Best for
- Use when running a weekly, monthly, or quarterly metrics review, investigating a sudden spike or drop, comparing performance against targets, or turning raw numbers into a scorecard with recommended actions.
aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team/skills/metrics-review/SKILL.md
Review and analyze product metrics with trend analysis and actionable insights. Use when running a weekly, monthly, or quarterly metrics review, investigating a sudden spike or drop, comparing performance against targets, or turning raw numbers into a scorecard with recommended actions.
Decision brief
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team --skill "skills/metrics-review"Inspect the Agent Skill "metrics-review" from https://github.com/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team/blob/bfcfb64081f94e5869ff420aaaed63b6da716bc6/skills/metrics-review/SKILL.md at commit bfcfb64081f94e5869ff420aaaed63b6da716bc6. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
Review the “Usage” section in the pinned source before continuing.
If product analytics is connected: - Pull key product metrics for the relevant time period - Get comparison data (previous period, same period last year, targets) - Pull segment breakdowns if available
2-3 sentences: overall product health, most notable changes, key callout.
Purpose: Catch issues quickly, monitor experiments, stay in touch with product health. Duration: 15-30 minutes. Attendees: Product manager, maybe engineering lead.
Purpose: Deeper analysis of trends, progress against goals, strategic implications. Duration: 30-60 minutes. Attendees: Product team, key stakeholders.
Permission review
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 95/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 89 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Review and analyze product metrics, identify trends, and surface actionable insights.
/metrics-review $ARGUMENTS
If ~~product analytics is connected:
If no analytics tool is connected, ask the user to provide:
Ask the user:
Structure the review using a metrics hierarchy: North Star metric at the top, L1 health indicators (acquisition, activation, engagement, retention, revenue, satisfaction), and L2 diagnostic metrics for drill-down. See Product Metrics Hierarchy below for full definitions.
If the user has not defined their metrics hierarchy, help them identify their North Star and key L1 metrics before proceeding.
For each key metric:
Identify correlations:
2-3 sentences: overall product health, most notable changes, key callout.
Table format for quick scanning:
| Metric | Current | Previous | Change | Target | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Metric] | [Value] | [Value] | [+/- %] | [Target] | [On track / At risk / Miss] |
For each metric worth discussing:
What is going well:
What needs attention:
Specific next steps based on the analysis:
After generating the review:
The single metric that best captures the core value your product delivers to users. It should be:
Examples by product type:
The 5-7 metrics that together paint a complete picture of product health. These map to the key stages of the user lifecycle:
Acquisition: Are new users finding the product?
Activation: Are new users reaching the value moment?
Engagement: Are active users getting value?
Retention: Are users coming back?
Monetization: Is value translating to revenue?
Satisfaction: How do users feel about the product?
Detailed metrics used to investigate changes in L1 metrics:
What they measure: Unique users who perform a qualifying action in a day, week, or month.
Key decisions:
How to use them:
What it measures: Of users who started in period X, what % are still active in period Y?
Common retention timeframes:
How to use retention:
What it measures: % of users who move from one stage to the next.
Common conversion funnels:
How to use conversion:
What it measures: % of new users who reach the moment where they first experience the product's core value.
Defining activation:
How to use activation:
Objectives: Qualitative, aspirational goals that describe what you want to achieve.
Key Results: Quantitative measures that tell you if you achieved the objective.
Example:
Objective: Make our product indispensable for daily workflows
Key Results:
- Increase DAU/MAU ratio from 0.35 to 0.50
- Increase D30 retention for new users from 40% to 55%
- 3 core workflows with >80% task completion rate
Purpose: Catch issues quickly, monitor experiments, stay in touch with product health. Duration: 15-30 minutes. Attendees: Product manager, maybe engineering lead.
What to review:
Action: If something looks off, investigate. Otherwise, note it and move on.
Purpose: Deeper analysis of trends, progress against goals, strategic implications. Duration: 30-60 minutes. Attendees: Product team, key stakeholders.
What to review:
Action: Identify 1-3 areas to investigate or invest in. Update priorities if metrics reveal new information.
Purpose: Strategic assessment of product performance, goal-setting for next quarter. Duration: 60-90 minutes. Attendees: Product, engineering, design, leadership.
What to review:
Action: Set OKRs for next quarter. Adjust product strategy based on what the data shows.
A good dashboard answers the question "How is the product doing?" at a glance.
Principles:
Start with the question, not the data. What decisions does this dashboard support? Design backwards from the decision.
Hierarchy of information. The most important metric should be the most visually prominent. North Star at the top, L1 metrics next, L2 metrics available on drill-down.
Context over numbers. A number without context is meaningless. Always show: current value, comparison (previous period, target, benchmark), trend direction.
Fewer metrics, more insight. A dashboard with 50 metrics helps no one. Focus on 5-10 that matter. Put everything else in a detailed report.
Consistent time periods. Use the same time period for all metrics on a dashboard. Mixing daily and monthly metrics creates confusion.
Visual status indicators. Use color to indicate health at a glance:
Actionability. Every metric on the dashboard should be something the team can influence. If you cannot act on it, it does not belong on the product dashboard.
Top row: North Star metric with trend line and target.
Second row: L1 metrics scorecard — current value, change, target, status for each key metric.
Third row: Key funnels or conversion metrics — visual funnel showing drop-off at each stage.
Fourth row: Recent experiments and launches — active A/B tests, recent feature launches with early metrics.
Bottom / drill-down: L2 metrics, segment breakdowns, and detailed time series for investigation.
Set alerts for metrics that require immediate attention:
Alert hygiene:
Use tables for the scorecard. Use clear status indicators. Keep the summary tight — the reader should get the essential story in 30 seconds.
Frequently asked questions
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team --skill "skills/metrics-review". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Alternatives
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching keywords, analyzing competitor rankings, generating metadata suggestions, and improving app visibility on Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Use when the user asks about ASO, app store rankings, app metadata, app titles and descriptions, app store listings, app visibility, or mobile app marketing on iOS or Android. Supports keyword research and scoring, competitor keyword analysis, metadata optimization, A/B test planning, launch checklist
wanshuiyin/Auto-claude-code-research-in-sleep
Use it for operations and research tasks; the detail page covers purpose, installation, and practical steps.
prowler-cloud/prowler
PostgreSQL indexing best practices for Prowler: index design, partial indexes, partitioned table indexing, EXPLAIN ANALYZE validation, concurrent operations, monitoring, and maintenance. Trigger: When creating or modifying PostgreSQL indexes, analyzing query performance with EXPLAIN, debugging slow queries, reviewing index usage statistics, reindexing, dropping indexes, or working with partitioned table indexes. Also trigger when discussing index strategies, partial indexes, or index maintenance
brucesongs/kali-claw
Insecure Design (OWASP A06:2025) focuses on security flaws in system architecture and design phases, rather than code implementation-level bugs.