WYRE-AI/msp-claude-plugins/msp-claude-plugins/shared/skills/incident-correlation/SKILL.md
Incident Correlation
Vendor-agnostic cross-tool incident correlation: combining PSA tickets, RMM device state, documentation-platform assets, and configuration- monitoring changes into a unified incident summary across Kaseya, ConnectWise, HaloPSA, Syncro, Atera, and similar MSP stacks.
- Source repository stars
- 42
- Declared platforms
- 0
- Static risk flags
- 0
- Last source update
- 2026-08-28
- Source checked
- 2026-08-28
Decision brief
What it does: where it fits
Vendor-agnostic cross-tool incident correlation: combining PSA tickets, RMM device state, documentation-platform assets, and configuration- monitoring changes into a unified incident summary across Kaseya, ConnectWise, HaloPSA, Syncro, Atera, and similar MSP stacks.
Not for
- Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
- Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.
Compatibility matrix
Platform support, with evidence labels
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
Inspect first. Install second.
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/WYRE-AI/msp-claude-plugins --skill "msp-claude-plugins/shared/skills/incident-correlation"Inspect the Agent Skill "Incident Correlation" from https://github.com/WYRE-AI/msp-claude-plugins/blob/5005f73ba2f52cd299f58aa6bb79f4e70ae87103/msp-claude-plugins/shared/skills/incident-correlation/SKILL.md at commit 5005f73ba2f52cd299f58aa6bb79f4e70ae87103. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
What the source asks the agent to do
- 01
The 6-Step Correlation Workflow
Fetch the ticket using the ticket ID or number provided by the user.
ticketID / ticket numbertitle and descriptioncompanyID (this becomes the cross-vendor key) - 02
Step 1: Get Ticket from PSA
Fetch the ticket using the ticket ID or number provided by the user.
ticketID / ticket numbertitle and descriptioncompanyID (this becomes the cross-vendor key) - 03
Step 2: Identify Company and Contact
The company name is the cross-vendor correlation key. Different tools use different company identifiers, but the name is the universal link.
From the ticket's companyID, fetch the company name from the PSAFrom the ticket's contactID, fetch contact details (name, email, phone)Store the company name — you'll use it to search the other platforms - 04
Step 3: Find the Device
Identifying the affected device is critical but not always straightforward. Try these methods in order:
Configuration item on ticket — If the PSA ticket has a linked CI/config item, use that hostname/serial to searchParse ticket title/description — Look for hostnames, computer names, IP addresses, or serial numbers mentioned in the textUser-provided device — The user may specify a hostname or device name directly - 05
Step 4: Query RMM for Device State
Using the hostname or device identifier from Step 3, query the RMM platform:
Device status: online / offlineLast seen timestampLast reboot timestamp
Permission review
Static risk signals and limitations
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
Why each signal appears
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 93/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 42 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Provenance and original SKILL.md
- Repository
- WYRE-AI/msp-claude-plugins
- Skill path
- msp-claude-plugins/shared/skills/incident-correlation/SKILL.md
- Commit
- 5005f73ba2f52cd299f58aa6bb79f4e70ae87103
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Collected
- 2026-08-28
- Default branch
- main
View the original SKILL.md
Cross-Vendor Incident Correlation
Overview
MSP technicians routinely context-switch between PSA (tickets), RMM (device state), documentation (asset records), and configuration monitoring (change detection) when investigating incidents. This skill teaches Claude how to automatically correlate data across these vendor roles, starting from a ticket and producing a unified incident summary.
Anti-triggers
This is a shared skill: it owns the stitching together of two or more platforms. A lookup inside one platform belongs to that platform's skill, which knows its filters, field names, and pagination.
- Reading a ticket — use
autotask-tickets,connectwise-psa-tickets,halopsa-tickets,syncro-tickets,atera-tickets, orninjaone-tickets. - Reading device state — use
ninjaone-devices,datto-rmm-devices,atera-devices,ncentral-devices, orconnectwise-automate-computers. - Reading documentation or credentials — use
hudu-assets,hudu-passwords, oritglue-configurations. - Reading detected changes — use
liongard-detections. - Deciding a new ticket's priority and owner — that is triage, which
happens before there is anything to correlate; use
shared-skills-ticket-triage. - A confirmed security incident — SOC-confirmed threats have their own
remediation lifecycle rather than a correlation workflow; use
huntress-incidents.
Four Vendor Roles
Each vendor tool fills one or more roles in incident investigation:
| Role | Purpose | Examples |
|---|---|---|
| PSA (ticket source) | Ticket details, company, contact, contract | Autotask, ConnectWise Manage, HaloPSA, Syncro, Atera, SuperOps |
| RMM (device state) | Device status, alerts, last seen, last reboot | Datto RMM, ConnectWise Automate, NinjaOne, Atera, Syncro |
| Documentation (asset docs) | Asset records, related docs, passwords | IT Glue, Hudu, ConnectWise Manage configs |
| Config Monitoring (change detection) | Recent changes, compliance, anomalies | Liongard |
A single vendor may fill multiple roles (e.g., Syncro is both PSA and RMM, Atera is both PSA and RMM).
Normalized Incident Model
The correlation workflow produces this canonical data structure:
Incident Summary
├── TICKET
│ ├── ID, title, description
│ ├── priority (normalized), status (normalized)
│ ├── created date, last updated
│ └── queue, assigned resource
├── COMPANY
│ ├── name (cross-vendor correlation key)
│ ├── company ID (per vendor)
│ └── contract status (if available)
├── CONTACT
│ ├── name, email, phone
│ └── role / VIP flag
├── DEVICE (if identified)
│ ├── hostname, IP, serial, type
│ ├── RMM status (online/offline), last seen, last reboot
│ ├── open alerts (count + top 3)
│ └── documentation link
├── DOCUMENTATION (if available)
│ ├── asset record summary
│ ├── related documents (titles)
│ └── related passwords (names only, never values)
├── CONFIG CHANGES (if available)
│ ├── recent detections (last 7 days)
│ ├── compliance status
│ └── notable changes near ticket creation time
└── CORRELATION INSIGHTS
├── temporal correlations
├── alert-ticket alignment
└── suggested next steps
The 6-Step Correlation Workflow
Step 1: Get Ticket from PSA
Fetch the ticket using the ticket ID or number provided by the user.
Extract these fields:
ticketID/ ticket numbertitleanddescriptioncompanyID(this becomes the cross-vendor key)contactIDpriority(normalize using VENDOR-MAPPINGS.md)status(normalize using VENDOR-MAPPINGS.md)createdDate(needed for temporal correlation in Step 6)queueandassignedResource
If ticket not found: Stop and inform the user. Suggest checking the ticket number format.
Step 2: Identify Company and Contact
The company name is the cross-vendor correlation key. Different tools use different company identifiers, but the name is the universal link.
- From the ticket's
companyID, fetch the company name from the PSA - From the ticket's
contactID, fetch contact details (name, email, phone) - Store the company name — you'll use it to search the other platforms
Company Name Matching Strategy:
When searching other platforms by company name:
- Exact match — Try the full company name first
- Contains match — If no exact match, search with partial name (e.g., "Acme" instead of "Acme Corporation")
- Ask user — If multiple matches or no match, present options and ask the user to confirm
Step 3: Find the Device
Identifying the affected device is critical but not always straightforward. Try these methods in order:
- Configuration item on ticket — If the PSA ticket has a linked CI/config item, use that hostname/serial to search
- Parse ticket title/description — Look for hostnames, computer names, IP addresses, or serial numbers mentioned in the text
- User-provided device — The user may specify a hostname or device name directly
- Ask the user — If no device can be identified, ask: "Which device is this ticket about?"
If no device is relevant (e.g., account/password requests, policy questions): Skip Steps 4-5 device sections and note "No device associated" in the summary.
Step 4: Query RMM for Device State
Using the hostname or device identifier from Step 3, query the RMM platform:
Fetch:
- Device status:
online/offline - Last seen timestamp
- Last reboot timestamp
- Open alerts (count and top 3 by severity)
- Device type, OS, IP addresses
Key insight: If the device is offline and the ticket is about connectivity, this is immediately valuable context. If the device has open alerts that match the ticket description, flag this correlation.
If RMM not available: Mark the DEVICE section as "RMM data unavailable" and continue.
Step 5: Query Documentation Platform
Using the company name and hostname, query the documentation platform:
Fetch:
- Asset/configuration record matching the hostname
- Related documents (titles and links, not full content)
- Related passwords (names only — never retrieve password values during correlation)
- Warranty status (if available)
- Notes or custom fields
If documentation platform not available: Mark the DOCUMENTATION section as "Documentation data unavailable" and continue.
Step 6: Query Configuration Monitoring
Using the company name (mapped to environment), query for recent changes:
Fetch:
- Recent detections in the last 7 days for this environment
- Filter for Critical and High severity first
- Any detections near the ticket creation time (within 24 hours before)
- Compliance metric status (if applicable)
If config monitoring not available: Mark the CONFIG CHANGES section as "Config monitoring data unavailable" and continue.
Correlation Insights Logic
After gathering data from all sources, generate insights:
Temporal Correlation
Compare the ticket createdDate with:
- Config detections: Any changes detected within 24 hours before ticket creation? Flag these as "Change detected shortly before this ticket was created."
- RMM alerts: Any alerts that fired within 24 hours before the ticket? Flag as "Alert preceded this ticket."
- Device reboot: Did the device reboot recently? Could indicate a crash or forced restart.
Alert-Ticket Alignment
Compare the ticket title/description keywords with:
- RMM alert messages: Do any open alerts mention similar issues?
- Detection summaries: Do any recent detections relate to the reported problem?
If keywords overlap (e.g., ticket says "email not working" and a detection says "Exchange mailbox policy changed"), highlight this connection.
Recurring Issues
If you have access to ticket history:
- Has this company had similar tickets in the last 30 days?
- Is this the same device with repeated issues?
- Flag patterns: "This is the 3rd ticket about email issues for this company in 2 weeks."
Unified Summary Output Format
Present the correlated data in this structured format:
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
INCIDENT CORRELATION SUMMARY
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
TICKET
ID: T20240215.0042
Title: Email not working for multiple users
Priority: High (normalized)
Status: In Progress
Created: 2024-02-15 09:23 UTC
Queue: Service Desk
Assigned: Jane Technician
COMPANY
Name: Acme Corporation
Autotask ID: 12345
Contract: Managed Services (Active)
CONTACT
Name: John Smith
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 555-0100
DEVICE
Hostname: ACME-EXCH01
Type: Server
RMM Status: Online (last seen 2 min ago)
Last Reboot: 2024-02-14 22:00 UTC (11 hours ago)
IP: 192.168.1.50
Open Alerts: 2
- HIGH: Exchange transport service stopped (09:15 UTC)
- MEDIUM: Disk usage 87% on C: drive (08:00 UTC)
DOCUMENTATION
Asset Record: ACME-EXCH01 (Server - Exchange 2019)
Related Docs: "Acme Email Configuration", "Exchange Maintenance Runbook"
Passwords: "Acme Exchange Admin", "Acme Domain Admin"
Warranty: Expires 2025-06-15
CONFIG CHANGES (last 7 days)
2 detections found:
- HIGH: Exchange transport rules modified (2024-02-14 23:30 UTC)
- MEDIUM: Windows Update KB5034763 installed (2024-02-13 02:00 UTC)
CORRELATION INSIGHTS
! Transport rule change detected 10 hours before ticket creation
— Likely root cause: modified transport rules may be blocking email flow
! Exchange transport service alert matches ticket description
— RMM confirms the service is stopped
- Device rebooted last night; verify if reboot triggered the service issue
SUGGESTED NEXT STEPS
1. Check Exchange transport rules for recent modifications
2. Restart the Exchange transport service
3. Verify mail flow after service restart
4. Review the transport rule change in Liongard for details
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════
Graceful Degradation
Each vendor role is optional. The workflow should always produce a summary, even if some data sources are unavailable:
| Missing Source | Impact | Handling |
|---|---|---|
| RMM unavailable | No device status or alerts | Note "RMM data unavailable" in DEVICE section |
| Documentation unavailable | No asset record or docs | Note "Documentation data unavailable" |
| Config monitoring unavailable | No change detection | Note "Config monitoring data unavailable" |
| Device not identified | No device-specific data | Skip device sections, note "No device associated" |
| Contact not found | No contact details | Note "Contact not found" in CONTACT section |
The TICKET and COMPANY sections should always be populated since the workflow starts from a ticket.
Depth Modes
Quick Mode
Query only PSA + RMM (Steps 1-4). Produces a faster summary focused on ticket context and device state. Useful for initial triage.
Full Mode (default)
Query all four vendor roles (Steps 1-6). Produces the complete correlated summary with documentation and config monitoring insights.
Related Skills
- Ticket Triage — Best practices for initial ticket assessment
- MSP Terminology — Vendor-agnostic MSP vocabulary
- Vendor Mappings — Field mappings and normalization tables per vendor
Frequently asked questions
What to verify before installation and use
What does the Incident Correlation source document cover?
Vendor-agnostic cross-tool incident correlation: combining PSA tickets, RMM device state, documentation-platform assets, and configuration- monitoring changes into a unified incident summary across Kaseya, ConnectWise, HaloPSA, Syncro, Atera, and similar MSP stacks.
How do I install Incident Correlation?
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/WYRE-AI/msp-claude-plugins --skill "msp-claude-plugins/shared/skills/incident-correlation". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Alternatives
Compare before choosing
oaustegard/claude-skills
featuring
Generate hierarchical _FEATURES.md files that describe what a codebase DOES from a user/consumer perspective, anchored to source symbols via tree-sitting. Supports large complex codebases through feature-driven decomposition into sub-feature files. Uses a multi-pass synthesis: orientation → detail → overview rewrite. Use when someone says "what does this do", "document features", "feature inventory", "_FEATURES.md", or needs to understand a codebase's purpose before modifying it. Complements tre
dancingteeth/unified-code-review
unified-code-review
Risk-first code review for PRs and branch audits: blast-radius triage, agent-authored discipline (tests first, intent evidence), call-graph pincer for integration defects between modules, then structural code-judo bar. Use when reviewing PRs, auditing agent-written diffs, catching rubber-stamp green CI, or wiring bugs single-file review misses. Prefer over structure-only thermo-nuclear review alone. Do not use for unrelated coding tasks or as an always-on rule.
Postpartum-genushyacinthus29/dotnet-skills
dotnet-worker-services
Build long-running .NET background services with `BackgroundService`, Generic Host, graceful shutdown, configuration, logging, and deployment patterns suited to workers and daemons.
PaulRBerg/agent-skills
skill-writing
Create/scaffold/init a project-local agent skill under `.agents/skills` in an ordinary repository; defer to repository instructions that define a source catalog and lifecycle.