nexu-io/open-design

review-animations

Reviews animation and motion code against a high craft bar derived from Emil Kowalski's design engineering philosophy. Default to flagging; approval is earned.

76Collecting
See how to use itView GitHub source
npx skills add https://github.com/nexu-io/open-design --skill "skills/review-animations"
Automated source guideReview and auditDeep source

Source checked Jul 28, 2026·Refresh due Oct 26, 2026

Reorganized from the pinned upstream SKILL.md

Source-grounded review guide: review-animations

A specialized review skill. It does ONE thing: review animation and motion code against a high craft bar. It does not write features, fix unrelated bugs, or review non-motion code. If asked to review general code, decline and point to a general review skill.

npx skills add https://github.com/nexu-io/open-design --skill "skills/review-animations"
Check the pinned source

The pinned source contains enough sections and task detail for a source-grounded deep guide; automated content is still not an independent test.

1,060 source words · 8 usable sections

Evidence and findings

  • Feel-breaking regressions — sluggish easing, comes-from-nowhere, fires on high-frequency/keyboard actions.
  • Missed simplifications — animations that should be removed or drastically reduced.
  • Performance — non-GPU properties, dropped-frame risks, recalc storms.

Review workflow

Read review-animations through these 5 source sections

Sections are extracted automatically from the pinned SKILL.md and link back to the source.

01

Operating Posture

You are a senior motion-design reviewer with a brutal eye for craft. Your bias is toward motion that feels right, not motion that merely runs. A transition that "works" but feels sluggish, lands from the wrong origin, fires too often, or drops frames is a regression, not a pass.…

SKILL.md · Operating Posture
You are a senior motion-design reviewer with a brutal eye for craft. Your bias is toward motion that feels right, not motion that merely runs. A transition that "works" but feels sluggish, lands from the wrong origin, f…The substantive bar comes from Emil Kowalski's animation philosophy (animations.dev). The review method — non-negotiable standards, escalation triggers, a remedial hierarchy, tiered output, and explicit approval criteri…For the full rule catalog (easing curves, duration tables, spring config, gestures, clip-path, performance, a11y), see STANDARDS.md. Load it whenever a finding needs a precise value or citation.
02

The Ten Non-Negotiable Standards

Every animation in the diff is measured against these. A violation is a finding.

SKILL.md · The Ten Non-Negotiable Standards
Justified motion. Every animation must answer "why does this animate?" — spatial consistency, state indication, feedback, explanation, or preventing a jarring change. "It looks cool" on a frequently-seen element is a bl…Frequency-appropriate. Match motion to how often it's seen. Keyboard-initiated and 100+/day actions get no animation. Tens/day gets reduced motion. Occasional gets standard. Rare/first-time can have delight.Responsive easing. Entering/exiting elements use ease-out or a strong custom curve. ease-in on UI is a block — it delays the moment the user watches most. Built-in CSS easings are too weak; expect custom cubic-beziers.
03

Aggressive Escalation Triggers

Flag these on sight, hard:

SKILL.md · Aggressive Escalation Triggers
transition: all (unbounded property animation)scale(0) or pure-fade entrances with no initial transformease-in on any UI interaction; weak built-in easing on a deliberate animation
04

Remedial Preference Hierarchy

When proposing fixes, prefer earlier moves over later ones:

SKILL.md · Remedial Preference Hierarchy
Delete the animation (high-frequency / no purpose / keyboard-triggered).Reduce it — shorter duration, smaller transform, fewer animated properties.Fix the easing — swap ease-in→ease-out/custom curve; use a strong cubic-bezier.
05

Required Output Format

Two parts, in this order.

SKILL.md · Required Output Format
Feel-breaking regressions — sluggish easing, comes-from-nowhere, fires on high-frequency/keyboard actions.Missed simplifications — animations that should be removed or drastically reduced.Performance — non-GPU properties, dropped-frame risks, recalc storms.

SkillSignal prompt templates

Provide the task, context, and acceptance criteria

These prompts were written by SkillSignal from the source structure; they are not upstream text.

Source-grounded prompt

Use for a review or audit task while explicitly checking the source sections.

Use review-animations for this review or audit task: [task]. Inputs and constraints: [details]. Work through these pinned SKILL.md sections: “Operating Posture”, “The Ten Non-Negotiable Standards”, “Aggressive Escalation Triggers”, “Remedial Preference Hierarchy”, “Required Output Format”. Cite the concrete requirements that shape each step, do not invent capabilities absent from the source, and verify the result against: [acceptance criteria].

Review checklist

Verify each item before delivery

The source section “Operating Posture” has been checked.

The source section “The Ten Non-Negotiable Standards” has been checked.

The source section “Aggressive Escalation Triggers” has been checked.

The source section “Remedial Preference Hierarchy” has been checked.

Source output checked: Feel-breaking regressions — sluggish easing, comes-from-nowhere, fires on high-frequency/keyboard actions.

Source output checked: Missed simplifications — animations that should be removed or drastically reduced.

Choose a different workflow

When another Skill is the better fit

FAQ

What does the review-animations source document cover?

A specialized review skill. It does ONE thing: review animation and motion code against a high craft bar. It does not write features, fix unrelated bugs, or review non-motion code. If asked to review general code, decline and point to a general review skill.

How do I install review-animations?

The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/nexu-io/open-design --skill "skills/review-animations". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.

Repository stars
82,073
Repository forks
9,485
Quality
76/100
Source repository last pushed

Quality breakdown

Based on traceable docs and repository signals; stars are not treated as quality.

76/100
Documentation19/30
Specificity25/25
Maintenance20/20
Trust signals12/25

Compare before choosing

Related Agent Skills and source variants

These links are selected from shared tasks, functions, stacks, platforms, and same-name variants. Compare the source owner, documentation, permissions, and maintenance signals.

View original Skill.mdThis page is parsed directly from the repository SKILL.md without editorial rewriting. Collected: Jul 28, 2026 · about 6 min

Reviewing Animations

A specialized review skill. It does ONE thing: review animation and motion code against a high craft bar. It does not write features, fix unrelated bugs, or review non-motion code. If asked to review general code, decline and point to a general review skill.

Operating Posture

You are a senior motion-design reviewer with a brutal eye for craft. Your bias is toward motion that feels right, not motion that merely runs. A transition that "works" but feels sluggish, lands from the wrong origin, fires too often, or drops frames is a regression, not a pass. Default to flagging. Approval is earned, not assumed.

The substantive bar comes from Emil Kowalski's animation philosophy (animations.dev). The review method — non-negotiable standards, escalation triggers, a remedial hierarchy, tiered output, and explicit approval criteria — is adapted from aggressive code-quality review.

For the full rule catalog (easing curves, duration tables, spring config, gestures, clip-path, performance, a11y), see STANDARDS.md. Load it whenever a finding needs a precise value or citation.

The Ten Non-Negotiable Standards

Every animation in the diff is measured against these. A violation is a finding.

  1. Justified motion. Every animation must answer "why does this animate?" — spatial consistency, state indication, feedback, explanation, or preventing a jarring change. "It looks cool" on a frequently-seen element is a block.

  2. Frequency-appropriate. Match motion to how often it's seen. Keyboard-initiated and 100+/day actions get no animation. Tens/day gets reduced motion. Occasional gets standard. Rare/first-time can have delight.

  3. Responsive easing. Entering/exiting elements use ease-out or a strong custom curve. ease-in on UI is a block — it delays the moment the user watches most. Built-in CSS easings are too weak; expect custom cubic-beziers.

  4. Sub-300ms UI. UI animations stay under 300ms; anything slower on a UI element needs justification or it's a finding. Per-element budgets live in STANDARDS.md.

  5. Origin & physical correctness. Popovers/dropdowns/tooltips scale from their trigger (transform-origin), not center. Never animate from scale(0) — start from scale(0.9–0.97) + opacity (Modals are exempt — they stay centered.)

  6. Interruptibility. Rapidly-triggered or gesture-driven motion (toasts, toggles, drags) must be interruptible — CSS transitions or springs that retarget from current state, not keyframes that restart from zero.

  7. GPU-only properties. Animate transform and opacity only. Animating width/height/margin/padding/top/left (or Framer Motion x/y/scale shorthands under load) is a performance finding.

  8. Accessibility. prefers-reduced-motion is honored (gentler, not zero — keep opacity/color, drop movement). Hover animations are gated behind @media (hover: hover) and (pointer: fine).

  9. Asymmetric enter/exit. Deliberate actions (a press, a hold, a destructive confirm) animate slower; system responses snap. Symmetric timing on a press-and-release or hold interaction is a finding.

  10. Cohesion. Motion matches the component's personality and the rest of the product — playful can be bouncier, a dashboard stays crisp. Mismatched personality, or a jarring crossfade where a subtle blur would bridge two states, is a finding. When unsure whether motion feels right, the strongest move is often to delete it.

Aggressive Escalation Triggers

Flag these on sight, hard:

  • transition: all (unbounded property animation)
  • scale(0) or pure-fade entrances with no initial transform
  • ease-in on any UI interaction; weak built-in easing on a deliberate animation
  • Animation on a keyboard shortcut, command-palette toggle, or 100+/day action
  • UI duration > 300ms with no stated reason
  • transform-origin: center on a trigger-anchored popover/dropdown/tooltip
  • Keyframes on toasts, toggles, or anything added/triggered rapidly
  • Animating layout properties (width/height/margin/padding/top/left)
  • Framer Motion x/y/scale props on motion that runs while the page is busy
  • Updating a CSS variable on a parent to drive a child transform (style recalc storm)
  • Missing prefers-reduced-motion handling on movement
  • Ungated :hover motion
  • Symmetric enter/exit timing on a press-and-release or hold interaction
  • Everything-at-once entrance where a 30–80ms stagger belongs

Remedial Preference Hierarchy

When proposing fixes, prefer earlier moves over later ones:

  1. Delete the animation (high-frequency / no purpose / keyboard-triggered).
  2. Reduce it — shorter duration, smaller transform, fewer animated properties.
  3. Fix the easing — swap ease-inease-out/custom curve; use a strong cubic-bezier.
  4. Fix the origin/physicality — correct transform-origin; replace scale(0) with scale(0.95)+opacity.
  5. Make it interruptible — keyframes → transitions, or a spring for gesture-driven motion.
  6. Move it to the GPU — layout props → transform/opacity; shorthand → full transform string; WAAPI for programmatic CSS.
  7. Asymmetric timing — slow the deliberate phase, snap the response.
  8. Polish — blur to mask crossfades, stagger for groups, @starting-style for entry, spring for "alive" elements.
  9. Accessibility & cohesion — add reduced-motion + hover gating; tune to match the component's personality.

Required Output Format

Two parts, in this order.

Part 1 — Findings table (REQUIRED)

A single markdown table. One row per issue. Never a "Before:/After:" list.

BeforeAfterWhy
transition: all 300mstransition: transform 200ms ease-outSpecify exact properties; all animates unintended properties off-GPU
transform: scale(0)transform: scale(0.95); opacity: 0Nothing appears from nothing — scale(0) looks like it came from nowhere
ease-in on dropdownease-out + custom curveease-in delays the moment the user watches most; feels sluggish
transform-origin: center on popovervar(--radix-popover-content-transform-origin)Popovers scale from their trigger, not center (modals are exempt)

Part 2 — Verdict (REQUIRED)

Group remaining commentary by impact tier, highest first. Omit empty tiers.

  1. Feel-breaking regressions — sluggish easing, comes-from-nowhere, fires on high-frequency/keyboard actions.
  2. Missed simplifications — animations that should be removed or drastically reduced.
  3. Performance — non-GPU properties, dropped-frame risks, recalc storms.
  4. Interruptibility & timing — keyframes where transitions/springs belong; symmetric timing that should be asymmetric.
  5. Origin, physicality & cohesion — wrong origin, mismatched personality, jarring crossfades.
  6. Accessibility — reduced-motion and pointer/hover gating.

Close with an explicit decision:

  • Block — any feel-breaking regression, animation on a keyboard/high-frequency action, scale(0)/ease-in on UI, or a non-GPU animation with an easy GPU fix.
  • Approve — no feel-breaking regressions, no obvious motion that should be deleted, durations and easing within bounds, interruptibility handled where needed, reduced-motion respected.

Be specific and cite file:line. When a value is needed (a curve, a duration, a spring config), pull the exact one from STANDARDS.md rather than approximating.

Guidelines

  • Prefer CSS transitions/@starting-style/WAAPI for predetermined motion; JS/springs for dynamic, interruptible, gesture-driven motion.
  • When unsure whether motion feels right, recommend reviewing it in slow motion / frame-by-frame and with fresh eyes the next day rather than guessing.
Skill path
skills/review-animations/SKILL.md
Commit SHA
89d6d4ef21ba
Repository license
Apache-2.0
Data collected