Best for
- Code is hard to understand or maintain
- Functions/classes are too large
- Code smells need addressing
github/awesome-copilot/skills/refactor/SKILL.md
Surgical code refactoring to improve maintainability without changing behavior. Covers extracting functions, renaming variables, breaking down god functions, improving type safety, eliminating code smells, and applying design patterns. Less drastic than repo-rebuilder; use for gradual improvements.
Decision brief
Surgical code refactoring to improve maintainability without changing behavior. Covers extracting functions, renaming variables, breaking down god functions, improving type safety, eliminating code smells, and applying design patterns.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot --skill "skills/refactor"Inspect the Agent Skill "refactor" from https://github.com/github/awesome-copilot/blob/9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685/skills/refactor/SKILL.md at commit 9933dcad5be5caeb288cebcd370eeeb2fc2f1685. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
Review the “Safe Refactoring Process” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Code is hard to understand or maintain
1. Behavior is preserved - Refactoring doesn't change what the code does, only how 2. Small steps - Make tiny changes, test after each 3. Version control is your friend - Commit before and after each safe state 4. Tests are essential - Without tests, you're not refactoring, you'…
1. Behavior is preserved - Refactoring doesn't change what the code does, only how 2. Small steps - Make tiny changes, test after each 3. Version control is your friend - Commit before and after each safe state 4. Tests are essential - Without tests, you're not refactoring, you'…
Review the “When NOT to Refactor” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Permission review
No configured static risk pattern was detected
This is not proof of safety. Runtime behavior, indirect dependencies, and hidden external systems are outside the static scan.
Evidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 94/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 37,126 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Improve code structure and readability without changing external behavior. Refactoring is gradual evolution, not revolution. Use this for improving existing code, not rewriting from scratch.
Use this skill when:
- Code that works and won't change again (if it ain't broke...)
- Critical production code without tests (add tests first)
- When you're under a tight deadline
- "Just because" - need a clear purpose
# BAD: 200-line function that does everything
- async function processOrder(orderId) {
- // 50 lines: fetch order
- // 30 lines: validate order
- // 40 lines: calculate pricing
- // 30 lines: update inventory
- // 20 lines: create shipment
- // 30 lines: send notifications
- }
# GOOD: Broken into focused functions
+ async function processOrder(orderId) {
+ const order = await fetchOrder(orderId);
+ validateOrder(order);
+ const pricing = calculatePricing(order);
+ await updateInventory(order);
+ const shipment = await createShipment(order);
+ await sendNotifications(order, pricing, shipment);
+ return { order, pricing, shipment };
+ }
# BAD: Same logic in multiple places
- function calculateUserDiscount(user) {
- if (user.membership === 'gold') return user.total * 0.2;
- if (user.membership === 'silver') return user.total * 0.1;
- return 0;
- }
-
- function calculateOrderDiscount(order) {
- if (order.user.membership === 'gold') return order.total * 0.2;
- if (order.user.membership === 'silver') return order.total * 0.1;
- return 0;
- }
# GOOD: Extract common logic
+ function getMembershipDiscountRate(membership) {
+ const rates = { gold: 0.2, silver: 0.1 };
+ return rates[membership] || 0;
+ }
+
+ function calculateUserDiscount(user) {
+ return user.total * getMembershipDiscountRate(user.membership);
+ }
+
+ function calculateOrderDiscount(order) {
+ return order.total * getMembershipDiscountRate(order.user.membership);
+ }
# BAD: God object that knows too much
- class UserManager {
- createUser() { /* ... */ }
- updateUser() { /* ... */ }
- deleteUser() { /* ... */ }
- sendEmail() { /* ... */ }
- generateReport() { /* ... */ }
- handlePayment() { /* ... */ }
- validateAddress() { /* ... */ }
- // 50 more methods...
- }
# GOOD: Single responsibility per class
+ class UserService {
+ create(data) { /* ... */ }
+ update(id, data) { /* ... */ }
+ delete(id) { /* ... */ }
+ }
+
+ class EmailService {
+ send(to, subject, body) { /* ... */ }
+ }
+
+ class ReportService {
+ generate(type, params) { /* ... */ }
+ }
+
+ class PaymentService {
+ process(amount, method) { /* ... */ }
+ }
# BAD: Too many parameters
- function createUser(email, password, name, age, address, city, country, phone) {
- /* ... */
- }
# GOOD: Group related parameters
+ interface UserData {
+ email: string;
+ password: string;
+ name: string;
+ age?: number;
+ address?: Address;
+ phone?: string;
+ }
+
+ function createUser(data: UserData) {
+ /* ... */
+ }
# EVEN BETTER: Use builder pattern for complex construction
+ const user = UserBuilder
+ .email('[email protected]')
+ .password('secure123')
+ .name('Test User')
+ .address(address)
+ .build();
# BAD: Method that uses another object's data more than its own
- class Order {
- calculateDiscount(user) {
- if (user.membershipLevel === 'gold') {
+ return this.total * 0.2;
+ }
+ if (user.accountAge > 365) {
+ return this.total * 0.1;
+ }
+ return 0;
+ }
+ }
# GOOD: Move logic to the object that owns the data
+ class User {
+ getDiscountRate(orderTotal) {
+ if (this.membershipLevel === 'gold') return 0.2;
+ if (this.accountAge > 365) return 0.1;
+ return 0;
+ }
+ }
+
+ class Order {
+ calculateDiscount(user) {
+ return this.total * user.getDiscountRate(this.total);
+ }
+ }
# BAD: Using primitives for domain concepts
- function sendEmail(to, subject, body) { /* ... */ }
- sendEmail('[email protected]', 'Hello', '...');
- function createPhone(country, number) {
- return `${country}-${number}`;
- }
# GOOD: Use domain types
+ class Email {
+ private constructor(public readonly value: string) {
+ if (!Email.isValid(value)) throw new Error('Invalid email');
+ }
+ static create(value: string) { return new Email(value); }
+ static isValid(email: string) { return /^[^\s@]+@[^\s@]+\.[^\s@]+$/.test(email); }
+ }
+
+ class PhoneNumber {
+ constructor(
+ public readonly country: string,
+ public readonly number: string
+ ) {
+ if (!PhoneNumber.isValid(country, number)) throw new Error('Invalid phone');
+ }
+ toString() { return `${this.country}-${this.number}`; }
+ static isValid(country: string, number: string) { /* ... */ }
+ }
+
+ // Usage
+ const email = Email.create('[email protected]');
+ const phone = new PhoneNumber('1', '555-1234');
# BAD: Unexplained values
- if (user.status === 2) { /* ... */ }
- const discount = total * 0.15;
- setTimeout(callback, 86400000);
# GOOD: Named constants
+ const UserStatus = {
+ ACTIVE: 1,
+ INACTIVE: 2,
+ SUSPENDED: 3
+ } as const;
+
+ const DISCOUNT_RATES = {
+ STANDARD: 0.1,
+ PREMIUM: 0.15,
+ VIP: 0.2
+ } as const;
+
+ const ONE_DAY_MS = 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000;
+
+ if (user.status === UserStatus.INACTIVE) { /* ... */ }
+ const discount = total * DISCOUNT_RATES.PREMIUM;
+ setTimeout(callback, ONE_DAY_MS);
# BAD: Arrow code
- function process(order) {
- if (order) {
- if (order.user) {
- if (order.user.isActive) {
- if (order.total > 0) {
- return processOrder(order);
+ } else {
+ return { error: 'Invalid total' };
+ }
+ } else {
+ return { error: 'User inactive' };
+ }
+ } else {
+ return { error: 'No user' };
+ }
+ } else {
+ return { error: 'No order' };
+ }
+ }
# GOOD: Guard clauses / early returns
+ function process(order) {
+ if (!order) return { error: 'No order' };
+ if (!order.user) return { error: 'No user' };
+ if (!order.user.isActive) return { error: 'User inactive' };
+ if (order.total <= 0) return { error: 'Invalid total' };
+ return processOrder(order);
+ }
# EVEN BETTER: Using Result type
+ function process(order): Result<ProcessedOrder, Error> {
+ return Result.combine([
+ validateOrderExists(order),
+ validateUserExists(order),
+ validateUserActive(order.user),
+ validateOrderTotal(order)
+ ]).flatMap(() => processOrder(order));
+ }
# BAD: Unused code lingers
- function oldImplementation() { /* ... */ }
- const DEPRECATED_VALUE = 5;
- import { unusedThing } from './somewhere';
- // Commented out code
- // function oldCode() { /* ... */ }
# GOOD: Remove it
+ // Delete unused functions, imports, and commented code
+ // If you need it again, git history has it
# BAD: One class reaches deep into another
- class OrderProcessor {
- process(order) {
- order.user.profile.address.street; // Too intimate
- order.repository.connection.config; // Breaking encapsulation
+ }
+ }
# GOOD: Ask, don't tell
+ class OrderProcessor {
+ process(order) {
+ order.getShippingAddress(); // Order knows how to get it
+ order.save(); // Order knows how to save itself
+ }
+ }
# Before: One long function
- function printReport(users) {
- console.log('USER REPORT');
- console.log('============');
- console.log('');
- console.log(`Total users: ${users.length}`);
- console.log('');
- console.log('ACTIVE USERS');
- console.log('------------');
- const active = users.filter(u => u.isActive);
- active.forEach(u => {
- console.log(`- ${u.name} (${u.email})`);
- });
- console.log('');
- console.log(`Active: ${active.length}`);
- console.log('');
- console.log('INACTIVE USERS');
- console.log('--------------');
- const inactive = users.filter(u => !u.isActive);
- inactive.forEach(u => {
- console.log(`- ${u.name} (${u.email})`);
- });
- console.log('');
- console.log(`Inactive: ${inactive.length}`);
- }
# After: Extracted methods
+ function printReport(users) {
+ printHeader('USER REPORT');
+ console.log(`Total users: ${users.length}\n`);
+ printUserSection('ACTIVE USERS', users.filter(u => u.isActive));
+ printUserSection('INACTIVE USERS', users.filter(u => !u.isActive));
+ }
+
+ function printHeader(title) {
+ const line = '='.repeat(title.length);
+ console.log(title);
+ console.log(line);
+ console.log('');
+ }
+
+ function printUserSection(title, users) {
+ console.log(title);
+ console.log('-'.repeat(title.length));
+ users.forEach(u => console.log(`- ${u.name} (${u.email})`));
+ console.log('');
+ console.log(`${title.split(' ')[0]}: ${users.length}`);
+ console.log('');
+ }
# Before: No types
- function calculateDiscount(user, total, membership, date) {
- if (membership === 'gold' && date.getDay() === 5) {
- return total * 0.25;
- }
- if (membership === 'gold') return total * 0.2;
- return total * 0.1;
- }
# After: Full type safety
+ type Membership = 'bronze' | 'silver' | 'gold';
+
+ interface User {
+ id: string;
+ name: string;
+ membership: Membership;
+ }
+
+ interface DiscountResult {
+ original: number;
+ discount: number;
+ final: number;
+ rate: number;
+ }
+
+ function calculateDiscount(
+ user: User,
+ total: number,
+ date: Date = new Date()
+ ): DiscountResult {
+ if (total < 0) throw new Error('Total cannot be negative');
+
+ let rate = 0.1; // Default bronze
+
+ if (user.membership === 'gold' && date.getDay() === 5) {
+ rate = 0.25; // Friday bonus for gold
+ } else if (user.membership === 'gold') {
+ rate = 0.2;
+ } else if (user.membership === 'silver') {
+ rate = 0.15;
+ }
+
+ const discount = total * rate;
+
+ return {
+ original: total,
+ discount,
+ final: total - discount,
+ rate
+ };
+ }
# Before: Conditional logic
- function calculateShipping(order, method) {
- if (method === 'standard') {
- return order.total > 50 ? 0 : 5.99;
- } else if (method === 'express') {
- return order.total > 100 ? 9.99 : 14.99;
+ } else if (method === 'overnight') {
+ return 29.99;
+ }
+ }
# After: Strategy pattern
+ interface ShippingStrategy {
+ calculate(order: Order): number;
+ }
+
+ class StandardShipping implements ShippingStrategy {
+ calculate(order: Order) {
+ return order.total > 50 ? 0 : 5.99;
+ }
+ }
+
+ class ExpressShipping implements ShippingStrategy {
+ calculate(order: Order) {
+ return order.total > 100 ? 9.99 : 14.99;
+ }
+ }
+
+ class OvernightShipping implements ShippingStrategy {
+ calculate(order: Order) {
+ return 29.99;
+ }
+ }
+
+ function calculateShipping(order: Order, strategy: ShippingStrategy) {
+ return strategy.calculate(order);
+ }
# Before: Nested validation
- function validate(user) {
- const errors = [];
- if (!user.email) errors.push('Email required');
+ else if (!isValidEmail(user.email)) errors.push('Invalid email');
+ if (!user.name) errors.push('Name required');
+ if (user.age < 18) errors.push('Must be 18+');
+ if (user.country === 'blocked') errors.push('Country not supported');
+ return errors;
+ }
# After: Chain of responsibility
+ abstract class Validator {
+ abstract validate(user: User): string | null;
+ setNext(validator: Validator): Validator {
+ this.next = validator;
+ return validator;
+ }
+ validate(user: User): string | null {
+ const error = this.doValidate(user);
+ if (error) return error;
+ return this.next?.validate(user) ?? null;
+ }
+ }
+
+ class EmailRequiredValidator extends Validator {
+ doValidate(user: User) {
+ return !user.email ? 'Email required' : null;
+ }
+ }
+
+ class EmailFormatValidator extends Validator {
+ doValidate(user: User) {
+ return user.email && !isValidEmail(user.email) ? 'Invalid email' : null;
+ }
+ }
+
+ // Build the chain
+ const validator = new EmailRequiredValidator()
+ .setNext(new EmailFormatValidator())
+ .setNext(new NameRequiredValidator())
+ .setNext(new AgeValidator())
+ .setNext(new CountryValidator());
1. PREPARE
- Ensure tests exist (write them if missing)
- Commit current state
- Create feature branch
2. IDENTIFY
- Find the code smell to address
- Understand what the code does
- Plan the refactoring
3. REFACTOR (small steps)
- Make one small change
- Run tests
- Commit if tests pass
- Repeat
4. VERIFY
- All tests pass
- Manual testing if needed
- Performance unchanged or improved
5. CLEAN UP
- Update comments
- Update documentation
- Final commit
any types without justification| Operation | Description |
|---|---|
| Extract Method | Turn code fragment into method |
| Extract Class | Move behavior to new class |
| Extract Interface | Create interface from implementation |
| Inline Method | Move method body back to caller |
| Inline Class | Move class behavior to caller |
| Pull Up Method | Move method to superclass |
| Push Down Method | Move method to subclass |
| Rename Method/Variable | Improve clarity |
| Introduce Parameter Object | Group related parameters |
| Replace Conditional with Polymorphism | Use polymorphism instead of switch/if |
| Replace Magic Number with Constant | Named constants |
| Decompose Conditional | Break complex conditions |
| Consolidate Conditional | Combine duplicate conditions |
| Replace Nested Conditional with Guard Clauses | Early returns |
| Introduce Null Object | Eliminate null checks |
| Replace Type Code with Class/Enum | Strong typing |
| Replace Inheritance with Delegation | Composition over inheritance |
Alternatives
griffinwork40/agent-afk
Orchestrates safe, large-scale structural changes across a codebase — symbol renames, API migrations, pattern standardizations, layer restructurings. Enumerates all affected sites, groups them into dependency layers via the DAG executor, applies changes in parallel per layer with worktree isolation, and verifies behavioral preservation at each layer boundary before proceeding. Exits immediately on first regression, surfacing the exact site, diff, and behavioral delta before any commit.
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program
event4u-app/agent-config
Grounded design brief from the adopted corpus — style, WCAG-checked color tokens, typography, layout pattern, anti-patterns. Use on ui-design-brief or any which-style/palette/font/chart decision.
event4u-app/agent-config
Use BEFORE writing or editing any non-trivial UI — inventories components, design tokens, shadcn primitives, and reusable patterns into state.ui_audit. Hard gate for the ui directive set.