Source profileQuality 85/100Review permissions

alirezarezvani/claude-skills/business-growth/skills/sales-engineer/SKILL.md

sales-engineer

Analyzes RFP/RFI responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature comparison matrices, and plans proof-of-concept (POC) engagements for pre-sales engineering. Use when responding to RFPs, bids, or proposal requests; comparing product features against competitors; planning or scoring a customer POC or sales demo; preparing a technical proposal; or performing win/loss competitor analysis. Handles tasks described as 'RFP response', 'bid response', 'proposal response', 'competitor comparison'

Source repository stars
23,781
Declared platforms
0
Static risk flags
1
Last source update
2026-07-17
Source checked
2026-08-04

Decision brief

What it does—and where it fits

Analyzes RFP/RFI responses for coverage gaps, builds competitive feature comparison matrices, and plans proof-of-concept (POC) engagements for pre-sales engineering. Handles tasks described as 'RFP response', 'bid response', 'proposal response', 'competitor comparison'

Best for

  • Use when responding to RFPs, bids, or proposal requests; comparing product features against competitors; planning or scoring a customer POC or sales demo; preparing a technical proposal; or performing win/loss competito…

Not for

  • Tasks that require unconfirmed production actions or broad system permissions.
  • Environments where the pinned source and install steps cannot be inspected.

Compatibility matrix

Platform support, with evidence labels

PlatformStatusEvidenceWhat to check
CodexNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Claude CodeNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
CursorNot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Gemini CLINot declaredNo explicit evidencePortability before use
Open the compatibility checker

Installation

Inspect first. Install second.

The source command is displayed only when detected. A safe inspection prompt is always available so your agent can explain every action before execution.

Source-detected install commandSource
npx skills add https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills --skill "business-growth/skills/sales-engineer"
Safe inspection promptEditorial

Inspect the Agent Skill "sales-engineer" from https://github.com/alirezarezvani/claude-skills/blob/aa8d778811a557a2c28ccadda4cf3d0bd028a4cc/business-growth/skills/sales-engineer/SKILL.md at commit aa8d778811a557a2c28ccadda4cf3d0bd028a4cc. List every install step, command, network request, credential, file read/write, external action, and rollback step. Explain whether it fits my task. Do not install or execute anything until I approve.

Workflow

What the source asks the agent to do

  1. 01

    5-Phase Workflow

    Objective: Understand customer requirements, technical environment, and business drivers.

    [ ] Conduct technical discovery calls with stakeholders[ ] Map customer's current architecture and pain points[ ] Identify integration requirements and constraints
  2. 02

    Phase 1: Discovery & Research

    Objective: Understand customer requirements, technical environment, and business drivers.

    [ ] Conduct technical discovery calls with stakeholders[ ] Map customer's current architecture and pain points[ ] Identify integration requirements and constraints
  3. 03

    Phase 2: Solution Design

    Objective: Design a solution architecture that addresses customer requirements.

    [ ] Map product capabilities to customer requirements[ ] Design integration architecture[ ] Identify customization needs and development effort
  4. 04

    Phase 3: Demo Preparation & Delivery

    Objective: Deliver compelling technical demonstrations tailored to stakeholder priorities.

    [ ] Build demo environment matching customer's use case[ ] Create demo script with talking points per stakeholder role[ ] Prepare objection handling responses
  5. 05

    Phase 4: POC & Evaluation

    Objective: Execute a structured proof-of-concept that validates the solution.

    [ ] Define POC scope, success criteria, and timeline[ ] Allocate resources and set up environment[ ] Execute phased testing (core, advanced, edge cases)

Permission review

Static risk signals and limitations

Runs scripts

medium · line 20

The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.

python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py assets/sample_rfp_data.json --format json > phase1_rfp_results.json

Runs scripts

medium · line 27

The documentation asks the agent to run terminal commands or scripts.

python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py assets/sample_rfp_data.json --format json | python -c "import sys,json; r=json.load(sys.stdin); print('PROCEED' if r['coverage_score']>50 and r['must_have_gaps']<=3 else 'REVIEW')"

Evidence record

Why each signal appears

EvidenceSourceComputedTestedEditorial
SignalValueEvidence typeMeaning
Quality score85/100ComputedDocumentation, specificity, maintenance, and trust rules
Repository stars23,781SourceRepository attention, not individual Skill quality
Compatibility0 platformsSourceDeclared in the catalog source record
Usage guideautomated source guideEditorialGenerated or reviewed according to the visible evidence level

Pinned source

Provenance and original SKILL.md

Repository
alirezarezvani/claude-skills
Skill path
business-growth/skills/sales-engineer/SKILL.md
Commit
aa8d778811a557a2c28ccadda4cf3d0bd028a4cc
License
MIT
Collected
2026-08-04
Default branch
main
View the original SKILL.md

Sales Engineer Skill

5-Phase Workflow

Phase 1: Discovery & Research

Objective: Understand customer requirements, technical environment, and business drivers.

Checklist:

  • Conduct technical discovery calls with stakeholders
  • Map customer's current architecture and pain points
  • Identify integration requirements and constraints
  • Document security and compliance requirements
  • Assess competitive landscape for this opportunity

Tools: Run rfp_response_analyzer.py to score initial requirement alignment.

python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py assets/sample_rfp_data.json --format json > phase1_rfp_results.json

Output: Technical discovery document, requirement map, initial coverage assessment.

Validation checkpoint: Coverage score must be >50% and must-have gaps ≤3 before proceeding to Phase 2. Check with:

python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py assets/sample_rfp_data.json --format json | python -c "import sys,json; r=json.load(sys.stdin); print('PROCEED' if r['coverage_score']>50 and r['must_have_gaps']<=3 else 'REVIEW')"

Phase 2: Solution Design

Objective: Design a solution architecture that addresses customer requirements.

Checklist:

  • Map product capabilities to customer requirements
  • Design integration architecture
  • Identify customization needs and development effort
  • Build competitive differentiation strategy
  • Create solution architecture diagrams

Tools: Run competitive_matrix_builder.py using Phase 1 data to identify differentiators and vulnerabilities.

python scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py competitive_data.json --format json > phase2_competitive.json

python -c "import json; d=json.load(open('phase2_competitive.json')); print('Differentiators:', d['differentiators']); print('Vulnerabilities:', d['vulnerabilities'])"

Output: Solution architecture, competitive positioning, technical differentiation strategy.

Validation checkpoint: Confirm at least one strong differentiator exists per customer priority before proceeding to Phase 3. If no differentiators found, escalate to Product Team (see Integration Points).


Phase 3: Demo Preparation & Delivery

Objective: Deliver compelling technical demonstrations tailored to stakeholder priorities.

Checklist:

  • Build demo environment matching customer's use case
  • Create demo script with talking points per stakeholder role
  • Prepare objection handling responses
  • Rehearse failure scenarios and recovery paths
  • Collect feedback and adjust approach

Templates: Use assets/demo_script_template.md for structured demo preparation.

Output: Customized demo, stakeholder-specific talking points, feedback capture.

Validation checkpoint: Demo script must cover every must-have requirement flagged in phase1_rfp_results.json before delivery. Cross-reference with:

python -c "import json; rfp=json.load(open('phase1_rfp_results.json')); [print('UNCOVERED:', r) for r in rfp['must_have_requirements'] if r['coverage']=='Gap']"

Phase 4: POC & Evaluation

Objective: Execute a structured proof-of-concept that validates the solution.

Checklist:

  • Define POC scope, success criteria, and timeline
  • Allocate resources and set up environment
  • Execute phased testing (core, advanced, edge cases)
  • Track progress against success criteria
  • Generate evaluation scorecard

Tools: Run poc_planner.py to generate the complete POC plan.

python scripts/poc_planner.py poc_data.json --format json > phase4_poc_plan.json

python -c "import json; p=json.load(open('phase4_poc_plan.json')); print('Go/No-Go:', p['recommendation'])"

Templates: Use assets/poc_scorecard_template.md for evaluation tracking.

Output: POC plan, evaluation scorecard, go/no-go recommendation.

Validation checkpoint: POC conversion requires scorecard score >60% across all evaluation dimensions (functionality, performance, integration, usability, support). If score <60%, document gaps and loop back to Phase 2 for solution redesign.


Phase 5: Proposal & Closing

Objective: Deliver a technical proposal that supports the commercial close.

Checklist:

  • Compile POC results and success metrics
  • Create technical proposal with implementation plan
  • Address outstanding objections with evidence
  • Support pricing and packaging discussions
  • Conduct win/loss analysis post-decision

Templates: Use assets/technical_proposal_template.md for the proposal document.

Output: Technical proposal, implementation timeline, risk mitigation plan.


Python Automation Tools

1. RFP Response Analyzer

Script: scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py

Purpose: Parse RFP/RFI requirements, score coverage, identify gaps, and generate bid/no-bid recommendations.

Coverage Categories: Full (100%), Partial (50%), Planned (25%), Gap (0%).
Priority Weighting: Must-Have 3×, Should-Have 2×, Nice-to-Have 1×.

Bid/No-Bid Logic:

  • Bid: Coverage >70% AND must-have gaps ≤3
  • Conditional Bid: Coverage 50–70% OR must-have gaps 2–3
  • No-Bid: Coverage <50% OR must-have gaps >3

Usage:

python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py assets/sample_rfp_data.json            # human-readable
python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py assets/sample_rfp_data.json --format json  # JSON output
python scripts/rfp_response_analyzer.py --help

Input Format: See assets/sample_rfp_data.json for the complete schema.


2. Competitive Matrix Builder

Script: scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py

Purpose: Generate feature comparison matrices, calculate competitive scores, identify differentiators and vulnerabilities.

Feature Scoring: Full (3), Partial (2), Limited (1), None (0).

Usage:

python scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py competitive_data.json              # human-readable
python scripts/competitive_matrix_builder.py competitive_data.json --format json  # JSON output

Output Includes: Feature comparison matrix, weighted competitive scores, differentiators, vulnerabilities, and win themes.


3. POC Planner

Script: scripts/poc_planner.py

Purpose: Generate structured POC plans with timeline, resource allocation, success criteria, and evaluation scorecards.

Default Phase Breakdown:

  • Week 1: Setup — environment provisioning, data migration, configuration
  • Weeks 2–3: Core Testing — primary use cases, integration testing
  • Week 4: Advanced Testing — edge cases, performance, security
  • Week 5: Evaluation — scorecard completion, stakeholder review, go/no-go

Usage:

python scripts/poc_planner.py poc_data.json              # human-readable
python scripts/poc_planner.py poc_data.json --format json  # JSON output

Output Includes: Phased POC plan, resource allocation, success criteria, evaluation scorecard, risk register, and go/no-go recommendation framework.


Reference Knowledge Bases

ReferenceDescription
references/rfp-response-guide.mdRFP/RFI response best practices, compliance matrix, bid/no-bid framework
references/competitive-positioning-framework.mdCompetitive analysis methodology, battlecard creation, objection handling
references/poc-best-practices.mdPOC planning methodology, success criteria, evaluation frameworks

Asset Templates

TemplatePurpose
assets/technical_proposal_template.mdTechnical proposal with executive summary, solution architecture, implementation plan
assets/demo_script_template.mdDemo script with agenda, talking points, objection handling
assets/poc_scorecard_template.mdPOC evaluation scorecard with weighted scoring
assets/sample_rfp_data.jsonSample RFP data for testing the analyzer
assets/expected_output.jsonExpected output from rfp_response_analyzer.py

Integration Points

  • Marketing Skills - Leverage competitive intelligence and messaging frameworks from marketing-skill/
  • Product Team - Coordinate on roadmap items flagged as "Planned" in RFP analysis from product-team/
  • C-Level Advisory - Escalate strategic deals requiring executive engagement from c-level-advisor/
  • Customer Success - Hand off POC results and success criteria to CSM from ../customer-success-manager/

Last Updated: February 2026 Status: Production-ready Tools: 3 Python automation scripts References: 3 knowledge base documents Templates: 5 asset files

Alternatives

Compare before choosing

Computed 8482

aAAaqwq/AGI-Super-Team

audit-code

Run a two-pass, multidisciplinary code audit led by a tie-breaker lead, combining security, performance, UX, DX, and edge-case analysis into one prioritized report with concrete fixes. Use when the user asks to audit code, perform a deep review, stress-test a codebase, or produce a risk-ranked remediation plan across backend, frontend, APIs, infra scripts, and product flows.

Computed 976

mgiovani/cc-arsenal

team-review

Multi-agent review team: architecture, security, performance, testing, style, docs/UX, plus an adversary that cross-examines the other 6, for security-sensitive, architectural, or large PRs (15+ files) where a single-agent pass risks missing cross-cutting issues. Use for auth/payments/PII changes, schema/pattern changes, compliance sign-off, or when asked to 'get the review team on this' / 'multi-agent review' / 'thorough review before merge'. For a standard PR or a quick pre-merge check, use /r

Computed 9623,781

alirezarezvani/claude-skills

loop-library

Discover, find, compare, audit, repair, adapt, and design repeatable AI-agent loops with explicit triggers, actions, verification, stopping conditions, guardrails, and handoffs. Use when a user asks to analyze a codebase for potential loops, mine coding-thread history for work done more than once, turn repeated engineering work into a loop, find or recommend a published loop, create a recurring agent workflow or automation cadence, turn an outcome into a bounded copy-ready loop, or review an exi

Computed 96249

majiayu000/spellbook

vscode-doctor

Diagnose slow or freezing VS Code-compatible editors with evidence-first, zero-hardcoded-assumption workflow. Use when the user reports editor lag, typing delay, UI freezes, extension host stalls, file watcher noise, high editor CPU/RSS, uses VS Code/Cursor as a file browser over a large folder, or wants a safe editor performance audit.