Source profileQuality 90/100Review permissions

jackwener/OpenCLI/skills/opencli-autofix/SKILL.md

opencli-autofix

Automatically fix broken OpenCLI adapters when commands fail. Load this skill when an opencli command fails — it guides you through collecting a trace artifact, patching the adapter, retrying, and filing an upstream GitHub issue after a verified fix. Works with any AI agent.

Source repository stars
27,702
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
4
Last source update
2026-07-30
Source checked
2026-08-04

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

When an opencli command fails because a website changed its DOM, API, or response schema, automatically diagnose, fix the adapter, and retry — don't just report the error.

Best for

  • SELECTOR — element not found (DOM changed)
  • EMPTYRESULT — no data returned (API response changed)
  • APIERROR / NETWORK — endpoint moved or broke

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/jackwener/OpenCLI --skill "skills/opencli-autofix"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "opencli-autofix" from https://github.com/jackwener/OpenCLI/blob/399c0de2a76eb979aee3a3836cf2d24fd247780f/skills/opencli-autofix/SKILL.md at commit 399c0de2a76eb979aee3a3836cf2d24fd247780f. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    Step 1: Collect Trace Context

    Run the failing command with failure-retained trace enabled:

    Run the failing command with failure-retained trace enabled:On failure, stderr contains the normal error envelope plus a small trace block:Read summaryPath first. It is the LLM-oriented entry point and includes front matter:
  2. 02

    Step 2: Analyze the Failure

    Read the trace summary and the adapter source. Classify the root cause:

    What is the adapter trying to do? (Read the file at adapterSourcePath)What did the page look like when it failed? (Read summary.md, then state/ if needed)What network requests happened? (Read Failed Network in summary.md, then network.jsonl if needed)
  3. 03

    Step 3: Explore the Current Website

    Use opencli browser to inspect the live website. Never use the broken adapter — it will just fail again.

    Use opencli browser to inspect the live website. Never use the broken adapter — it will just fail again.
  4. 04

    Step 4: Patch the Adapter

    Read the adapter source file at adapterSourcePath from the trace summary front matter and make targeted fixes. This path is authoritative — it may be in the repo (clis/) or user-local (/.opencli/clis/).

    Make minimal changes — fix only what's broken, don't refactorKeep the same output structure — columns and return format must stay compatiblePrefer API over DOM scraping — if you discover a JSON API during exploration, switch to it
  5. 05

    Step 5: Verify the Fix

    Review the “Step 5: Verify the Fix” section in the pinned source before continuing.

    Review and apply the “Step 5: Verify the Fix” source section.

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

Writes files

medium · line 15

The documentation asks the agent to create, modify, or delete local files.

**Only modify the file at `adapterSourcePath` in the trace `summary.md` front matter** — this is the authoritative adapter location (may be `clis/<site>/` in repo or `~/.opencli/clis/<site>/` for npm installs)

Network access

medium · line 43

The documentation includes network, browsing, or remote request actions.

**"0 results" from a search is an answer.** If the adapter successfully reached the search endpoint, got an HTTP 200, and the platform returned `results: []`, that is a valid answer — report it to the user as "no matches for this query" rat

Runs scripts

medium · line 49

The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.

Run the failing command with failure-retained trace enabled:

Reads files

low · line 99

The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.

If you redirected stderr to a file, read that file and copy `trace.summaryPath`.

Reads files

low · line 117

The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.

What is the adapter trying to do? (Read the file at `adapterSourcePath`)

Network access

medium · line 130

The documentation includes network, browsing, or remote request actions.

opencli browser open https://example.com/target-page && opencli browser state

Runs scripts

medium · line 190

The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.

**Test after patching** — run the command again to verify

Writes files

medium · line 249

The documentation asks the agent to create, modify, or delete local files.

gh issue create --repo jackwener/OpenCLI \

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score90/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars27,702SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
jackwener/OpenCLI
Skill path
skills/opencli-autofix/SKILL.md
Commit
399c0de2a76eb979aee3a3836cf2d24fd247780f
License
Apache-2.0
Collected
2026-08-04
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

OpenCLI AutoFix — Automatic Adapter Self-Repair

When an opencli command fails because a website changed its DOM, API, or response schema, automatically diagnose, fix the adapter, and retry — don't just report the error.

Safety Boundaries

Before starting any repair, check these hard stops:

  • AUTH_REQUIRED (exit code 77) — STOP. Do not modify code. Tell the user to log into the site in Chrome.
  • BROWSER_CONNECT (exit code 69) — STOP. Do not modify code. Tell the user to run opencli doctor.
  • CAPTCHA / rate limitingSTOP. Not an adapter issue.

Scope constraint:

  • Only modify the file at adapterSourcePath in the trace summary.md front matter — this is the authoritative adapter location (may be clis/<site>/ in repo or ~/.opencli/clis/<site>/ for npm installs)
  • Never modify src/, extension/, tests/, package.json, or tsconfig.json

Retry budget: Max 3 repair rounds per failure. If 3 rounds of diagnose → fix → retry don't resolve it, stop and report what was tried.

Prerequisites

opencli doctor    # Verify extension + daemon connectivity

When to Use This Skill

Use when opencli <site> <command> fails with repairable errors:

  • SELECTOR — element not found (DOM changed)
  • EMPTY_RESULT — no data returned (API response changed)
  • API_ERROR / NETWORK — endpoint moved or broke
  • PAGE_CHANGED — page structure no longer matches
  • COMMAND_EXEC — runtime error in adapter logic
  • TIMEOUT — page loads differently, adapter waits for wrong thing

Before Entering Repair: "Empty" ≠ "Broken"

EMPTY_RESULT — and sometimes a structurally-valid SELECTOR that returns nothing — is often not an adapter bug. Platforms actively degrade results under anti-scrape heuristics, and a "not found" response from the site doesn't mean the content is actually missing. Rule this out before committing to a repair round:

  • Retry with an alternative query or entry point. If opencli xiaohongshu search "X" returns 0 but opencli xiaohongshu search "X 攻略" returns 20, the adapter is fine — the platform was shaping results for the first query.
  • Spot-check in a normal Chrome tab. If the data is visible in the user's own browser but the adapter comes back empty, the issue is usually authentication state, rate limiting, or a soft block — not a code bug. The fix is opencli doctor / re-login, not editing source.
  • Look for soft 404s. Sites like xiaohongshu / weibo / douyin return HTTP 200 with an empty payload instead of a real 404 when an item is hidden or deleted. The snapshot will look structurally correct. A retry 2-3 seconds later often distinguishes "temporarily hidden" from "actually gone".
  • "0 results" from a search is an answer. If the adapter successfully reached the search endpoint, got an HTTP 200, and the platform returned results: [], that is a valid answer — report it to the user as "no matches for this query" rather than patching the adapter.

Only proceed to Step 1 if the empty/selector-missing result is reproducible across retries and alternative entry points. Otherwise you're patching a working adapter to chase noise, and the patched version will break the next working path.

Step 1: Collect Trace Context

Run the failing command with failure-retained trace enabled:

opencli <site> <command> [args...] --trace retain-on-failure 2>trace-error.yaml

On failure, stderr contains the normal error envelope plus a small trace block:

ok: false
error:
  code: SELECTOR
  message: "Could not find element: .old-selector"
trace:
  schemaVersion: 1
  opencliVersion: "..."
  traceId: "..."
  dir: "/path/to/.opencli/profiles/default/traces/..."
  summaryPath: "/path/to/.opencli/profiles/default/traces/.../summary.md"
  receiptPath: "/path/to/.opencli/profiles/default/traces/.../receipt.json"

Read summaryPath first. It is the LLM-oriented entry point and includes front matter:

---
schemaVersion: 1
opencliVersion: "..."
traceId: "..."
status: failure
site: "example"
command: "example/search"
adapterSourcePath: "/path/to/clis/example/search.js"
errorCode: "SELECTOR"
errorMessage: "Could not find element: .old-selector"
---

The artifact directory contains:

summary.md      # start here
receipt.json    # machine-readable trace receipt
trace.jsonl     # full redacted timeline
network.jsonl   # redacted network events
console.jsonl   # redacted console events
state/          # final snapshots when available
screenshots/    # final screenshots when available

If you redirected stderr to a file, read that file and copy trace.summaryPath.

Do not ask the user to rerun with legacy diagnostic env vars. Trace is the repair evidence path.

Step 2: Analyze the Failure

Read the trace summary and the adapter source. Classify the root cause:

Error CodeLikely CauseRepair Strategy
SELECTORDOM restructured, class/id renamedExplore current DOM → find new selector
EMPTY_RESULTAPI response schema changed, or data movedCheck network → find new response path
API_ERROREndpoint URL changed, new params requiredDiscover new API via network intercept
AUTH_REQUIREDLogin flow changed, cookies expiredSTOP — tell user to log in, do not modify code
TIMEOUTPage loads differently, spinner/lazy-loadAdd/update wait conditions
PAGE_CHANGEDMajor redesignMay need full adapter rewrite

Key questions to answer:

  1. What is the adapter trying to do? (Read the file at adapterSourcePath)
  2. What did the page look like when it failed? (Read summary.md, then state/ if needed)
  3. What network requests happened? (Read Failed Network in summary.md, then network.jsonl if needed)
  4. What's the gap between what the adapter expects and what the page provides?

Step 3: Explore the Current Website

Use opencli browser to inspect the live website. Never use the broken adapter — it will just fail again.

DOM changed (SELECTOR errors)

# Open the page and inspect current DOM
opencli browser open https://example.com/target-page && opencli browser state

# Look for elements that match the adapter's intent
# Compare the snapshot with what the adapter expects

API changed (API_ERROR, EMPTY_RESULT)

# Open page with network interceptor, then trigger the action manually
opencli browser open https://example.com/target-page && opencli browser state

# Interact to trigger API calls
opencli browser click <N> && opencli browser network

# Narrow to the request you care about by the fields its body should have
opencli browser network --filter author,text,likes

# Inspect specific API response (key is the `key` field from the default JSON output)
opencli browser network --detail <key>

Step 4: Patch the Adapter

Read the adapter source file at adapterSourcePath from the trace summary front matter and make targeted fixes. This path is authoritative — it may be in the repo (clis/) or user-local (~/.opencli/clis/).

Use the Read tool on the exact path from summary.md front matter.

Common Fixes

Selector update:

// Before: page.evaluate('document.querySelector(".old-class")...')
// After:  page.evaluate('document.querySelector(".new-class")...')

API endpoint change:

// Before: const resp = await page.evaluate(`fetch('/api/v1/old-endpoint')...`)
// After:  const resp = await page.evaluate(`fetch('/api/v2/new-endpoint')...`)

Response schema change:

// Before: const items = data.results
// After:  const items = data.data.items  // API now nests under "data"

Wait condition update:

// Before: await page.wait({ selector: '.loading-spinner', hidden: true })
// After:  await page.wait({ selector: '[data-loaded="true"]' })

Rules for Patching

  1. Make minimal changes — fix only what's broken, don't refactor
  2. Keep the same output structurecolumns and return format must stay compatible
  3. Prefer API over DOM scraping — if you discover a JSON API during exploration, switch to it
  4. Use @jackwener/opencli/* imports only — never add third-party package imports
  5. Test after patching — run the command again to verify
  6. Never relax verify/<cmd>.json fixtures to silence a failure. A failing patterns / notEmpty / mustNotContain / mustBeTruthy rule means the adapter's output is broken. Tighten the adapter so it produces correct values; do not loosen the fixture to accept the broken values. The one legitimate reason to edit a fixture during repair is when the site itself changed shape (e.g. URL format migration) — in that case update the fixture and note the change in ~/.opencli/sites/<site>/notes.md. Otherwise editing the fixture is covering up a silent correctness regression.

Step 5: Verify the Fix

# Run the command normally
opencli <site> <command> [args...]

If it still fails, go back to Step 1 and collect a fresh trace. You have a budget of 3 repair rounds (trace → fix → retry). If the same error persists after a fix, try a different approach. After 3 rounds, stop and report what was tried.

Step 6: File an Upstream Issue

If the retry passes, the local adapter has drifted from upstream. File a GitHub issue so the fix flows back to jackwener/OpenCLI.

Do NOT file for:

  • AUTH_REQUIRED, BROWSER_CONNECT, ARGUMENT, CONFIG — environment/usage issues, not adapter bugs
  • CAPTCHA or rate limiting — not fixable upstream
  • Failures you couldn't actually fix (3 rounds exhausted)

Only file after a verified local fix — the retry must pass first.

Procedure:

  1. Prepare the issue content from the trace summary you already have:
    • Title: [autofix] <site>/<command>: <error_code> (e.g. [autofix] zhihu/hot: SELECTOR)
    • Body (use this template):
## Summary
OpenCLI autofix repaired this adapter locally, and the retry passed.

## Adapter
- Site: `<site>`
- Command: `<command>`
- OpenCLI version: `<version from opencli --version>`

## Original failure
- Error code: `<error_code>`

~~~
<error_message>
~~~

## Local fix summary

~~~
<1-2 sentence description of what you changed and why>
~~~

_Issue filed by OpenCLI autofix after a verified local repair._
  1. Ask the user before filing. Show them the draft title and body. Only proceed if they confirm.

  2. If the user approves and gh auth status succeeds:

gh issue create --repo jackwener/OpenCLI \
  --title "[autofix] <site>/<command>: <error_code>" \
  --body "<the body above>"

If gh is not installed or not authenticated, tell the user and skip — do not error out.

When to Stop

Hard stops (do not modify code):

  • AUTH_REQUIRED / BROWSER_CONNECT — environment issue, not adapter bug
  • Site requires CAPTCHA — can't automate this
  • Rate limited / IP blocked — not an adapter issue

Soft stops (report after attempting):

  • 3 repair rounds exhausted — stop, report what was tried and what failed
  • Feature completely removed — the data no longer exists
  • Major redesign — needs full adapter rewrite via opencli-adapter-author skill

In all stop cases, clearly communicate the situation to the user rather than making futile patches.

Example Repair Session

1. User runs: opencli zhihu hot
   → Fails: SELECTOR "Could not find element: .HotList-item"

2. AI runs: opencli zhihu hot --trace retain-on-failure 2>trace-error.yaml
   → Gets trace summary with final state and failed action evidence

3. AI reads summary/state: page loaded but uses ".HotItem" instead of ".HotList-item"

4. AI explores: opencli browser open https://www.zhihu.com/hot && opencli browser state
   → Confirms new class name ".HotItem" with child ".HotItem-content"

5. AI patches: Edit adapter at `adapterSourcePath` — replace ".HotList-item" with ".HotItem"

6. AI verifies: opencli zhihu hot
   → Success: returns hot topics

7. AI prepares upstream issue draft, shows it to the user

8. User approves → AI runs: gh issue create --repo jackwener/OpenCLI --title "[autofix] zhihu/hot: SELECTOR" --body "..."

Alternatives

Compare before choosing

Computed 10042,968

coreyhaines31/marketingskills

ab-testing

When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program

Computed 10023,781

alirezarezvani/claude-skills

app-store-optimization

App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching keywords, analyzing competitor rankings, generating metadata suggestions, and improving app visibility on Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Use when the user asks about ASO, app store rankings, app metadata, app titles and descriptions, app store listings, app visibility, or mobile app marketing on iOS or Android. Supports keyword research and scoring, competitor keyword analysis, metadata optimization, A/B test planning, launch checklist

Computed 100165

JasonColapietro/suede-creator-skills

suede-ab-testing

Suede-owned experimentation discipline for hypotheses, sample sizing, test duration, significance, and repeatable experiment programs. Use when comparing variants, deciding whether a result is reliable, or building an experiment backlog and cadence. NOT FOR: analytics instrumentation (use suede-analytics), post-click conversion diagnosis (use suede-site-alchemy), or writing the variant copy itself (use suede-copy).

Computed 1007

narrative-io/narrative-skills-marketplace

design-analysis

Translate a fuzzy analytical question into a rigorous investigation plan. Interrogates the ask, grounds the plan in the available data dictionary, applies analytical best practices, and produces a structured brief of query specifications for a downstream query-writing skill. Plans, does not write SQL. Use when: "why did X drop", "is there a relationship between A and B", "who are our highest-value customers", "what's driving the change in Y", "investigate this trend", "design an analysis for", "