Source profileQuality 84/100

techygarg/lattice/skills/refiners/language-idioms-refiner/SKILL.md

language-idioms-refiner

Facilitate a structured conversation to define language-specific idioms and patterns for a repository. Produces a language-idioms.md document consumed by multiple atoms to adapt pseudocode defaults to the project's language. Use when setting up a new project, switching languages, or when the user says 'setup language', 'define language idioms', 'configure language', 'language patterns', or 'adapt for Go/Rust/Python'.

Source repository stars
170
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
1
Last source update
2026-07-06
Source checked
2026-08-04

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

Facilitate a structured conversation to define language-specific idioms and patterns for a repository. Produces a language-idioms.

Best for

  • Use when setting up a new project, switching languages, or when the user says 'setup language', 'define language idioms', 'configure language', 'language patterns', or 'adapt for Go/Rust/Python'.

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/techygarg/lattice --skill "skills/refiners/language-idioms-refiner"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "language-idioms-refiner" from https://github.com/techygarg/lattice/blob/75b7e0728587f2e822e8cdbe11583a6f9a38a4b3/skills/refiners/language-idioms-refiner/SKILL.md at commit 75b7e0728587f2e822e8cdbe11583a6f9a38a4b3. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Step 1: Confirm language and version

    "I detected [Language] [version]. Is this correct?"

    "I detected [Language] [version]. Is this correct?"Record language and version. These go in the document frontmatter.
  2. 02

    Step 2: Walk through sections with proposals

    For each of the 6 sections:

    Propose pre-populated content based on the detected language (see Language-Specific Proposals below).Present the proposal: "Here's what I'd recommend for [Language]. Does this match how your team uses [Language]?"User confirms → record as-is.
  3. 03

    Step 3: Additional sections

    After the 6 core sections, ask: "Any language-specific patterns I should add? For example: concurrency patterns, memory management, async/await idioms, or framework-specific conventions."

    After the 6 core sections, ask: "Any language-specific patterns I should add? For example: concurrency patterns, memory management, async/await idioms, or framework-specific conventions."Record any additional sections the user wants.
  4. 04

    Step 4: Produce document

    Assemble and write the document.

    Assemble and write the document.
  5. 05

    What This Produces

    These six section headings are the stable contract. Atoms reference them by name. Additional sections can be added by consumers but these six must be present.

    Output: .lattice/standards/language-idioms.md (or custom path from .lattice/config.yaml - paths.languageidioms)Mode: Always standalone -- no embedded language defaults exist in atoms to overlay on. For revisions, load existing document and update sections in place.Config keys:

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

Reads files

low · line 49

The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.

If yes, read that file. Ask the user:

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score84/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars170SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
techygarg/lattice
Skill path
skills/refiners/language-idioms-refiner/SKILL.md
Commit
75b7e0728587f2e822e8cdbe11583a6f9a38a4b3
License
MIT
Collected
2026-08-04
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

Language Idioms Refiner

What This Produces

  • Output: .lattice/standards/language-idioms.md (or custom path from .lattice/config.yaml -> paths.language_idioms)
  • Mode: Always standalone -- no embedded language defaults exist in atoms to overlay on. For revisions, load existing document and update sections in place.
  • Config keys:
    • language (top-level) -- language identifier (e.g., go, rust, python, java, typescript)
    • paths.language_idioms -- path to the produced document
  • Template: Read ./assets/template.md for the full document structure, pre-populated examples, and interview guidance comments
  • Consumed by: Multiple atoms reference specific sections by heading name:
SectionConsumed by
Error Handlingclean-code atom (§8), secure-coding atom (§1 trust boundary messages)
Type System & Object Modelclean-code atom (§1 SRP/cohesion), domain-driven-design atom (entities, VOs, aggregates)
Naming Conventionsclean-code atom (§4)
Testing Patternstest-quality atom (§5 naming, §4 isolation, §6 builders)
Parameter & Function Designclean-code atom (§2 function size, §5 parameters)
Dependency Managementclean-code atom (§9 testability/DI), architecture atom (dependency direction)

These six section headings are the stable contract. Atoms reference them by name. Additional sections can be added by consumers but these six must be present.

Scope Clarification

This document captures how the project's language expresses engineering patterns -- the language-level idioms that atoms need to adapt their pseudocode defaults. Clear boundaries:

ConcernWhere It BelongsNot Here
Project identity, tech stack, directory layoutknowledge-priming atomNo project structure or framework docs
Code craftsmanship rules (thresholds, heuristics)clean-code atom / overlayNo function size limits or DRY rules
Architecture layers, dependency directionarchitecture atom / overlayNo layer definitions
Domain modeling guardrailsdomain-driven-design atom / overlayNo aggregate rules
Team-specific preferences within languageAtom-specific overlaysNo team decisions (see below)

Key distinction from atom overlays: This document describes how the language works. Atom overlays describe how the team works within the language.

  • Language idioms doc: "Go uses explicit error returns (if err != nil), not exceptions"
  • Clean-code overlay: "We use fmt.Errorf('context: %w', err) for wrapping, custom error types for domain errors"

Language idioms are facts about the language. Atom overlays are team choices.

Before You Begin

Check for existing documents

  1. Read .lattice/config.yaml -- does paths.language_idioms point to a file?
  2. If yes, read that file. Ask the user:
    • "You already have a language idioms document for [language]. Would you like to revise it (update specific sections), start fresh (new interview), or switch language?"
    • Revise: Load the existing document, walk through only the sections the user wants to change.
    • Start fresh: Proceed with the full interview flow below.
    • Switch language: Proceed with full interview for the new language; existing document will be replaced.
  3. If no config or no existing document, proceed with the full interview flow.

Detect the language

Determine the project language before starting the interview:

  1. From config: Check .lattice/config.yaml for language key.
  2. From project files (if no config key):
    • package.json → TypeScript / JavaScript
    • tsconfig.json → TypeScript (confirm over JavaScript)
    • go.mod → Go
    • pom.xml or build.gradle or build.gradle.kts → Java or Kotlin
    • Cargo.toml → Rust
    • requirements.txt or pyproject.toml or setup.py → Python
    • Gemfile → Ruby
    • *.csproj or *.sln → C# / .NET
    • Package.swift → Swift
  3. Multiple languages detected: Ask the user which is the primary language. One language-idioms document per project (covers the primary language).
  4. No detection: Ask the user directly.

Present the detected language: "I detected this is a Go project (found go.mod). I'll propose Go-idiomatic patterns for each section. You can confirm or adjust."

Interview Flow

This refiner works differently from other refiners. Instead of showing defaults and asking "change or keep?", it proposes language-specific content and asks "does this match your team's usage?"

Step 1: Confirm language and version

"I detected [Language] [version]. Is this correct?"

Record language and version. These go in the document frontmatter.

Step 2: Walk through sections with proposals

For each of the 6 sections:

  1. Propose pre-populated content based on the detected language (see Language-Specific Proposals below).
  2. Present the proposal: "Here's what I'd recommend for [Language]. Does this match how your team uses [Language]?"
  3. User confirms → record as-is.
  4. User adjusts → discuss specifics, record their version.

Step 3: Additional sections

After the 6 core sections, ask: "Any language-specific patterns I should add? For example: concurrency patterns, memory management, async/await idioms, or framework-specific conventions."

Record any additional sections the user wants.

Step 4: Produce document

Assemble and write the document.

Section-by-Section Interview Guide

Read ./assets/template.md and follow the <!-- INTERVIEW GUIDANCE: --> comments for each section.

The 6 core sections

#SectionWhat It Captures
1Error HandlingLanguage error philosophy (exceptions, error returns, Result types), error propagation patterns, error creation idioms
2Type System & Object ModelClasses vs structs, interfaces (nominal vs structural), inheritance vs composition, generics, type safety idioms
3Naming ConventionsCase conventions, visibility modifiers, acronym style, package/module naming, idiomatic patterns
4Testing PatternsTest framework idioms, test organization, assertion patterns, mocking approach, test naming style
5Parameter & Function DesignArgument passing idioms, options/config patterns, multiple returns, named parameters, function signatures
6Dependency ManagementDI approach (container vs manual), interface placement, wiring patterns, import/module conventions

Cross-section awareness

Decision inAffectsHow
§1 Error Handling§4 TestingError patterns determine how error paths are tested
§2 Type System§5 Parameters, §6 DependenciesObject model shapes function signatures and DI approach
§3 Naming§4 TestingNaming conventions apply to test names too

Language-Specific Proposals

For well-known languages, pre-populate each section with idiomatic defaults. The interview confirms or adjusts these. For unrecognized languages, ask open-ended questions.

Go

SectionProposal summary
Error HandlingExplicit error returns (value, err := ...), if err != nil, error wrapping with fmt.Errorf("context: %w", err), sentinel errors for expected cases, no exceptions
Type SystemStructs with methods (receiver functions), implicit interfaces (structural typing), composition via embedding, no inheritance, no classes
NamingExported = capitalized, unexported = lowercase, short names in small scopes, acronyms fully uppercase (HTTP, ID), package name is part of identifier (http.Client not http.HTTPClient)
TestingTable-driven tests, t.Run for subtests, testing.T parameter, test files _test.go co-located, no assertion library required (stdlib comparisons)
ParametersAccept interfaces return structs, functional options pattern for config (WithTimeout(5*time.Second)), multiple return values, no method overloading
DependenciesPass interface parameters (not constructor DI), define interfaces at consumer not provider, no DI container, explicit wiring in main() or cmd/

Rust

SectionProposal summary
Error HandlingResult<T, E> for recoverable, panic! for unrecoverable, ? operator for propagation, thiserror for library errors, anyhow for application errors
Type SystemStructs + impl blocks, traits (explicit implementation), enums with data (algebraic types), ownership/borrowing, no inheritance, no null (Option<T> instead)
Namingsnake_case functions/variables, PascalCase types/traits, SCREAMING_SNAKE constants, lifetime names short ('a, 'b)
Testing#[test] attribute, #[cfg(test)] mod tests in same file, integration tests in tests/ directory, assert_eq!/assert! macros
ParametersOwnership: borrow (&T) vs move, generic bounds (impl Trait), builder pattern for complex config, no default parameters
DependenciesTrait objects (dyn Trait) or generics (impl Trait) for abstraction, no DI container, explicit construction

Python

SectionProposal summary
Error HandlingEAFP over LBYL (try/except, not if-checks), context managers (with) for cleanup, custom exceptions inheriting from base classes, raise/except
Type SystemClasses, dataclasses (@dataclass), protocols for structural typing (PEP 544), duck typing, type hints encouraged but optional at runtime
Namingsnake_case functions/variables, PascalCase classes, SCREAMING_SNAKE constants, _private convention (single underscore), __dunder__ for magic methods
Testingpytest preferred, fixtures for setup/teardown, @pytest.mark.parametrize for data-driven tests, plain assert (pytest rewrites), test files test_*.py
Parameters**kwargs for options, named/keyword arguments, default values, dataclass or TypedDict for config objects
DependenciesConstructor injection with protocols/ABCs, or function parameters, no heavyweight DI container (or dependency-injector if needed)

Java / Kotlin

SectionProposal summary
Error HandlingJava: unchecked exceptions preferred over checked (modern style), custom exceptions extend RuntimeException. Kotlin: sealed class Result pattern, runCatching, no checked exceptions
Type SystemJava: classes, interfaces, records (16+), sealed classes (17+). Kotlin: data classes, sealed hierarchies, null safety (?), extension functions
NamingcamelCase variables/methods, PascalCase classes/interfaces, SCREAMING_SNAKE constants, packages lowercase.dotted
TestingJUnit 5, @Test, @ParameterizedTest, @Nested for grouping, Mockito (Java) / MockK (Kotlin), AssertJ for fluent assertions
ParametersJava: builder pattern for >3 params, method overloading. Kotlin: named arguments, default values, data class config
DependenciesConstructor injection (Spring, Guice, or manual), DI containers are idiomatic, program to interfaces

TypeScript

SectionProposal summary
Error Handlingtry/catch with custom Error subclasses, typed error handling optional (Result pattern via libraries), no checked exceptions
Type SystemInterfaces, type aliases, union/intersection types, generics, unknown over any, discriminated unions for state
NamingcamelCase variables/functions, PascalCase types/classes/enums, SCREAMING_SNAKE constants, no I prefix for interfaces
TestingJest or Vitest, describe/it blocks, mock functions (jest.fn()), expect().toBe() assertions, .test.ts or .spec.ts co-located
ParametersOptions objects with destructuring, default values, rest parameters, overloaded signatures for type narrowing
DependenciesConstructor injection, DI optional (tsyringe, inversify), or module-level factory functions

C# / .NET

SectionProposal summary
Error HandlingExceptions for exceptional cases, custom exceptions from Exception base, try/catch/finally, no error codes for business logic, Result pattern growing in popularity
Type SystemClasses, interfaces (explicit), records (C# 9+), structs (value types), nullable reference types (C# 8+), generics
NamingPascalCase methods/properties/classes, camelCase local variables/parameters, _camelCase private fields, I prefix for interfaces (IService)
TestingxUnit or NUnit, [Fact]/[Theory] (xUnit), [Test]/[TestCase] (NUnit), FluentAssertions, Moq for mocking
ParametersNamed parameters, optional parameters with defaults, builder pattern or options pattern (IOptions<T>) for config
DependenciesConstructor injection via built-in DI (IServiceCollection), DI containers idiomatic, interface-first

Other Languages

For languages not listed above, use open-ended questions for each section:

  1. "How does [Language] handle errors? Exceptions, error returns, algebraic types, or something else?"
  2. "What's the object model? Classes, structs, traits, protocols? Inheritance or composition?"
  3. "What are the naming conventions? Case style, visibility markers, module naming?"
  4. "What's the testing ecosystem? Framework, organization, assertion style?"
  5. "How do you pass configuration and options to functions? Named params, objects, builders?"
  6. "How is dependency injection handled? Containers, manual wiring, interface parameters?"

Output Assembly

  1. YAML frontmatter: language and version
  2. Title line: # Language Idioms: {Language}
  3. All 6 core sections with confirmed/adjusted content
  4. Any additional sections the user added
  5. Strip all <!-- INTERVIEW GUIDANCE: --> comments

Target size: 40-60 lines of focused content. Each section should be 4-8 lines: a brief philosophy statement plus the key idiomatic patterns as a concise list. No code examples -- atoms have their own examples in pseudocode that they adapt using this document's guidance.

Determine output path:

  1. If .lattice/config.yaml exists and has paths.language_idioms, use that path.
  2. Otherwise, default to .lattice/standards/language-idioms.md.

Update config:

  1. Set language: {language} at top level (create or update).
  2. Set paths.language_idioms pointing to the output file.
  3. If .lattice/config.yaml does not exist, create it. Preserve all existing content.

Confirm to user: "Your language idioms document has been written to [PATH] for [Language] [version]. The following atoms will now adapt their patterns: clean-code, test-quality, secure-coding, domain-driven-design, and architecture."

Document Quality Checks

Before writing the final document, verify:

  • All 6 core section headings are present and match exactly: Error Handling, Type System & Object Model, Naming Conventions, Testing Patterns, Parameter & Function Design, Dependency Management
  • Content is specific to the language, not generic advice ("use error returns" not "handle errors properly")
  • No code craftsmanship rules (thresholds, complexity limits) -- those belong in atom overlays
  • No project identity information (tech stack, directory layout) -- that belongs in knowledge-priming
  • Content is concise -- each section 4-8 lines, total document under 60 lines
  • Frontmatter has correct language and version values
  • Config file is correctly updated with both language key and paths.language_idioms
  • No <!-- INTERVIEW GUIDANCE: --> comments remain in output

Alternatives

Compare before choosing