Best fit
- Searching MEDLINE or life-sciences literature.
- Building PubMed queries with MeSH terms, field tags, dates, or article types.
- Looking up PMIDs, abstracts, publication metadata, or related citations.
affaan-m/ECC
Direct PubMed and NCBI E-utilities search workflows for biomedical literature, MeSH queries, PMID lookup, citation retrieval, and API-backed literature monitoring.
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "skills/scientific-db-pubmed-database"Source checked Jul 28, 2026·Refresh due Oct 26, 2026
Reorganized from the pinned upstream SKILL.md
According to the pinned SKILL.md from affaan-m/ECC: Use this skill when a task needs biomedical literature from PubMed rather than general web search.
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "skills/scientific-db-pubmed-database"Best fit
Bring this context
Expected outputs
Key source sections
Sections are extracted automatically from the pinned SKILL.md and link back to the source.
NCBI E-utilities supports repeatable API workflows:
Are field tags valid PubMed tags?
Searching MEDLINE or life-sciences literature.
Start with the research question, split it into concepts, then combine concepts with Boolean operators.
Prefer MeSH when the concept has a stable controlled-vocabulary term. Combine MeSH with title/abstract terms when the topic is new or terminology varies.
SkillSignal prompt templates
These prompts were written by SkillSignal from the source structure; they are not upstream text.
Task-start prompt
Confirm source fit, inputs, and outputs before acting.
Use pubmed-database to help me with: [specific task]. Context: [files, data, or background]. Constraints: [environment, scope, and prohibited actions]. Before acting, check the pinned SKILL.md and explain which sections apply, what inputs are still missing, and what you will deliver.
Source-guided execution
Make the Agent explicitly follow the key extracted sections.
Apply the pinned pubmed-database source to [task]. Pay particular attention to these source sections: “E-utilities Workflow”, “Review Checklist”, “When to Use”, “Query Construction”, “MeSH and Subheadings”. Preserve the important decision at each step. Mark facts not covered by the source as “needs confirmation” instead of inventing them. Then verify the result against my acceptance criteria: [criteria].
Result-review prompt
Check omissions, permissions, and source drift before delivery.
Review the current pubmed-database result: (1) does it satisfy the original task; (2) were any applicable steps or limits in the pinned SKILL.md missed; (3) did it perform any unauthorized file, command, network, or data action; and (4) which conclusions remain unverified? List issues first, then fix only what the source or user authorization supports.
Output checklist
The task matches the purpose documented in the SKILL.md.
The source section “E-utilities Workflow” has been checked.
The source section “Review Checklist” has been checked.
The source section “When to Use” has been checked.
The source section “Query Construction” has been checked.
Inputs, constraints, and acceptance criteria are explicit.
Unverified facts, compatibility, and outcome claims are clearly marked.
Any file, command, network, or data action has been reviewed.
Choose a different workflow
生物医学文献、MeSH クエリ、PMID 検索、引用取得、および API を利用した文献モニタリングのための PubMed および NCBI E-utilities の直接検索ワークフロー。
A separate implementation from affaan-m/ECC; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detailUse when the user says "review the design", "check the UI", or wants a comprehensive UI/UX review. Uses a 7-phase methodology covering interaction, responsiveness, accessibility, and more.
A separate implementation from event4u-app/agent-config; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detailDistributed computing for larger-than-RAM pandas/NumPy workflows. Use when you need to scale existing pandas/NumPy code beyond memory or across clusters. Best for parallel file processing, distributed ML, integration with existing pandas code. For out-of-core analytics on single machine use vaex; for in-memory speed use polars.
A separate implementation from K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detailFAQ
Use this skill when a task needs biomedical literature from PubMed rather than general web search.
The catalog detected this source-specific install command: npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "skills/scientific-db-pubmed-database". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
No dedicated Agent platform is declared in the pinned source record.
Quality breakdown
Based on traceable docs and repository signals; stars are not treated as quality.
Compare before choosing
These links are selected from shared tasks, functions, stacks, platforms, and same-name variants. Compare the source owner, documentation, permissions, and maintenance signals.
生物医学文献、MeSH クエリ、PMID 検索、引用取得、および API を利用した文献モニタリングのための PubMed および NCBI E-utilities の直接検索ワークフロー。
Use when the user says "review the design", "check the UI", or wants a comprehensive UI/UX review. Uses a 7-phase methodology covering interaction, responsiveness, accessibility, and more.
Distributed computing for larger-than-RAM pandas/NumPy workflows. Use when you need to scale existing pandas/NumPy code beyond memory or across clusters. Best for parallel file processing, distributed ML, integration with existing pandas code. For out-of-core analytics on single machine use vaex; for in-memory speed use polars.
Use NeuroKit2 to build or audit reproducible research workflows for physiological time-series preprocessing, event/interval analysis, multimodal alignment, variability, and complexity. Trigger when code imports neurokit2 or needs its current APIs, schemas, and method-aware validation—not for diagnosis or device validation.
Analyze raw prompts, identify intent and gaps, match ECC components (skills/commands/agents/hooks), and output a ready-to-paste optimized prompt. Advisory role only — never executes the task itself. TRIGGER when: user says "optimize prompt", "improve my prompt", "how to write a prompt for", "help me prompt", "rewrite this prompt", or explicitly asks to enhance prompt quality. Also triggers on Chinese equivalents: "优化prompt", "改进prompt", "怎么写prompt", "帮我优化这个指令". DO NOT TRIGGER when: user wants th
Use this skill when a task needs biomedical literature from PubMed rather than general web search.
Start with the research question, split it into concepts, then combine concepts with Boolean operators.
concept_1 AND concept_2 AND filter
synonym_a OR synonym_b
NOT exclusion_term
Useful PubMed field tags:
[ti]: title[ab]: abstract[tiab]: title or abstract[au]: author[ta]: journal title abbreviation[mh]: MeSH term[majr]: major MeSH topic[pt]: publication type[dp]: date of publication[la]: languageExamples:
diabetes mellitus[mh] AND treatment[tiab] AND systematic review[pt] AND 2023:2026[dp]
(metformin[nm] OR insulin[nm]) AND diabetes mellitus, type 2[mh] AND randomized controlled trial[pt]
smith ja[au] AND cancer[tiab] AND 2026[dp] AND english[la]
Prefer MeSH when the concept has a stable controlled-vocabulary term. Combine MeSH with title/abstract terms when the topic is new or terminology varies.
Correct subheading syntax puts the subheading before the field tag:
diabetes mellitus, type 2/drug therapy[mh]
cardiovascular diseases/prevention & control[mh]
Use [majr] only when the topic must be central to the paper. It can improve
precision but may miss relevant work.
Publication types:
clinical trial[pt]meta-analysis[pt]randomized controlled trial[pt]review[pt]systematic review[pt]guideline[pt]Date filters:
2026[dp]
2020:2026[dp]
2026/03/15[dp]
Availability filters:
free full text[sb]
hasabstract[text]
NCBI E-utilities supports repeatable API workflows:
esearch.fcgi: search and return PMIDs.esummary.fcgi: return lightweight article metadata.efetch.fcgi: fetch abstracts or full records in XML, MEDLINE, or text.elink.fcgi: find related articles and linked resources.Use an email and API key for production scripts. Store API keys in environment variables, never in committed files or command history.
import os
import time
import requests
BASE = "https://eutils.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/eutils"
def esearch(query: str, retmax: int = 20) -> list[str]:
params = {
"db": "pubmed",
"term": query,
"retmode": "json",
"retmax": retmax,
"tool": "ecc-pubmed-search",
"email": os.environ.get("NCBI_EMAIL", ""),
}
api_key = os.environ.get("NCBI_API_KEY")
if api_key:
params["api_key"] = api_key
response = requests.get(f"{BASE}/esearch.fcgi", params=params, timeout=30)
response.raise_for_status()
time.sleep(0.35)
return response.json()["esearchresult"]["idlist"]
pmids = esearch("hypertension[mh] AND randomized controlled trial[pt] AND 2024:2026[dp]")
print(pmids)
For batches, prefer NCBI history server parameters (usehistory=y,
WebEnv, query_key) instead of passing very long PMID lists through URLs.
For each search pass, record:
Example:
| Database | Date searched | Query | Filters | Results |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | ---: |
| PubMed | 2026-05-11 | `sickle cell disease[mh] AND CRISPR[tiab]` | 2020:2026[dp], English | 42 |
raise_for_status() or otherwise handle non-200
responses before parsing?