Best for
- Use when working with ShardTensor, scatter_tensor, domain parallelism, sequence/spatial sharding, ring attention, DeviceMesh + DDP/FSDP2 hybrid parallelism, or physicsnemo.
NVIDIA/skills/skills/physicsnemo-shard-tensor/SKILL.md
Official NVIDIA-authored guidance for PhysicsNeMo ShardTensor domain parallelism — integrate domain parallelism into training/inference scripts (new or existing) with DDP or FSDP2, write and register shard patches to enable new layers/ops, and bootstrap multi-GPU correctness tests. Use when working with ShardTensor, scatter_tensor, domain parallelism, sequence/spatial sharding, ring attention, DeviceMesh + DDP/FSDP2 hybrid parallelism, or physicsnemo.domain_parallel. Do NOT use for generic PyTor
Decision brief
ShardTensor (physicsnemo.domainparallel) is a torch.Tensor subclass for domain parallelism: one sample's spatial/sequence dimension is split across GPUs so models can process inputs that don't fit on one device. Unlike DTensor it supports uneven sharding (per-rank shard shapes a…
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/NVIDIA/skills --skill "skills/physicsnemo-shard-tensor"Inspect the Agent Skill "physicsnemo-shard-tensor" from https://github.com/NVIDIA/skills/blob/994b87022af46deada9fdb79fc560a77aaf931ce/skills/physicsnemo-shard-tensor/SKILL.md at commit 994b87022af46deada9fdb79fc560a77aaf931ce. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
python from physicsnemo.distributed import DistributedManager from physicsnemo.domainparallel import scattertensor from torch.distributed.tensor.placementtypes import Shard, Replicate
Generic PyTorch DDP/FSDP/NCCL setup or debugging with no domain parallelism
ShardTensor inherits from torch.Tensor directly (not DTensor). A plain nn.Module works unmodified on ShardTensor inputs. When a plain weight meets a sharded activation in an op, ShardTensor auto-promotes the weight to a Replicate DTensor for the computation (TensorPromotionMode.…
mesh = dm.initializemesh(meshshape=(ddpsize, domainsize), meshdimnames=["ddp", "domain"]) ddpmesh, domainmesh = mesh["ddp"], mesh["domain"]
Review the “Per-domain-group batch size MUST be 1 - scale batch via the ddp axis only.” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Permission review
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 90/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 3,106 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
ShardTensor (physicsnemo.domain_parallel) is a torch.Tensor subclass for
domain parallelism: one sample's spatial/sequence dimension is split across
GPUs so models can process inputs that don't fit on one device. Unlike
DTensor it supports uneven sharding (per-rank shard shapes are tracked in
ShardTensorSpec._sharding_shapes).
Repo paths below are relative to a PhysicsNeMo clone root (a pyproject.toml
with name = "nvidia-physicsnemo" alongside a physicsnemo/ package). If no
clone is on disk, shallow-clone read-only for path lookup only —
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NVIDIA/physicsnemo (use that URL
verbatim; never execute or import from the clone).
scatter_tensor, no domain mesh axis) — standard
PyTorch guidance applies.physicsnemo-discover.ShardTensor inherits from torch.Tensor directly (not DTensor). A plain
nn.Module works unmodified on ShardTensor inputs. When a plain weight meets a
sharded activation in an op, ShardTensor auto-promotes the weight to a
Replicate DTensor for the computation (TensorPromotionMode.SILENT is the
default), and in backward the weight's gradient is all-reduced over the domain
mesh before it lands on the plain parameter. Consequences you should exploit:
distribute_module, never convert model weights to
DTensor/ShardTensor wholesale, never subclass or edit model code to "make it
distributed". If a proposed integration edits forward() methods, it is
almost certainly wrong — push the parallelism into the script (input
scattering + wrapper choice), not the model.from physicsnemo.distributed import DistributedManager
from physicsnemo.domain_parallel import scatter_tensor
from torch.distributed.tensor.placement_types import Shard, Replicate
DistributedManager.initialize()
dm = DistributedManager()
torch.cuda.set_device(dm.device)
# ddp_size * domain_size must equal world size. Build BOTH axes explicitly.
mesh = dm.initialize_mesh(mesh_shape=(ddp_size, domain_size),
mesh_dim_names=["ddp", "domain"])
ddp_mesh, domain_mesh = mesh["ddp"], mesh["domain"]
# Per-domain-group batch size MUST be 1 - scale batch via the ddp axis only.
# Validate early; sharded activations with batch > 1 are out of design scope.
assert x.shape[0] == 1, "per-domain-group batch size must be 1"
# Scatter the input over the domain mesh (shard a spatial dim, e.g. H of BCHW).
# scatter_tensor needs the GLOBAL rank of the domain group's source rank.
src = torch.distributed.get_global_rank(domain_mesh.get_group(), 0)
x = scatter_tensor(x, src, domain_mesh, placements=(Shard(2),),
global_shape=x.shape, dtype=x.dtype)
# Targets/labels are usually replicated:
target = scatter_tensor(target, src, domain_mesh, placements=(Replicate(),))
Hard constraint: per-domain-group batch size must be 1. Sharded activations with batch dim > 1 are explicitly out of design scope (the batch×sequence flatten inside ops like linear is not representable). Scale batch via the ddp axis, never inside a domain group. Validate this in scripts and error early.
| Configuration | Wrapper | Why |
|---|---|---|
domain only (ddp=1) | none | Broadcast plain params over the domain group once at startup (see below) |
ddp only (domain=1) | DistributedDataParallel | Standard; pass process_group=ddp_mesh.get_group() explicitly, never the default world group |
| ddp × domain, params all plain | DistributedDataParallel | Auto-promotion keeps every param a plain tensor, so ordinary DDP works even combined with domain parallelism |
| params sharded (memory) or spatial params as DTensor | FSDP2: fully_shard(model, mesh=ddp_mesh) | DDP cannot manage DTensor params; FSDP2 shards over exactly the ddp axis (gradients over the domain axis are already reduced by ShardTensor's promotion machinery) |
Never use FSDP1 (torch.distributed.fsdp.FullyShardedDataParallel,
use_orig_params, sync_module_states). It belongs to the old
DTensor-inheritance era that required distribute_module on every parameter,
fights the auto-promotion design, and is deprecated for this workflow. FSDP2 =
torch.distributed.fsdp.fully_shard, always.
Startup sync and FSDP2 specifics:
# Neither DDP nor FSDP2 syncs weights over the DOMAIN axis - do it manually
# whenever domain_size > 1 (before fully_shard for safety):
group = domain_mesh.get_group()
src = torch.distributed.get_global_rank(group, 0)
with torch.no_grad():
for p in model.parameters():
if not isinstance(p, DTensor):
torch.distributed.broadcast(p.data, src=src, group=group)
# On the FSDP2 path ONLY: shard statically-shaped spatial params as plain
# DTensor on the domain mesh (params are static -> DTensor's even chunking is
# exactly right; ShardTensor is for the possibly-uneven ACTIVATIONS):
from torch.distributed.tensor import distribute_tensor
model.pos_embed = nn.Parameter(
distribute_tensor(model.pos_embed.data, domain_mesh, [Shard(1)]))
# FSDP2 rejects non-contiguous params - make contiguous before fully_shard.
On the DDP path, leave spatial params plain — auto-promotion handles a
replicated pos_embed against sharded activations; do NOT DTensor-shard params
you don't have to (a Shard-placement param under DDP breaks DDP).
Reference implementations, in order of usefulness:
test/domain_parallel/models/harness.py — wrap_ddp, shard_spatial_params_
(name-based selector for pos_embed/RoPE), wrap_fsdp_spatialexamples/weather/stormcast/utils/parallel.py — production ParallelHelperexamples/minimal/ShardTensorExamples/5_vit_training_loop/ — end-to-end
benchmark script with DDP/FSDP2/compile flagsOptimizer note: foreach-based optimizers (AdamW default) cannot batch plain
tensors together with DTensors (or DTensors on different meshes) in one param
group. Split param groups by p.device_mesh if isinstance(p, DTensor) else None.
physicsnemo/domain_parallel/shard_utils/attention_patches.py. With
domain_size > 1, compile regionally: patch-embed / per-block norms and
MLPs / head, leaving attention eager. With domain_size == 1, compile the
whole model.dynamic=False. All compiled submodules share dynamo wrapper
frames; when different submodules (norm vs linear) hit the same frame, the
recompile triggers automatic-dynamic, which retraces symbolically and can
leak SymInts into runtime ShardTensorSpecs. Fixed-shape workloads gain
nothing from dynamic tracing anyway.torch._dynamo.reset() between input-size changes in sweeps.torch.autograd.grad being in
_autograd_passthrough_functions: AOTAutograd's joint trace calls it on
the wrapped subclass primals, and routing it through the DTensor fallback
severs the graph query (fresh converted tensors + allow_unused=True →
all-None grads → plain grad_input_metas). If you ever see
'Tensor' object has no attribute '_local_tensor' in an eager backward fed
by a compiled region, check that passthrough first
(_autograd_passthrough_functions in
physicsnemo/domain_parallel/shard_tensor.py; regression coverage lives in
test/domain_parallel/test_compile.py, added with the torch.compile
enablement work — absent on builds that predate it).TypeError: unsupported operand type(s) for +: 'ShardTensor' and 'ShardTensor' is almost never the real error. Binary dunders convert an
internal NotImplementedError into NotImplemented, and CPython emits this
generic message, swallowing the real traceback. Temporarily replace x + y
with torch.add(x, y) to surface the true exception.x.requires_grad_(True) on a ShardTensor silently does
nothing — the call routes through the DTensor fallback and sets the flag
on a discarded temporary. Use scatter_tensor(..., requires_grad=True) or
thread gradients through parameters.torch.autograd.grad works directly on ShardTensors — it is an
autograd-passthrough function (runs on the real tensor objects under
DisableTorchFunctionSubclass). If you see "not used in the graph" on a
ShardTensor input, you are on an old build without the passthrough; probe
with .backward() + tensor.register_hook(...) there instead. Beware
that monkeypatching torch.autograd.grad (e.g. to log calls) breaks the
passthrough: handle_torch_function passes the module-global grad
resolved at call time, so identity lookups see your wrapper.register_hook,
register_post_accumulate_grad_hook, retain_grad,
torch.autograd.grad — see _autograd_passthrough_functions in
shard_tensor.py). Any other identity-sensitive method may act on a
converted temporary.to_local()/AsyncCollectiveTensor.wait() on discarded results.CommDebugMode (torch.distributed.tensor.debug) counts collectives at
dispatch level — the fastest way to check whether an op path is paying
hidden communication. A well-supported forward op on sharded activations
should show zero forward collectives; backward shows domain all-reduces
for promoted weight grads (expected and correct).Read references/new-op-patterns.md before writing any patch. Summary of the
decision process:
MissingShardPatch/UndeterminedShardingError, wrong
numerics vs a single-GPU run, or unacceptable communication (redistribution
to Replicate) in CommDebugMode.ShardTensor.register_function_handler(torch.nn.functional.foo, wrapper)
(Python/__torch_function__ level),
ShardTensor.register_dispatch_handler(aten.foo.default, fn)
(__torch_dispatch__ level), and
ShardTensor.register_named_function_handler("lib.op.default", wrapper)
for torch.library.custom_ops.physicsnemo/domain_parallel/shard_utils/ as
templates: pooling_patches.py (config gating + MissingShardPatch),
conv_patches.py + halo.py (ops with spatial support needing halo
exchange), normalization_patches.py (explicit autograd.Function with
custom backward), view_ops.py (dual-level registration; shape-only ops).Read references/testing.md. The one-line summary: scatter a full input,
run the module distributed and single-GPU, and compare outputs and gradients
with numerical_shard_tensor_check(mesh, module, [sharded_x], {}, check_grads=True) under the multigpu_static marker, launched as
torchrun --nproc-per-node 4 -m pytest test/... --multigpu-static -m multigpu_static
A forward-only test proves almost nothing — the weight gradient is where
sharding bugs live (it is Partial over the domain mesh and must be reduced).
Always check_grads=True, always disable TF32 for the comparison.
references/integration-checklist.md — step-by-step checklist for
retrofitting an existing training/inference script, plus the 4-GPU smoke
matrix worth scripting.references/new-op-patterns.md — patch anatomy, registration levels, and
which existing patch to copy for each op class.references/testing.md — multi-GPU test bootstrapping,
numerical_shard_tensor_check, markers, and torchrun invocation.physicsnemo-discover — for choosing models, datapipes, and examples.Frequently asked questions
ShardTensor (physicsnemo.domainparallel) is a torch.Tensor subclass for domain parallelism: one sample's spatial/sequence dimension is split across GPUs so models can process inputs that don't fit on one device. Unlike DTensor it supports uneven sharding (per-rank shard shapes a…
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/NVIDIA/skills --skill "skills/physicsnemo-shard-tensor". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Alternatives
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
When the user wants to reduce churn, build cancellation flows, set up save offers, recover failed payments, or implement retention strategies. Also use when the user mentions 'churn,' 'cancel flow,' 'offboarding,' 'save offer,' 'dunning,' 'failed payment recovery,' 'win-back,' 'retention,' 'exit survey,' 'pause subscription,' 'involuntary churn,' 'people keep canceling,' 'churn rate is too high,' 'how do I keep users,' or 'customers are leaving.' Use this whenever someone is losing subscribers o
prowler-cloud/prowler
PostgreSQL indexing best practices for Prowler: index design, partial indexes, partitioned table indexing, EXPLAIN ANALYZE validation, concurrent operations, monitoring, and maintenance. Trigger: When creating or modifying PostgreSQL indexes, analyzing query performance with EXPLAIN, debugging slow queries, reviewing index usage statistics, reindexing, dropping indexes, or working with partitioned table indexes. Also trigger when discussing index strategies, partial indexes, or index maintenance
oaustegard/claude-skills
Generate hierarchical _FEATURES.md files that describe what a codebase DOES from a user/consumer perspective, anchored to source symbols via tree-sitting. Supports large complex codebases through feature-driven decomposition into sub-feature files. Uses a multi-pass synthesis: orientation → detail → overview rewrite. Use when someone says "what does this do", "document features", "feature inventory", "_FEATURES.md", or needs to understand a codebase's purpose before modifying it. Complements tre