yonatangross/orchestkit/src/skills/glyph/SKILL.md
glyph
Render an answer as ASCII art plus semantic emojis inline, right now, with no setup questions. Use for a fast visual take on status, comparisons, trade-offs, architecture, or any ad-hoc 'show me X visually' ask. For a full multi-artifact plan playground, use visualize-plan instead.
- Source repository stars
- 224
- Declared platforms
- 1
- Static risk flags
- 1
- Last source update
- 2026-08-28
- Source checked
- 2026-08-28
Decision brief
What it does: where it fits
Render the answer as ASCII art plus semantic emojis, inline, immediately. All output renders in a monospace terminal with no external tools.
Not for
- Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
- Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.
Compatibility matrix
Platform support, with evidence labels
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Declared | Source record | Install path and trigger |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
Inspect first. Install second.
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit --skill "src/skills/glyph"Inspect the Agent Skill "glyph" from https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit/blob/1ff988bd66daf223028ed44767b591fecc8510c2/src/skills/glyph/SKILL.md at commit 1ff988bd66daf223028ed44767b591fecc8510c2. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
What the source asks the agent to do
- 01
Execution (run this, do not ask first)
The whole point is speed, so there is no setup phase.
Render immediately. Do NOT call AskUserQuestion to pick a format, do NOT call TaskCreate, do NOT spawn an Agent. Choose the form yourself from the topic shape and draw it. Asking first defeats the skill.Pick the form from the shape of the data, using the pattern library below:Emit inline in the reply. Never write a file unless the user asked for one. This is a chat answer, not an artifact. - 02
Box-Drawing Character Reference
This block intentionally shows multiple sets together as a key. Authors should use ONE set per real diagram; the single-set lint rule enforces this on production diagrams.
This block intentionally shows multiple sets together as a key. Authors should use ONE set per real diagram; the single-set lint rule enforces this on production diagrams.Tokens live in tokens.json. Names describe USE not APPEARANCE.Rename codemod (D8): old light/heavy/double/rounded/ascii-fallback → new names above. Old names accepted with warning for one minor release. - 03
Set Conventions (D8: intent-driven naming)
Tokens live in tokens.json. Names describe USE not APPEARANCE.
Tokens live in tokens.json. Names describe USE not APPEARANCE.Rename codemod (D8): old light/heavy/double/rounded/ascii-fallback → new names above. Old names accepted with warning for one minor release. - 04
Status Glyph Vocabulary
Closed-set v1 of 11 semantic glyphs (●○✓✗⚠◆◇▶▷ ↑↓→ ▓▒░). Single source of truth — see rules/status-glyph-vocabulary.md. Add-a-glyph process in CONTRIBUTING.md.
Closed-set v1 of 11 semantic glyphs (●○✓✗⚠◆◇▶▷ ↑↓→ ▓▒░). Single source of truth — see rules/status-glyph-vocabulary.md. Add-a-glyph process in CONTRIBUTING.md. - 05
Diagram Patterns
Review the “Diagram Patterns” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Review and apply the “Diagram Patterns” source section.
Permission review
Static risk signals and limitations
Writes files
The documentation asks the agent to create, modify, or delete local files.
**Emit inline in the reply.** Never write a file unless the user asked for one. This is a chat answer, not an artifact.Writes files
The documentation asks the agent to create, modify, or delete local files.
*Over budget is the same signal.** If the honest rendering needs more than ~12 lines, that is not a bigger chat answer, it is a different deliverable: write the playground or file and print the path. The old escape hatch fired on artifact TEvidence record
Why each signal appears
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 91/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 224 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 1 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Provenance and original SKILL.md
- Repository
- yonatangross/orchestkit
- Skill path
- src/skills/glyph/SKILL.md
- Commit
- 1ff988bd66daf223028ed44767b591fecc8510c2
- License
- MIT
- Collected
- 2026-08-28
- Default branch
- main
View the original SKILL.md
Glyph
Render the answer as ASCII art plus semantic emojis, inline, immediately. All output renders in a monospace terminal with no external tools.
Core principle: Encode information into structure, not decoration. Every diagram element should communicate something meaningful.
Execution (run this, do not ask first)
The whole point is speed, so there is no setup phase.
With no argument, the topic is the current conversation. Measured over a real 13-prompt session: zero asks supplied a self-contained topic, and the one direct invocation passed nothing at all. /ork:glyph on its own means "render where we are right now" — the open work, the decision just reached, the state of the thing being discussed. Render that; do not ask what to draw.
Given a topic (or the conversation, when none is given):
-
Render immediately. Do NOT call
AskUserQuestionto pick a format, do NOT callTaskCreate, do NOT spawn anAgent. Choose the form yourself from the topic shape and draw it. Asking first defeats the skill. -
Pick the form from the shape of the data, using the pattern library below:
Topic shape Form state / progress / health status box + bar meters A vs B, options, trade-offs comparison table or side-by-side boxes steps, pipeline, hand-offs left-to-right flow with ──▶containment, layers, layout nested boxes / tree ranked list, scores, counts table + bar meters over time sparkline or milestone track -
Emit inline in the reply. Never write a file unless the user asked for one. This is a chat answer, not an artifact.
-
Use the 12-emoji semantic set and box-drawing vocabulary defined in
rules/visual-style.md(shipped with this skill). Semantic, never decorative: an emoji must mean something (✅ pass, ❌ fail, ⚠️ risk, 🔴 blocked). -
Stay inside the budget: ≤ 12 visual lines, and ≤ 40% of the reply. Block count within that is free — two 5-line blocks are fine, four 10-line blocks are not. This skill renders on request, it does not render without limit (#3558). Full derivation of the numbers is in
rules/visual-style.md. -
State the point in prose first, in one or two sentences, then show the visual. The visual supports the answer; it is never the answer. If the reader has to parse a diagram to find out what happened, the reply failed.
-
Stay honest. If a number is unknown, print
?rather than inventing one. A confident-looking chart built on guesses is worse than prose.
When NOT to use this skill: if the deliverable is a multi-section HTML playground, a persisted plan artifact, or anything needing file output, use visualize-plan instead. Glyph is the cheap inline path; visualize-plan is the full pipeline.
Over budget is the same signal. If the honest rendering needs more than ~12 lines, that is not a bigger chat answer, it is a different deliverable: write the playground or file and print the path. The old escape hatch fired on artifact TYPE only, so a 40-line inline reply never tripped it.
Box-Drawing Character Reference
This block intentionally shows multiple sets together as a key. Authors
should use ONE set per real diagram; the single-set lint rule enforces
this on production diagrams.
default: ┌─┐ │ └─┘ ├─┤ ┬ ┴ ┼
emphasis: ┏━┓ ┃ ┗━┛ ┣━┫ ┳ ┻ ╋
title: ╔═╗ ║ ╚═╝ ╠═╣ ╦ ╩ ╬
soft: ╭─╮ │ ╰─╯
portable: +-+ | +-+ +-+ + + +
Arrows: → ← ↑ ↓ ─> <─ ──> <──
Blocks: █ ▓ ░ ▏▎▍▌▋▊▉
Status: ● ○ ✓ ✗ ⚠ ◆ ◇ ▶ ▷ ↑↓→ ▓▒░ (closed-set vocab — see rules)
Set Conventions (D8: intent-driven naming)
Tokens live in tokens.json. Names describe USE not APPEARANCE.
| Set | Characters | Use For |
|---|---|---|
default ─│ | Normal boxes and connectors | Most diagrams |
emphasis ━┃ | Headers, focus, draw the eye | Key components, outer frames |
title ═║ | Document titles | §0-style banners only |
soft ╭╮╰╯ ─│ | Status cards, ambient UI | Diff blocks |
portable +-| | NO_COLOR / CI / bare TTY | Fallback |
Rename codemod (D8): old light/heavy/double/rounded/ascii-fallback → new names above. Old names accepted with warning for one minor release.
Status Glyph Vocabulary
Closed-set v1 of 11 semantic glyphs (●○✓✗⚠◆◇▶▷ ↑↓→ ▓▒░). Single source of truth — see rules/status-glyph-vocabulary.md. Add-a-glyph process in CONTRIBUTING.md.
Diagram Patterns
Architecture Diagrams
┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐
│ Frontend │─────>│ Backend │
│ React 19 │ │ FastAPI │
└──────────────┘ └───────┬──────┘
│
v
┌──────────────┐
│ PostgreSQL │
└──────────────┘
File Trees with Annotations
src/
├── api/
│ ├── routes.py [M] +45 -12 !! high-traffic path
│ └── schemas.py [M] +20 -5
├── services/
│ └── billing.py [A] +180 ** new file
└── tests/
└── test_billing.py [A] +120 ** new file
Legend: [A]dd [M]odify [D]elete !! Risk ** New
Progress Bars
[████████░░] 80% Complete
+ Design (2 days)
+ Backend (5 days)
~ Frontend (3 days)
- Testing (pending)
Swimlane / Timeline Diagrams
Backend ===[Schema]======[API]===========================[Deploy]====>
| | ^
| +------blocks------+ |
| | |
Frontend ------[Wait]--------[Components]=======[Integration]=+
=== Active work --- Blocked/waiting | Dependency
Blast Radius (Concentric Rings)
Ring 3: Tests (8 files)
+-------------------------------+
| Ring 2: Transitive (5) |
| +------------------------+ |
| | Ring 1: Direct (3) | |
| | +--------------+ | |
| | | CHANGED FILE | | |
| | +--------------+ | |
| +------------------------+ |
+-------------------------------+
Comparison Tables
BEFORE AFTER
┌────────────┐ ┌────────────┐
│ Monolith │ │ Service A │──┐
│ (all-in-1)│ └────────────┘ │ ┌──────────┐
└────────────┘ ┌────────────┐ ├─>│ Shared │
│ Service B │──┘ │ Queue │
└────────────┘ └──────────┘
Reversibility Timeline
Phase 1 [================] FULLY REVERSIBLE (add column)
Phase 2 [================] FULLY REVERSIBLE (new endpoint)
Phase 3 [============....] PARTIALLY (backfill)
--- POINT OF NO RETURN ---
Phase 4 [........????????] IRREVERSIBLE (drop column)
Key Rules
| Rule | Description |
|---|---|
| Font | Always monospace — box-drawing requires fixed-width |
| Weight | Standard for normal, Heavy for emphasis, Double for titles |
| Arrows | ─>, ──>, or │ with v/^ for direction |
| Alignment | Right-pad labels to match column widths |
| Annotations | !! for risk, ** for new, [A/M/D] for change type |
| Width | Keep under 80 chars for terminal compatibility |
| Nesting | Max 3 levels of box nesting before readability degrades |
When to Use Each Pattern
| Pattern | Use Case |
|---|---|
| Layered boxes | System architecture, deployment topology |
| Concentric rings | Blast radius, impact analysis |
| Timeline bars | Reversibility, migration phases |
| Swimlanes | Execution order, parallel work streams |
| Annotated trees | File change manifests, directory structures |
| Comparison tables | Cross-layer consistency, before/after |
| Progress bars | Status tracking, completion metrics |
Related Skills
brainstorm— Design exploration where diagrams communicate ideasarchitecture-patterns— System architecture that benefits from ASCII diagramscode-review-playbook— Review comments with inline diagrams
Frequently asked questions
What to verify before installation and use
What does the glyph source document cover?
Render the answer as ASCII art plus semantic emojis, inline, immediately. All output renders in a monospace terminal with no external tools.
How do I install glyph?
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit --skill "src/skills/glyph". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Which Agent platforms does the source record declare?
The pinned source record declares support for: claude code.
Which permission-related actions were detected?
Static rules flagged write-files in the source; the page lists the matching lines and excerpts.
Alternatives
Compare before choosing
oaustegard/claude-skills
featuring
Generate hierarchical _FEATURES.md files that describe what a codebase DOES from a user/consumer perspective, anchored to source symbols via tree-sitting. Supports large complex codebases through feature-driven decomposition into sub-feature files. Uses a multi-pass synthesis: orientation → detail → overview rewrite. Use when someone says "what does this do", "document features", "feature inventory", "_FEATURES.md", or needs to understand a codebase's purpose before modifying it. Complements tre
narrative-io/narrative-skills-marketplace
design-analysis
Translate a fuzzy analytical question into a rigorous investigation plan. Interrogates the ask, grounds the plan in the available data dictionary, applies analytical best practices, and produces a structured brief of query specifications for a downstream query-writing skill. Plans, does not write SQL. Use when: "why did X drop", "is there a relationship between A and B", "who are our highest-value customers", "what's driving the change in Y", "investigate this trend", "design an analysis for", "
vasilyu1983/AI-Agents-public
qa-testing-ios
Guides iOS testing with XCTest, XCUITest, Swift Testing, simctl, and xcresult. Use when choosing destinations, controlling flakes, or parsing test artifacts for native apps.
brucesongs/kali-claw
insecure-design
Insecure Design (OWASP A06:2025) focuses on security flaws in system architecture and design phases, rather than code implementation-level bugs.