing; confirmation is only ever sought for scope (which deliverable, which extent, which decision), and it is requested alongside the routed stages, never instead of them.

    Every stage ends with a verification criterion. Spatial work fails silently (wrong CRS, empty joins, inverted axes produce plausible-looking garbage), so a stage without a check is not a stage.

    Module-wide invariants (enforced in every stage)

    1. CRS is explicit, always. Report the CRS of every input on first contact. Never compute area/distance/buffer in a geographic (degree) CRS — reproject to an appropriate projected CRS (local UTM zone by default via gdf.estimate_utm_crs(); equal-area such as EPSG:6933 for global area statistics). If a CRS is undefined, stop and resolve it; never guess silently.
    2. Axis order discipline. GeoJSON is lon/lat; many APIs and humans say lat/lon. Verify with a known landmark before pipeline-scale processing.
    3. Geometry validity before analysis. Check is_valid; repair with shapely.make_valid (not buffer(0), which can silently drop parts).
    4. Row-count accounting. After every join/overlay/filter, report rows in vs rows out. Silent duplication or loss is the top geospatial bug.
    5. Spatial autocorrelation awareness. Random train/test splits on spatial data leak. Any ML stage follows the canonical protocol in ml-experiment-standardsreferences/spatial-cv-protocol.md.
    6. Units in column names. area_ha, dist_km, elev_m — never bare area. Unit confusion survives code review; column names don't lie.
    7. Visual + numeric verification. Every spatial output gets both a summary table AND a quick map check (.explore(), a PNG, or GIS software). A confusion matrix cannot show spatially clustered errors.
    8. Reproducibility. Pin package versions, seed randomness, log parameters. Intermediate artifacts go to GeoPackage or GeoParquet, never shapefile (10-char column truncation, 2 GB limit, no proper encoding).

    Internationalization note

    Attribute tables in non-ASCII locales break naive string handling. Canonical example: Turkish dotted/dotless I — 'İ'.lower() yields a 2-character string in Python. Before any string matching on attributes, apply a locale-aware normalization step and show value_counts() of cleaned categorical fields. Prefer UTF-8 formats; legacy shapefiles may carry cp1252/cp125x mojibake silently.

    Choosing the stack

    Default to the open Python stack: GeoPandas + Shapely 2 + Rasterio + xarray/rioxarray + PyProj. Route to PostGIS when data exceeds comfortable memory (~millions of features) or needs concurrent/repeated querying; to Earth Engine when the data is a planetary archive rather than local files. Use GDAL CLI for bulk format conversion. If the user works in ArcGIS Pro or QGIS, generate headless-runnable scripts (arcpy / PyQGIS) rather than click instructions, and keep the analysis logic portable.

    Anti-patterns to catch early

    • Buffering in degrees ("0.01 degree buffer") — reproject first.
    • EPSG:4326 → Web Mercator area statistics — Mercator distorts area massively away from the equator.
    • Joining datasets from different CRS without alignment.
    • Treating a DEM's nodata value (-9999, 3.4e38) as real elevation.
    • Classifying imagery without checking cloud/shadow masks.
    • Reporting model accuracy without a spatially independent test set.

    Execution contract

    • Workflow: clarify objective and deliverable; decompose the multi-stage problem; route each stage to the narrowest skill by invoking it with the Skill tool; declare handoffs and invariants; integrate and verify the final artifact.
    • Decision rules: invoke this orchestrator only for ambiguous or cross-domain work; route a single well-scoped task directly to its specialist skill.
    • Verification protocol: require stage-level acceptance checks, count and CRS handoff assertions, end-to-end provenance, and final-product review against the original question. Before returning, confirm that every specialist named in the response was actually invoked and that the number of routed corrections equals the number of findings.
    • Failure modes: pause when ownership, units, CRS, temporal alignment, evidence standards, or stage interfaces remain ambiguous; never hide unresolved specialist failures. Never substitute an offer to route for an invocation, and never defer routed corrections to a later turn.
    • Deliverables: pipeline plan, skill-routing table, stage inputs and outputs, verification gates, risk register, and final integration checklist.
    • Source freshness: consult the authoritative source registry and the selected specialists' registries before fixing interfaces.

    Alternatives

    Compare before choosing

    Computed 10042,968

    coreyhaines31/marketingskills

    ab-testing

    When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program

    Computed 100165

    JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills

    suede-ab-testing

    Suede-owned experimentation discipline for hypotheses, sample sizing, test duration, significance, and repeatable experiment programs. Use when comparing variants, deciding whether a result is reliable, or building an experiment backlog and cadence. NOT FOR: analytics instrumentation (use suede-analytics), post-click conversion diagnosis (use suede-site-alchemy), or writing the variant copy itself (use suede-copy).

    Computed 1007

    narrative-io/narrative-skills-marketplace

    design-analysis

    Translate a fuzzy analytical question into a rigorous investigation plan. Interrogates the ask, grounds the plan in the available data dictionary, applies analytical best practices, and produces a structured brief of query specifications for a downstream query-writing skill. Plans, does not write SQL. Use when: "why did X drop", "is there a relationship between A and B", "who are our highest-value customers", "what's driving the change in Y", "investigate this trend", "design an analysis for", "

    Computed 98413

    notque/vexjoy-agent

    html-artifact

    Generate rich self-contained HTML artifacts instead of markdown. Auto-detects artifact shape (spec, code-review, prototype, report, editor, data-viz, diagram, deck) and loads shape-specific patterns. Bundles Birchline design system with 4 theme presets. Use for "make HTML", "as HTML", "HTML artifact", or auto-injected by router when output benefits from rich visualization.