boshu2/agentops/skills/idea-genie/SKILL.md
idea-genie
Generate evidenced opportunities or challenge an idea with sealed perspectives. Triggers: "idea genie", "what should we build", "challenge this idea", "compare proposals".
- Source repository stars
- 416
- Declared platforms
- 0
- Static risk flags
- 0
- Last source update
- 2026-08-05
- Source checked
- 2026-08-05
Decision brief
What it does—and where it fits
One canonical root for idea work: elicit an evidence-grounded opportunity portfolio, or challenge a consequential idea with sealed independent perspectives. Both modes explore and advise; neither selects, schedules, tracks, implements, or validates work.
Not for
- Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
- Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.
Compatibility matrix
Platform support, with evidence labels
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
Inspect first. Install second.
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/boshu2/agentops --skill "skills/idea-genie"Inspect the Agent Skill "idea-genie" from https://github.com/boshu2/agentops/blob/c0f78fddd95ab30f8adadc5e513e27064980a529/skills/idea-genie/SKILL.md at commit c0f78fddd95ab30f8adadc5e513e27064980a529. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
What the source asks the agent to do
- 01
Workflow
1. Freeze the question, constraints, evidence paths, and comparison rubric. 2. For a one-way door, create at least two fresh contexts with distinct context identifiers. Each produces its perspective before any is revealed. When the caller pins perspectives to model profiles, rec…
Freeze the question, constraints, evidence paths, and comparison rubric.For a one-way door, create at least two fresh contexts with distinct contextReveal the sealed perspectives and cross-review by evidence, reversibility, - 02
Modes
Elicitation is the entry mode. Dueling is an optional escalation for a consequential choice, typically consuming an idea-portfolio.v1 or a framed question.
Elicitation is the entry mode. Dueling is an optional escalation for a consequential choice, typically consuming an idea-portfolio.v1 or a framed question. - 03
Elicit mode
Generate a small portfolio of evidenced options.
State the question, constraints, non-goals, and sources.Separate cited observations from assumptions.Give each candidate its supporting evidence, overlap with existing - 04
Duel mode
Produce independent challenges for a consequential choice. The result is advisory evidence for Plan. It never decides whether a plan is ready and never turns a later optional Premortem challenge into an approval gate.
Keep generation sealed until every perspective is complete to prevent laterPreserve dissent and concrete refutation attempts because Plan must see alternativesKeep reversible choices lightweight because they do not warrant a pane manager, - 05
Constraints
Keep generation sealed until every perspective is complete to prevent later
Keep generation sealed until every perspective is complete to prevent laterPreserve dissent and concrete refutation attempts because Plan must see alternativesKeep reversible choices lightweight because they do not warrant a pane manager,
Permission review
Static risk signals and limitations
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
Why each signal appears
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 91/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 416 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Provenance and original SKILL.md
- Repository
- boshu2/agentops
- Skill path
- skills/idea-genie/SKILL.md
- Commit
- c0f78fddd95ab30f8adadc5e513e27064980a529
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Collected
- 2026-08-05
- Default branch
- main
View the original SKILL.md
Idea Genie
One canonical root for idea work: elicit an evidence-grounded opportunity portfolio, or challenge a consequential idea with sealed independent perspectives. Both modes explore and advise; neither selects, schedules, tracks, implements, or validates work.
Modes
| Trigger phrases | Mode | Output contract |
|---|---|---|
| "idea genie", "what should we build", "supported opportunities" | elicit (single genie) | idea-portfolio.v1 via scripts/validate-output.sh |
| "challenge this idea", "compare independent proposals", "stress-test a one-way door" | duel (adversarial challenge) | idea-challenge.v1 via scripts/validate-challenge.sh |
Elicitation is the entry mode. Dueling is an optional escalation for a
consequential choice, typically consuming an idea-portfolio.v1 or a framed
question.
Elicit mode
Generate a small portfolio of evidenced options.
- State the question, constraints, non-goals, and sources.
- Separate cited observations from assumptions.
- Give each candidate its supporting evidence, overlap with existing capabilities, and one normal or edge scenario.
- Run a novelty pass, merge equivalents, and discard unsupported ideas.
- Stop when no materially new evidenced candidate appears.
- Write and validate
idea-portfolio.v1, then return it to the caller or Plan.
An empty no-new-work portfolio is valid. Plan alone may incorporate a selected
option into the existing bead or caller intent.
Duel mode
Produce independent challenges for a consequential choice. The result is advisory evidence for Plan. It never decides whether a plan is ready and never turns a later optional Premortem challenge into an approval gate.
Constraints
- Keep generation sealed until every perspective is complete to prevent later proposals from anchoring on earlier ones.
- Preserve dissent and concrete refutation attempts because Plan must see alternatives that synthesis might otherwise erase.
- Keep reversible choices lightweight because they do not warrant a pane manager, messaging service, council, or model-family rule.
- Emit no readiness, approval, quorum, retry, budget, helper, delivery, or tracker state because this strategy supplies evidence rather than lifecycle authority.
Workflow
- Freeze the question, constraints, evidence paths, and comparison rubric.
- For a one-way door, create at least two fresh contexts with distinct context
identifiers. Each produces its perspective before any is revealed. When the
caller pins perspectives to model profiles, record each perspective's
model_identity(see theagent-nativemodel-dispatch recipe); a duel may use two distinct models on request. Sealed generation is unchanged: no perspective may see another before reveal. Unavailable profiles → disclose and continue single-model. - Reveal the sealed perspectives and cross-review by evidence, reversibility, system fit, failure modes, and cost.
- Attempt concrete refutations. Preserve disagreements, failed refutations, and minority reasoning.
- Write
idea-challenge.v1, validate it, and pass the artifact to Plan as one optional input alongside research and operator intent.
For a cheap two-way door, emit the lightweight packet directly after one fresh challenge. Do not manufacture panel ceremony.
Output Specification
- Artifact directory:
.agents/scratch/ideas/<run-id>/ - Filename:
idea-challenge.json - Format:
idea-challenge.v1JSON with route-specific fields enforced by the validator - Validation command:
skills/idea-genie/scripts/validate-challenge.sh <idea-challenge.json> - Downstream handoff:
handoff.owneris exactlyplan; Plan may accept, reject, or combine the advisory evidence
Quality
- One-way packets prove distinct context IDs and cross-review another perspective by named dimensions.
- Dissent and refutation attempts remain explicit.
- The packet contains no semantic readiness field or decision.
- The validator passes before handoff to Plan.
Do not
- Let perspectives see one another before sealed generation completes.
- Convert consensus, transport availability, or a self-score into readiness.
- Require orchestration infrastructure for a reversible choice.
References
Alternatives
Compare before choosing
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
app-store-optimization
App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching keywords, analyzing competitor rankings, generating metadata suggestions, and improving app visibility on Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Use when the user asks about ASO, app store rankings, app metadata, app titles and descriptions, app store listings, app visibility, or mobile app marketing on iOS or Android. Supports keyword research and scoring, competitor keyword analysis, metadata optimization, A/B test planning, launch checklist
prowler-cloud/prowler
postgresql-indexing
PostgreSQL indexing best practices for Prowler: index design, partial indexes, partitioned table indexing, EXPLAIN ANALYZE validation, concurrent operations, monitoring, and maintenance. Trigger: When creating or modifying PostgreSQL indexes, analyzing query performance with EXPLAIN, debugging slow queries, reviewing index usage statistics, reindexing, dropping indexes, or working with partitioned table indexes. Also trigger when discussing index strategies, partial indexes, or index maintenance
wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep
citation-audit
Use it for operations and research tasks; the detail page covers purpose, installation, and practical steps.
dotnet/skills
migrate-vstest-to-mtp
Migrates .NET test projects from VSTest to Microsoft.Testing.Platform (MTP). Use when user asks to "migrate to MTP", "switch from VSTest", "enable Microsoft.Testing.Platform", "use MTP runner", set OutputType=Exe only for test projects in Directory.Build.props, or mentions EnableMSTestRunner, EnableNUnitRunner, or UseMicrosoftTestingPlatformRunner. USE FOR: MTP behavioral differences vs VSTest (exit code 8, zero tests discovered, --ignore-exit-code, TESTINGPLATFORM_EXITCODE_IGNORE); centralizing