Best fit
- 単体テスト、統合テスト、非同期テスト、プロパティベーステスト、モック、カバレッジを含むRustテストパターン。TDD方法論に従う。
affaan-m/ECC
単体テスト、統合テスト、非同期テスト、プロパティベーステスト、モック、カバレッジを含むRustテストパターン。TDD方法論に従う。
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "docs/ja-JP/skills/rust-testing"Source checked Jul 28, 2026·Refresh due Oct 26, 2026
Reorganized from the pinned upstream SKILL.md
According to the pinned SKILL.md from affaan-m/ECC: TDD方法論に従って信頼性が高く保守しやすいテストを書くための包括的なRustテストパターン。
npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "docs/ja-JP/skills/rust-testing"Best fit
Bring this context
Expected outputs
Key source sections
Sections are extracted automatically from the pinned SKILL.md and link back to the source.
新しいRustの関数、メソッド、またはトレイトを書く場合 既存のコードにテストカバレッジを追加する場合 パフォーマンスクリティカルなコードのベンチマークを作成する場合 入力検証にプロパティベーステストを実装する場合 RustプロジェクトでTDDワークフローに従う場合
1. ターゲットコードを特定する — テストする関数、トレイト、またはモジュールを見つける 2. テストを書く — [cfg(test)] モジュール内で [test] を使用、rstest でパラメータ化テスト、または proptest でプロパティベーステスト 3. 依存関係をモックする — mockall を使用してテスト対象のユニットを分離する 4. テストを実行する (RED) — テストが期待通りに失敗することを確認する 5. 実装する (GREEN) — テストを通過するための最小限のコードを書く 6. リファクタリングする — テストを…
Review the “RustのTDDワークフロー” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Review the “RED-GREEN-REFACTOR サイクル” section in the pinned source before continuing.
Review the “Rustでの段階的TDD” section in the pinned source before continuing.
SkillSignal prompt templates
These prompts were written by SkillSignal from the source structure; they are not upstream text.
Task-start prompt
Confirm source fit, inputs, and outputs before acting.
Use rust-testing to help me with: [specific task]. Context: [files, data, or background]. Constraints: [environment, scope, and prohibited actions]. Before acting, check the pinned SKILL.md and explain which sections apply, what inputs are still missing, and what you will deliver.
Source-guided execution
Make the Agent explicitly follow the key extracted sections.
Apply the pinned rust-testing source to [task]. Pay particular attention to these source sections: “使用場面”, “動作原理”, “RustのTDDワークフロー”, “RED-GREEN-REFACTOR サイクル”, “Rustでの段階的TDD”. Preserve the important decision at each step. Mark facts not covered by the source as “needs confirmation” instead of inventing them. Then verify the result against my acceptance criteria: [criteria].
Result-review prompt
Check omissions, permissions, and source drift before delivery.
Review the current rust-testing result: (1) does it satisfy the original task; (2) were any applicable steps or limits in the pinned SKILL.md missed; (3) did it perform any unauthorized file, command, network, or data action; and (4) which conclusions remain unverified? List issues first, then fix only what the source or user authorization supports.
Output checklist
The task matches the purpose documented in the SKILL.md.
The source section “使用場面” has been checked.
The source section “動作原理” has been checked.
The source section “RustのTDDワークフロー” has been checked.
The source section “RED-GREEN-REFACTOR サイクル” has been checked.
Inputs, constraints, and acceptance criteria are explicit.
Unverified facts, compatibility, and outcome claims are clearly marked.
Any file, command, network, or data action has been reviewed.
Choose a different workflow
Rust testing patterns including unit tests, integration tests, async testing, property-based testing, mocking, and coverage. Follows TDD methodology.
A separate implementation from affaan-m/ECC; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detailPatrones de pruebas en Rust incluyendo pruebas unitarias, de integración, async, basadas en propiedades, mocking y cobertura. Sigue la metodología TDD.
A separate implementation from affaan-m/ECC; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detailRust testing patterns including unit tests, integration tests, async testing, property-based testing, mocking, and coverage. Follows TDD methodology.
A separate implementation from affaan-m/ECC; compare its source, maintenance signals, and permission requirements.
Open source detailFAQ
TDD方法論に従って信頼性が高く保守しやすいテストを書くための包括的なRustテストパターン。
The catalog detected this source-specific install command: npx skills add https://github.com/affaan-m/ECC --skill "docs/ja-JP/skills/rust-testing". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
No dedicated Agent platform is declared in the pinned source record.
Quality breakdown
Based on traceable docs and repository signals; stars are not treated as quality.
Compare before choosing
These links are selected from shared tasks, functions, stacks, platforms, and same-name variants. Compare the source owner, documentation, permissions, and maintenance signals.
Rust testing patterns including unit tests, integration tests, async testing, property-based testing, mocking, and coverage. Follows TDD methodology.
Patrones de pruebas en Rust incluyendo pruebas unitarias, de integración, async, basadas en propiedades, mocking y cobertura. Sigue la metodología TDD.
Rust testing patterns including unit tests, integration tests, async testing, property-based testing, mocking, and coverage. Follows TDD methodology.
Rust测试模式,包括单元测试、集成测试、异步测试、基于属性的测试、模拟和覆盖率。遵循TDD方法学。
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program
TDD方法論に従って信頼性が高く保守しやすいテストを書くための包括的なRustテストパターン。
#[cfg(test)] モジュール内で #[test] を使用、rstest でパラメータ化テスト、または proptest でプロパティベーステストRED → まず失敗するテストを書く
GREEN → テストを通過する最小限のコードを書く
REFACTOR → テストを通過したままコードをリファクタリングする
REPEAT → 次の要件に進む
// RED: Write test first, use todo!() as placeholder
pub fn add(a: i32, b: i32) -> i32 { todo!() }
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn test_add() { assert_eq!(add(2, 3), 5); }
}
// cargo test → panics at 'not yet implemented'
// GREEN: Replace todo!() with minimal implementation
pub fn add(a: i32, b: i32) -> i32 { a + b }
// cargo test → PASS, then REFACTOR while keeping tests green
// src/user.rs
pub struct User {
pub name: String,
pub email: String,
}
impl User {
pub fn new(name: impl Into<String>, email: impl Into<String>) -> Result<Self, String> {
let email = email.into();
if !email.contains('@') {
return Err(format!("invalid email: {email}"));
}
Ok(Self { name: name.into(), email })
}
pub fn display_name(&self) -> &str {
&self.name
}
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
#[test]
fn creates_user_with_valid_email() {
let user = User::new("Alice", "alice@example.com").unwrap();
assert_eq!(user.display_name(), "Alice");
assert_eq!(user.email, "alice@example.com");
}
#[test]
fn rejects_invalid_email() {
let result = User::new("Bob", "not-an-email");
assert!(result.is_err());
assert!(result.unwrap_err().contains("invalid email"));
}
}
assert_eq!(2 + 2, 4); // Equality
assert_ne!(2 + 2, 5); // Inequality
assert!(vec![1, 2, 3].contains(&2)); // Boolean
assert_eq!(value, 42, "expected 42 but got {value}"); // Custom message
assert!((0.1_f64 + 0.2 - 0.3).abs() < f64::EPSILON); // Float comparison
Result の戻り値のテスト#[test]
fn parse_returns_error_for_invalid_input() {
let result = parse_config("}{invalid");
assert!(result.is_err());
// Assert specific error variant
let err = result.unwrap_err();
assert!(matches!(err, ConfigError::ParseError(_)));
}
#[test]
fn parse_succeeds_for_valid_input() -> Result<(), Box<dyn std::error::Error>> {
let config = parse_config(r#"{"port": 8080}"#)?;
assert_eq!(config.port, 8080);
Ok(()) // Test fails if any ? returns Err
}
#[test]
#[should_panic]
fn panics_on_empty_input() {
process(&[]);
}
#[test]
#[should_panic(expected = "index out of bounds")]
fn panics_with_specific_message() {
let v: Vec<i32> = vec![];
let _ = v[0];
}
my_crate/
├── src/
│ └── lib.rs
├── tests/ # 統合テスト
│ ├── api_test.rs # 各ファイルが独立したテストバイナリ
│ ├── db_test.rs
│ └── common/ # 共有テストユーティリティ
│ └── mod.rs
// tests/api_test.rs
use my_crate::{App, Config};
#[test]
fn full_request_lifecycle() {
let config = Config::test_default();
let app = App::new(config);
let response = app.handle_request("/health");
assert_eq!(response.status, 200);
assert_eq!(response.body, "OK");
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn fetches_data_successfully() {
let client = TestClient::new().await;
let result = client.get("/data").await;
assert!(result.is_ok());
assert_eq!(result.unwrap().items.len(), 3);
}
#[tokio::test]
async fn handles_timeout() {
use std::time::Duration;
let result = tokio::time::timeout(
Duration::from_millis(100),
slow_operation(),
).await;
assert!(result.is_err(), "should have timed out");
}
rstest を使用したパラメータ化テストuse rstest::{rstest, fixture};
#[rstest]
#[case("hello", 5)]
#[case("", 0)]
#[case("rust", 4)]
fn test_string_length(#[case] input: &str, #[case] expected: usize) {
assert_eq!(input.len(), expected);
}
// Fixtures
#[fixture]
fn test_db() -> TestDb {
TestDb::new_in_memory()
}
#[rstest]
fn test_insert(test_db: TestDb) {
test_db.insert("key", "value");
assert_eq!(test_db.get("key"), Some("value".into()));
}
#[cfg(test)]
mod tests {
use super::*;
/// Creates a test user with sensible defaults.
fn make_user(name: &str) -> User {
User::new(name, &format!("{name}@test.com")).unwrap()
}
#[test]
fn user_display() {
let user = make_user("alice");
assert_eq!(user.display_name(), "alice");
}
}
proptest を使用したプロパティベーステストuse proptest::prelude::*;
proptest! {
#[test]
fn encode_decode_roundtrip(input in ".*") {
let encoded = encode(&input);
let decoded = decode(&encoded).unwrap();
assert_eq!(input, decoded);
}
#[test]
fn sort_preserves_length(mut vec in prop::collection::vec(any::<i32>(), 0..100)) {
let original_len = vec.len();
vec.sort();
assert_eq!(vec.len(), original_len);
}
#[test]
fn sort_produces_ordered_output(mut vec in prop::collection::vec(any::<i32>(), 0..100)) {
vec.sort();
for window in vec.windows(2) {
assert!(window[0] <= window[1]);
}
}
}
use proptest::prelude::*;
fn valid_email() -> impl Strategy<Value = String> {
("[a-z]{1,10}", "[a-z]{1,5}")
.prop_map(|(user, domain)| format!("{user}@{domain}.com"))
}
proptest! {
#[test]
fn accepts_valid_emails(email in valid_email()) {
assert!(User::new("Test", &email).is_ok());
}
}
mockall を使用したモックuse mockall::{automock, predicate::eq};
#[automock]
trait UserRepository {
fn find_by_id(&self, id: u64) -> Option<User>;
fn save(&self, user: &User) -> Result<(), StorageError>;
}
#[test]
fn service_returns_user_when_found() {
let mut mock = MockUserRepository::new();
mock.expect_find_by_id()
.with(eq(42))
.times(1)
.returning(|_| Some(User { id: 42, name: "Alice".into() }));
let service = UserService::new(Box::new(mock));
let user = service.get_user(42).unwrap();
assert_eq!(user.name, "Alice");
}
#[test]
fn service_returns_none_when_not_found() {
let mut mock = MockUserRepository::new();
mock.expect_find_by_id()
.returning(|_| None);
let service = UserService::new(Box::new(mock));
assert!(service.get_user(99).is_none());
}
/// Adds two numbers together.
///
/// # Examples
///
/// ```
/// use my_crate::add;
///
/// assert_eq!(add(2, 3), 5);
/// assert_eq!(add(-1, 1), 0);
/// ```
pub fn add(a: i32, b: i32) -> i32 {
a + b
}
/// Parses a config string.
///
/// # Errors
///
/// Returns `Err` if the input is not valid TOML.
///
/// ```no_run
/// use my_crate::parse_config;
///
/// let config = parse_config(r#"port = 8080"#).unwrap();
/// assert_eq!(config.port, 8080);
/// ```
///
/// ```no_run
/// use my_crate::parse_config;
///
/// assert!(parse_config("}{invalid").is_err());
/// ```
pub fn parse_config(input: &str) -> Result<Config, ParseError> {
todo!()
}
# Cargo.toml
[dev-dependencies]
criterion = { version = "0.5", features = ["html_reports"] }
[[bench]]
name = "benchmark"
harness = false
// benches/benchmark.rs
use criterion::{black_box, criterion_group, criterion_main, Criterion};
fn fibonacci(n: u64) -> u64 {
match n {
0 | 1 => n,
_ => fibonacci(n - 1) + fibonacci(n - 2),
}
}
fn bench_fibonacci(c: &mut Criterion) {
c.bench_function("fib 20", |b| b.iter(|| fibonacci(black_box(20))));
}
criterion_group!(benches, bench_fibonacci);
criterion_main!(benches);
# Install: cargo install cargo-llvm-cov (or use taiki-e/install-action in CI)
cargo llvm-cov # Summary
cargo llvm-cov --html # HTML report
cargo llvm-cov --lcov > lcov.info # LCOV format for CI
cargo llvm-cov --fail-under-lines 80 # Fail if below threshold
| コードの種類 | 目標 |
|---|---|
| クリティカルなビジネスロジック | 100% |
| パブリックAPI | 90%以上 |
| 汎用コード | 80%以上 |
| 生成済み / FFIバインディング | 除外 |
cargo test # Run all tests
cargo test -- --nocapture # Show println output
cargo test test_name # Run tests matching pattern
cargo test --lib # Unit tests only
cargo test --test api_test # Integration tests only
cargo test --doc # Doc tests only
cargo test --no-fail-fast # Don't stop on first failure
cargo test -- --ignored # Run ignored tests
すべきこと:
#[cfg(test)] モジュールを使用するassert! より assert_eq! を優先するResult を返すテストでは ? を使用するすべきでないこと:
Result::is_err() をテストできる場合に #[should_panic] を使用するsleep() を使用する——チャンネル、バリア、または tokio::time::pause() を使用する# GitHub Actions
test:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: dtolnay/rust-toolchain@stable
with:
components: clippy, rustfmt
- name: Check formatting
run: cargo fmt --check
- name: Clippy
run: cargo clippy -- -D warnings
- name: Run tests
run: cargo test
- uses: taiki-e/install-action@cargo-llvm-cov
- name: Coverage
run: cargo llvm-cov --fail-under-lines 80
覚えておくこと:テストはドキュメントである。コードをどのように使うべきかを示している。明確に書き、最新の状態を保つこと。