Best fit
- AI原生的潜在客户情报与外联管道。取代Apollo、Clay和ZoomInfo,提供基于代理的信号评分、相互排名、温暖路径发现、来源驱动的语音建模以及跨电子邮件、LinkedIn和X的渠道特定外联。当用户想要查找、筛选并联系高价值联系人时使用。
affaan-m/ECC
AI原生的潜在客户情报与外联管道。取代Apollo、Clay和ZoomInfo,提供基于代理的信号评分、相互排名、温暖路径发现、来源驱动的语音建模以及跨电子邮件、LinkedIn和X的渠道特定外联。当用户想要查找、筛选并联系高价值联系人时使用。
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "docs/zh-CN/skills/lead-intelligence"Source checked Jul 28, 2026·Refresh due Oct 26, 2026
Reorganized from the pinned upstream SKILL.md
According to the pinned SKILL.md from affaan-m/ECC: 基于智能体的线索情报管道,通过社交图谱分析与温暖路径发现,寻找、评分并触达高价值联系人。
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "docs/zh-CN/skills/lead-intelligence"Best fit
Bring this context
Expected outputs
Key source sections
Sections are extracted automatically from the pinned SKILL.md and link back to the source.
targetverticals = ["prediction markets", "AI tooling", "developer tools"] targetroles = ["founder", "CEO", "CTO", "VP Engineering", "investor", "partner"] targetlocations = ["San Francisco", "New York", "London", "remote"]
for vertical in targetverticals: results = websearchexa( query=f"{vertical} {role} founder CEO", category="company", numResults=20 ) Score each result
xsearch = searchrecenttweets( query="prediction markets OR AI tooling OR developer tools", maxresults=100 )
用户希望在特定行业寻找线索或潜在客户 为合作、销售或融资构建外联名单 研究应该联系谁以及最佳联系路径 用户提及"寻找线索"、"外联名单"、"我应该联系谁"、"温暖引荐" 需要根据相关性对联系人列表进行评分或排序 希望绘制共同联系人图谱以寻找温暖引荐路径
Exa MCP — 用于人员、公司和信号的深度网络搜索(websearchexa) X API — 关注者/关注图谱、共同联系人分析、近期活动(XBEARERTOKEN,以及写上下文凭据,如 XCONSUMERKEY、XCONSUMERSECRET、XACCESSTOKEN、XACCESSTOKENSECRET)
SkillSignal prompt templates
These prompts were written by SkillSignal from the source structure; they are not upstream text.
Task-start prompt
Confirm source fit, inputs, and outputs before acting.
Use lead-intelligence to help me with: [specific task]. Context: [files, data, or background]. Constraints: [environment, scope, and prohibited actions]. Before acting, check the pinned SKILL.md and explain which sections apply, what inputs are still missing, and what you will deliver.
Source-guided execution
Make the Agent explicitly follow the key extracted sections.
Apply the pinned lead-intelligence source to [task]. Pay particular attention to these source sections: “Step 1: Define target parameters”, “Step 2: Exa deep search for people”, “Step 3: X API search for active voices”, “何时激活”, “工具要求”. Preserve the important decision at each step. Mark facts not covered by the source as “needs confirmation” instead of inventing them. Then verify the result against my acceptance criteria: [criteria].
Result-review prompt
Check omissions, permissions, and source drift before delivery.
Review the current lead-intelligence result: (1) does it satisfy the original task; (2) were any applicable steps or limits in the pinned SKILL.md missed; (3) did it perform any unauthorized file, command, network, or data action; and (4) which conclusions remain unverified? List issues first, then fix only what the source or user authorization supports.
Output checklist
The task matches the purpose documented in the SKILL.md.
The source section “Step 1: Define target parameters” has been checked.
The source section “Step 2: Exa deep search for people” has been checked.
The source section “Step 3: X API search for active voices” has been checked.
The source section “何时激活” has been checked.
Inputs, constraints, and acceptance criteria are explicit.
Unverified facts, compatibility, and outcome claims are clearly marked.
Any file, command, network, or data action has been reviewed.
Choose a different workflow
AI-native lead intelligence and outreach pipeline. Replaces Apollo, Clay, and ZoomInfo with agent-powered signal scoring, mutual ranking, warm path discovery, source-derived voice modeling, and channel-specific outreach across email, LinkedIn, and X. Use when the user wants to find, qualify, and reach high-value contacts.
A separate implementation from affaan-m/ECC; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detail日本語翻訳:このファイルは lead-intelligence 用の日本語翻訳が必要です
A separate implementation from affaan-m/ECC; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detailMedicinal chemistry filters for compound triage. Apply drug-likeness rules (Lipinski, Veber, CNS), structural alert catalogs (PAINS, NIBR, ChEMBL), complexity metrics, and the medchem query language for library filtering.
A separate implementation from K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detailFAQ
基于智能体的线索情报管道,通过社交图谱分析与温暖路径发现,寻找、评分并触达高价值联系人。
The catalog detected this source-specific install command: npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "docs/zh-CN/skills/lead-intelligence". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
No dedicated Agent platform is declared in the pinned source record.
Quality breakdown
Based on traceable docs and repository signals; stars are not treated as quality.
Compare before choosing
These links are selected from shared tasks, functions, stacks, platforms, and same-name variants. Compare the source owner, documentation, permissions, and maintenance signals.
AI-native lead intelligence and outreach pipeline. Replaces Apollo, Clay, and ZoomInfo with agent-powered signal scoring, mutual ranking, warm path discovery, source-derived voice modeling, and channel-specific outreach across email, LinkedIn, and X. Use when the user wants to find, qualify, and reach high-value contacts.
日本語翻訳:このファイルは lead-intelligence 用の日本語翻訳が必要です
Medicinal chemistry filters for compound triage. Apply drug-likeness rules (Lipinski, Veber, CNS), structural alert catalogs (PAINS, NIBR, ChEMBL), complexity metrics, and the medchem query language for library filtering.
Build self-serve acquisition and expansion motions. Use when deciding PLG vs sales-led, optimizing activation, driving freemium conversion, building growth equations, or recognizing when product complexity demands human touch. Includes the parallel test where sales-led won 10x on revenue.
When the user wants to figure out which marketing actually drives conversions and revenue, choose or interpret an attribution model, or reconcile conflicting numbers across tools. Also use when the user mentions "attribution," "attribution model," "first-touch vs last-touch," "multi-touch," "which channel drives revenue," "what's my real CAC," "my dashboards disagree," "Google/Meta says X but GA says Y," "media mix model," "MMM," "incrementality," "geo lift," "holdout test," "how did you hear ab
基于智能体的线索情报管道,通过社交图谱分析与温暖路径发现,寻找、评分并触达高价值联系人。
web_search_exa)X_BEARER_TOKEN,以及写上下文凭据,如 X_CONSUMER_KEY、X_CONSUMER_SECRET、X_ACCESS_TOKEN、X_ACCESS_TOKEN_SECRET)┌─────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌─────────────────┐
│ 1. 信号评分 │────>│ 2. 相互排序 │────>│ 3. 发现热路径 │────>│ 4. 丰富内容 │────>│ 5. 起草外联 │
└─────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └─────────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └─────────────────┘
不要从通用的销售文案中起草外联信息。
当用户的语气很重要时,首先运行 brand-voice。在此技能中重复使用其 VOICE PROFILE,而不是临时重新推导风格。
如果实时X访问可用,在起草前拉取最近的原创帖子。如果不可用,则使用提供的示例或最佳的仓库/网站材料。
在目标垂直领域中搜索高信号人员。根据以下标准为每个人分配权重:
| 信号 | 权重 | 来源 |
|---|---|---|
| 角色/职位匹配 | 30% | Exa, LinkedIn |
| 行业匹配 | 25% | Exa 公司搜索 |
| 近期相关话题活动 | 20% | X API 搜索, Exa |
| 关注者数量/影响力 | 10% | X API |
| 地理位置接近度 | 10% | Exa, LinkedIn |
| 与您内容的互动 | 5% | X API 互动 |
# Step 1: Define target parameters
target_verticals = ["prediction markets", "AI tooling", "developer tools"]
target_roles = ["founder", "CEO", "CTO", "VP Engineering", "investor", "partner"]
target_locations = ["San Francisco", "New York", "London", "remote"]
# Step 2: Exa deep search for people
for vertical in target_verticals:
results = web_search_exa(
query=f"{vertical} {role} founder CEO",
category="company",
numResults=20
)
# Score each result
# Step 3: X API search for active voices
x_search = search_recent_tweets(
query="prediction markets OR AI tooling OR developer tools",
max_results=100
)
# Extract and score unique authors
对于每个评分目标,分析用户的社交图谱以找到最温暖的路径。
social-graph-ranker 模型来评分桥梁价值| 因素 | 权重 |
|---|---|
| 与目标的联系数量 | 40% — 最高权重,联系最多 = 排名最高 |
| 共同联系人的当前角色/公司 | 20% — 决策者 vs 个人贡献者 |
| 共同联系人的地理位置 | 15% — 同一城市 = 更容易引荐 |
| 行业匹配 | 15% — 同一垂直领域 = 自然引荐 |
| 共同联系人的X账号/LinkedIn | 10% — 可识别性以便外联 |
规范规则:
当用户需要图数学本身、作为独立报告的桥接排名或显式衰减模型调优时,使用 social-graph-ranker。
在此技能中,使用相同的加权桥梁模型:
B(m) = Σ_{t ∈ T} w(t) · λ^(d(m,t) - 1)
R(m) = B_ext(m) · (1 + β · engagement(m))
解读:
R(m) 和直接桥梁路径 -> 请求温暖引荐R(m) 和一跳桥梁路径 -> 有条件地请求引荐如果用户明确要求将排名引擎单独拆分、将数学计算可视化,或在完整线索工作流之外对网络进行评分,请先独立运行 `social-graph-ranker` 作为独立步骤,然后将结果反馈回此流程。
相互排名报告
=====================
#1 @mutual_handle (得分: 92)
姓名: Jane Smith
角色: Partner @ Acme Ventures
地点: San Francisco
与目标对象的连接数: 7
关联对象: @target1, @target2, @target3, @target4, @target5, @target6, @target7
最佳引荐路径: Jane 投资了 Target1 的公司
#2 @mutual_handle2 (得分: 85)
...
对于每个目标,找到最短的引荐链:
你 ──[关注]──> 互关A ──[投资了]──> 目标公司
你 ──[关注]──> 互关B ──[共同创立了]──> 目标人物
你 ──[在]──> 活动 ──[也参加了]──> 目标人物
对于每个合格的线索,拉取:
为每个线索生成个性化的外联信息。草稿应与来源匹配的语气配置文件和目标渠道保持一致。
按以下顺序选择一个主要渠道:
仅在有充分理由且节奏不会显得像垃圾邮件时使用多渠道。
目标:
避免:
目标:
避免:
对于每个目标,生成:
如果浏览器控制可用:
如果桌面自动化可用:
未经用户明确批准,不要自动发送消息。
用户应设置以下环境变量:
# Required
export X_BEARER_TOKEN="..."
export X_ACCESS_TOKEN="..."
export X_ACCESS_TOKEN_SECRET="..."
export X_CONSUMER_KEY="..."
export X_CONSUMER_SECRET="..."
export EXA_API_KEY="..."
# Optional
export LINKEDIN_COOKIE="..." # For browser-use LinkedIn access
export APOLLO_API_KEY="..." # For Apollo enrichment
此技能在 agents/ 子目录中包含专门的智能体:
用户:帮我找出预测市场中我应该联系的20位顶尖人物
智能体工作流程:
1. signal-scorer 在 Exa 和 X 上搜索预测市场领导者
2. mutual-mapper 检查用户的 X 社交图谱以寻找共同联系人
3. enrichment-agent 提取公司数据和近期动态
4. outreach-drafter 为排名靠前的潜在联系人生成个性化消息
输出:包含热路径、语音画像摘要以及针对特定渠道或应用内草稿的排名列表
brand-voice 用于规范语气捕获connections-optimizer 用于在外联前进行先审后用的网络修剪和扩展