Source profileQuality 70/100

paperclipai/paperclip/.agents/skills/prepare-paperclip-pr/SKILL.md

prepare-paperclip-pr

Prepare a Paperclip branch for PR with commits, template body, and checks.

Source repository stars
74,938
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
1
Last source update
2026-07-28
Source checked
2026-07-28

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

The standard Paperclip procedure for turning branch work into a reviewed, green pull request against paperclipai/paperclip master. Apply it once per PR (if a task splits a branch into several PRs, run the whole procedure for each one).

Best for

    Not for

    • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
    • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

    Compatibility matrix

    Platform support, with evidence labels

    PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
    CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Open the compatibility checker

    Installation

    Inspect first. Install second.

    The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

    Source-detected install commandSource
    npx skills add https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip --skill ".agents/skills/prepare-paperclip-pr"
    Safe inspection promptEditorial

    Inspect the Agent Skill "prepare-paperclip-pr" from https://github.com/paperclipai/paperclip/blob/77979950381a99271e4690c581a7440b73807b11/.agents/skills/prepare-paperclip-pr/SKILL.md at commit 77979950381a99271e4690c581a7440b73807b11. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

    Workflow

    What the source asks the agent to do

    1. 01

      5. Review loops

      Run the /greploop company skill: trigger Greptile review, address its comments, push, and repeat until Greptile gives 5/5 with zero unresolved comments (max 20 turns). Do not stop early while turns remain. Then run the /prcheckloop company skill and address any verification / CI…

      Run the /greploop company skill: trigger Greptile review, address itsThen run the /prcheckloop company skill and address any verification /RUN GREPTILE UNTIL IT GETS TO 5/5 - DO NOT STOP UNTIL GREPTILE IS 5/5, all
    2. 02

      0. Preconditions — worktree safety

      Do all PR work in a git worktree on a dedicated branch. The main /paperclip checkout typically runs the live Paperclip server — never check out branches there. If you are already on a worktree/branch, verify it (git rev-parse --git-dir, git branch --show-current) and proceed. If…

      Do all PR work in a git worktree on a dedicated branch. The mainIf the main checkout is unexpectedly off master, fix that first withoutConfirm which remote/ref you are targeting (normally master on the
    3. 03

      1. Commit everything — lose no work

      Make logical commits of all uncommitted changes before anything else. Do not stash and forget; do not leave files behind. If commits are missing, make them. Commit messages must end with exactly: Co-Authored-By: Paperclip

      Make logical commits of all uncommitted changes before anything else.Commit messages must end with exactly:Make logical commits of all uncommitted changes before anything else. Do not stash and forget; do not leave files behind. If commits are missing, make them. Commit messages must end with exactly: Co-Authored-By: Papercl…
    4. 04

      2. Get changes cleanly on top of master

      Fetch the target remote and rebase (or otherwise replay) your branch on top of the target master so the PR has no merge conflicts. Re-verify after rebase: build/tests relevant to the change still pass at whatever depth the task warrants.

      Fetch the target remote and rebase (or otherwise replay) your branch on topRe-verify after rebase: build/tests relevant to the change still pass atFetch the target remote and rebase (or otherwise replay) your branch on top of the target master so the PR has no merge conflicts. Re-verify after rebase: build/tests relevant to the change still pass at whatever depth…
    5. 05

      3. Guardrails checklist (every PR)

      Never commit pnpm-lock.yaml — the repo has actions that manage it. If it is already in a commit, rewrite/drop that change before pushing. Never change .github/workflows/ unless the underlying commit was explicitly about that and the task calls it out. No design screenshots / wir…

      Never commit pnpm-lock.yaml — the repo has actions that manage it.Never change .github/workflows/ unless the underlying commit wasNo design screenshots / wireframe images committed to the repo unless

    Permission review

    Static risk signals and limitations

    Network access

    medium · line 30

    The documentation includes network, browsing, or remote request actions.

    Fetch the target remote and rebase (or otherwise replay) your branch on top

    Evidence record

    Why each signal appears

    EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
    SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
    Quality score70/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
    Repository stars74,938SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
    Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
    Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

    Pinned source

    Provenance and original SKILL.md

    Repository
    paperclipai/paperclip
    Skill path
    .agents/skills/prepare-paperclip-pr/SKILL.md
    Commit
    77979950381a99271e4690c581a7440b73807b11
    License
    MIT
    Collected
    2026-07-28
    Default branch
    master
    View the original SKILL.md

    Prepare Paperclip PR

    The standard Paperclip procedure for turning branch work into a reviewed, green pull request against paperclipai/paperclip master. Apply it once per PR (if a task splits a branch into several PRs, run the whole procedure for each one).

    0. Preconditions — worktree safety

    • Do all PR work in a git worktree on a dedicated branch. The main ~/paperclip checkout typically runs the live Paperclip server — never check out branches there. If you are already on a worktree/branch, verify it (git rev-parse --git-dir, git branch --show-current) and proceed.
    • If the main checkout is unexpectedly off master, fix that first without losing work (usually: move that branch's work into a worktree).
    • Confirm which remote/ref you are targeting (normally master on the paperclipai/paperclip repo; the task may name a specific remote such as origin or public-gh).

    1. Commit everything — lose no work

    • Make logical commits of all uncommitted changes before anything else. Do not stash and forget; do not leave files behind. If commits are missing, make them.
    • Commit messages must end with exactly: Co-Authored-By: Paperclip <[email protected]>

    2. Get changes cleanly on top of master

    • Fetch the target remote and rebase (or otherwise replay) your branch on top of the target master so the PR has no merge conflicts.
    • Re-verify after rebase: build/tests relevant to the change still pass at whatever depth the task warrants.

    3. Guardrails checklist (every PR)

    • Never commit pnpm-lock.yaml — the repo has actions that manage it. If it is already in a commit, rewrite/drop that change before pushing.
    • Never change .github/workflows/* unless the underlying commit was explicitly about that and the task calls it out.
    • No design screenshots / wireframe images committed to the repo unless they are genuinely part of the work product.
    • Migrations: numbered incrementally with no conflicts against master. If master moved and took your number, renumber on top. Make migrations idempotent so users who already applied the old number are safe.
    • Greptile file limit: keep each PR under 100 changed files; if a PR exceeds that, split it into two.

    4. Open the PR

    5. Review loops

    • Run the /greploop company skill: trigger Greptile review, address its comments, push, and repeat until Greptile gives 5/5 with zero unresolved comments (max 20 turns). Do not stop early while turns remain.
    • Then run the /prcheckloop company skill and address any verification / CI failures you can.
    • RUN GREPTILE UNTIL IT GETS TO 5/5 - DO NOT STOP UNTIL GREPTILE IS 5/5, all tests pass, all verification checks pass, and there are no merge conflicts.

    6. Report back and hand off

    • Comment on the driving task: what you did, the PR URL(s), the worktree path (use ~ for home), Greptile score, and check status.
    • Create a pull_request work product for each opened PR (plus branch / commit work products where the branch or a commit is itself the handoff).
    • If the task requires follow-up per PR (e.g. sub-issues per PR), create them as the task directs and link them.

    Hard rules

    • YOU DO NOT MERGE THE PR YOURSELF. NEVER MERGE THE PR YOURSELF.
    • Never lose work: no orphaned stashes, no dropped files, no force-pushes that discard commits.
    • Always post the URLs to every pull request you created.

    Alternatives

    Compare before choosing

    Computed 10042,015

    coreyhaines31/marketingskills

    ab-testing

    When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program

    Computed 10042,015

    coreyhaines31/marketingskills

    churn-prevention

    When the user wants to reduce churn, build cancellation flows, set up save offers, recover failed payments, or implement retention strategies. Also use when the user mentions 'churn,' 'cancel flow,' 'offboarding,' 'save offer,' 'dunning,' 'failed payment recovery,' 'win-back,' 'retention,' 'exit survey,' 'pause subscription,' 'involuntary churn,' 'people keep canceling,' 'churn rate is too high,' 'how do I keep users,' or 'customers are leaving.' Use this whenever someone is losing subscribers o

    Computed 997

    event4u-app/agent-config

    design-review

    Use when the user says "review the design", "check the UI", or wants a comprehensive UI/UX review. Uses a 7-phase methodology covering interaction, responsiveness, accessibility, and more.

    Computed 9831,966

    K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

    dask

    Distributed computing for larger-than-RAM pandas/NumPy workflows. Use when you need to scale existing pandas/NumPy code beyond memory or across clusters. Best for parallel file processing, distributed ML, integration with existing pandas code. For out-of-core analytics on single machine use vaex; for in-memory speed use polars.