Source profileQuality 93/100

NVIDIA/skills/skills/nemo-rl-auto-research/SKILL.md

nemo-rl-auto-research

Autonomous NeMo-RL research agent workflow for directed hypothesis testing and open-ended discovery. Guides agents through the full experiment lifecycle: understanding recipes and environments, wiring RL or NeMo-gym runs, launching reproducible baselines and iterations, analyzing results, preserving human oversight, and using git plus TSV logs as the research ledger. Do NOT use for: bug fixes, code review, documentation, refactoring, dependency updates, or single-file changes.

Source repository stars
3,093
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
0
Last source update
2026-08-25
Source checked
2026-08-25

Decision brief

What it does: where it fits

Run iterative NeMo-RL experiments in this repository against the user's stated objective, such as accuracy, reward, throughput, latency, stability, or another recipe-specific metric, with git as the research ledger.

Best for

    Not for

    • Do NOT use for: bug fixes, code review, documentation, refactoring, dependency updates, or single-file changes.

    Compatibility matrix

    Platform support, with evidence labels

    PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
    CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Open the compatibility checker

    Installation

    Inspect first. Install second.

    The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

    Source-detected install commandSource
    npx skills add https://github.com/NVIDIA/skills --skill "skills/nemo-rl-auto-research"
    Safe inspection promptEditorial

    Inspect the Agent Skill "nemo-rl-auto-research" from https://github.com/NVIDIA/skills/blob/3a38625bf3e863eb9f26ea0d985130ddfb5c66ae/skills/nemo-rl-auto-research/SKILL.md at commit 3a38625bf3e863eb9f26ea0d985130ddfb5c66ae. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

    Workflow

    What the source asks the agent to do

    1. 01

      Workflow

      1. Inspect the current git state and identify unrelated user changes before branching. 2. Use a shared branch prefix. Prefer a user-provided one; otherwise create a suggestive default such as autoresearch/2026-03-24-dapo-qwen2p5. 3. Read the target recipe, its parents, and the r…

      Inspect the current git state and identify unrelated user changes before branching.Use a shared branch prefix. Prefer a user-provided one; otherwise create a suggestive default such as autoresearch/2026-03-24-dapo-qwen2p5.Read the target recipe, its parents, and the relevant code paths in examples/rungrpo.py, nemorl/models/, nemorl/algorithms/, nemorl/environments/, and docs/. For NeMo-gym recipes, also inspect examples/nemogym/ entrypoi…
    2. 02

      Branching

      See references/git-workflow.md for the exact pattern.

      Put every experiment on its own branch under the shared prefix.Keep every branch, even for failed or weak ideas.Put at least one commit on each branch for the hypothesis.
    3. 03

      Loop

      1. Pick one concrete hypothesis. 2. Create a branch such as autoresearch/2026-03-24-dapo-qwen2p5/prompt-compact-schema. 3. Edit the smallest set of files needed. 4. Commit the hypothesis. 5. Before launching the run, check the monitored stop conditions. Do not stop early unless…

      Pick one concrete hypothesis.Create a branch such as autoresearch/2026-03-24-dapo-qwen2p5/prompt-compact-schema.Edit the smallest set of files needed.
    4. 04

      Priorities

      Prefer ideas with high expected objective gain and low complexity cost: - correctness and backend compatibility - prompt and rollout formatting - batch, sequence, and precision layout - optimizer and scheduler tuning - reward shaping, clipping, or scaling - dataset mix or valida…

      correctness and backend compatibilityprompt and rollout formattingbatch, sequence, and precision layout
    5. 05

      Avoid

      Do not conclude a training idea failed from an underpowered smoke run. If a run uses tiny batch sizes, very few optimizer steps, or otherwise non-representative settings, treat it as plumbing validation only; scale to a…

      Do not conclude a training idea failed from an underpowered smoke run. If a run uses tiny batch sizes, very few optimizer steps, or otherwise non-representative settings, treat it as plumbing validation only; scale to a…Do not repeatedly pay batch-scheduler setup costs for tight edit-run-debug loops. If Slurm batch jobs have a large startup tax and failures require quick iteration, use the documented interactive Slurm pattern or ask th…Do not let context compaction or follow-up steering questions erase the original campaign goal. Refresh nemo-rl-session-memory, reload active skills, and preserve the main objective unless the user explicitly changes it.

    Permission review

    Static risk signals and limitations

    No configured static risk pattern was detected

    This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.

    Evidence record

    Why each signal appears

    EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
    SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
    Quality score93/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
    Repository stars3,093SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
    Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
    Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

    Pinned source

    Provenance and original SKILL.md

    Repository
    NVIDIA/skills
    Skill path
    skills/nemo-rl-auto-research/SKILL.md
    Commit
    3a38625bf3e863eb9f26ea0d985130ddfb5c66ae
    License
    Apache-2.0
    Collected
    2026-08-25
    Default branch
    main
    View the original SKILL.md

    Auto Research

    Run iterative NeMo-RL experiments in this repository against the user's stated objective, such as accuracy, reward, throughput, latency, stability, or another recipe-specific metric, with git as the research ledger.

    Treat dependencies as ready, but choose the runtime deliberately. Use the recipe's authoritative metric as the source of truth. Keep changes small, reproducible, and simple. Preserve unrelated user work.

    Safety: This skill creates git branches, writes files to disk, and executes shell commands including training jobs that may consume GPU resources. Always confirm the campaign plan with the user before creating branches or launching jobs. Do not execute destructive git operations (reset, force-push) or launch compute-intensive jobs without explicit user approval.

    Use the nemo-rl-session-memory skill for every auto-research campaign. Start or resume a session record before branching, then checkpoint after forming the plan, before and after meaningful edits or long-running launches, when the user changes direction, and before handoff or final summary.

    After context compaction, handoff, disconnect, or a long gap, reload this skill and any companion skills already in use, read the latest nemo-rl-session-memory handoff, and restate the overall objective, stop rules, current branch, and latest result before continuing. Treat follow-up steering as additive unless the user explicitly changes the main objective.

    Workflow

    1. Inspect the current git state and identify unrelated user changes before branching.
    2. Use a shared branch prefix. Prefer a user-provided one; otherwise create a suggestive default such as autoresearch/2026-03-24-dapo-qwen2p5.
    3. Read the target recipe, its parents, and the relevant code paths in examples/run_grpo.py, nemo_rl/models/, nemo_rl/algorithms/, nemo_rl/environments/, and docs/. For NeMo-gym recipes, also inspect examples/nemo_gym/ entrypoints, configs, and launch scripts.
    4. Translate any user stop rule into explicit values you can monitor, such as the requested number of experiments as target_experiment_count, campaign_deadline, per_experiment_timeout, or target_metric.
    5. Verify required data, checkpoints, runtime inputs, and the launcher.
    6. Create an untracked TSV log and per-experiment log directory.
    7. Run a baseline first on <prefix>/baseline if none exists.

    For GPU, CPU-heavy, distributed, or long-running work, choose the execution environment deliberately. Run locally when the current machine has suitable GPUs and capacity; otherwise follow the user's requested environment, use launch-nemo-rl for nrl-k8s/Kubernetes, use the environment's native launcher for Slurm, or clarify with the user before launching. Use CPU-only local runs only for light inspection, dry runs, and short non-GPU checks.

    If the user mentions Brev, or if /home/ubuntu/RL exists and /ephemeral is available as a volume, treat the machine as a Brev instance and use nemo-rl-brev-etiquette before creating experiment directories, caches, logs, checkpoints, or authenticated runtime state.

    Branching

    • Put every experiment on its own branch under the shared prefix.
    • Keep every branch, even for failed or weak ideas.
    • Put at least one commit on each branch for the hypothesis.
    • Add follow-up fix commits on the same branch when a rerun is justified.
    • Never stash, reset, or overwrite unrelated user changes silently. If dirty files overlap the experiment, use a separate worktree or ask before proceeding.

    See references/git-workflow.md for the exact pattern.

    Loop

    1. Pick one concrete hypothesis.
    2. Create a branch such as autoresearch/2026-03-24-dapo-qwen2p5/prompt-compact-schema.
    3. Edit the smallest set of files needed.
    4. Commit the hypothesis.
    5. Before launching the run, check the monitored stop conditions. Do not stop early unless one is already clearly met.
    6. Identify the authoritative metric source from the recipe or logging code, then run with a unique log path:
    LOG_DIR=reports/auto_research/<campaign>/<experiment>
    mkdir -p "$LOG_DIR"
    uv run <entrypoint> > "$LOG_DIR/run.log" 2>&1
    
    1. If the user gave a per-experiment wall-clock limit, enforce it explicitly. Prefer a recipe-level timeout when one already exists; otherwise wrap the command with an external timeout. If both exist, honor the tighter limit.
    2. Extract the primary metric with a command appropriate for the actual log format. If extraction is empty, inspect the last log lines and the recipe's logging path before marking the run.
    3. Record index, branch, parent commit, commit, recipe, metric name, metric value, memory (GB), elapsed time (minutes), launcher, job id, command, log path, status, and description in the TSV, along with enough timing or count information to evaluate the stop rule.
    4. Periodically print user-facing progress updates during the campaign. Include the current branch, latest known result, attempted experiment count, remaining experiment count if applicable, remaining campaign time if applicable, and whether any stop condition has been met yet.
    5. Re-check the monitored stop conditions after the experiment completes and state the result explicitly, for example stop condition not yet met: 17/24 attempted, 6h12m remaining or stop condition met: 24/24 attempted.
    6. Mark the result as keep, discard, or crash, then move to the next branch unless a user-specified stop condition has been clearly met.

    For count-based stop rules, count attempted ideas, not only successful or fully completed runs.

    For campaign time budgets, convert the user limit into an absolute deadline at the start of the campaign and keep checking remaining time.

    For per-experiment budgets, enforce a timeout on every run and treat overruns as failures.

    Examples:

    • do 50 experiments: stop only after 50 attempted experiment rows exist in the TSV
    • 10h total, 1h each: enforce a 1 hour limit per run and stop when the 10 hour campaign budget is reached, or when there is not enough remaining budget to start another 1 hour run
    • 50 experiments or 10h total, 1h each: monitor all three values, never exceed the per-run cap, and stop only when one campaign-level stop trigger is clearly reached

    Priorities

    Prefer ideas with high expected objective gain and low complexity cost:

    • correctness and backend compatibility
    • prompt and rollout formatting
    • batch, sequence, and precision layout
    • optimizer and scheduler tuning
    • reward shaping, clipping, or scaling
    • dataset mix or validation changes
    • synchronous versus asynchronous execution based on hardware

    All else equal, prefer simpler wins and avoid brittle hardware-specific hacks.

    Avoid

    • Do not conclude a training idea failed from an underpowered smoke run. If a run uses tiny batch sizes, very few optimizer steps, or otherwise non-representative settings, treat it as plumbing validation only; scale to a meaningful batch size and train long enough to test the hypothesis before marking it discard.
    • Do not repeatedly pay batch-scheduler setup costs for tight edit-run-debug loops. If Slurm batch jobs have a large startup tax and failures require quick iteration, use the documented interactive Slurm pattern or ask the user before resubmitting more batch jobs.
    • Do not let context compaction or follow-up steering questions erase the original campaign goal. Refresh nemo-rl-session-memory, reload active skills, and preserve the main objective unless the user explicitly changes it.

    Stop

    If the user gives explicit stopping conditions, they override the generic rule. Do not stop because the search feels sufficient; stop only when the requested count, deadline, budget, or target condition has been clearly met.

    During the campaign, explicitly inform the user whether the stop condition has been met. If not, report the remaining count, remaining time, or other remaining threshold in concrete terms.

    If the user does not give explicit stopping conditions, run the baseline plus up to three low-risk experiments, then summarize the best result and ask before continuing.

    References

    • references/git-workflow.md for branch, dirty-worktree, parent-commit, and baseline rules.
    • references/exploration-ideas.md for turning symptoms into concrete hypotheses.
    • references/experiment-log-template.md for the TSV schema and reproducibility fields.

    Frequently asked questions

    What to verify before installation and use

    What does the nemo-rl-auto-research source document cover?

    Run iterative NeMo-RL experiments in this repository against the user's stated objective, such as accuracy, reward, throughput, latency, stability, or another recipe-specific metric, with git as the research ledger.

    How do I install nemo-rl-auto-research?

    The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/NVIDIA/skills --skill "skills/nemo-rl-auto-research". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.

    Alternatives

    Compare before choosing

    Computed 90236

    ArabelaTso/Skills-4-SE

    code-change-summarizer

    Generates clear and structured pull request descriptions from code changes. Use when Claude needs to: (1) Create PR descriptions from git diffs or code changes, (2) Summarize what changed and why, (3) Document breaking changes with migration guides, (4) Add technical details and design decisions, (5) Provide testing instructions, (6) Enhance descriptions with security, performance, and architecture notes, (7) Document dependency changes. Takes code changes as input, outputs comprehensive PR desc

    Computed 9616

    th3vib3coder/vibe-science

    vibe-science

    Scientific research engine for hypothesis testing, literature gap analysis, experimental validation, and data-driven discovery. Enforces adversarial review (Reviewer 2), 32 quality gates, tree search over hypotheses, confounder harness for quantitative claims, and serendipity detection. TRIGGER when: user asks to analyze scientific data, test hypotheses, validate findings, search for research gaps, design experiments, or investigate results. DO NOT TRIGGER when: pure code review, documentation w

    Computed 9357

    oaslananka/kicad-mcp-pro

    code-review

    Use this skill for GitHub Copilot pull request and code reviews in oaslananka/kicad-mcp-pro. Review Python MCP server changes, KiCad adapter and tool-contract changes, tests, npm/package wrappers, Tauri/Rust desktop code, GitHub Actions, security controls, documentation, generated metadata, and compatibility/release surfaces. Use it whenever reviewing a PR or diff in this repository, especially changes under src/, tests/, packages/, src-tauri/, .github/workflows/, or public MCP metadata/configur

    Computed 9320

    upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplate

    git-flow-master

    End-to-end Git operator for any branching strategy. Auto-detects the project's strategy (solo-main, main+integration, enterprise multi-branch, trunk-based, GitFlow, GitHub Flow, GitLab Flow, SDET integration-trunk for chained test-automation suites) from .git config, branches, and the `git_strategy:` block in `.agents/project.yaml`, then adapts every commit, branch, push, PR, conflict-fix, and chained-PR action to that strategy. Use this skill whenever the user wants to: create a branch (`crear