Source profileQuality 93/100

griffinwork40/agent-afk/src/bundled-plugins/awa-bundled/skills/ground-claim/SKILL.md

ground-claim

Grounds capability claims with file-read evidence. Default mode answers meta-capability questions ('what does X enable') with path:line citations. Pass mode: runtime-wiring with a claims list to trace actual runtime execution paths — call sites, DI registration, middleware — and get CONFIRMED/UNVERIFIED/REFUTED verdicts per claim. Blocks sign-off on any non-CONFIRMED claim.

Source repository stars
45
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
1
Last source update
2026-07-28
Source checked
2026-07-28

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

Mode: capability (default) — Self-referential meta-capability questions about the current repository, framework, or system: - "What does this repo enable?" - "What are the orchestration patterns available?" - "List the available skills." - "What capabilities does the plugin prov…

Best for

    Not for

    • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
    • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

    Compatibility matrix

    Platform support, with evidence labels

    PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
    CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Open the compatibility checker

    Installation

    Inspect first. Install second.

    The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

    Source-detected install commandSource
    npx skills add https://github.com/griffinwork40/agent-afk --skill "src/bundled-plugins/awa-bundled/skills/ground-claim"
    Safe inspection promptEditorial

    Inspect the Agent Skill "ground-claim" from https://github.com/griffinwork40/agent-afk/blob/803066d4f1e0cd57e983658dc670d647fcd893c9/src/bundled-plugins/awa-bundled/skills/ground-claim/SKILL.md at commit 803066d4f1e0cd57e983658dc670d647fcd893c9. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

    Workflow

    What the source asks the agent to do

    1. 01

      Procedure

      1. Extract capability nouns. From the user's question, identify 2–5 concrete capability categories (e.g., skills, hooks, agents, orchestration patterns, CLI commands, verification methods). Write them down.

      Extract capability nouns. From the user's question, identify 2–5 concrete capability categories (e.g., skills, hooks, agents, orchestration patterns, CLI commands, verification methods). Write them down.Locate and read evidence. For each capability noun:Use Glob or Grep to locate source files (e.g., skills//SKILL.md for skills, hooks/ for hooks, agents/ for agents).
    2. 02

      Trigger

      Mode: capability (default) — Self-referential meta-capability questions about the current repository, framework, or system: - "What does this repo enable?" - "What are the orchestration patterns available?" - "List the available skills." - "What capabilities does the plugin prov…

      "What does this repo enable?""What are the orchestration patterns available?""List the available skills."
    3. 03

      Mode: capability (default)

      1. Extract capability nouns. From the user's question, identify 2–5 concrete capability categories (e.g., skills, hooks, agents, orchestration patterns, CLI commands, verification methods). Write them down.

      Extract capability nouns. From the user's question, identify 2–5 concrete capability categories (e.g., skills, hooks, agents, orchestration patterns, CLI commands, verification methods). Write them down.Locate and read evidence. For each capability noun:Use Glob or Grep to locate source files (e.g., skills//SKILL.md for skills, hooks/ for hooks, agents/ for agents).
    4. 04

      Hard rules

      Do not answer from model recall alone.

      Do not answer from model recall alone.Do not answer from session-listing attachments without reading the underlying SKILL.md or manifest files.Every capability claim must point to a source. Do not summarize without citation.
    5. 05

      Exit criteria

      Response contains ≥1 path:line citation per capability mentioned.

      Response contains ≥1 path:line citation per capability mentioned.Every unverified claim is explicitly tagged with [UNVERIFIED: …].Response explicitly lists which files were read.

    Permission review

    Static risk signals and limitations

    Reads files

    low · line 26

    The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.

    Read at least one concrete source file per capability. Record the file path and specific line numbers.

    Evidence record

    Why each signal appears

    EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
    SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
    Quality score93/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
    Repository stars45SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
    Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
    Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

    Pinned source

    Provenance and original SKILL.md

    Repository
    griffinwork40/agent-afk
    Skill path
    src/bundled-plugins/awa-bundled/skills/ground-claim/SKILL.md
    Commit
    803066d4f1e0cd57e983658dc670d647fcd893c9
    License
    Apache-2.0
    Collected
    2026-07-28
    Default branch
    main
    View the original SKILL.md

    Trigger

    Mode: capability (default) — Self-referential meta-capability questions about the current repository, framework, or system:

    • "What does this repo enable?"
    • "What are the orchestration patterns available?"
    • "List the available skills."
    • "What capabilities does the plugin provide?"

    Mode: runtime-wiring — Claims that require tracing actual execution paths, not static structure:

    • "Verify that middleware Y intercepts all requests."
    • "Confirm plugin Z is loaded on startup."
    • "Validate that feature X is active in production."

    Skip both modes for: usage questions ("how do I use X?"), bug reports, feature requests.


    Mode: capability (default)

    Procedure

    1. Extract capability nouns. From the user's question, identify 2–5 concrete capability categories (e.g., skills, hooks, agents, orchestration patterns, CLI commands, verification methods). Write them down.

    2. Locate and read evidence. For each capability noun:

      • Use Glob or Grep to locate source files (e.g., skills/*/SKILL.md for skills, hooks/ for hooks, agents/ for agents).
      • Read at least one concrete source file per capability. Record the file path and specific line numbers.
      • Do not rely on training data, model recall, or session-listing attachments. Evidence must come from Read tool output.
    3. Build the answer inline. Embed citations within claims, not in a separate appendix. Format: path/to/file.md:line—<claim context>.

    4. Tag ungrounded claims. If a capability claim cannot be traced to a file read, prefix it with [UNVERIFIED: what would be needed to verify this]. Never present an unverified claim without the tag.

    5. Declare sources read. Explicitly name which files you read in the response.

    Hard rules

    • Do not answer from model recall alone.
    • Do not answer from session-listing attachments without reading the underlying SKILL.md or manifest files.
    • Every capability claim must point to a source. Do not summarize without citation.
    • Do not bury unverified claims. Use the [UNVERIFIED] prefix and state the evidence gap.
    • At least one path:line citation per named capability.

    Exit criteria

    • Response contains ≥1 path:line citation per capability mentioned.
    • Every unverified claim is explicitly tagged with [UNVERIFIED: …].
    • Response explicitly lists which files were read.
    • No claims rest on model recall or default knowledge.

    Mode: runtime-wiring

    Activated when the caller provides a claims: list and mode: runtime-wiring. Validates capability claims by tracing actual runtime wiring — call sites, DI registration, middleware registration, config manifests — not type signatures or import presence.

    Inputs

    mode:        runtime-wiring
    claims:      string[]   # natural-language claims to verify (≤20 per batch; see batching)
    entrypoints: string[]   # known runtime entry files (e.g. main.ts, server.ts)
    max_depth:   number     # max call-graph hops per chain (default: 8)
    

    Pre-flight gate: If entrypoints is empty, abort immediately with entrypoints_required — do not dispatch any sub-agents. If claims exceeds 20 items, split into batches of 10 and run sequentially; the Qualifier aggregates across batches.

    WireTracer sub-agent (one per claim, run in parallel)

    For each claim:

    1. Identify the claimed behavior's implementation symbol (function, class, middleware, plugin).
    2. Search for registration or injection sites — not import statements. Targets: DI container bindings, app.use(...), router.register(...), config manifests, plugin loaders, factory calls.
    3. Trace forward from the entrypoint, documenting each hop: { file, line, symbol, role }.
    4. If a hop is missing or conditional on an env var / feature flag, record the condition and stop the chain.
    5. Return:
      • chain: ordered { file, line, symbol, role } list
      • last_confirmed: deepest confirmed hop
      • gap: missing-link description, or null if complete
      • verdict: CONFIRMED | UNVERIFIED | REFUTED

    Prohibited reasoning — these are NOT evidence of runtime wiring:

    • "The type implements the interface, therefore it is active."
    • "The import exists, therefore it is called."
    • "The function is exported, therefore it is used."

    If no chain can be constructed, return UNVERIFIED with gap: "no_entry_found". Max 3 retries per claim (narrowing search scope each time) before final escalation to UNVERIFIED.

    Qualifier sub-agent

    Reviews all WireTracer reports. Applies:

    • CONFIRMED — unbroken chain from entrypoint to invocation site; no conditional gaps left unresolved.
    • UNVERIFIED — chain breaks at an identifiable gap; return gap location and a resolution hint.
    • REFUTED — positive evidence the symbol is excluded, overridden, or dead-code eliminated at runtime.

    If Qualifier verdict disagrees with WireTracer verdict, Qualifier wins; discrepancy is logged.

    Emits a machine-readable verdict table:

    | Claim | Verdict | Last Confirmed Hop | Gap / Evidence |
    |-------|---------|-------------------|----------------|
    | ...   | ...     | ...               | ...            |
    

    Sign-off gate

    Any UNVERIFIED or REFUTED verdict blocks downstream review sign-off and is returned to the caller with the gap location. Only an all-CONFIRMED table clears sign-off.

    Orchestration flow

    entrypoints_required check → abort if empty
            │
    claims (batched ≤10 if >20)
            │
            ▼
     [WireTracer × N]  ── parallel, one per claim
       (≤3 retries per claim, narrowing scope)
            │
            ▼
       [Qualifier]     ── reviews all reports, assigns verdicts
            │
       ┌────┴────────┐
    CONFIRMED    UNVERIFIED / REFUTED
       │                │
    sign-off OK    return gaps, block sign-off
    

    Out of scope

    • Usage questions ("how do I use library X?") → normal research.
    • Bug reports → /diagnose.
    • Building new capability → /mint.
    • Verification of sub-agent findings → /shadow-verify.