Best for
- Use when: (1) a command or operation fails unexpectedly, (2) the user corrects the agent, (3) the agent discovers non-obvious behavior through debugging, (4) an API or tool behaves differently than expected, (5) a bette…
xoai/sage/skills/sage-self-learning/SKILL.md
Detects mistakes, stores prevention rules, promotes them across scope — the 'experience' layer for any AI agent that recurringly hits the same bugs, miscommunications, or wrong-tool choices across sessions. Use when: (1) a command or operation fails unexpectedly, (2) the user corrects the agent, (3) the agent discovers non-obvious behavior through debugging, (4) an API or tool behaves differently than expected, (5) a better approach is found for a recurring task. Also searches past learnings bef
Decision brief
Learn from mistakes. Don't repeat them.
Compatibility matrix
| Platform | Status | Evidence | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|
| Codex | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Claude Code | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Cursor | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
| Gemini CLI | Not declared | No explicit evidence | Portability before use |
Installation
The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.
npx skills add https://github.com/xoai/sage --skill "skills/sage-self-learning"Inspect the Agent Skill "sage-self-learning" from https://github.com/xoai/sage/blob/6ddd558bc41c0f1024ed79948370f9c15abd8c43/skills/sage-self-learning/SKILL.md at commit 6ddd558bc41c0f1024ed79948370f9c15abd8c43. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.
Workflow
Content: Four-part structure: 1. What happened — the symptom 2. Why it was wrong — root cause 3. What's correct — the right approach 4. Prevention — what to check BEFORE this happens again
Triggered by "sage review" or "review learnings."
How to detect backend: At session start, call sagememorysetproject with the project root. If it responds, use MCP. If not, use .sage-memory/ files.
At task start, search for learnings relevant to the current task.
Always include filtertags: ["self-learning"] — this excludes all non-learning entries.
Permission review
The documentation asks the agent to create, modify, or delete local files.
| Update learnings | ✅ `sage_memory_update` | ✅ edit file |The documentation asks the agent to create, modify, or delete local files.
| Delete learnings | ✅ `sage_memory_delete` | ✅ delete file |The documentation asks the agent to read local files, directories, or repositories.
*Detect availability:** if `sage-memory scan-codebase --help` exitsEvidence record
| Signal | Value | Evidence type | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Quality score | 93/100 | Computed | Documentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules |
| Repository stars | 26 | Source | Repository attention, not individual Skill quality |
| Compatibility | 0 platforms | Source | Declared in the catalog source record |
| Usage guide | automated source guide | Editorial | Generated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level |
Pinned source
Learn from mistakes. Don't repeat them.
Captures what went wrong, what was non-obvious, and what the agent should do differently. Every learning includes a prevention rule — a forward-looking instruction that changes future behavior.
Part of the unified knowledge system. Self-learning stores through
sage-memory (or files) with the self-learning tag / learning type.
During recall, learnings surface as warnings alongside regular knowledge.
| Capability | MCP | Files |
|---|---|---|
| Store learnings | ✅ sage_memory_store | ✅ .sage-memory/lrn-*.md files |
| Search learnings | ✅ BM25 + filter_tags | ⚠️ scan lrn- files by name |
| Update learnings | ✅ sage_memory_update | ✅ edit file |
| Delete learnings | ✅ sage_memory_delete | ✅ delete file |
| Browse by type | ✅ sage_memory_list | ✅ scan lrn- files |
| Link to entities | ✅ sage_memory_link | ⚠️ relations: frontmatter (see sage-ontology skill) |
| Multi-hop graph recall | ✅ sage_memory_graph | ❌ single-hop scan only |
| Namespace isolation | ✅ filter_tags | ✅ lrn- filename prefix |
How to detect backend: At session start, call sage_memory_set_project
with the project root. If it responds, use MCP. If not, use
.sage-memory/ files.
At task start, search for learnings relevant to the current task.
Basic recall (keyword):
sage_memory_search(
query: "<task-relevant keywords>",
filter_tags: ["self-learning"],
limit: 5
)
Always include filter_tags: ["self-learning"] — this excludes all
non-learning entries.
Targeted recall (graph-based): When you know the current task's ontology entity ID:
sage_memory_graph(
id: "<task_entity_memory_id>",
relation: "applies_to",
direction: "inbound",
depth: 1
)
Returns learnings explicitly linked to this task — more precise than keyword search.
Hot spot detection:
sage_memory_graph(
id: "<module_entity_id>",
relation: "applies_to",
direction: "inbound",
depth: 1
)
If 5+ linked learnings → flag the area as mistake-prone.
Scan .sage-memory/ for lrn- prefixed files. Read filenames and
identify those relevant to the current task. Read matching files for
their prevention rules.
For a broad search: list all lrn-*.md files and scan names.
For a focused search: look for keywords in filenames like
lrn-stripe-webhook-*.md when working on Stripe webhooks.
When learnings are found, report the prevention rule, not the incident. Say: "Before working with Stripe webhooks, verify that body parsing middleware is skipped for the webhook route."
When nothing is found, say nothing.
| Type | Trigger |
|---|---|
gotcha | Non-obvious behavior discovered through debugging |
correction | User corrected the agent |
convention | Undocumented project/team pattern discovered |
api-drift | API/library behaves differently than expected |
error-fix | Recurring error with a known solution |
Title: [LRN:<type>] <specific description>
Content: Four-part structure:
With MCP:
sage_memory_store(
title: "[LRN:gotcha] Stripe webhook requires raw body before JSON parsing",
content: "What happened: Webhook signature verification failed with 400.
Why: Express body parser replaced raw body with parsed JSON.
What's correct: Use express.raw() for the webhook route.
Prevention: Before implementing any webhook handler that verifies
signatures, check whether the SDK requires the raw request body.",
tags: ["self-learning", "gotcha", "stripe", "webhooks"],
entities: [
{name: "Stripe", type: "TECHNOLOGY"},
{name: "Express", type: "TECHNOLOGY"}
],
scope: "project"
)
Extract Before Store (0.9+). Pass an entities array naming the
technologies, services, or modules the learning is about. The
Prevention line in particular should usually reference a real entity
(library, service, module) so future graph traversal from that entity
surfaces this learning. Optional relations array if the learning
connects two entities (e.g., {from: "Express", to: "Stripe", rel: "contradicts"} for a body-parser/signature-verification conflict).
With files:
File: .sage-memory/lrn-stripe-webhook-raw-body.md
---
tags: [self-learning, gotcha, stripe, webhooks]
type: learning
scope: project
created: 2026-03-20
---
[LRN:gotcha] Stripe webhook requires raw body before JSON parsing
What happened: Webhook signature verification failed with 400
"No signatures found matching the expected signature."
Why: Express body parser replaced raw body with parsed JSON before
the Stripe SDK could verify the signature.
What's correct: Use express.raw({type: 'application/json'})
middleware for the webhook route, before the global body parser.
Prevention: Before implementing any webhook handler that verifies
signatures (Stripe, GitHub, Twilio), check whether the SDK requires
the raw request body. If yes, ensure body parsing middleware is
skipped or deferred for that route.
After storing a learning, link it to the relevant entity:
sage_memory_link(
source_id: "<learning_memory_id>",
target_id: "<task_or_module_entity_id>",
relation: "applies_to"
)
With files: Skip linking. Mention the related entity in the content if the connection is important: "Related entity: task_a1b2 (Fix payment timeout)."
When a learning applies to a SPECIFIC function or class — not just
"the payment system" but PaymentOrchestrator.charge on line 47 —
link it to the actual symbol so the recall surfaces during code work
on that exact symbol.
Detect availability: if sage-memory scan-codebase --help exits
0 and a recent scan has run, code-symbol memories exist in the
project DB.
Workflow:
Find the symbol's memory id:
sage_memory_search(
query: "PaymentOrchestrator.charge",
filter_tags: ["codebase"],
limit: 3
)
The file-memory result's id field is the parent for all symbols
in that file. For symbol-level linkage, query code_symbols
directly via the MCP search (filter on the qualified name in tags
or content), or accept the file-level link as the v1 granularity.
Link the learning to the file memory:
sage_memory_link(
source_id: "<learning_memory_id>",
target_id: "<file_memory_id>",
relation: "applies_to"
)
Future recall: when an agent works on the same file, the graph channel surfaces this learning even if the query doesn't mention the file by name — entity-mediated proximity at work.
Why bother: "show me past mistakes on PaymentOrchestrator" is
the single most valuable self-learning query, and it ONLY works when
learnings are linked to the code structure, not just to free-text
file paths that drift when files move.
With files: Skip — relative paths in prose go stale; the file-memory id is stable across renames as long as content_hash doesn't change. Without MCP, document the path in the content and re-find the file each session.
When you follow a stored self-learning entry and it leads to incorrect behavior (wrong library, outdated pattern, contradicted convention):
Store a NEW learning (type: correction) describing what the
original said, why it's now wrong, and what the correct approach is.
Invalidate the original:
sage_memory_update(id: "<original_id>", status: "invalidated")
Link the correction to the original:
sage_memory_link(
source_id: "<correction_id>",
target_id: "<original_id>",
relation: "corrects"
)
The original learning will never appear in search again. The correction replaces it as active knowledge. The graph edge preserves the audit trail.
With files: Rename the original file to lrn-INVALID-<name>.md and
add status: invalidated to its frontmatter. Create the correction as
a new file.
When sage_memory_store returns a suggested_links entry with
confidence: "near_duplicate", the new content is a semantic
paraphrase of an existing memory (cosine similarity ≥ 0.95
against the existing memory's embedding). Decide one of:
Link via supersedes if the new wording is more accurate or
current:
sage_memory_link(
source_id: "<new_id>",
target_id: "<older_id>",
relation: "supersedes"
)
Future sage_memory_search results will surface the older
memory with superseded_by: <new_id> so agents can prefer the
newer one. The older memory is NOT filtered or down-ranked —
transparency over silent hiding.
Merge content if the old phrasing carries useful detail the
new one lost: sage_memory_update(id: "<older_id>", content: "<merged_text>") then sage_memory_delete(id: "<new_id>").
Keep both if they cover meaningfully different angles (rare at cosine ≥ 0.95). No action needed; both stay active.
supersedes vs corrects — pick the right one:
corrects + status: invalidated (see "When a Learning Causes
a Bug" above) is for memories that are factually wrong —
outdated library names, broken patterns, contradicted
conventions. The original is hidden from future search.supersedes is for semantic paraphrase where both versions
are valid but the newer is preferred. Both stay visible;
the older carries a pointer to the newer.Before creating a new learning, check for existing similar learnings:
Search with the new learning's core content:
sage_memory_search(
query: "<what_happened + prevention_rule>",
filter_tags: ["self-learning"],
limit: 3
)
If the top result describes the same root cause and same prevention:
sage_memory_update(id: "<existing_id>", content: "<merged content>")
If no strong match → store as new.
Why: Three entries saying "check middleware order" waste search slots. One entry that gets richer over time is more useful.
With files: Scan lrn-*.md filenames for similar topics. If a
match exists, edit that file instead of creating a new one.
Ask: "Would this change how I approach a future task?"
Budget: 2-5 learnings per significant task.
Triggered by "sage review" or "review learnings."
sage_memory_list(tags: ["self-learning"]) → all learningssage_memory_list(tags: ["self-learning", "gotcha"]) etc.sage_memory_graph on key entities → count inbound
applies_to edges → report most mistake-prone areaslrn-*.md fileslrn-*.md files by domain keyword in filenameProject → Global: Learning applies beyond this codebase. Store a context-independent version at global scope.
With MCP: sage_memory_store(..., scope: "global")
With files: Copy to ~/.sage-memory/ (global directory), remove
project-specific details.
Global → Team: Export to a shared file in the repo. Read:
references/team-sharing.md.
Read: references/promotion-rules.md for criteria.
Prevention over documentation. Every learning answers: "What should I check before this happens again?"
Specificity retrieves. [LRN:gotcha] Stripe webhook requires raw body
retrieves. [LRN:gotcha] API issue does not.
Freshness matters. Update or delete when code changes make a learning obsolete.
Learnings are not memories. "Billing uses saga pattern" is a memory. "Agent assumed REST, broke the compensation chain" is a learning.
references/capture-patterns.md — Triggers, examples, prevention rulesreferences/storage-conventions.md — Format conventionsreferences/promotion-rules.md — Scope escalation criteriareferences/team-sharing.md — Export formats for teamsreferences/review-workflow.md — Curation processreferences/examples.md — End-to-end scenariosreferences/ontology-integration.md — Graph integrationFrequently asked questions
Learn from mistakes. Don't repeat them.
The source record exposes this install command: npx skills add https://github.com/xoai/sage --skill "skills/sage-self-learning". Inspect the command and pinned source before running it.
Static rules flagged write-files, read-files in the source; the page lists the matching lines and excerpts.
Alternatives
coreyhaines31/marketingskills
When the user wants to plan, design, or implement an A/B test or experiment, or build a growth experimentation program. Also use when the user mentions "A/B test," "split test," "experiment," "test this change," "variant copy," "multivariate test," "hypothesis," "should I test this," "which version is better," "test two versions," "statistical significance," "how long should I run this test," "growth experiments," "experiment velocity," "experiment backlog," "ICE score," "experimentation program
garrytan/gbrain
End-to-end discipline for turning any large data source (audio libraries, email takeouts, document corpora, chat exports, API dumps) into brain pages at scale. The lifecycle spine: SCHEMA → ACCESS → TRIAL → EVALUATE → IMPROVE → CODIFY → TEST → SKILLIFY → BULK → MONITOR. State is tracked in a durable JSON manifest (see MANIFEST-PATTERN.md) so any crash, session boundary, or subagent fan-out resumes from ground truth instead of memory.
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
App Store Optimization (ASO) toolkit for researching keywords, analyzing competitor rankings, generating metadata suggestions, and improving app visibility on Apple App Store and Google Play Store. Use when the user asks about ASO, app store rankings, app metadata, app titles and descriptions, app store listings, app visibility, or mobile app marketing on iOS or Android. Supports keyword research and scoring, competitor keyword analysis, metadata optimization, A/B test planning, launch checklist
dotnet/skills
Migrates .NET test projects from VSTest to Microsoft.Testing.Platform (MTP). Use when user asks to "migrate to MTP", "switch from VSTest", "enable Microsoft.Testing.Platform", "use MTP runner", set OutputType=Exe only for test projects in Directory.Build.props, or mentions EnableMSTestRunner, EnableNUnitRunner, or UseMicrosoftTestingPlatformRunner. USE FOR: MTP behavioral differences vs VSTest (exit code 8, zero tests discovered, --ignore-exit-code, TESTINGPLATFORM_EXITCODE_IGNORE); centralizing