Best for
- Use when the user says "positioning", "messaging framework", "go-to-market", "GTM strategy", "product marketing", "competitive positioning", "battlecard", "sales enablement", "launch plan", or asks about how to position…
OpenClaudia/openclaudia-skills/skills/product-marketing/SKILL.md
Build product marketing strategy including positioning, messaging, and go-to-market. Use when the user says "positioning", "messaging framework", "go-to-market", "GTM strategy", "product marketing", "competitive positioning", "battlecard", "sales enablement", "launch plan", or asks about how to position or message their product in the market.
Decision brief
You are a product marketing strategist. Build positioning, messaging, competitive intelligence, and go-to-market strategies.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/OpenClaudia/openclaudia-skills --skill "skills/product-marketing"Inspect the Agent Skill "product-marketing" from https://github.com/OpenClaudia/openclaudia-skills/blob/6b91665a5ab7d36599a605df17dae3e27d5ab242/skills/product-marketing/SKILL.md at commit 6b91665a5ab7d36599a605df17dae3e27d5ab242. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
What would customers use if your product didn't exist?
What do you have that alternatives don't?
For each unique attribute, answer "So what? Why does the customer care?"
Who cares the most about these specific values?
What category context makes your value obvious?
Permission review
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 90/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 662 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
You are a product marketing strategist. Build positioning, messaging, competitive intelligence, and go-to-market strategies.
What would customers use if your product didn't exist?
List all alternatives:
What do you have that alternatives don't?
| Attribute | You | Competitor A | Competitor B | Status Quo |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| {Feature/capability} | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| {Feature/capability} | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
| {Feature/capability} | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ |
Focus on attributes that are unique to you or where you are significantly better.
For each unique attribute, answer "So what? Why does the customer care?"
| Attribute | → | Value to Customer |
|---|---|---|
| {Feature} | → | {Saves X hours per week} |
| {Capability} | → | {Reduces error rate by Y%} |
| {Integration} | → | {Eliminates manual data entry} |
Who cares the most about these specific values?
Define with:
What category context makes your value obvious?
Options:
LEVEL 1: Positioning Statement (internal)
"For {target customer} who {situation/need},
{Product} is a {category} that {key benefit}.
Unlike {alternative}, we {key differentiator}."
LEVEL 2: Value Propositions (3 pillars)
Pillar 1: {Benefit} — Because {proof point}
Pillar 2: {Benefit} — Because {proof point}
Pillar 3: {Benefit} — Because {proof point}
LEVEL 3: Headlines & Taglines (external-facing)
Homepage: {Compelling headline}
Subhead: {Supporting detail}
LEVEL 4: Feature Messages (per feature/capability)
Feature → Benefit → Proof
| Audience | They Care About | Messaging Emphasis |
|---|---|---|
| End user | Day-to-day workflow improvement | Ease of use, time savings |
| Manager | Team productivity, oversight | Collaboration, reporting |
| Executive | Business outcomes, ROI | Revenue impact, cost reduction |
| Technical | Implementation, security | Architecture, APIs, compliance |
| Procurement | Risk, compliance, cost | Security, SLA, pricing model |
Create for each key competitor:
# Battlecard: {Your Product} vs {Competitor}
## Quick Facts
- **Their positioning:** {How they describe themselves}
- **Pricing:** {Their pricing model and tiers}
- **Target customer:** {Who they sell to}
- **Strengths:** {Honest assessment}
- **Weaknesses:** {Where they fall short}
## Where We Win
| Scenario | Why We Win | Talk Track |
|----------|-----------|------------|
| {Use case} | {Our advantage} | "{What to say to the prospect}" |
## Where They Win
| Scenario | Why They Win | Counter |
|----------|-------------|---------|
| {Use case} | {Their advantage} | "{How to reframe}" |
## Common Objections
| Objection | Response |
|-----------|----------|
| "They're cheaper" | "{Value-based response}" |
| "They have {feature}" | "{Reframe or roadmap response}" |
| "They're the market leader" | "{Category leadership angle}" |
## Landmines (Questions to Ask Prospects)
- "{Question that highlights competitor weakness}"
- "{Question that highlights your strength}"
## Win/Loss Insights
- Win rate vs this competitor: {%}
- Common deal sizes: {range}
- Average sales cycle: {days}
After each deal (won or lost), document:
| Field | Details |
|---|---|
| Outcome | Won / Lost |
| Competitor(s) | {Who you competed against} |
| Deal size | {Amount} |
| Decision maker | {Title/role} |
| Why they chose us / them | {Top 3 reasons} |
| What could have changed the outcome | {Specific actions} |
| Sales cycle length | {Days} |
| Tier | When | Activities | Goal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1: Major | New product, pivot, rebrand | Press, event, campaign, all channels | Maximum awareness |
| Tier 2: Medium | Major feature, integration | Blog, email, social, product in-app | Adoption + upgrades |
| Tier 3: Minor | Feature update, improvement | Changelog, in-app notification, email | User awareness |
PRE-LAUNCH (-4 weeks)
□ Positioning and messaging finalized
□ Landing page / product page created
□ Demo video or walkthrough produced
□ Press kit assembled (press release, images, founder bios)
□ Sales enablement materials created (deck, battlecard, FAQ)
□ Customer testimonials or beta feedback gathered
LAUNCH WEEK
□ Blog post published
□ Email to existing customers/subscribers
□ Social media campaign (all channels)
□ Press outreach (if newsworthy)
□ Product Hunt submission (if relevant)
□ Community posts (Reddit, Hacker News, Twitter, LinkedIn)
□ Partner/integration co-marketing
POST-LAUNCH (+2 weeks)
□ Follow-up content (case study, deep dive, tutorial)
□ Retargeting ads to landing page visitors
□ Win/loss tracking on new deals
□ Performance metrics review
□ Iterate messaging based on response
For each product or major feature, create:
# Product Marketing Strategy: {Product}
## Positioning
**For** {target customer} **who** {need/situation},
**{Product}** is a {category} that {key benefit}.
**Unlike** {alternative}, we {differentiator}.
## Value Propositions
1. **{Pillar 1}:** {Benefit + proof}
2. **{Pillar 2}:** {Benefit + proof}
3. **{Pillar 3}:** {Benefit + proof}
## Messaging Matrix
| Audience | Headline | Key Message | Proof Point |
|----------|----------|------------|-------------|
## Competitive Landscape
{Positioning map or comparison table}
## GTM Plan
{Launch tier and timeline}
## Sales Enablement
{Materials needed and status}
## Success Metrics
| Metric | Baseline | Target | Timeline |
Frequently asked questions
You are a product marketing strategist. Build positioning, messaging, competitive intelligence, and go-to-market strategies.
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/OpenClaudia/openclaudia-skills --skill "skills/product-marketing". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Alternatives
johnqtcg/awesome-skills
Review a US-listed company's industry position and competitive moat for an equity-research workup. Covers Porter Five Forces scan, market-share trend (absolute and relative to industry growth), TAM size and trajectory, unit economics where disclosed (LTV/CAC, unit gross margin), moat classification (network / brand / scale-cost / switching-cost / patent / regulatory / proprietary-data), substitute threats, new-entrant threats, pricing-power evidence, supplier/channel concentration risk, and regu
adaptico/adaptico-os
Brand voice analysis and guidelines for /gtm brand <target>. Audits the live voice (formal/casual, technical/simple, archetype, consistency) and produces a reusable voice guide - voice chart, do's and don'ts, messaging hierarchy, and on-brand copy samples - distilled into a brand-voice.md the writing commands (copy, copyedit, social, outreach, emails, pricing, ads, leadmagnet, content, article, repurpose, changelog, audit, geo, humanize) read automatically. Use when the user wants to define, ana
aaron-he-zhu/aaron-marketing-skills
Use when the user asks to "analyze my target audience", "build an audience profile for influencer targeting", "research a niche community", or "deep-dive a subculture before partnering with creators"; in audience mode produces demographic/psychographic profiles, a platform-priority matrix, named personas, and an influencer-selection criteria set, and in niche mode produces a community map, culture decode (language/norms/taboos), key-voice tiers, a Brand Fit Score, and a phased entry strategy. No
indranilbanerjee/digital-marketing-pro
Inventory and score everything currently running for a brand across paid search, paid social, email, organic, SEO, AEO/GEO, CRM, and analytics — produces a dated audit document with a 4-tier triage (healthy / quick win / strategic gap / red flag), a quick-wins backlog, and a compliance posture section. Strictly read-only: it never pauses, edits, or launches anything. Triggers on "/digital-marketing-pro:campaign-audit", "what's currently running for this brand", "audit our existing campaigns", "w