Source profileQuality 56/100

griffinwork40/agent-afk/src/bundled-plugins/awa-bundled/skills/research/SKILL.md

research

Dispatches two sub-agents in parallel to gather external and local context for the current task.

Source repository stars
45
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
1
Last source update
2026-07-28
Source checked
2026-07-28

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

Dispatch two sub-agents in parallel using the Agent tool. Prefer subagenttype: "research-agent"; fall back to subagenttype: "Explore" with thoroughness "very thorough" if the research-agent is not available. One researches the web for external context relevant to the current tas…

Best for

    Not for

    • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
    • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

    Compatibility matrix

    Platform support, with evidence labels

    PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
    CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
    Open the compatibility checker

    Installation

    Inspect first. Install second.

    The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

    Source-detected install commandSource
    npx skills add https://github.com/griffinwork40/agent-afk --skill "src/bundled-plugins/awa-bundled/skills/research"
    Safe inspection promptEditorial

    Inspect the Agent Skill "research" from https://github.com/griffinwork40/agent-afk/blob/803066d4f1e0cd57e983658dc670d647fcd893c9/src/bundled-plugins/awa-bundled/skills/research/SKILL.md at commit 803066d4f1e0cd57e983658dc670d647fcd893c9. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

    Workflow

    What the source asks the agent to do

    1. 01

      Sub-agent contract

      Dispatch two sub-agents in parallel using the Agent tool. Prefer subagenttype: "research-agent"; fall back to subagenttype: "Explore" with thoroughness "very thorough" if the research-agent is not available. One researches the web for external context relevant to the current tas…

      Dispatch two sub-agents in parallel using the Agent tool. Prefer subagenttype: "research-agent"; fall back to subagenttype: "Explore" with thoroughness "very thorough" if the research-agent is not available. One researc…Web research agent — always the same: search for external context, prior art, patterns, APIs, and comparable approaches relevant to the task. Domain-agnostic.Local inspection agent — adapt to the domain:
    2. 02

      Coverage reporting

      Both agents must end their response with a coverage assessment:

      Coverage confidence: low / medium / high — how thoroughly could this domain be searched?Known gaps: what couldn't be accessed? (proprietary databases, paywalled papers, unpublished work, practitioner-only knowledge)Tacit knowledge risk: low / medium / high — is this a domain where critical knowledge is unwritten or not documented online?

    Permission review

    Static risk signals and limitations

    Reads files

    low · line 16

    The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.

    | *(other)* | Scan the working directory for any files relevant to the stated domain — documents, data, config, scripts — and describe what you find |

    Evidence record

    Why each signal appears

    EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
    SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
    Quality score56/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
    Repository stars45SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
    Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
    Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

    Pinned source

    Provenance and original SKILL.md

    Repository
    griffinwork40/agent-afk
    Skill path
    src/bundled-plugins/awa-bundled/skills/research/SKILL.md
    Commit
    803066d4f1e0cd57e983658dc670d647fcd893c9
    License
    Apache-2.0
    Collected
    2026-07-28
    Default branch
    main
    View the original SKILL.md

    Sub-agent contract

    /contract

    Dispatch two sub-agents in parallel using the Agent tool. Prefer subagent_type: "research-agent"; fall back to subagent_type: "Explore" with thoroughness "very thorough" if the research-agent is not available. One researches the web for external context relevant to the current task. The other inspects the local working directory for domain-relevant artifacts. Return a concise merged research brief highlighting relevant findings, conflicts, risks, and implications for the task.

    Web research agent — always the same: search for external context, prior art, patterns, APIs, and comparable approaches relevant to the task. Domain-agnostic.

    Local inspection agent — adapt to the domain:

    DomainWhat to inspect
    softwareCode, config files, package manifests, CI configs, test suites, git history, README/docs, existing patterns and conventions
    researchPapers (PDF/LaTeX), notes, data files, citation databases (.bib), lab notebooks, analysis scripts, prior drafts
    designDesign files (Figma exports, SVGs, mockups), brand guidelines, component libraries, user research docs, style guides
    businessFinancial models, strategy docs, market research, pitch decks, competitive analyses, KPI dashboards, stakeholder maps
    (other)Scan the working directory for any files relevant to the stated domain — documents, data, config, scripts — and describe what you find

    When domain is unspecified, infer it: git repo → software; PDFs/LaTeX/.bib → research; design assets → design; spreadsheets/decks → business. If ambiguous, inspect broadly and note what you found.

    Coverage reporting

    Both agents must end their response with a coverage assessment:

    • Coverage confidence: low / medium / high — how thoroughly could this domain be searched?
    • Known gaps: what couldn't be accessed? (proprietary databases, paywalled papers, unpublished work, practitioner-only knowledge)
    • Tacit knowledge risk: low / medium / high — is this a domain where critical knowledge is unwritten or not documented online?

    When merging results, surface coverage gaps prominently. If both agents report low coverage, flag: "Low epistemic coverage — findings may be incomplete. Consider consulting domain practitioners or providing access to private sources."

    Alternatives

    Compare before choosing

    Computed 10042,015

    coreyhaines31/marketingskills

    ab-testing

    When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program

    Computed 10042,015

    coreyhaines31/marketingskills

    churn-prevention

    When the user wants to reduce churn, build cancellation flows, set up save offers, recover failed payments, or implement retention strategies. Also use when the user mentions 'churn,' 'cancel flow,' 'offboarding,' 'save offer,' 'dunning,' 'failed payment recovery,' 'win-back,' 'retention,' 'exit survey,' 'pause subscription,' 'involuntary churn,' 'people keep canceling,' 'churn rate is too high,' 'how do I keep users,' or 'customers are leaving.' Use this whenever someone is losing subscribers o

    Computed 997

    event4u-app/agent-config

    design-review

    Use when the user says "review the design", "check the UI", or wants a comprehensive UI/UX review. Uses a 7-phase methodology covering interaction, responsiveness, accessibility, and more.

    Computed 9831,966

    K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills

    dask

    Distributed computing for larger-than-RAM pandas/NumPy workflows. Use when you need to scale existing pandas/NumPy code beyond memory or across clusters. Best for parallel file processing, distributed ML, integration with existing pandas code. For out-of-core analytics on single machine use vaex; for in-memory speed use polars.